Human local field potentials in motor and non-motor brain areas encode upcoming movement direction

Machine Learning


  • Georgopoulos, A. P., Kalaska, J. F., Caminiti, R. & Massey, J. T. On the relations between the direction of two-dimensional arm movements and cell discharge in primate motor cortex. J. Neurosci. 2, 1527–1537 (1982).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgopoulos, A., Schwartz, A. & Kettner, R. Neuronal population coding of movement direction. Science 233, 1416–1419 (1986).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D. M. Direct cortical control of 3D neuroprosthetic devices. Science 296, 1829–1832 (2002).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Heldman, D. A., Wang, W., Chan, S. S. & Moran, D. W. Local field potential spectral tuning in motor cortex during reaching. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 14, 180–183 (2006).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, E. & Abeles, M. Predicting movement from multiunit activity. J. Neurosci. 27, 8387–8394 (2007).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, W., Chan, S. S., Heldman, D. A. & Moran, D. W. Motor cortical representation of position and velocity during reaching. J. Neurophysiol. 97, 4258–4270 (2007).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tankus, A., Yeshurun, Y., Flash, T. & Fried, I. Encoding of speed and direction of movement in the human supplementary motor area. J. Neurosurg. 110, 1304–1316 (2009).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehring, C. et al. Inference of hand movements from local field potentials in monkey motor cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 6, 1253–1254 (2003).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickert, J. Encoding of movement direction in different frequency ranges of motor cortical local field potentials. J. Neurosci. 25, 8815–8824 (2005).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. & Newsome, W. T. Local field potential in cortical area MT: stimulus tuning and behavioral correlations. J. Neurosci. 26, 7779–7790 (2006).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Schalk, G. et al. Decoding two-dimensional movement trajectories using electrocorticographic signals in humans. J. Neural Eng. 4, 264 (2007).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao, Z. C., Nagasaka, Y. & Fujii, N. Long-term asynchronous decoding of arm motion using electrocorticographic signals in monkey. Front. Neuroeng. 3, 3 (2010).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran, B., Pezaris, J. S., Sahani, M., Mitra, P. P. & Andersen, R. A. Temporal structure in neuronal activity during working memory in macaque parietal cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 805–811 (2002).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, R. A. & Cui, H. Intention, action planning, and decision making in parietal-frontal circuits. Neuron 63, 568–583 (2009).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuthardt, E. C., Schalk, G., Wolpaw, J. R., Ojemann, J. G. & Moran, D. W. A brain–computer interface using electrocorticographic signals in humans. J. Neural Eng. 1, 63 (2004).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehring, C. et al. Comparing information about arm movement direction in single channels of local and epicortical field potentials from monkey and human motor cortex. J. Physiol. -Paris 98, 498–506 (2004).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, T., Schulze-Bonhage, A., Aertsen, A. & Mehring, C. Differential representation of arm movement direction in relation to cortical anatomy and function. J. Neural Eng. 6, 016006 (2009).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunduz, A. et al. Differential roles of high gamma and local motor potentials for movement preparation and execution. Brain–Comput. Interfaces 3, 88–102 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, G. et al. Assessing differential representation of hand movements in multiple domains using stereo-electroencephalographic recordings. NeuroImage 250, 118969 (2022).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldert, S. et al. A review on directional information in neural signals for brain-machine interfaces. J. Physiol. -Paris 103, 244–254 (2009).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldert, S. et al. Hand movement direction decoded from MEG and EEG. J. Neurosci. 28, 1000–1008 (2008).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezeika, A. et al. Brain–computer interface spellers: a review. Brain Sci. 8, 57 (2018).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, D. J., Herron, J. A., Ko, A. L. & Ojemann, J. G. Motor BMIs have entered the clinical realm. In Handbook of Neuroengineering (ed. Thakor, N.V.) 1–37 (Springer, Singapore, 2022).

  • Tang, X., Shen, H., Zhao, S., Li, N. & Liu, J. Flexible brain–computer interfaces. Nat. Electron. 6, 109–118 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanagisawa, T. et al. Regulation of motor representation by phase-amplitude coupling in the sensorimotor cortex. J. Neurosci. 32, 15467–15475 (2012).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, J. et al. The role of ECoG magnitude and phase in decoding position, velocity, and acceleration during continuous motor behavior. Front. Neurosci. 7, 200 (2013).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemptinne, et al. Exaggerated phase amplitude coupling in the primary motor cortex in Parkinson disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1214546110 (2013).

