Lalonde, S. et al. Molecular and cellular approaches for the detection of protein–protein interactions: latest techniques and current limitations. Plant J. 53, 610–635 (2008).
Google Scholar
Bechelli, S. & Delhommelle, J. AI’s role in pharmaceuticals: assisting drug design from protein interactions to drug development. Artif. Intell. Chem. 2, 100038 (2024).
Google Scholar
Piehler, J. New methodologies for measuring protein interactions in vivo and in vitro. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 15, 4–14 (2005).
Google Scholar
Louche, A., Salcedo, S. P. & Bigot, S. Protein–protein interactions: pull-down assays. In Bacterial Protein Secretion Systems. Methods in Molecular Biology, Vol. 1615 (eds Journet, L. & Cascales, E.) 247–255 (Humana, 2017).
Miura, K. An overview of current methods to confirm protein-protein interactions. Protein Pept. Lett. 25, 728–733 (2018).
Google Scholar
Greenblatt, J. F., Alberts, B. M. & Krogan, N. J. Discovery and significance of protein-protein interactions in health and disease. Cell 187, 6501–6517 (2024).
Google Scholar
Ngounou Wetie, A. G. et al. Protein–protein interactions: switch from classical methods to proteomics and bioinformatics-based approaches. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 71, 205–228 (2014).
Google Scholar
Browne, F., Zheng, H., Wang, H. & Azuaje, F. From experimental approaches to computational techniques: a review on the prediction of protein-protein interactions. Adv. Artif. Intell. 2010, 924529 (2010).
Sarkar, D. & Saha, S. Machine-learning techniques for the prediction of protein–protein interactions. J. Biosci. 44, 104 (2019).
Google Scholar
Yu, D., Chojnowski, G., Rosenthal, M. & Kosinski, J. AlphaPulldown—a python package for protein–protein interaction screens using AlphaFold-Multimer. Bioinformatics 39, btac749 (2023).
Google Scholar
Tang, T. et al. Machine learning on protein–protein interaction prediction: models, challenges and trends. Brief. Bioinform. 24, bbad076 (2023).
Google Scholar
Evans, I. M. & Paliashvili, K. Co-immunoprecipitation assays. In VEGF Signaling. Methods in Molecular Biology, Vol. 2475 (eds Fiedler, L. R. & Pellet-Many, C.) 125–132 (Humana, 2022).
Akbarzadeh, S., Coşkun, Ö & Günçer, B. Studying protein–protein interactions: latest and most popular approaches. J. Struct. Biol. 216, 108118 (2024).
Google Scholar
Tang, Z. & Takahashi, Y. Analysis of protein–protein interaction by Co-IP in human cells. In Two-Hybrid Systems. Methods in Molecular Biology, Vol. 1794 (ed. Oñate-Sánchez, L.) 289–296 (Humana, 2018).
Lo Sardo, F. in Polycomb Group Proteins. Methods in Molecular Biology, Vol. 2655 (eds Lanzuolo, C. & Marasca, F.) 67–77 (Humana, 2023).
Lin, J.-S. & Lai, E.-M. Protein–protein interactions: co-immunoprecipitation. In Bacterial Protein Secretion Systems. Methods in Molecular Biology, Vol. 1615 (eds Journet, L. & Cascales, E.) 211–219 (Humana, 2017).
Yang, H. et al. The host antiviral protein SAMHD1 suppresses NF-κB activation by interacting with the IKK complex during inflammatory responses and viral infection. J. Biol. Chem. 299, 104750 (2023).
Google Scholar
Yang, J., Liao, Q. & Lu, C. SOX9 promotes the invasion and migration of lung adenocarcinoma cells by activating the RAP1 signaling pathway. BMC Pulm. Med. 23, 421 (2023).
Google Scholar
Muñoz, A. & Castellano, M. M. Coimmunoprecipitation of interacting proteins in plants. In Two-Hybrid Systems. Methods in Molecular Biology, Vol. 1794 (ed. Oñate-Sánchez, L.) 279–287 (Humana, 2018).
Smith, D. B. & Johnson, K. S. Single-step purification of polypeptides expressed in Escherichia coli as fusions with glutathione S-transferase. Gene 67, 31–40 (1988).
Google Scholar
Gnanasekaran, P. & Pappu, H. R. Detection of protein–protein interactions using glutathione-S-transferase (GST) pull-down assay technique. In Protein-Protein Interactions. Methods in Molecular Biology, Vol. 2690 (ed. Mukhtar, S.) 111–115 (Humana, 2023).
Lyu, S., Zhang, C., Hou, X. & Wang, A. Tag-based pull-down assay. In Plant Virology. Methods in Molecular Biology, Vol. 2400 (eds Wang, A. & Li, Y.) 105–114 (Humana, 2022).
Kim, S.-Y. & Hakoshima, T. GST Pull-down assay to measure complex formations. In The Hippo Pathway. Methods in Molecular Biology, Vol. 1893 (ed. Hergovich, A.) 273–280 (Humana, 2019).
Rigaut, G. et al. A generic protein purification method for protein complex characterization and proteome exploration. Nat. Biotechnol. 17, 1030–1032 (1999).
Google Scholar
Li, Y. The tandem affinity purification technology: an overview. Biotechnol. Lett. 33, 1487–1499 (2011).
Google Scholar
Yang, Z. & Zheng, C. in Molecular Virology. Methods in Molecular Biology, Vol. 2940 (ed. Zheng, C.) 33–42 (Humana, 2025).
Tang, X. & Bruce, J. E. in Mass Spectrometry of Proteins and Peptides. Methods In Molecular Biology, Vol. 492 (eds Lipton, M. S. & Paša-Tolic, L.) 283–293 (Humana, 2009).
Cheng, J., Wang, H., Zhang, Y., Wang, X. & Liu, G. Advances in crosslinking chemistry and proximity-enabled strategies: deciphering protein complexes and interactions. Org. Biomol. Chem. 22, 7549–7559 (2024).
Google Scholar
Young, M. M. et al. High throughput protein fold identification by using experimental constraints derived from intramolecular cross-links and mass spectrometry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 5802–5806 (2000).
Google Scholar
Leitner, A. et al. Toward increased reliability, transparency, and accessibility in cross-linking mass spectrometry. Structure 28, 1259–1268 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lenz, S. et al. Reliable identification of protein-protein interactions by crosslinking mass spectrometry. Nat. Commun. 12, 3564 (2021).
Google Scholar
Fields, S. & Song, O. A novel genetic system to detect protein–protein interactions. Nature 340, 245–246 (1989).
Google Scholar
Ito, T. et al. A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 4569–4574 (2001).
Google Scholar
Uetz, P. et al. A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 403, 623–627 (2000).
Google Scholar
Mehla, J., Caufield, J. H. & Uetz, P. The yeast two-hybrid system: a tool for mapping protein–protein interactions. In Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. https://doi.org/10.1101/pdb.top083345 (2015).
Brückner, A., Polge, C., Lentze, N., Auerbach, D. & Schlattner, U. Yeast two-hybrid, a powerful tool for systems biology. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 10, 2763–2788 (2009).
Google Scholar
Snider, J., Kittanakom, S., Curak, J. & Stagljar, I. Split-ubiquitin based membrane yeast two-hybrid (MYTH) system: a powerful tool for identifying protein-protein interactions. J. Vis. Exp. 36, e1698 (2010).
He, R. & Li, X. Mammalian two-hybrid assay for detecting protein-protein interactions in vivo. In Genomics Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology, Vol. 439 (eds Starkey, M. & Elaswarapu, R.) 327–337 (Humana, 2008).
Snider, J. et al. Fundamentals of protein interaction network mapping. Mol. Syst. Biol. 11, MSB156351 (2015).
Google Scholar
Trinkle-Mulcahy, L. Recent advances in proximity-based labeling methods for interactome mapping. F1000Research 8, 135 (2019).
Google Scholar
Schopp, I. M. et al. Split-BioID a conditional proteomics approach to monitor the composition of spatiotemporally defined protein complexes. Nat. Commun. 8, 15690 (2017).
Google Scholar
Guo, J. et al. The development of proximity labeling technology and its applications in mammals, plants, and microorganisms. Cell Commun. Signal. 21, 269 (2023).
Google Scholar
Turinsky, A. L., Razick, S., Turner, B., Donaldson, I. M. & Wodak, S. J. Literature curation of protein interactions: measuring agreement across major public databases. Database 2010, baq026 (2010).
Google Scholar
von Mering, C. STRING: a database of predicted functional associations between proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 258–261 (2003).
Google Scholar
Oughtred, R. et al. The BioGRID database: a comprehensive biomedical resource of curated protein, genetic, and chemical interactions. Protein Sci. 30, 187–200 (2021).
Google Scholar
Szklarczyk, D. et al. The STRING database in 2025: protein networks with directionality of regulation. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, D730–D737 (2025).
Google Scholar
Mosca, R., Céol, A. & Aloy, P. Interactome3D: adding structural details to protein networks. Nat. Methods 10, 47–53 (2013).
Google Scholar
Fraser, H. B., Hirsh, A. E., Wall, D. P. & Eisen, M. B. Coevolution of gene expression among interacting proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 9033–9038 (2004).
Google Scholar
Marks, D. S. et al. Protein 3D structure computed from evolutionary sequence variation. PLoS One 6, e28766 (2011).
Google Scholar
Hopf, T. A. et al. Sequence co-evolution gives 3D contacts and structures of protein complexes. eLife 3, e03430 (2014).
Google Scholar
Ovchinnikov, S., Kamisetty, H. & Baker, D. Robust and accurate prediction of residue–residue interactions across protein interfaces using evolutionary information. eLife 3, e02030 (2014).
Google Scholar
Hopf, T. A. et al. The EVcouplings Python framework for coevolutionary sequence analysis. Bioinformatics 35, 1582–1584 (2019).
Google Scholar
Cong, Q., Anishchenko, I., Ovchinnikov, S. & Baker, D. Protein interaction networks revealed by proteome coevolution. Science 365, 185–189 (2019).
Google Scholar
Green, A. G. et al. Large-scale discovery of protein interactions at residue resolution using co-evolution calculated from genomic sequences. Nat. Commun. 12, 1396 (2021).
Google Scholar
Pitre, S. et al. PIPE: a protein-protein interaction prediction engine based on the re-occurring short polypeptide sequences between known interacting protein pairs. BMC Bioinform. 7, 365 (2006).
Google Scholar
Li, Y. & Ilie, L. SPRINT: ultrafast protein-protein interaction prediction of the entire human interactome. BMC Bioinform. 18, 485 (2017).
Google Scholar
Murakami, Y. & Mizuguchi, K. Applying the Naïve Bayes classifier with kernel density estimation to the prediction of protein–protein interaction sites. Bioinformatics 26, 1841–1848 (2010).
Google Scholar
Sanchez-Garcia, R., Sorzano, C. O. S., Carazo, J. M. & Segura, J. BIPSPI: a method for the prediction of partner-specific protein–protein interfaces. Bioinformatics 35, 470–477 (2019).
Google Scholar
Petrey, D., Zhao, H., Trudeau, S. J., Murray, D. & Honig, B. PrePPI: a structure informed proteome-wide database of protein–protein interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 435, 168052 (2023).
Google Scholar
Hashemifar, S., Neyshabur, B., Khan, A. A. & Xu, J. Predicting protein–protein interactions through sequence-based deep learning. Bioinformatics 34, i802–i810 (2018).
Google Scholar
Chen, M. et al. Multifaceted protein–protein interaction prediction based on Siamese residual RCNN. Bioinformatics 35, i305–i314 (2019).
Google Scholar
Rives, A. et al. Biological structure and function emerge from scaling unsupervised learning to 250 million protein sequences. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2016239118 (2021).
Google Scholar
Bepler, T. & Berger, B. Learning the protein language: evolution, structure, and function. Cell Syst. 12, 654–669.e3 (2021).
Google Scholar
Sledzieski, S., Singh, R., Cowen, L. & Berger, B. D-SCRIPT translates genome to phenome with sequence-based, structure-aware, genome-scale predictions of protein-protein interactions. Cell Syst. 12, 969–982.e6 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ko, Y. S., Parkinson, J., Liu, C. & Wang, W. TUnA: an uncertainty-aware transformer model for sequence-based protein–protein interaction prediction. Brief. Bioinform. 25, bbae359 (2024).
Google Scholar
Liu, D. et al. PLM-interact: extending protein language models to predict protein-protein interactions. Nat. Commun. 16, 9012 (2025).
Google Scholar
Ullanat, V., Jing, B., Sledzieski, S. & Berger, B. Learning the language of protein-protein interactions. Nat. Commun. 17, 1199 (2026).
Google Scholar
Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).
Google Scholar
Bertoline, L. M. F., Lima, A. N., Krieger, J. E. & Teixeira, S. K. Before and after AlphaFold2: an overview of protein structure prediction. Front. Bioinform. 3, 1120370 (2023).
Google Scholar
Yin, R., Feng, B. Y., Varshney, A. & Pierce, B. G. Benchmarking AlphaFold for protein complex modeling reveals accuracy determinants. Protein Sci. 31, e4379 (2022).
Google Scholar
Mirdita, M. et al. ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all. Nat. Methods 19, 679–682 (2022).
Google Scholar
Evans, R. et al. Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 (2022).
Dunbrack, R. L. Rēs ipSAE loquuntur: what’s wrong with AlphaFold’s ipTM score and how to fix it. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.10.637595 (2025).
Bryant, P., Pozzati, G. & Elofsson, A. Improved prediction of protein-protein interactions using AlphaFold2. Nat. Commun. 13, 1265 (2022).
Google Scholar
Bryant, P. et al. Predicting the structure of large protein complexes using AlphaFold and Monte Carlo tree search. Nat. Commun. 13, 6028 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zhu, W., Shenoy, A., Kundrotas, P. & Elofsson, A. Evaluation of AlphaFold-Multimer prediction on multi-chain protein complexes. Bioinformatics 39, btad424 (2023).
Google Scholar
Bellinzona, G., Sassera, D. & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. Accelerating protein–protein interaction screens with reduced AlphaFold-Multimer sampling. Bioinform. Adv. 4, vbae153 (2024).
Google Scholar
Molodenskiy, D. et al. AlphaPulldown2—a general pipeline for high-throughput structural modeling. Bioinformatics 41, btaf115 (2025).
Google Scholar
Abramson, J. et al. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature 630, 493–500 (2024).
Google Scholar
Yang, Z., Zeng, X., Zhao, Y. & Chen, R. AlphaFold2 and its applications in the fields of biology and medicine. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 8, 115 (2023).
Google Scholar
Baek, M. et al. Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a three-track neural network. Science 373, 871–876 (2021).
Google Scholar
McLean, T. C. LazyAF, a pipeline for accessible medium-scale in silico prediction of protein-protein interactions. Microbiology 170, 001473 (2024).
Google Scholar
Singh, R., Devkota, K., Sledzieski, S., Berger, B. & Cowen, L. Topsy-Turvy: integrating a global view into sequence-based PPI prediction. Bioinformatics 38, i264–i272 (2022).
Google Scholar
Lee, M. Recent advances in deep learning for protein-protein interaction analysis: a comprehensive review. Molecules 28, 5169 (2023).
Google Scholar
Krapp, L. F., Abriata, L. A., Cortés Rodriguez, F. & Dal Peraro, M. PeSTo: parameter-free geometric deep learning for accurate prediction of protein binding interfaces. Nat. Commun. 14, 2175 (2023).
Google Scholar
Jin, X. et al. TPepPro: a deep learning model for predicting peptide–protein interactions. Bioinformatics 41, btae708 (2024).
Google Scholar
Farooq, Q. U. A., Shaukat, Z., Aiman, S. & Li, C.-H. Protein-protein interactions: methods, databases, and applications in virus-host study. World J. Virol. 10, 288–300 (2021).
Google Scholar
Chang, J.-W., Zhou, Y.-Q., Ul Qamar, M., Chen, L.-L. & Ding, Y.-D. Prediction of protein–protein interactions by evidence combining methods. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17, 1946 (2016).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Q. C. et al. Structure-based prediction of protein–protein interactions on a genome-wide scale. Nature 490, 556–560 (2012).
Google Scholar
Humphreys, I. R. et al. Protein interactions in human pathogens revealed through deep learning. Nat. Microbiol. 9, 2642–2652 (2024).
Google Scholar
Burke, D. F. et al. Towards a structurally resolved human protein interaction network. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 30, 216–225 (2023).
Google Scholar
O’Reilly, F. J. et al. Protein complexes in cells by AI -assisted structural proteomics. Mol. Syst. Biol. 19, e11544 (2023).
Trepte, P. et al. AI-guided pipeline for protein–protein interaction drug discovery identifies a SARS-CoV-2 inhibitor. Mol. Syst. Biol. 20, 428–457 (2024).
Google Scholar
Salgania, H. K., Metz, J. & Jeske, M. ReLo is a simple and rapid colocalization assay to identify and characterize direct protein–protein interactions. Nat. Commun. 15, 2875 (2024).
Google Scholar
Salgania, H. K. et al. Molecular insights into the Drosophila piRNA pathway via systematic ReLo protein interaction screening and structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, gkaf993 (2025).
Google Scholar
Stahl, K. et al. Modelling protein complexes with crosslinking mass spectrometry and deep learning. Nat. Commun. 15, 7866 (2024).
Google Scholar
Xie, Y. et al. Integrating diverse experimental information to assist protein complex structure prediction by GRASP. Nat. Methods 22, 2362–2374 (2025).
Google Scholar
The OpenFold3 Team. OpenFold3-preview. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.19001000 (2026).
