USDAERS. Agriculture and Farm Income: Cash Income in the U.S. Agricultural Sector (2023). https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/farm-income-and-wealth-statistics.
USDA NASS. Crop Production Annual Summary, 2023 (2024). https://usda.library.cornell.edu/concern/publications/k3569432s.
USDA FAS. Global Agricultural Trade System (GATS) (2024). https://apps.fas.usda.gov/gats.
Godfrey, HCJ et al. Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people. science 327812–818 (2010).
Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J. & Befort, BL Global food demand and the intensification of sustainable agriculture. PNAS 10820260–20264 (2011).
Persson, UM The impact of biofuel demand on agricultural commodity prices: a systematic review. in Advances in bioenergy 465–482 (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2016).
Lauer, JG et al. 21st Century Scientific Grand Challenges for the Crop Science Society of America. crop science. 521003–1010 (2012).
Reddy, BVS, Reddy, S., Bidinger, P., Blümmel, M. & F. & Crop management factors influencing crop residue yield and quality. Field Crops Research Institute 8457–77 (2003).
Peng, B. et al. Towards a multiscale crop modeling framework for climate change adaptation assessment. nut. plant. 6338–348 (2020).
Andorff, C. et al. Technological advances in corn breeding: past, present, and future. theory. Applied Genet. 132817–849 (2019).
Boehm, JD Jr. et al. Genetic improvement of U.S. soybeans in maturity groups V, VI, and VII. crop science. 591838–1852 (2019).
Prasanna, BM World maize germplasm diversity: characterization and utilization. J. Biosci. 37843–855 (2012).
Xavier, A., Thapa, R., Muir, WM & Rainey, KM Population and quantitative genomic characterization of the USDA soybean germplasm collection. plant. Genet. resource. 16513–523 (2018).
Heineman, JA et al. Sustainability and innovation in staple crop production in the Midwest and the US. internal. J. Agric. last. 1271–88 (2014).
Egli, DB U.S. corn and soybean yield comparisons: past trends and future prospects. Agron. J. 10079–88 (2008).
Yost, MA et al. Long-term precision farming systems keep crops profitable. Plessis Agri. 201177–1198 (2019).
Gage, JL et al. Effects of artificial selection on phenotypic plasticity in maize. nut. common. 81348 (2017).
Kang, Y. & Özdoğan, M. Field-level crop yield mapping with Landsat using a hierarchical data assimilation approach. Remote sensory environment. 228144–163 (2019).
Lobell, DB & Burke, MB On the use of statistical models to predict crop yield responses to climate change. Agriculture. meteorol. 1501443–1452 (2010).
Khaki, S. & Wang, L. Crop yield prediction using deep neural networks. front. plant. Science. 10621 (2019).
Shahhosseini, M., Hu, G. & Archontoulis, SV Predicting maize yield using machine learning ensembles. front. plant. Science. 111120 (2020).
Molnar, C. Interpretable Machine Learning: A Guide to Making Black Box Models Explainable (2025).
Kasper, T.C. et al. Relationship between maize yield and topographic characteristics over 6 years. Plessis Agri. 487–101 (2003).
Jagadamma, S., Lal, R., Hoeft, RG, Nafziger, ED & Adee, EA Nitrogen fertilization and cropping systems influence the relationship between soil properties and crop yield in the central corn belt of the United States. soil. Tillage resistance 98120–129 (2008).
Ericsson, N. et al. AutoGluon-tabular: Robust and accurate automl for structured data. preprint in https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2003.06505 (2020).
Geurts, P., Ernst, D. & Wehenkel, L. Highly randomized trees. Mach. learn. 633–42 (2006).
Ke, G. et al. LightGBM: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. in Evolving neural information. process. system Vol. 30 (2017).
Dhillon, R., Takoo, G., Sharma, V., Nagle, M. Utilizing a machine learning framework to assess the impact of climate change on corn and soybean yields. Calculate. electronic. Agriculture. 221108982 (2024).
Chang, Y., Latham, J., Licht, M., Wang, L. Data-driven crop models for corn yield prediction. common. Biol. 61–9 (2023).
Cheney, NW et al. POLARIS soil properties: 30-meter probability map of soil properties in the continental United States. Water resources. resolution 552916–2938 (2019).
Lv, X et al. Heat stress and sexual reproduction in maize: uncovering the most important factors and greatest opportunities. J.Exp.Bot. 754219–4243 (2024).
Hoffman, L., Kemanian, AR, Forest, E. & A. & Machine learning reveals corn, sorghum, and soybean yield responses to growing season climate. environment. resolution let. 15094013 (2020).
Ray, DK, Gerber, JS, MacDonald, GK & West, PC Climate change explains one-third of global crop yield variation. nut. common. 65989 (2015).
Ashworth, AJ, Allen, FL, Saxton, AM Using partial least squares and regression to interpret the effects of temperature and precipitation on genetic variance expression in corn and soybean. Agriculture 132752 (2023).
Bhattarai, B., Leasor, Z. & Reis, Incorporating AFDB soil moisture data into a machine learning framework improves U.S. corn yield prediction accuracy Agriculture. Water management. 319109762 (2025).
Kravchenko, AN & Bullock, DG Correlation of corn and soybean grain yield with topography and soil properties. Agron. J. 9275–83 (2000).
Cairns, J. E. et al. Identification of drought, heat, and combined drought and heat tolerance donors in maize. crop science. 531335–1346 (2013).
Valliyodan, B. et al. Genetic diversity and genomic strategies to improve drought and waterlogging tolerance in soybean. J.Exp.Bot. 681835–1849 (2017).
Safi, AR, Karimi, P., Mul, M., Chukalla, A. & de Fraiture, C. Translating open-source remote sensing data into crop water productivity enhancement activities. Agriculture. Water management. 261107373 (2022).
Jin, Z. et al. National small-scale corn area and yield mapping using Google Earth engine. Remote sensory environment. 228115–128 (2019).
Celis, J., Xiao, X., Wagle, P., Adler, PR & White, P. A review of yield prediction techniques and their impact on sustainable agriculture. in Transforming to a circular food system: sustainable, smart and resilient citrus supply chains in the Mediterranean region 139–168 (Springer Nature, 2024).
Block, DS et al. Data-intensive farm management projects: Transforming agricultural research through precision on-farm experiments. Agron. J. 1112736–2746 (2019).
Vega, A., Córdaba, M., Castro-Franco, M. & Balzarini, M. A protocol for automating error removal from yield maps. Plessis Agri. 201030–1044 (2019).
Thornton, MM, Shrestha, R., Wei, Y., Thornton, PE & Kao, SC Daymet: Daily surface weather data on a 1 km grid for North America, version 4 R1 (ORNL Distributed Active Archive Center, 2022). https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/2129.
U.S. Geological Survey. 3D Elevation Program 1 meter resolution digital elevation model (2019). https://www.usgs.gov/the-national-map-data-delivery
Safanelli, JL et al. Terrain analysis using the Google Earth engine: A method adapted for high-performance global analysis. ISPRS International J.Geo-Inf. 9400 (2020).
Lehner, B., Verdin, K. & Jarvis, A. A new global hydrographic map derived from spaceflight elevation data. iostrans. morning. Geophysics. union. 8993–94 (2008).
Gorelick, N. et al. Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis available to everyone. Remote sensory environment. 20218–27 (2017).
Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. J. Mach. learn. resolution 122825–2830 (2011).
Lundberg, SM & Lee, SI A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. in Evolving neural information. process. system Vol. 30 (2017).
Mosca, E., Szigeti, F., Tragianni, S., Gallagher, D. & Groh, G. SHAP-based explanation methods: A review of NLP interpretability. in Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Computational Linguistics 4593–4603 (2022).
Ying, X. An overview of overfitting and its solutions. J. Phys. conference sir. 1168022022 (2019).
