Patla, A. Strategies for dynamic stability during adaptive human locomotion. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. 22, 48–52. https://doi.org/10.1109/memb.2003.1195695 (2003).
Google Scholar
Zampogna, A. et al. Fifteen years of wireless sensors for balance assessment in neurological disorders. Sensors 20, 3247. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20113247 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lencioni, T. et al. Strategies for maintaining dynamic balance in persons with neurological disorders during overground walking. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H J. Eng. Med. 235, 1079–1087. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544119211023624 (2021).
Google Scholar
Tinetti, M. E. & Kumar, C. The patient who falls: “It’s always a trade-off’’. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2303, 58–266. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.2024 (2010).
Google Scholar
Mancini, M. & Horak, F. B. The relevance of clinical balance assessment tools to differentiate balance deficits. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 46, 239–48 (2010).
Google Scholar
Verghese, J., Holtzer, R., Lipton, R. B. & Wang, C. Quantitative gait markers and incident fall risk in older adults. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 64A, 896–901. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glp033 (2009).
Google Scholar
Edginton Bigelow, K. & Berme, N. Development of a protocol for improving the clinical utility of posturography as a fall-risk screening tool. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 66A, 228–233. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glq202 (2011).
Google Scholar
Stevens, J. A. & Phelan, E. A. Development of STEADI: A fall prevention resource for health care providers. Health Promot. Pract. 14, 706–714. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839912463576 (2013).
Google Scholar
Muir-Hunter, S. & Wittwer, J. Dual-task testing to predict falls in community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review. Physiotherapy 102, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2015.04.011 (2016).
Google Scholar
Godi, M. et al. Comparison of reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the mini-bestest and berg balance scale in patients with balance disorders. Phys. Ther. 93, 158–167. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20120171 (2012).
Google Scholar
Yelnik, A. & Bonan, I. Clinical tool for assessing balance disorders. Neurophysiol. Clin. Clin. Neurophysiol. 38, 439–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucli.2008.09.008 (2009).
Google Scholar
Matsuda, P. N., Taylor, C. S. & Shumway-Cook, A. Evidence for the validity of the modified dynamic gait index across diagnostic groups. Phys. Ther. 9, 996–1004. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20130294 (2014).
Google Scholar
Corrini, C. et al. Minimal clinically important difference of modified dynamic gait index in people with neurological disorders. Gait Posture 90, 210–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.08.024 (2021).
Google Scholar
Shumway-Cook, A., Taylor, C. S., Matsuda, P. N., Studer, M. T. & Whetten, B. K. Expanding the scoring system for the dynamic gait index. Phys. Ther. 93, 1493–1506. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20130035 (2013).
Google Scholar
Shumway-Cook, A., Matsuda, P. N. & Taylor, C. Investigating the validity of the environmental framework underlying the original and modified dynamic gait index. Phys. Ther. 95, 864–870. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20140047 (2015).
Google Scholar
Torchio, A. et al. Identification of modified dynamic gait index cutoff scores for assessing fall risk in people with Parkinson disease, stroke and multiple sclerosis. Gait Posture 91, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.09.201 (2021).
Google Scholar
Anastasi, D. et al. Instrumented version of the modified dynamic gait index in patients with neurologic disorders. PM R 11, 1312–1319. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.12137 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ancona, S. et al. Wearables in the home-based assessment of abnormal movements in Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review of the literature. J. Neurol.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-10350-3 (2021).
Google Scholar
Carpinella, I. et al. Instrumental assessment of stair ascent in people with multiple sclerosis, stroke, and Parkinson’s disease: A wearable-sensor-based approach. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 26, 2324–2332. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2018.2881324 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lundberg, S. M. et al. Explainable machine-learning predictions for the prevention of hypoxaemia during surgery. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2, 749. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-018-0304-0 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lundberg, S. M. et al. From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2, 2522–5839. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0138-9 (2020).
Google Scholar
Demura, S., Yamaji, S. & Kitabayashi, T. Gender and age-related differences of dynamic balancing ability based on various stepping motions in the healthy elderly. J. Hum. Ergol. 34, 1–11 (2005).
Marschollek, M. et al. Sensor-based fall risk assessment—An expert ‘to go’. Methods Inf. Med. 50, 420–6. https://doi.org/10.3414/ME10-01-0040 (2011).
Google Scholar
van Schooten, K. et al. Ambulatory fall-risk assessment: Amount and quality of daily-life gait predict falls in older adults. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 70, 608–615. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glu225 (2015).
