How serious is the use of AI in Netflix's 'What Jennifer Did'?

big picture

• Including several entertainment projects
  real detective,
  Late nights spent with the devil
  and
  civil war
  it is believed that images generated by AI were used.
• Documentary on Netflix
  what jennifer did
  A company is facing backlash for allegedly using AI to create a false image of convicted murderer Jennifer Pan.
• The use of AI in documentaries raises concerns about trustworthiness and trustworthiness, as viewers may question the legitimacy of any images presented.

Since the leap forward in technology available in 2023, the use of artificially generated images has already sparked multiple controversies across the entertainment industry. This trend started when Disney used a series of his AI-generated images in his film credits sequences. secret invasion last year. Lately, there has been a seemingly endless stream of further criticism of Max's latest season. true detectivenot just movies Late nights spent with the devil and civil war, each utilized AI images in different ways. But recent scandals are even more alarming. Netflix's latest true crime documentarywhat jennifer did It is claimed to have used AI to create what is presented as an actual photo of its subject, convicted murderer Jennifer Pan. The allegations were first made public by Futurism and then only addressed by the documentary's producers. In other words, the use of AI was intended to be undetectable. The use of AI images in documentaries, where there is a disparate trust relationship between producers and viewers, raises even greater concerns How this technology is being used and what will happen as its use expands.

What is “what Jennifer did”?

what jennifer did supervised by jenny popplewellher second Netflix true crime documentary since the 2020s American Murder: The Family Next Door. This time's topic is Canadian crime novels. In 2010, 24-year-old Jennifer Pang was at home with her family when three men entered the house in what appeared to be burglaries. His mother, Bich Ha Pan, was murdered and his father, Hui Han Pan, was in a coma. Police investigating the murder initially thought Jennifer was the victim. However, as the case was investigated, details emerged that cast doubt on her story. It included security camera footage that showed the killer breaking into Pan's home, although there were no signs of forced entry. When her father woke up from his coma, he said he saw her whispering intimately with her attackers.

An investigation into Pang's life revealed that for several months she lied to her parents about attending college and fabricated her college transcripts and student loan documents. In fact, she had not graduated from high school and her admission to Toronto Metropolitan University had been revoked. Eventually, Pan connected with the killer through text messages obtained from his cell phone and partially confessed.. She was later convicted of murder and attempted murder, as were three assailants who were allegedly hired to kill her parents in order to divide her potential inheritance.

Did “What Jennifer Did” use AI?

what jennifer did We follow the investigation from the perspective of the detective in charge of the case and conduct extensive interviews. That means that at the beginning of the documentary, Pan is shown as she would have first appeared: an ordinary 24-year-old girl who became the random victim of a horrific crime. As police began investigating Ms Pang, three candid photos of her were taken to show her friend a positive portrayal of her as “happy, cheerful, confident and very sincere''. It was published. Pan is seen smiling in all of the photos, and in two of them he is flashing a peace sign to the camera.

One of these photos is suspected to have been generated by AI This is because Pan's hands have multiple irregularities (hands are notoriously difficult for many AI image generators to get right). Additionally, the bookshelf behind her appears to contain several strange objects that cannot be identified. The second close-up photo of Pan is suspected to have been generated by AI due to irregularities in the gum margins that cannot be identified elsewhere. Irregularities are thoroughly cataloged.

As of this writing, the only response to these allegations from the documentary's producers is: jeremy grimaldi, he is credited as an executive producer. Grimaldi is also a crime reporter who covered the Pan trial and wrote a 2016 book about it. A Daughter's Fatal Deception: The Story of Jennifer Pan. In response to an inquiry from the Toronto Star, Mr. Grimaldi denied that Mr. Pang's image had been altered, although he acknowledged that something was added to the background of the image to hide the identity of the person who provided the original photo.. “Any filmmaker, in his movies he uses different tools such as Photoshop,” Grimaldi says. Additionally, “Jennifer's photo is a real photo of her. The foreground is exactly her. The background has been anonymized to protect the source.” It is unclear what method was used. It also doesn't explain the numerous indicators that suggest both the background and foreground of the photo in question were generated by AI.

Why is it a problem to use AI-generated images in documentaries?

To some, it may not seem like a big deal that these images could have been generated by AI. After all, they only appear on the screen for a few seconds. And while Jennifer Pan is appealing her own convictions, it's unclear how photos of her intended to show how normal she is on the surface will convince her judge or jury. It is unclear whether this will cause any upset. As many have argued, documentaries already create a distorted picture of reality through the editing process, which reflects the director's point of view. True-crime documentaries already use a lot of re-enactments combined with archival footage to heighten the sense of reality. Does the use of this new technology to create fake images really matter?

Perhaps the most important reason this is important is that even just a handful of AI images in a single documentary make it difficult to trust. Any The footage shown in the documentary in question. It also casts a shadow of doubt on all the information the documentary presents. I'm watching what jennifer did All the photos used look questionable because we know there is one or two purported AI images. This is not surprising. Because while most of us have a fairly accurate understanding of which footage from real crime documentaries was recreated in a studio, it's hard to tell the difference between an AI image and a real one, even when it's not labeled. Because it's still very difficult to do. thing. People online are saying that they can no longer trust Netflix's true crime documentaries.

In particular, these particular images may seem otherwise. that Harmful. There is already one image of her with Jennifer Pan smiling and no one will object. So what difference does it make to generate several other images to fill the frame? But even this seemingly neutral decision has hidden consequences. There is a difference between having just one photo of a happy person (it looks like a selfie) and having multiple photos. Like AI-generated images, there are differences between images taken in a club and images taken in a bedroom. Especially since Jennifer Pan allegedly conspired with her ex-boyfriend to commit the crime. Was he the one who took the photo?

There are concerns about the expansion of the use of AI.

These may seem like very small concerns, but But imagine these questions multiplied by a thousand times If the use of AI images like this becomes commonplace. The final thing to consider is: There is still much we don't understand about how image generation AI works. This technology is sometimes referred to as a “black box” because even its creators have little understanding of what's going on inside. We created hardware and software that can take billions of images and recognize enough patterns to reapproximate them on command. It can also be fine-tuned based on human feedback. We call it “artificial intelligence,” but it actually works exactly like the human mind. The image data on which the AI ​​was trained was often made publicly available on social media sites such as Friendster and MySpace. If you ask an AI to fill your bedroom wall with “typical photos”, will it generate a photo of you?

What we do know is that the temptation to use this software is strong. Imagine ignoring the irony and using his AI in a documentary about a murderer who used Photoshop to create a fake life. Using unlabeled AI in any form is socially discouraged. But that may not be enough to prevent these images from infiltrating our media and slowly eroding our ability to know what's true.

what jennifer did You can stream it on Netflix.

Watch on Netflix