Cai, L., Ju, F. & Zhang, T. Tracking human sewage microbiome in a municipal wastewater treatment plant. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 98(7), 3317–3326 (2014).
Google Scholar
Lee, S. H., Kang, H. J. & Park, H. D. Influence of influent wastewater communities on temporal variation of activated sludge communities. Water Res. 73, 132–144 (2015).
Google Scholar
Hultman, J. et al. Host range of antibiotic resistance genes in wastewater treatment plant influent and effluent. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 94(4), fiy038 (2018).
Google Scholar
Dueholm, M. K. D. et al. MiDAS 4: A global catalogue of full-length 16S rRNA gene sequences and taxonomy for studies of bacterial communities in wastewater treatment plants. Nat. Commun. 13(1), 1908 (2022).
Google Scholar
Dueholm, M. K. D. et al. MiDAS 5: Global diversity of bacteria and archaea in anaerobic digesters. Nat. Commun. 15(1), 5361 (2024).
Google Scholar
Do, T. T., Delaney, S. & Walsh, F. 16S rRNA gene based bacterial community structure of wastewater treatment plant effluents. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 366(3), fnz017 (2019).
Google Scholar
Kalinowska, A. et al. Insights into the microbial community of treated wastewater, its year-round variability and impact on the receiver, using cultivation, microscopy and amplicon-based methods. Sci. Total Environ. 829, 154630 (2022).
Google Scholar
Aghalari, Z., Dahms, H. U., Sillanpaa, M., Sosa-Hernandez, J. E. & Parra-Saldivar, R. Effectiveness of wastewater treatment systems in removing microbial agents: a systematic review. Glob. Health. 16(1), 13 (2020).
Fairbairn, D. J. et al. Contaminants of emerging concern: Mass balance and comparison of wastewater effluent and upstream sources in a mixed-use watershed. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50(1), 36–45 (2016).
Google Scholar
Yang, W. et al. Emerging contaminants in the effluent of wastewater should be regulated: Which and to what extent?. Toxics 12(5), 309 (2024).
Google Scholar
Gatica, J. & Cytryn, E. Impact of treated wastewater irrigation on antibiotic resistance in the soil microbiome. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 20(6), 3529–3538 (2013).
Google Scholar
Hladilek, M. D. et al. Microbial community structure of a freshwater system receiving wastewater effluent. Environ. Monit. Assess. 188(11), 626 (2016).
Google Scholar
Deng, P. et al. Profiling of intracellular and extracellular antibiotic resistance genes in municipal wastewater treatment plant and their effluent-receiving river. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 30(12), 33516–33523 (2023).
Google Scholar
Su, Z., Chen, L. & Wen, D. Impact of wastewater treatment plant effluent discharge on the antibiotic resistome in downstream aquatic environments: A mini review. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 18(3), 36 (2023).
Xiao, Z. et al. Effects of wastewater treatment plant effluent on microbial risks of pathogens and their antibiotic resistance in the receiving river. Environ. Pollut. 345, 123461 (2024).
Google Scholar
Shchegolkova, N. M. et al. Microbial community structure of activated sludge in treatment plants with different wastewater compositions. Front. Microbiol. 7, 90 (2016).
Google Scholar
Li, L. G., Yin, X. & Zhang, T. Tracking antibiotic resistance gene pollution from different sources using machine-learning classification. Microbiome 6(1), 93 (2018).
Google Scholar
Tiwari, A. et al. Bacterial diversity and predicted enzymatic function in a multipurpose surface water system – from wastewater effluent discharges to drinking water production. Environ. Microbiome 16(1), 11 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wijaya, J. & Oh, S. Machine learning reveals the complex ecological interplay of microbiome in a full-scale membrane bioreactor wastewater treatment plant. Environ. Res. 222, 115366 (2023).
Google Scholar
Kitajima, M., Sassi, H. P. & Torrey, J. R. Pepper mild mottle virus as a water quality indicator. NPJ Clean Water 1, 19 (2018).
Google Scholar
Farkas, K. et al. Critical evaluation of crAssphage as a molecular marker for human-derived wastewater contamination in the aquatic environment. Food Environ. Virol. 11(2), 113–119 (2019).