Google Scholar
Ihlen, E., Weiss, A., Beck, Y., Helbostad, J. & Hausdorff, J. A comparison study of local dynamic stability measures of daily life walking in older adult community-dwelling fallers and non-fallers. J. Biomech. 49, 1498–1503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.03.019 (2016).
Google Scholar
Riva, F., Bisi, M. & Stagni, R. Gait variability and stability measures: Minimum number of strides and within-session reliability. Comput. Biol. Med. 50C, 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2014.04.001 (2014).
Google Scholar
Angelini, L. et al. Is a wearable sensor-based characterisation of gait robust enough to overcome differences between measurement protocols? a multi-centric pragmatic study in patients with multiple sclerosis. Sensors 20, 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20010079 (2019).
Google Scholar
Caronni, A. et al. Local dynamic stability of gait in people with early multiple sclerosis and no-to-mild neurological impairment. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 28, 1389–1396. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2020.2991636 (2020).
Google Scholar
Plotnik, M., Wagner, J., Adusumilli, G., Gottlieb, A. & Naismith, R. Gait asymmetry, and bilateral coordination of gait during a six-minute walk test in persons with multiple sclerosis. Sci. Rep. 10, 12382. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68263-0 (2020).
Google Scholar
Socie, M. & Sosnoff, J. Gait variability and multiple sclerosis. Multiple Scler. Int. 2013, 645197. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/645197 (2013).
Google Scholar
Patterson, K., Gage, W., Brooks, D., Black, S. & McILROY, W. Evaluation of gait symmetry after stroke: A comparison of current methods and recommendations for standardization. Gait Posture 31, 241–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.10.014 (2009).
Google Scholar
Godi, M., Arcolin, I., Giardini, M., Corna, S. & Schieppati, M. A pathophysiological model of gait captures the details of the impairment of pace/rhythm, variability and asymmetry in parkinsonian patients at distinct stages of the disease. Sci. Rep. 11, 21143. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00543-9 (2021).
Google Scholar
Chee, J. et al. Influence of multiple sclerosis on spatiotemporal gait parameters: A systematic review and meta-regression. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 102, 1801–1815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2020.12.013 (2021).
Google Scholar
Morris, M., Iansek, R., Matyas, T. & Summers, J. The pathogenesis of gait hypokinesia in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 117, 1169–1181. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/117.5.1169 (1994).
Google Scholar
Wonsetler, E. & Bowden, M. A systematic review of mechanisms of gait speed change post-stroke. Part 1. Spatiotemporal parameters and asymmetry ratios. Top. Stroke Rehabil. 24, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2017.1285746 (2017).
Google Scholar
Carpinella, I. et al. Walking with horizontal head turns is impaired in persons with early-stage multiple sclerosis showing normal locomotion. Front. Neurol. 12, 821640. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.821640 (2022).
Google Scholar
Hilfiker, R. et al. Local dynamic stability as a responsive index for the evaluation of rehabilitation effect on fall risk in patients with multiple sclerosis: A longitudinal study. BMC Res. Notes 6, 260. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-6-260 (2013).
Google Scholar
Carpinella, I. et al. Instrumentally assessed gait quality is more relevant than gait endurance and velocity to explain patient-reported walking ability in early stage multiple sclerosis. Eur. J. Neurol. 28, 2259–2268. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.14866 (2021).
Google Scholar
Bennett, S., Bromley, L., Fisher, N., Tomita, M. & Niewczyk, P. Validity and reliability of four clinical gait measures in patients with multiple sclerosis. Int. J. MS Care 19, 247–252. https://doi.org/10.7224/1537-2073.2015-006 (2017).
Google Scholar
Combs, S. A., Diehl, D. M., Filip, J. & Long, E. Short-distance walking speed tests in people with Parkinson disease: Reliability, responsiveness, and validity. Gait Posture 39, 784–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.10.019 (2014).
Google Scholar
Pohl, P. et al. Influence of stroke-related impaiments on performance in 6-minute walk test. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 39, 439–44 (2002).
Google Scholar
Fritz, S. & Lusardi, M. White paper: “Walking speed: the sixth vital sign’’. J. Geriatr. Phys. Ther. 2001(32), 46–9. https://doi.org/10.1519/00139143-200932020-00002 (2009).
Google Scholar
Callisaya, M. L. & Verghese, J. The association of clinic-based mobility tasks and measures of community performance and risk. PM R 10, 704-711.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.12.008 (2018).
Google Scholar
Menz, H., Lord, S. & Fitzpatrick, R. Age-related differences in walking stability. Age Ageing 32, 137–42 (2003).
