Endler, J. A. Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. Am. Nat. 139, S125–S153 (1992).
Romer, H. Ecological constraints for the evolution of hearing and sound communication in insects. Evol. Biol. Hear. 79–93 (1992).
Slabbekoorn, H. & Smith, T. B. Bird song, ecology and speciation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 357, 493–503 (2002).
Mendelson, T. C. & Shaw, K. L. Sexual behaviour: Rapid speciation in an arthropod. Nature 433, 375–376. https://doi.org/10.1038/433375a (2005).
Google Scholar
Bradbury, J. W. & Vehrencamp, S. L. Principles of Animal Communication (Sinauer Associates, 2011).
Mason, N. A. et al. Song evolution, speciation, and vocal learning in passerine birds. Evolution 71, 786–796 (2016).
Chen, Z. & Wiens, J. J. The origins of acoustic communication in vertebrates. Nat. Commun. 11, 369. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14356-3 (2020).
Google Scholar
Beecher, M. D. & Brenowitz, E. A. Functional aspects of song learning in songbirds. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 143–149 (2005).
Google Scholar
Catchpole, C. K. & Slater, P. J. B. Bird Song: Biological Themes and Variations 2nd edn. (Cambridge University Press, 2008).
Seddon, N., Merrill, R. M. & Tobias, J. A. Sexually selected traits predict patterns of species richness in a diverse clade of suboscine birds. Am. Nat. 171, 620–631. https://doi.org/10.1086/587071 (2008).
Google Scholar
Riebel, K. Song and female mate choices in zebra finches—A review. Adv. Stud. Behav. 40, 197–238 (2009).
Ackermann, H., Hage, S. R. & Ziegler, W. Brain mechanisms of acoustic communication in humans and nonhuman primates: An evolutionary perspective. Behav. Brain Sci. 37, 529–546. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X13003099 (2014).
Google Scholar
Woolley, S. M. N. & Moore, J. M. Coevolution in communication senders and receivers: Vocal behavior and auditory processing in multiple songbird species. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1225, 155–165 (2011).
Google Scholar
Wilkins, M. R., Seddon, N. & Safran, R. J. Evolutionary divergence in acoustic signals: Causes and consequences. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28, 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.002 (2013).
Google Scholar
Podos, J. & Patek, S. N. Acoustic signal evolution: biomechanics, size, and performance. Anim. Signal. Funct. Integr. Approach 175–203 (2015).
Demery, A.-J.C., Burns, K. J. & Mason, N. A. Bill size, bill shape, and body size constrain bird song evolution on a macroevolutionary scale. Ornithology 138, 1–11 (2021).
Simmons, A. M. Acoustic Communication (eds Simmons, A. M. et al.) 1–14 (Springer New York, 2003).
Searcy, W. A. & Nowicki, S. The Evolution of Animal Communication: Reliability and Deception in Signaling Systems (Princeton University Press, 2005).
Dooling, R. J., Brown, S. D., Klump, G. M. & Okanoya, K. Auditory perception of conspecific and heterospecific vocalizations in birds: Evidence for special processes. J. Comp. Psychol. 106, 20–28 (1992).
Google Scholar
Hauber, M. E., Campbell, D. L. & Woolley, S. M. N. The functional role and female perception of male song in Zebra Finches. Emu-Austral. Ornithol. 110, 209–218 (2010).
Lynch, A. Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds (eds Kroodsma, D. E. & Miller, E. H.) 181–197 (Comstock Publishing Associates, 1996).
Catchpole, C. K. Acoustic Communication in Birds Vol. 1 (eds Kroodsma, D. E. & Miller, E. H.) 297–319 (Academic Press, 1982).
Wiley, R. H. & Richards, D. G. Physical constraints on acoustic communication in the atmosphere: Implications for the evolution of animal vocalizations. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 3, 69–94 (1978).