Google Scholar
Liu, M. et al. Chemical fingerprinting of organic micropollutants in different industrial treated wastewater effluents and their effluent-receiving river. Sci. Total Environ. 838(Pt 4), 156399 (2022).
Google Scholar
Lim, F. Y., Ong, S. L., Hu, J. Recent advances in the use of chemical markers for tracing wastewater contamination in Aquatic Environment. Water. 9(2), 143 (2017).
Liu, X., Nie, Y. & Wu, X. L. Predicting microbial community compositions in wastewater treatment plants using artificial neural networks. Microbiome 11(1), 93 (2023).
Google Scholar
Kim, Y. & Oh, S. Machine-learning insights into nitrate-reducing communities in a full-scale municipal wastewater treatment plant. J. Environ. Manage 300, 113795 (2021).
Google Scholar
Bombaywala, S., Bajaj, A. & Dafale, N. A. Meta-analysis of wastewater microbiome for antibiotic resistance profiling. J. Microbiol. Methods 223, 106953 (2024).
Google Scholar
Wang, J. et al. Metabolomics-based estimation of activated sludge microbial composition and prediction of filamentous bulking. Water Res. 259, 121805 (2024).
Google Scholar
Kozich JJ et al. Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform. Appl Environ Microbiol. 79(17), 5112–5120 (2013).
Google Scholar
Bolyen, E. et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 37(8), 852–857 (2019).
Google Scholar
Bokulich, N. A. et al. Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2’s q2-feature-classifier plugin. Microbiome 6(1), 90 (2018).
Google Scholar
Dueholm, M.K.D., Andersen, K.S., Petersen, A.-K.C., Rudkjøbing, V., Nielsen, P.H.: MiDAS 5: Global diversity of bacteria and archaea in anaerobic digesters. bioRxiv. 2023:2023.08.24.554448
Katoh, K., Misawa, K., Kuma, K. & Miyata, T. MAFFT: A novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucl. Acids Res. 30(14), 3059–3066 (2002).
Google Scholar
Shannon, C. E. The mathematical theory of communication. MD Comput. 14(4), 306–317 (1997).
Google Scholar
Faith, D. P. Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biol. Cons. 61(1), 1–10 (1992).
Google Scholar
McKinney, W. (ed.): Data structures for statistical computing in Python. In: Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference (2010)
Lemaìtre, G., Nogueira, F. & Aridas, C. K. Imbalanced-learn: A python toolbox to tackle the curse of imbalanced datasets in machine learning. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 18(17), 1–5 (2017).
Waskom, M. L. Seaborn: Statistical data visualization. J. Open Sour. Softw. 6(60), 3021 (2021).
Google Scholar
Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).
Google Scholar
Harris, C. R. et al. Array programming with NumPy. Nature 585(7825), 357–362 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ellson, J. et al. (eds) Graphviz—Open source graph drawing tools (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2002).
Hunter, J. D. Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment. Comput. Sci. Eng. 9(3), 90–95 (2007).
Virtanen, P. et al. SciPy 1.0: Fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat. Methods 17(3), 261–272 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lundberg, S. M. & Lee, S. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 30, 4765–4774 (2017).
Seabold, S., Perktold, J. (ed.): Statsmodels: Econometric and statistical modeling with Python. In: Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference (2010)
Jordahl, K., Van den Bossche, J., Fleischmann, M., Wasserman, J., McBride, J., Gerard, J., et al.: geopandas/geopandas: v0.8.1. v0.8.1 ed: Zenodo (2020)
Gillies, S., van der Wel, C., Van den Bossche, J., Taves, M.W., Arnott, J., Ward, B.C.: Manipulation and analysis of geometric objects in the Cartesian plane. 2.0.5 ed.
Planet dump retrieved from https://planet.osm.org 2024.07.20 [Internet]. 2017. Available from: https://www.openstreetmap.org.
ChatGPT. 4 ed. San Francisco, CA: OpenAI; 2024.