Google Scholar
Lencioni, T., Carpinella, I., Rabuffetti, M., Cattaneo, D. & Ferrarin, M. Measures of dynamic balance during level walking in healthy adult subjects: Relationship with age, anthropometry and spatio-temporal gait parameters. Porc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H 65, 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411919889237 (2020).
Google Scholar
Moe-Nilssen, R. & Helbostad, J. Interstride trunk acceleration variability but not step width variability can differentiate between fit and frail older adults. Gait Posture 21, 164–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.01.013 (2005).
Google Scholar
Callisaya, M., Blizzard, L., Mcginley, J., Schmidt, M. & Srikanth, V. Sensorimotor factors affecting gait variability in older people-a population-based study. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 65, 386–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glp184 (2009).
Google Scholar
Handelzalts, S. et al. Insights into motor performance deficits after stroke: An automated and refined analysis of the lower-extremity motor coordination test (lemocot). J. NeuroEng. Rehabil. 18, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00950-z (2021).
Google Scholar
Kalron, A., Dolev, M. & Givon, U. Further construct validity of the timed up and go test as a measure of ambulation in persons with multiple sclerosis. Eur. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 53, 841–847. https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04599-3 (2017).
Google Scholar
Angelini, L. et al. Wearable sensors can reliably quantify gait alterations associated with disability in people with progressive multiple sclerosis in a clinical setting. J. Neurol. 267, 2897–2909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-09928-8 (2020).
Google Scholar
Mizuike, C., Ohgi, S. & Morita, S. Analysis of stroke patient walking dynamics using a tri-axial accelerometer. Gait Posture 30, 60–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.02.017 (2009).
Google Scholar
Buckley, C., Galna, B., Rochester, L. & Mazzà, C. Upper body accelerations as a biomarker of gait impairment in the early stages of Parkinson’s disease. Gait Posture 71, 289–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.06.166 (2018).
Google Scholar
Huisinga, J., Mancini, M., St George, R. & Horak, F. Accelerometry reveals differences in gait variability between patients with multiple sclerosis and healthy controls. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 41, 1670–1679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-012-0697-y (2012).
Google Scholar
Bruijn, S., Meijer, O., Beek, P. & Van Dieen, J. Assessing the stability of human locomotion: A review of current measures. J. R. Soc. Interface R. Soc. 10, 20120999. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2012.0999 (2013).
Google Scholar
Ellis, R., Howard, K. & Kram, R. The metabolic and mechanical costs of step time asymmetry in walking. Proc. Biol. Sci. R. Soc. 280, 20122784. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.2784 (2013).
Google Scholar
Alexander, S., Peryer, G., Gray, E., Barkof, F. & Chataway, J. Wearable technologies to measure clinical outcomes in multiple sclerosis: A scoping review. Multiple Scler. 27, 1643–1656. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458520946005 (2020).
Google Scholar
Casamassima, F. et al. A wearable system for gait training in subjects with Parkinson’s disease. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 14, 6229–46. https://doi.org/10.3390/s140406229 (2014).
Google Scholar
Ginis, P. et al. Feasibility and effects of home-based smartphone-delivered automated feedback training for gait in people with Parkinson’s disease: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 22, 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.11.004 (2015).
Google Scholar
Soltani, A. et al. Algorithms for walking speed estimation using a lower-back-worn inertial sensor: A cross-validation on speed ranges. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 29, 1955–1964. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2021.3111681 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ferrari, A. et al. A mobile Kalman-filter based solution for the real-time estimation of spatio-temporal gait parameters. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. Publ. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 24, 764–773. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2015.2457511 (2015).
Google Scholar
Trojaniello, D. et al. Estimation of step-by-step spatio-temporal parameters of normal and impaired gait using shank-mounted magneto-inertial sensors: Application to elderly, hemiparetic, parkinsonian and choreic gait. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 11, 152. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-152 (2014).
Google Scholar
Pasciuto, I., Bergamini, E., Iosa, M., Vannozzi, G. & Cappozzo, A. Overcoming the limitations of the harmonic ratio for the reliable assessment of gait symmetry. J. Biomech. 53, 84–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.01.005 (2017).
Google Scholar
Riva, F., Grimpampi, E., Mazzà, C. & Stagni, R. Are gait variability and stability measures influenced by directional changes?. Biomed. Eng. Online 13, 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-13-56 (2014).
Google Scholar
Caronni, A. et al. Criterion validity of the instrumented timed up and go test: A partial least square regression study. Gait Posture 61, 287–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.01.015 (2018).