Päckert, M., Martens, J., Kosuch, J., Nazarenko, A. A. & Veith, M. Phylogenetic signal in the song of crests and kinglets (Aves: Regulus). Evolution 57, 616–629 (2003).
Google Scholar
Arato, J. & Fitch, W. T. Phylogenetic signal in the vocalizations of vocal learning and vocal non-learning birds. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 376, 20200241 (2021).
Google Scholar
Podos, J. Correlated evolution of morphology and vocal signal structure in Darwin’s finches. Nature 409, 185–188. https://doi.org/10.1038/35051570 (2001).
Google Scholar
Grant, B. R. & Grant, P. R. Cultural inheritance of song and its role in the evolution of Darwin’s finches. Evolution 50, 2471–2487 (1996).
Google Scholar
Payne, R. B. Handbook of the Birds of the World vol. 15 (eds del Hoyo, A. E. J. & Christie, D. A.) 234–377 (Lynx Edicions, 2010).
Payne, R. B., Payne, L. L., Woods, J. L. & Sorenson, M. D. Imprinting and the origin of parasite–host species associations in brood-parasitic indigobirds, Vidua chalybeata. Anim. Behav. 59, 69–81 (2000).
Google Scholar
Zann, R. A. Variation in the songs of three species of estrildine grassfinches. Emu-Austral. Ornithol. 76, 97–108 (1976).
Moore, J. M. & Woolley, S. M. N. Emergent tuning for learned vocalizations in auditory cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 1469–1476 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zann, R. A. The Zebra Finch: A Synthesis of Field and Laboratory Studies (Oxford University Press, 1996).
Payne, R. B. & Payne, L. L. Song mimicry and species associations of west African indigobirds Vidua with Quail-finch Ortygospiza atricollis, Goldbreast Amandava subflava and Brown Twinspot Clytospiza monteiri. Ibis 136, 291–304 (1994).
Hosino, T. & Okanoya, K. Lesion of a higher-order song nucleus disruptsphrase level complexity in Bengalese finches. NeuroReport 11, 2091–2095 (2000).
Google Scholar
Woolley, S. M. & Rubel, E. W. Bengalese finches Lonchura striata domestica depend upon auditory feedback for the maintenance of adult song. J. Neurosci. 17, 6380–6390. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-16-06380.1997 (1997).
Google Scholar
Honda, E. & Okanoya, K. Acoustical and syntactical comparisons between songs of the white-backed munia (Lonchura striata) and its domesticated strain, the Bengalese finch (Lonchura striata var. domestica). Zool. Sci. 16, 319–326 (1999).
Glaze, C. M. & Troyer, T. W. Temporal structure in zebra finch song: implications for motor coding. J. Neurosci. 26, 991–1005 (2006).
Google Scholar
Troyer, T. W., Brainard, M. S. & Bouchard, K. E. Timing during transitions in Bengalese finch song: Implications for motor sequencing. J. Neurophysiol. 118, 1556–1566 (2017).
Google Scholar
Ondracek, J. M., and Hahnloser, R. H. R. Insights from Comparative Hearing Research (eds Köppl, C. et al.) 347–388 (Springer, 2013).
Lachlan, R. F., Van Heijningen, C. A., Ter Haar, S. M. & Ten Cate, C. Zebra finch song phonology and syntactical structure across populations and continents—A computational comparison. Front. Psychol. 7, 980 (2016).
Google Scholar
Tchernichovski, O., Nottebohm, F., Ho, C. E., Bijan, P. & Mitra, P. P. A procedure for an automated measurement of song similarity. Anim. Behav. 59, 1167–1176 (2000).
Google Scholar
Wohlgemuth, M. J., Sober, S. J. & Brainard, M. S. Linked control of syllable sequence and phonology in birdsong. J. Neurosci. 30, 12936–12949 (2010).
Google Scholar
Chen, Y. & Sakata, J. T. Norepinephrine in the avian auditory cortex enhances developmental song learning. J. Neurophysiol. 125, 2397–2407. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00612.2020 (2021).
Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Saltos, C. A. et al. Song preferences predict the quality of vocal learning in zebra finches. Sci. Rep. 13, 605. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-27708-y (2023).
Google Scholar
Sober, S. J., Wohlgemuth, M. J. & Brainard, M. S. Central contributions to acoustic variation in birdsong. J. Neurosci. 28, 10370–10379 (2008).
Google Scholar
James, L. S. & Sakata, J. T. Learning biases underlie “universals” in avian vocal sequencing. Curr. Biol. 27, 3676-3682.e3674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.10.019 (2017).
Google Scholar
MacLean, E. L. et al. How does cognition evolve? Phylogenetic comparative psychology. Anim. Cogn. 15, 223–238 (2012).
Google Scholar
Olsson, U. & Alström, P. A comprehensive phylogeny and taxonomic evaluation of the waxbills (Aves: Estrildidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 146, 106757 (2020).
Google Scholar
Sorenson, M. D. & Payne, R. B. A single ancient origin of brood parasitism in African finches: Implications for host-parasite coevolution. Evolution 55, 2550–2567 (2001).
Google Scholar
Sorenson, M. D., Balakrishnan, C. N. & Payne, R. B. Clade-limited colonization in brood parasitic finches (Vidua spp.). Syst. Biol. 53, 104–153 (2004).
Arnaiz-Villena, A. et al. Estrildinae finches (Aves, Passeriformes) from Africa, South Asia and Australia: A molecular phylogeographic study. Open Ornithol. J. 2, 29–36 (2009).
Google Scholar
Kagawa, H., Suzuki, K., Takahasi, M. & Okanoya, K. Domestication changes innate constraints for birdsong learning. Behav. Proc. 106, 91–97 (2014).
Podos, J. A performance constraint on the evolution of trilled vocalizations in a songbird family (Passeriformes: Emberizidae). Evolution 51, 537–551 (1997).
Google Scholar
ten-Cate, C. Nature’s Music: The Science of Birdsong (eds Marler, P. R. & Slabbekoorn, H.) 300–321 (Elsevier Academic Press, 2004).
So, N. L. T., Edwards, J. A. & Woolley, S. M. N. Auditory selectivity for spectral contrast in cortical neurons and behavior. J. Neurosci. 40, 1015–1027 (2020).
Google Scholar
Vignal, C., Mathevon, N. & Mottin, S. Mate recognition by female zebra finch: Analysis of individuality in male call and first investigations on female decoding process. Behav. Proc. 77, 191–198 (2008).
Chen, Y., Clark, O. & Woolley, S. C. Courtship song preferences in female zebra finches are shaped by developmental auditory experience. Proc. R. Soc. B 284, 20170054 (2017).
Google Scholar
Woolley, S. M., Fremouw, T. E., Hsu, A. & Theunissen, F. E. Tuning for spectro-temporal modulations as a mechanism for auditory discrimination of natural sounds. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 1371–1379 (2005).
Google Scholar
Burkett, Z., Day, N., Peñagarikano, O., Geschwind, D. H. & White, S. A. VoICE: A semi-automated pipeline for standardizing vocal analysis across models. Sci. Rep. 5, 10237 (2015).
Google Scholar
Marler, P. R. & Slabbekoorn, H. Nature’s Music: The Science of Birdsong (Academic Press/Elsevier, 2004).
Araya-Salas, M. & Smith-Vidaurre, G. warbler: An r package to streamline analysis of animal acoustic signals. Methods Ecol. Evol. 8, 184–191 (2017).
Mann, D. C., Lahti, D. C., Waddick, L. & Mundinger, P. C. House finches learn canary trills. Bioacoustics https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2020.1718551 (2020).
Google Scholar
Vicario, D. S., Raksin, J. N., Naqvi, N. H., Thande, N. & Simpson, H. B. The relationship between perception and production in songbird vocal imitation: What learned calls can teach us. J. Comp. Physiol. A 188, 897–908 (2002).
