Henry Kissinger turned 100 years old last weekend and warned with undiminished enthusiasm about two modern threats to an increasingly volatile world: the rivalry between America and China and the growing power of artificial intelligence. bottom.
How we address these challenges may hinge heavily on the deeper questions Kissinger first posed 30 years ago. It is how the United States chooses to engage in a “New World Order” that it can no longer design or govern as it once did. A few years after World War II.
why i wrote this
a story focused on
Henry Kissinger, who turned 100 last weekend, posed a key conundrum of American foreign policy three decades ago. America cannot withdraw from the world, nor can it rule the world. it remains unresolved.
What does America, still a great power, want from the world? Can China, as Kissinger put it, break out of its “historic cycle of over-expansion and moody isolationism”?
And with the bipartisan consensus in post-World War II Washington crumbling, will any US president be able to establish and sustain a cohesive foreign policy beyond dealing with the inevitable crisis?
With all eyes on America’s rivals and allies alike, the core challenge that Mr. Kissinger identified in his 1994 book, Diplomacy, was to steer this evolving new order: We cannot withdraw, we cannot withdraw from the world.” she controls it. ”
Joe Biden also seems to share that analysis. But it is by no means clear whether his potential successor, Donald Trump, will do so.
Henry Kissinger turned 100 years old last weekend and warned with undiminished enthusiasm about two modern threats to an increasingly volatile world: the rivalry between America and China and the growing power of artificial intelligence. bottom.
But how we address these challenges may hinge heavily on the deeper issues that Kissinger first warned of 30 years ago. It is how we choose to engage in a “New World Order” that the United States can no longer design or control as it once did. years after World War II.
What does America, still a great power, want from the world? Can China, in Kissinger’s words, break out of its “historic cycle of frenzied overexpansion and moody isolationism”?
why i wrote this
a story focused on
Henry Kissinger, who turned 100 last weekend, posed a key conundrum of American foreign policy three decades ago. America cannot withdraw from the world, nor can it rule the world. it remains unresolved.
And with the bipartisan consensus in post-World War II Washington crumbling, will any US president be able to establish and sustain a cohesive foreign policy beyond dealing with the inevitable crisis?
Mr. Kissinger laid out all these mysteries in his 1994 book Diplomacy, and I read it again as he blew out his birthday candles.
He wrote it after the collapse of the Soviet Union. But the “new order” he envisioned was more troublesome. Cumbersome. States that share influence with China, perhaps “imperial” Russia, Europe and India are still emerging.
And while America’s rivals and allies alike are watching intently, the United States has yet to resolve the core conundrum that Kissinger identified in his book. In navigating this evolving new order, America can neither withdraw from the world nor dominate it. ”
While showing some legitimacy, President Joe Biden believes that a changing world has come through George W. It would argue that it shows the international engagement it seeks.
As evidence A, he will probably point to the US government’s response to President Vladimir Putin’s war on Ukraine. That means making the United States an essential leader in policies that have been carefully coordinated and jointly implemented with our allies in Europe and beyond.
But the 100-year-old Kissinger was right in his pre-birthday interview to name two key policy challenges that are currently putting a stress test on Biden’s foreign policy approach.
AP/File
China first. His advocacy, power and influence have grown exponentially since his 1990s. Unlike the Soviet Union during the Cold War, it is also the second largest economy in the world after the United States.
Since the beginning of this century, under successive US presidents, US-China relations have become even colder and more confrontational.
And unlike US-Soviet relations today, that relationship is hampered by the almost complete lack of regular contact between senior political and military officials in Beijing and Washington.
Amid rare bipartisan enthusiasm for a tougher, protectionist economic policy, especially toward China, the challenge for Mr. Biden is to prevent the world’s two great powers from leaving without a sustained and credible communication channel. Find a way to avoid it.
It is precisely at this point that Kissinger emphasizes the importance of artificial intelligence, which, without regulation and constraints, could pose a 21st-century threat comparable to that of Cold War-era nuclear weapons, he fears. are doing.
In Kissinger’s view, trying to work together to put AI guardrails in place, as the US and Russia did with the nuclear deal in a less complex geopolitical situation, would be a big win for the US, China, and It will benefit everyone in the wider world. Cold War era.
Markus Schreiber/Associated Press
That may not be easy, given the recent tensions and mistrust in US-China relations. But when it comes to AI, there are growing signs of concern on both sides of the divide.
This week, many of the Western tech industry’s leading figures declared that mitigating the risks of AI should be a “global priority” on par with preventing nuclear war. And on Tuesday, Chinese leader Xi Jinping called for “dedicated efforts to safeguard the security governance of Internet data and artificial intelligence.”
Biden appears to share Kissinger’s view that the United States needs to engage with its Chinese rivals, especially on issues that neither country can solve alone. Indeed, despite the increasingly divisive tendencies in US-China relations, the US president is making that case to Beijing as he seeks to restore communication and cooperation.
But the sustainability of the Biden administration’s vision of America’s engagement in a changing world may hinge on one of the unresolved issues Kissinger wrote about in the 1990s.
It is the lack of a national consensus on America’s role in the world that American presidents enjoyed after World War II.
That bond was marred by the Vietnam War. In recent years, the decline has progressed further.
Restoration is likely to be particularly difficult as the 2024 US presidential election approaches. Already, some voices within the Republican Party, particularly current presidential front-runner Donald Trump, have questioned the aggressive U.S. support for Ukraine.
All of this heightens uncertainty among both allies and adversaries about how long the Biden administration’s re-engagement of the United States in global affairs will last.
It should be clear that Mr. Biden broadly accepts Mr. Kissinger’s fundamental analysis that the United States cannot withdraw from or dominate the world.
But it’s not clear that’s not the case with Trump, Biden’s predecessor and likely successor.