Google Scholar
Leach, J., Mellone, S., Palumbo, P., Bandinelli, S. & Chiari, L. Natural turn measures predict recurrent falls in community-dwelling older adults: A longitudinal cohort study. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22492-6 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lindberg, D. et al. Identification of important factors in an inpatient fall risk prediction model to improve the quality of care using EHR and electronic administrative data: A machine-learning approach. Int. J. Med. Inform. 143, 104272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104272 (2020).
Google Scholar
Noh, B. et al. Xgboost based machine learning approach to predict the risk of fall in older adults using gait outcomes. Sci. Rep. 11, 12183. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91797-w (2021).
Google Scholar
Brooks, D., Solway, S. & Gibbons, W. ATS statement on six-minute walk test. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 167, 1287. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.167.9.950 (2003).
Google Scholar
Storm, F., Cesareo, A., Reni, G. & Biffi, E. Wearable inertial sensors to assess gait during the 6-minute walk test: A systematic review. Sensors 20, 2660. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20092660 (2020).
Google Scholar
Scalera, G., Ferrarin, M., Marzegan, A. & Rabuffetti, M. Assessment of stability of MIMU probes to skin-marker-based anatomical reference frames during locomotion tasks: Effect of different locations on the lower limb. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9, 721900. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.721900 (2021).
Google Scholar
Pacini Panebianco, G., Bisi, M., Stagni, R. & Fantozzi, S. Analysis of the performance of 17 algorithms from a systematic review: Influence of sensor position, analysed variable and computational approach in gait timing estimation from imu measurements. Gait Posture 66, 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.08.025 (2018).
Google Scholar
Moe-Nilssen, R. A new method for evaluating motor control in gait under real-life environmental conditions. Clin. Biomech. 13, 320–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0268-0033(98)00089-8 (1998).
Google Scholar
Nguyen, H. et al. Auto detection and segmentation of daily living activities during a timed up and go task in people with Parkinson’s disease using multiple inertial sensors. J. NeuroEng. Rehabil. 14, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-017-0241-2 (2017).
Google Scholar
Salarian, A. Gait assessment in Parkinson’s disease: Toward an ambulatory system for long-term monitoring. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 51, 1434–43. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2004.827933 (2004).
Google Scholar
Moon, Y., Sung, J., An, R., Hernandez, M. & Sosnoff, J. Gait variability in people with neurological disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum. Mov. Sci. 47, 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2016.03.010 (2016).
Google Scholar
Moe-Nilssen, R. & Helbostad, J. L. Estimation of gait cycle characteristics by trunk accelerometry. J. Biomech. 37, 121–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00233-1 (2004).
Google Scholar
England, S. & Granata, K. The influence of gait speed on local dynamic stability of walking. Gait Posture 25, 172–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.03.003 (2007).
Google Scholar
Rosenstein, M. T., Collins, J. J. & De Luca, C. J. A practical method for calculating largest Lyapunov exponents from small data sets. Physica D Nonlinear Phenom. 65, 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(93)90009-P (1993).
Google Scholar
Wallot, S. & Mønster, D. Calculation of average mutual information (AMI) and false-nearest neighbors (FNN) for the estimation of embedding parameters of multidimensional time series in Matlab. Front. Psychol. 9, 1679. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01679 (2018).
Google Scholar
Caby, B., Kieffer, S., Hubert, M., Cremer, G. & Macq, B. Feature extraction and selection for objective gait analysis and fall risk assessment by accelerometry. Biomed. Eng. Online 10, 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-10-1 (2011).
Google Scholar
Castiglia, S. et al. Ability of a set of trunk inertial indexes of gait to identify gait instability and recurrent fallers in Parkinson’s disease. Sensors 21, 3449. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21103449 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zou, H. & Hastie, T. Regularization and variable selection via the elastic nets. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 67, 301–320 (2015).
Google Scholar
Fan, J. & Li, R. Statistical challenges with high dimensionality: Feature selection in knowledge discovery. In Proceedings of the Madrid International Congress of Mathematicians, vol. 3 (2006).
Parvandeh, S., Yeh, H.-W., Paulus, M. P. & McKinney, B. A. Consensus features nested cross-validation. Bioinformatics 36, 3093–3098. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa046 (2020).
Google Scholar
Torgo, L., Branco, P., Ribeiro, R. P. & Pfahringer, B. Resampling strategies for regression. Expert Syst. 32, 465–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12081 (2015).
Google Scholar
