evaluation: Before adopting the tool, Gibson Dan is running a three-stage review process, said Meredith Williams Range, the company's chief legal officer.
The tool must first pass an internal audit covering security, privacy and risk. They then take a proof of concept test in a small group. Finally, the tool must demonstrate real value to the lawyer through practical use. This can grow over several months, like a Harvey pilot.
Apply: ChatGpt Enterprise is one tool that goes through Gibson Dunn's internal processes. In June, the company launched a pilot with over 500 participants (a mixed lawyer and staff) to bring the product to its pace.
Williams-Range said he emailed leaders and managing partners from practice groups around the world and asked them to submit attorneys who are willing to test the tool. Three days later, 450 people signed up.
Gibson Dunn says he is using rival AI models Google Gemini and Claude Enterprise. The company works with a variety of vendors, including Harvey, Thomson Reuters, and Microsoft. While some tools like Harvey and Cocounsel are used to support legal work, Copilot is useful for administrative tasks.
For more specific use cases, the company will work with developers to build custom workflows tailored to their practices and data, Williams-Range said.
match: The company's AI policy is reviewed quarterly to stay up to date with regulatory changes, she said. It also includes a procurement playbook with specific security terminology and ways to share learning about the tool.
Gibson Dunn also has a strategic advisory committee consisting of over 30 partners across offices around the world. This Brain Trust is held monthly to guide policy decisions, discuss use cases, and determine whether tools such as ChatGPT Enterprises need to be restricted, expanded or customized.
“It doesn't mean we should,” Williams Range said, referring to the principles that guide the board's work.