Google Scholar
Beckers, G. J. L., Goossens, B. M. A. & Ten Cate, C. Perceptual salience of acoustic differences between conspecific and allospecific vocalizations in African collared-doves. Anim. Behav. 65, 605–614 (2003).
Wu, W., Thompson, J. A., Bertram, R. & Johnson, F. A statistical method for quantifying songbird phonology and syntax. J. Neurosci. 174, 147–154 (2008).
Brainard, M. S. & Doupe, A. J. Translating birdsong: Songbirds as a model for basic and applied medical research. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 36, 489–517 (2013).
Google Scholar
Krishnan, A. & Tamma, K. Divergent morphological and acoustic traits in sympatric communities of Asian barbets. R. Soc. Open Sci 3, 160117 (2016).
Google Scholar
Slabbekoorn, H. & Smith, T. B. Habitat-dependent song divergence in the little greenbul: An analysis of environmental selection pressures on acoustic signals. Evolution 56, 1846–1858 (2002).
Feher, O., Ljubiac, I., Suzuki, K., Okanoya, K. & Tchernichovski, O. Statistical learning in songbirds: From self-tutoring to song culture. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 372, 20160053 (2017).
McCracken, K. G. & Sheldon, F. H. Avian vocalizations and phylogenetic signal. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 3833–3836 (1997).
Google Scholar
Amezquita, A. et al. Calls, colours, shape, and genes: A multi-trait approach to the study of geographic variation in the Amazonian frog Allobates femoralis. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 98, 826–838 (2009).
Garcia-Navas, V. & Blumstein, D. T. The effect of body size and habitat on the evolution of alarm vocalizations in rodents. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 118, 745–751 (2016).
Lewis, R. N., Williams, L. J. & Gilman, R. T. The uses and implications of avian vocalizations for conservation planning. Conserv. Biol. 35, 50–63 (2020).
Google Scholar
Fournet, M. E. H. et al. Some things never change: Multidecadal stability in humpback whale calling repertoire on Southeast Alaskan foraging grounds. Sci. Rep. 8, 13186 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wood, C. M. et al. Using the ecological significance of animal vocalizations to improve inference in acoustic monitoring programs. Conserv. Biol. 35, 336–345 (2020).
Google Scholar
Frouin-Mouy, H. et al. Acoustic and visual cetacean surveys reveal year-round spatial and temporal distributions for multiple species in northern British Columbia, Canada. Sci. Rep. 12, 19272 (2022).
Google Scholar
Forstmeier, W., Burger, C., Temnow, K. & Derégnaucourt, S. The genetic basis of zebra finch vocalizations. Evolution 63, 2114–2130 (2009).
Google Scholar
Prum, R. O. Syringeal morphology, phylogeny, and evolution of the neotropical manakins (Aves, Pipridae). American Museum novitates no. 3043 (1992).
Sen, K., Theunissen, F. E. & Doupe, A. J. Feature analysis of natural sounds in the songbird auditory forebrain. J. Neurophysiol. 86, 1445–1458. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.2001.86.3.1445 (2001).
Google Scholar
Yanagihara, S. & Yazaki-Sugiyama, Y. Auditory experience-dependent cortical circuit shaping for memory formation in bird song learning. Nat. Commun. 7, 11946. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11946 (2016).
Google Scholar
van Buskirk, J. Evolution of song structure and note structure in American wood warblers. Proc. R. Soc. B 264, 755–761 (1997).
Google Scholar
Price, J. J. & Lanyon, S. M. Reconstructing the evolution of complex bird song in the Oropendolas. Evolution 56, 1514–1529 (2002).
Google Scholar
Tosso, F. et al. Highlighting convergent evolution in morphological traits in response to climatic gradient in African tropical tree species: The case of genus Guibourtia Benn. Ecol. Evol. 9, 13114–13126 (2019).
Google Scholar
Soma, M., Hasegawa, T. & Okanoya, K. Genetic and developmental effects, and morphological influences on the acoustic structure of individual distance calls in female Bengalese finches Lonchura striata var. domestica. J. Avian Biol. 39, 101–107 (2008).
Tubaro, P. L. & Mahler, B. Acoustic frequencies and body mass in New World doves. Condor 100, 54–61 (1998).
Handford, P. & Lougheed, S. C. Variation in duration and frequency characters in the song of the rufous-collard sparrow, Zonotrichia capensis, with respect to habitat, trill dialects, and body size. Condor 93, 644–658 (1991).
Podos, J., Huber, S. K. & Taft, B. Bird song: The interface of evolution and mechanism. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. S 35, 55–87 (2004).
Prather, J. F. Auditory signal processing in communication: Perception and performance of vocal sounds. Hear. Res. 305, 144–155 (2013).
Google Scholar
Wilczynski, W., Rand, A. S. & Ryan, M. J. Evolution of calls and auditory tuning in the Physalaemus pustulosus species group. Brain Behav. Evol. 58, 137–151 (2001).
Google Scholar
Ryan, M. J. Neuroanatomy influences speciation rates among anurans. PNAS 83, 1379–1382 (1986).
Google Scholar
Cynx, J. Conspecific song perception in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). J. Compar. Psychol. 107, 395 (1993).
Google Scholar
Searcy, W. A. & Andersson, M. Sexual selection and the evolution of song. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17, 507–533 (1986).
Woolley, S. M. N., Hauber, M. E. & Theunissen, F. E. Developmental experience alters information coding in auditory midbrain and forebrain neurons. Dev. Neurobiol. 70, 235–252 (2010).
Google Scholar
Clayton, N. S. Assortive mating in zebra finch subspecies, Taeniopygia guttata guttata and T. g. castanotis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 330, 351–370 (1990).
Google Scholar
Mandelblat-Cerf, Y. & Fee, M. S. An automated procedure for evaluating song imitation. PLoS ONE 9, e96484 (2014).
Google Scholar
Tobias, J. A., Planque, R., Cram, D. L. & Seddon, N. Species interactions and the structure of complex communication networks. PNAS 111, 1020–1025 (2014).
Google Scholar
Laiolo, P., Rolando, A., Delestrade, A. & de Sanctis, A. Geographical variation in the calls of the choughs. Condor 103, 287–297 (2001).
Soma, M., Hasegawa, T. & Okanoya, K. The evolution of song learning: A review from a biological perspective. Cogn. Stud. 12, 166–176 (2005).
R. version 4.0.3. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2020).
Sueur, J., Aubin, T. & Simonis, C. Seewave, a free modular tool for sound analysis and synthesis. Bioacoustics 18, 213–226 (2008).
Josse, J. & Husson, F. missMDA: A package for handling missing values in multivariate data analysis. J. Stat. Softw. 70, 1–31 (2016).
Dray, S. & Josse, J. Principal component analysis with missing values: A comparative survey of methods. Plant Ecol. 216, 657–667 (2015).
Tachibana, R. O., Oosugi, N. & Okanoya, K. Semi-automatic classification of birdsong elements using a linear support vector machine. PLoS ONE 9, e92584 (2014).
Google Scholar
Holland, S. M. Data Analysis in the Geosciences: Principal Components Analysis. Retrieved from http://strata.uga.edu/8370/lecturenotes/principalComponents.html (2021).
Jackson, D. A. Stopping rules in principal components analysis: A comparison of heuristical and statistical approaches. Ecology 74, 2204–2214 (1993).
Blonder, B. Hypervolume: high dimensional geometry and set operations using kernel density estimation, support vector machines, and convex hulls. R package version 2.0.12. (2019).
Blonder, B. et al. New approaches for delineating n-dimensional hypervolumes. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 305–319 (2018).
James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T. & Tibshirani, R. An Introduction to Statistical Learning with Applications in R 2nd edn. (Springer, 2021).
Google Scholar
Youngblood, M. & Lahti, D. Content bias in the cultural evolution of house finch song. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.05.434109 (2021).
Google Scholar
MATLAB. version 9.9.0.1592791 (R2020b) (The MathWorks Inc., 2020).
Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324 (2001).
Google Scholar
Xie, J., Hilal, A. R. & Kulic, D. Driving maneuver classification: A comparison of feature extraction methods. IEEE Sens. J. 18, 4777–4784 (2018).
Google Scholar
scutr: Balancing multiclass datasets for classification tasks v. 0.1.2 (2021).
Agrawal, A., Viktor, H. L. & Paquet, E. SCUT: Multi-class imbalanced data classification using SMOTE and cluster-based undersampling. Comm. Com. Inf. Sc. 1, 226–234 (2015).
Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O. & Kegelmeyer, W. P. SMOTE: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 16, 321–357 (2002).
Google Scholar
Stahel, W. A. Statistische Datenanalyse: Eine Einführung für Naturwissenschaftler (Vieweg Verlag, 2000).
Google Scholar
Wunder, J. et al. Growth-mortality relationships as indicators of life-history strategies: A comparison of nine tree species in unmanaged European forests. Oikos 117, 815–828 (2008).
Fowlkes, E. B. & Mallows, C. L. A method for comparing two hierarchical clusterings. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 78, 553–569 (1983).
Google Scholar
Galili, T. dendextend: An R package for visualizing, adjusting, and comparing trees of hierarchical clustering. Bioinformatics 31, 3718–3720 (2015).
Google Scholar
De Kort, S. R. & Ten Cate, C. Response to interspecific vocalizations is affected by degree of phylogenetic relatedness in Streptopelia doves. Anim. Behav. 61, 239–247 (2001).
Google Scholar
Münkemüller, T. et al. How to measure and test phylogenetic signal. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 743–756 (2012).
Debastiani, V. J. & da Silva Duarte, L. Evolutionary models and phylogenetic signal assessment via Mantel test. Evol. Biol. 44, 135–143 (2017).
Harmon, L. J. & Glor, R. E. Poor statistical performance of the Mantel test in phylogenetic comparative analyses. Evolution 64, 2173–2178 (2010).
Google Scholar
Lapointe, F.-J. & Garland, T. Jr. A generalized permutation model for the analysis of cross-species data. J. Class 18, 109–127 (2001).
Google Scholar
Garland, T. Jr., Harvey, P. H. & Ives, A. R. Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Syst. Biol. 41, 18–32 (1992).
Tobias, J. A. et al. AVONET: Morphological, ecological and geographical data for all birds. Ecol. Lett. 25, 581–597 (2021).
Melo, D., Garcia, G., Hubbe, A., Assis, A. P. & Marroig, G. EvolQG—An R package for evolutionary quantitative genetics. F1000Research 4, 925 (2015).
Google Scholar
Allen, W. L., Stevens, M. & Higham, J. P. Character displacement of Cercopithecini primate visual signals. Nat. Commun. 5, 4266 (2014).
Google Scholar
Macholan, M. A geometric morphometric analysis of the shape of the first upper molar in mice of the genus Mus (Muridae, Rodentia). J. Zool. 270, 672–681 (2006).
Monteiro, L. R. & Abe, A. S. Functional and historical determinants of shape in the scapula of xenarthran mammals: Evolution of a complex morphological structure. J. Morphol. 241, 251–263 (1999).
Google Scholar
Palmer, M. Landmark-based morphometric analysis of two sibling species of the genus Asida (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae). Contrib. Zool. 70, 213–220 (2002).
Bohning-Gaese, K., Schuda, M. D. & Helbig, A. J. Weak phylogenetic effects on ecological niches of Sylvia warblers. J. Evol. Biol. 16, 956–965 (2003).
Google Scholar