  • Combrisson, E. et al. From intentions to actions: Neural oscillations encode motor processes through phase, amplitude and phase-amplitude coupling. NeuroImage 147, 473–487 (2017).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerbi, K. et al. Coherent neural representation of hand speed in humans revealed by MEG imaging. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 7676–7681 (2007).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerbi, K. et al. Inferring hand movement kinematics from MEG, EEG and intracranial EEG: From brain–machine interfaces to motor rehabilitation. IRBM 32, 8–18 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavanna, A. E. & Trimble, M. R. The precuneus: a review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates. Brain 129, 564–583 (2006).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Soon, C. S., Brass, M., Heinze, H.-J. & Haynes, J.-D. Unconscious determinants of free decisions in the human brain. Nat. Neurosci. 11, 543–545 (2008).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Soon, C. S., He, A. H., Bode, S. & Haynes, J.-D. Predicting free choices for abstract intentions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 6217–6222 (2013).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Schurger, A., Pak, J. & Roskies, A. L. What is the readiness potential? Trends Cogn. Sci. 25, 558–570 (2021).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Shibasaki, H. & Hallett, M. What is the bereitschaftspotential? Clin. Neurophysiol. 117, 2341–2356 (2006).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanakawa, T., Dimyan, M. A. & Hallett, M. Motor planning, imagery, and execution in the distributed motor network: a time-course study with functional MRI. Cereb. Cortex 18, 2775–2788 (2008).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J.-R. & Dehaene, S. Characterizing the dynamics of mental representations: the temporal generalization method. Trends Cogn. Sci. 18, 203–210 (2014).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Thut, G. et al. Internally driven vs. externally cued movement selection: a study on the timing of brain activity. Cogn. Brain Res. 9, 261–269 (2000).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiery, T. et al. Decoding the neural dynamics of free choice in humans. PLoS Biol. 18, e3000864 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoshi, E. & Tanji, J. Differential roles of neuronal activity in the supplementary and presupplementary motor areas: from information retrieval to motor planning and execution. J. Neurophysiol. 92, 3482–3499 (2004).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosseini, S. M., Aminitabar, A. H. & Shalchyan, V. Investigating the application of graph theory features in hand movement directions decoding using EEG signals. Neurosci. Res. 194, 24–35 (2023).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, L. H., Batista, A. P. & Andersen, R. A. Coding of intention in the posterior parietal cortex. Nature 386, 167–170 (1997).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, R. A. & Buneo, C. A. Intentional maps in posterior parietal cortex. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 25, 189–220 (2002).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Buneo, C. A. & Andersen, R. A. The posterior parietal cortex: sensorimotor interface for the planning and online control of visually guided movements. Neuropsychologia 44, 2594–2606 (2006).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnath, H.-O. New insights into the functions of the superior temporal cortex. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 569 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallivan, J. P., McLean, D. A., Flanagan, J. R. & Culham, J. C. Where one hand meets the other: limb-specific and action-dependent movement plans decoded from preparatory signals in single human frontoparietal brain areas. J. Neurosci. 33, 1991–2008 (2013).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Combrisson, E. et al. Group-level inference of information-based measures for the analyses of cognitive brain networks from neurophysiological data. NeuroImage 258, 119347 (2022).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, R. P. Towards neural co-processors for the brain: combining decoding and encoding in brain–computer interfaces. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 55, 142–151 (2019).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Śliwowski, M., Martin, M., Souloumiac, A., Blanchart, P. & Aksenova, T. Decoding ECoG signal into 3D hand translation using deep learning. J. Neural Eng. 19, 026023 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunduz, A. & Schalk, G. Ecog-based bcis. Brain–Comput. Interfaces Handb. 297, 322 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tam, W., Wu, T., Zhao, Q., Keefer, E. & Yang, Z. Human motor decoding from neural signals: a review. BMC Biomed. Eng. 1, 22 (2019).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z. et al. Decoding onset and direction of movements using electrocorticographic (ECoG) signals in humans. Front. Neuroeng. 5, 15 (2012).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpaw, J. R. & McFarland, D. J. Control of a two-dimensional movement signal by a noninvasive brain–computer interface in humans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 17849–17854 (2004).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pistohl, T., Ball, T., Schulze-Bonhage, A., Aertsen, A. & Mehring, C. Prediction of arm movement trajectories from ECoG-recordings in humans. J. Neurosci. Methods 167, 105–114 (2008).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Schalk, G. et al. Two-dimensional movement control using electrocorticographic signals in humans. J. Neural Eng. 5, 75–84 (2008).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerbi, K. et al. Task-related gamma-band dynamics from an intracerebral perspective: review and implications for surface EEG and MEG. Hum. Brain Mapp. 30, 1758–1771 (2009).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, J. et al. Brain responses to success and failure: direct recordings from human cerebral cortex. Hum. Brain Mapp. 31, 1217–1232 (2010).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastin, J. et al. Direct recordings from human anterior insula reveal its leading role within the error-monitoring network. Cereb. Cortex bhv352 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhv352.

  • Combrisson, E. et al. Neural interactions in the human frontal cortex dissociate reward and punishment learning. eLife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.92938.1 (2023).

  • Talairach, J. & Tournoux, P. Referentially Oriented Cerebral MRI Anatomy: An Atlas of Stereotaxic Anatomical Correlations for Gray and White Matter (Thieme, 1993).