Whon, T. W. et al. The effects of sequencing platforms on phylogenetic resolution in 16 S rRNA gene profiling of human feces. Sci. Data 5, 180068 (2018).
Google Scholar
Johnson, J. S. et al. Evaluation of 16S rRNA gene sequencing for species and strain-level microbiome analysis. Nat. Commun. 10(1), 5029 (2019).
Google Scholar
Nierychlo, M. et al. MiDAS 3: An ecosystem-specific reference database, taxonomy and knowledge platform for activated sludge and anaerobic digesters reveals species-level microbiome composition of activated sludge. Water Res. 182, 115955 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ziyan, Y. et al. Diversity of activated sludge microbial community structure in different wastewater treatment plants. Biol. Bull. 50(3), 329–337 (2023).
Seviour, R. & Nielsen, P. H. Microbial ecology of activated sludge (IWA publishing, London, 2010).
Speth, D. R., In’t Zandt, M. H., Guerrero-Cruz, S., Dutilh, B. E. & Jetten, M. S. Genome-based microbial ecology of anammox granules in a full-scale wastewater treatment system. Nat. Commun. 7, 11172 (2016).
Google Scholar
Perez-Cataluna, A., Collado, L., Salgado, O., Lefinanco, V. & Figueras, M. J. A polyphasic and taxogenomic evaluation uncovers Arcobacter cryaerophilus as a species complex that embraces four genomovars. Front. Microbiol. 9, 805 (2018).
Google Scholar
Nouha, K., Kumar, R. S. & Tyagi, R. D. Heavy metals removal from wastewater using extracellular polymeric substances produced by Cloacibacterium normanense in wastewater sludge supplemented with crude glycerol and study of extracellular polymeric substances extraction by different methods. Bioresour. Technol. 212, 120–129 (2016).
Google Scholar
Kertesz, M. A. & Kawasaki, A. Hydrocarbon-degrading Sphingomonads: Sphingomonas, Sphingobium, Novosphingobium, and Sphingopyxis. In Handbook of hydrocarbon and lipid microbiology (ed. Timmis, K. N.) 1693–1705 (Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010).
Zhang, L., Liu, H., Dai, J., Xu, P. & Tang, H. Unveiling degradation mechanism of PAHs by a Sphingobium strain from a microbial consortium. mLife 1(3), 287–302 (2022).
Google Scholar
Lee, J., Koo, T., Yulisa, A. & Hwang, S. Magnetite as an enhancer in methanogenic degradation of volatile fatty acids under ammonia-stressed condition. J. Environ. Manage 241, 418–426 (2019).
Google Scholar
Schwan, B. et al. Chemically stressed bacterial communities in anaerobic digesters exhibit resilience and ecological flexibility. Front. Microbiol. 11, 867 (2020).
Google Scholar
Shakeri Yekta, S. et al. Effluent solids recirculation to municipal sludge digesters enhances long-chain fatty acids degradation capacity. Biotechnol. Biofuels 14(1), 56 (2021).
Google Scholar
Butler, B. J., Mccallum, K. J. & Inniss, W. E. Characterization of Aquaspirillum arcticum sp. Nov., a new psychrophilic bacterium. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 12(3), 263–266 (1989).
Tehei, M. & Zaccai, G. Adaptation to extreme environments: Macromolecular dynamics in complex systems. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1724(3), 404–410 (2005).
Google Scholar
Zellner, G. et al. Methanocorpusculaceae fam. nov., represented by Methanocorpusculum parvum, Methanocorpusculum sinense spec. nov. and Methanocorpusculum bavaricum spec. nov.. Arch. Microbiol. 151(5), 381–390 (1989).
Google Scholar
Thomas, C. M., Desmond-Le Quéméner, E., Gribaldo, S. & Borrel, G. Factors shaping the abundance and diversity of the gut archaeome across the animal kingdom. Nat. Commun. 13(1), 3358 (2022).
Google Scholar
Schrecengost, A., Rotterova, J., Polakova, K., Cepicka, I. & Beinart, R. A. Divergent marine anaerobic ciliates harbor closely related Methanocorpusculum endosymbionts. ISME J. 18(1), wrae125 (2024).
Google Scholar