  • Jerbi, K. et al. Exploring the electrophysiological correlates of the default-mode network with intracerebral EEG. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 4, 27 (2010).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ossandon, T. et al. Transient suppression of broadband gamma power in the default-mode network is correlated with task complexity and subject performance. J. Neurosci. 31, 14521–14530 (2011).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Combrisson, E. et al. Visbrain: a multi-purpose GPU-accelerated open-source suite for multimodal brain data visualization. Front. Neuroinform. 13, 14 (2019).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachaux, J. P., Rudrauf, D. & Kahane, P. Intracranial EEG and human brain mapping. J. Physiol. -Paris 97, 613–628 (2003).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahane, P., Landré, E., Minotti, L., Francione, S. & Ryvlin, P. The Bancaud and Talairach view on the epileptogenic zone: a working hypothesis. Epileptic Disord. Int. Epilepsy J. Videotape 8, S16–S26 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Delorme, A. & Makeig, S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J. Neurosci. Methods 134, 9–21 (2004).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrone-Bertolotti, M. et al. How silent is silent reading? Intracerebral evidence for top-down activation of temporal voice areas during reading. J. Neurosci. 32, 17554–17562 (2012).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, J. R. et al. Long-distance amplitude correlations in the high gamma band reveal segregation and integration within the reading network. J. Neurosci. 32, 6421–6434 (2012).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, J. R. et al. Neural repetition suppression in ventral occipito-temporal cortex occurs during conscious and unconscious processing of frequent stimuli. Neuroimage 95, 129–135 (2014).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamamé, C. M. et al. Functional selectivity in the human occipitotemporal cortex during natural vision: evidence from combined intracranial EEG and eye-tracking. NeuroImage 95, 276–286 (2014).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallon-Baudry, C., Bertrand, O., Delpuech, C. & Pernier, J. Stimulus specificity of phase-locked and non-phase-locked 40 Hz visual responses in human. J. Neurosci. 16, 4240–4249 (1996).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Babiloni, C. et al. Human brain oscillatory activity phase-locked to painful electrical stimulations: a multi-channel EEG study. Hum. Brain Mapp. 15, 112–123 (2002).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, P. An oscillatory hierarchy controlling neuronal excitability and stimulus processing in the auditory cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 94, 1904–1911 (2005).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Berens, P. CircStat a MATLAB toolbox for circular statistics. J. Stat. Softw. 31, 1–21 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahramisharif, A. et al. Propagating neocortical gamma bursts are coordinated by traveling alpha waves. J. Neurosci. 33, 18849–18854 (2013).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, O. & Colgin, L. L. Cross-frequency coupling between neuronal oscillations. Trends Cogn. Sci. 11, 267–269 (2007).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Canolty, R. T. & Knight, R. T. The functional role of cross-frequency coupling. Trends Cogn Sci. 14, 506–515 (2010).

  • Tort, A. B. L., Komorowski, R., Eichenbaum, H. & Kopell, N. Measuring phase-amplitude coupling between neuronal oscillations of different frequencies. J. Neurophysiol. 104, 1195–1210 (2010).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Soto, J. L. P. & Jerbi, K. Investigation of cross-frequency phase-amplitude coupling in visuomotor networks using magnetoencephalography. In 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 1550–1553 (IEEE, San Diego, USA, 2012).

  • Aru, J. et al. Untangling cross-frequency coupling in neuroscience. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 31, 51–61 (2015).

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Canolty, R. T. et al. High gamma power is phase-locked to theta oscillations in human neocortex. Science 313, 1626–1628 (2006).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Combrisson, E. et al. Tensorpac: an open-source Python toolbox for tensor-based phase-amplitude coupling measurement in electrophysiological brain signals. PLoS Comput. Biol. 16, e1008302 (2020).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ojala, M. & Garriga, G. C. Permutation tests for studying classifier performance. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 11, 1833–1863 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Combrisson, E. & Jerbi, K. Exceeding chance level by chance: the caveat of theoretical chance levels in brain signal classification and statistical assessment of decoding accuracy. J. Neurosci. Methods 250, 126–136 (2015).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, T. E. & Holmes, A. P. Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples. Hum. Brain Mapp. 15, 1–25 (2002).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantazis, D., Nichols, T. E., Baillet, S. & Leahy, R. M. A comparison of random field theory and permutation methods for the statistical analysis of MEG data. NeuroImage 25, 383–394 (2005).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, S. Filters, wrappers and a boosting-based hybrid for feature selection. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning Vol. 1, 74–81 (Citeseer, 2001).

  • Guyon, I. & Elisseeff, A. An introduction to variable and feature selection. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 1157–1182 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Ranka, S. & Kahveci, T. Classification and feature selection algorithms for multi-class CGH data. Bioinformatics 24, i86–i95 (2008).

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, L. & Liu, H. Redundancy based feature selection for microarray data. In Proc. 10th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining 737–742 (ACM, New York, USA, 2004).

  • Ding, C. & Peng, H. Minimum redundancy feature selection from microarray gene expression data. J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol. 3, 185–205 (2005).

  • Hsu, C.-W., Chang, C.-C., Lin, C.-J. et al. A Practical Guide To Support Vector Classification. Technical report, Department of Computer Science, National Taiwan University. http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/papers/guide/guide.pdf (2003).



  • Source link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *