Rothenberg, G. Catalysis. Concepts and Green Applications 127–187 (Wiley-VCH, 2008).
Tembhurne, S., Nandjou, F. & Haussener, S. A thermally synergistic photo-electrochemical hydrogen generator operating under concentrated solar irradiation. Nat. Energy 4, 399–407 (2019).
Google Scholar
Steinfeld, A. Solar thermochemical production of hydrogen — a review. Sol. Energy 78, 603–615 (2005).
Google Scholar
Fukushima, A. & Honda, K. Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature 238, 37–38 (1972).
Taibi, E., Blanco, H., Miranda, R. & Carmo, M. Green hydrogen cost reduction: scaling up electrolysers to meet the 1.5 °C climate goal. International Renewable Energy Agency https://www.irena.org/publications/2020/Dec/Green-hydrogen-cost-reduction (2020).
Burwell, R. L. in Catalysis. Science and Technology (eds Anderson, J. R. & Boudart, M.) 1–87 (Springer, 1982).
Moulijn, J. A. & van Santen, R. A. in Contemporary Catalysis. Science, Technology, and Applications (eds Kamer, P. C. J., Vogt, D. & Thybaut, J. W.) 3–28 (Royal Society of Chemistry, 2017).
Baerlocher, C., McCusker, L. B. & Olson, D. H. Atlas of Zeolite Framework Types 6th edn (Elsevier, 2007).
Margeta, K. & Farkaš, A. in Zeolites – New Challenges (eds Margeta, K. & Farkaš, A.) Ch. 1 (IntechOpen, 2020).
Green, M. L. et al. Fulfilling the promise of the materials genome initiative with high-throughput experimental methodologies. Appl. Phys. Rev. 4, 011105 (2017).
Dar, Y. L. High-throughput experimentation: a powerful enabling technology for the chemicals and materials industry. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 25, 34–47 (2004).
Google Scholar
Steinmann, S. N., Hermawan, A., Bin Jassar, M. & Seh, Z. W. Autonomous high-throughput computations in catalysis. Chem Catal. 2, 940–956 (2022).
Google Scholar
Nørskov, J. K., Bligaard, T., Rossmeisl, J. & Christensen, C. H. Towards the computational design of solid catalysts. Nat. Chem. 1, 37–46 (2009).
Google Scholar
Farrusseng, D. High-throughput heterogeneous catalysis. Surf. Sci. Rep. 63, 487–513 (2008).
Google Scholar
Allen, C. L., Leitch, D. C., Anson, M. S. & Zajac, M. A. The power and accessibility of high-throughput methods for catalysis research. Nat. Catal. 2, 2–4 (2019).
Géron, A. Hands-on Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn, Keras, and TensorFlow: Concepts, Tools, and Techniques to Build Intelligent Systems 2nd edn (O’Reilly, 2019).
Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).
Abadi, M. et al. TensorFlow: large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous distributed systems. OSDI’16: Proc. 12th USENIX conference on Operating Systems Design and Implementation 265–283 (OSDI, 2016).
Guido, S. & Müller, A. C. Introduction to Machine Learning with Python: a Guide for Data Scientists 1st edn (O’Reilly, 2016).
Royse, C., Wolter, S. & Greenberg, J. A. Emergence and distinction of classes in XRD data via machine learning. In Proc. SPIE 10999, Anomaly Detection and Imaging with X-Rays (ADIX) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2519500 (SPIE, 2019).
Kalinin, S. V. et al. Machine learning in scanning transmission electron microscopy. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 2, 11 (2022).
Google Scholar
Carbone, M. R., Topsakal, M., Lu, D. & Yoo, S. Machine-learning X-ray absorption spectra to quantitative accuracy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 156401 (2020).
Google Scholar
Modarres, M. H. Neural network for nanoscience scanning electron microscope image recognition. Sci. Rep. 7, 13282 (2017).
Google Scholar
Howarth, A., Ermanis, K. & Goodman, J. M. DP4-AI automated NMR data analysis: straight from spectrometer to structure. Chem. Sci. 11, 4351–4359 (2020).
Google Scholar
Jensen, Z. et al. A machine learning approach to zeolite synthesis enabled by automatic literature data extraction. ACS Cent. Sci. 5, 892–899 (2019).
Google Scholar
Huo, H. et al. Semi-supervised machine-learning classification of materials synthesis procedures. npj Comput. Mater. 5, 62 (2019).
Tang, B. et al. Machine learning-guided synthesis of advanced inorganic materials. Mater. Today 41, 72–80 (2020).
Google Scholar
Shimizu, R., Kobayashi, S., Watanabe, Y., Ando, Y. & Hitosugi, T. Autonomous materials synthesis by machine learning and robotics. APL Mater. 8, 111110 (2020).
Google Scholar
Shambhawi, Mohan, O., Choksi, T. S. & Lapkin, A. A. The design and optimization of heterogeneous catalysts using computational methods. Catal. Sci. Technol. 14, 515–532 (2024).
Google Scholar
Günay, M. E. & Yıldırım, R. Recent advances in knowledge discovery for heterogeneous catalysis using machine learning. Catal. Rev. 63, 120–164 (2021).
McCullough, K., Williams, T., Mingle, K., Jamshidi, P. & Lauterbach, J. High-throughput experimentation meets artificial intelligence: a new pathway to catalyst discovery. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 22, 11174–11196 (2020).
Google Scholar
Goldsmith, B. R., Esterhuizen, J., Liu, J., Bartel, C. J. & Sutton, C. Machine learning for heterogeneous catalyst design and discovery. AIChE J. 64, 2311–2323 (2018).
Google Scholar
Bahn, S. R. & Jacobsen, K. W. An object-oriented scripting interface to a legacy electronic structure code. Comput. Sci. Eng. 4, 56–66 (2002).
Google Scholar
Ong, S. P. et al. Python materials genomics (pymatgen): a robust, open-source python library for materials analysis. Comput. Mater. Sci. 68, 314–319 (2013).
Google Scholar
Jain, A. et al. FireWorks: a dynamic workflow system designed for high-throughput applications. Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp. 27, 5037–5059 (2015).
Mölder, F. et al. Sustainable data analysis with Snakemake. F1000Research 10, 33 (2021).
Google Scholar
Huber, S. P. et al. AiiDA 1.0, a scalable computational infrastructure for automated reproducible workflows and data provenance. Sci. Data 7, 300 (2020).
Google Scholar
Álvarez-Moreno, M. et al. Managing the computational chemistry big data problem: the ioChem-BD platform. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 55, 95–103 (2015).
Google Scholar
Scheidgen, M. et al. NOMAD: a distributed web-based platform for managing materials science research data. J. Open Source Softw. 8, 5388 (2023).
Esters, M. et al. aflow.org: a web ecosystem of databases, software and tools. Comput. Mater. Sci. 216, 111808 (2023).
Saal, J. E., Kirklin, S., Aykol, M., Meredig, B. & Wolverton, C. Materials design and discovery with high-throughput density functional theory: the open quantum materials database (OQMD). JOM 65, 1501–1509 (2013).
Google Scholar
Jain, A. et al. Commentary: the materials project: a materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater. 1, 011002 (2013).
Bo, C., Maseras, F. & López, N. The role of computational results databases in accelerating the discovery of catalysts. Nat. Catal. 1, 809–810 (2018).
Tran, R. et al. The open catalyst 2022 (OC22) dataset and challenges for oxide electrocatalysts. ACS Catal. 13, 3066–3084 (2023).
Google Scholar
Chanussot, L. et al. Open catalyst 2020 (OC20) dataset and community challenges. ACS Catal. 11, 6059–6072 (2021).
Google Scholar
Tezak, C. et al. BEAST DB: grand-canonical database of electrocatalyst properties. J. Phys. Chem. C 128, 20165–20176 (2024).
Google Scholar
Wilkinson, M. D. et al. The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 3, 160018 (2016).
Google Scholar
Alegre-Requena, J. V., Sowndarya, S., Alturaifi, T., Pérez-Soto, R. & Paton, R. AQME: automated quantum mechanical environments for researchers and educators. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 13, e1663 (2023).
Google Scholar
Senocrate, A. et al. Parallel experiments in electrochemical CO2 reduction enabled by standardized analytics. Nat. Catal. 7, 742–752 (2024).
Google Scholar
Jones, R. J. R. et al. Accelerated screening of gas diffusion electrodes for carbon dioxide reduction. Digit. Discov. 3, 1144–1149 (2024).
Google Scholar
Chammingkwan, P., Terano, M. & Taniike, T. High-throughput synthesis of support materials for olefin polymerization catalyst. ACS Comb. Sci. 19, 331–342 (2017).
Google Scholar
Nguyen, T. N. et al. High-throughput experimentation and catalyst informatics for oxidative coupling of methane. ACS Catal. 10, 921–932 (2020).
Google Scholar
Barad, H.-N. et al. Combinatorial growth of multinary nanostructured thin functional films. Mater. Today 50, 89–99 (2021).
Google Scholar
Batchelor, T. A. A. et al. Complex-solid-solution electrocatalyst discovery by computational prediction and high-throughput experimentation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 6932–6937 (2021).
Google Scholar
Strotkötter, V. et al. Discovery of high-entropy oxide electrocatalysts: from thin-film material libraries to particles. Chem. Mater. 34, 10291–10303 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zerdoumi, R. et al. Combinatorial screening of electronic and geometric effects in compositionally complex solid solutions toward a rational design of electrocatalysts. Adv. Energy Mater. 14, 2302177 (2024).
Google Scholar
Yang, K. et al. Development of a high-throughput methodology for screening coking resistance of modified thin-film catalysts. ACS Comb. Sci. 14, 372–377 (2012).
Google Scholar
Abed, J. et al. Open catalyst experiments 2024 (OCx24): bridging experiments and computational models. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.11783 (2024).
Reddington, E. et al. Combinatorial electrochemistry: a highly parallel, optical screening method for discovery of better electrocatalysts. Science 280, 1735–1737 (1998).
Google Scholar
Seley, D., Ayers, K. & Parkinson, B. A. Combinatorial search for improved metal oxide oxygen evolution electrocatalysts in acidic electrolytes. ACS Comb. Sci. 15, 82–89 (2013).
Google Scholar
Katz, J. E., Gingrich, T. R., Santori, E. A. & Lewis, N. S. Combinatorial synthesis and high-throughput photopotential and photocurrent screening of mixed-metal oxides for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Energy Environ. Sci. 2, 103–112 (2009).
Google Scholar
Stein, H. S. et al. Functional mapping reveals mechanistic clusters for OER catalysis across (Cu–Mn–Ta–Co–Sn–Fe)Ox composition and pH space. Mater. Horiz. 6, 1251–1258 (2019).
Google Scholar
Gregoire, J. M. et al. Combined catalysis and optical screening for high throughput discovery of solar fuels catalysts. J. Electrochem. Soc. 160, F337 (2013).
Google Scholar
Shinde, A. et al. High-throughput screening for acid-stable oxygen evolution electrocatalysts in the (Mn–Co–Ta–Sb)Ox composition space. Electrocatalysis 6, 229–236 (2015).
Google Scholar
Rohr, B. et al. Benchmarking the acceleration of materials discovery by sequential learning. Chem. Sci. 11, 2696–2706 (2020).
Google Scholar
Guevarra, D. et al. High throughput discovery of complex metal oxide electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction. Electrocatalysis 13, 1–10 (2022).
Google Scholar
Woodhouse, M. & Parkinson, B. A. Combinatorial discovery and optimization of a complex oxide with water photoelectrolysis activity. Chem. Mater. 20, 2495–2502 (2008).
Google Scholar
Kafizas, A. et al. Optimizing the activity of nanoneedle structured WO3 photoanodes for solar water splitting: direct synthesis via chemical vapor deposition. J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 5983–5993 (2017).
Google Scholar
Woodhouse, M., Herman, G. S. & Parkinson, B. A. Combinatorial approach to identification of catalysts for the photoelectrolysis of water. Chem. Mater. 17, 4318–4324 (2005).
Google Scholar
Zhou, L. et al. Quaternary oxide photoanode discovery improves the spectral response and photovoltage of copper vanadates. Matter 3, 1614–1630 (2020).
Greeley, J. Theoretical heterogeneous catalysis: scaling relationships and computational catalyst design. Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 7, 605–635 (2016).
Google Scholar
Medford, A. J. et al. From the Sabatier principle to a predictive theory of transition-metal heterogeneous catalysis. J. Catal. 328, 36–42 (2015).
Google Scholar
Thornton, A. W., Winkler, D. A., Liu, M. S., Haranczyk, M. & Kennedy, D. F. Towards computational design of zeolite catalysts for CO2 reduction. RSC Adv. 5, 44361–44370 (2015).
Google Scholar
Ma, X., Li, Z., Achenie, L. E. K. & Xin, H. Machine-learning-augmented chemisorption model for CO2 electroreduction catalyst screening. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 3528–3533 (2015).
Google Scholar
Chen, Y., Huang, Y., Cheng, T. & Goddard, W. A. Identifying active sites for CO2 reduction on dealloyed gold surfaces by combining machine learning with multiscale simulations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 11651–11657 (2019).
Google Scholar
Gu, G. H. et al. Practical deep-learning representation for fast heterogeneous catalyst screening. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11, 3185–3191 (2020).
Google Scholar
Chen, A., Zhang, X., Chen, L., Yao, S. & Zhou, Z. A machine learning model on simple features for CO2 reduction electrocatalysts. J. Phys. Chem. C 124, 22471–22478 (2020).
Google Scholar
Yohannes, A. G. et al. Combined high-throughput DFT and ML screening of transition metal nitrides for electrochemical CO2 reduction. ACS Catal. 13, 9007–9017 (2023).
Google Scholar
Yang, Z., Gao, W. & Jiang, Q. A machine learning scheme for the catalytic activity of alloys with intrinsic descriptors. J. Mater. Chem. A 8, 17507–17515 (2020).
Google Scholar
Mok, D. H. & Back, S. Atomic structure-free representation of active motifs for expedited catalyst discovery. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 61, 4514–4520 (2021).
Google Scholar
Noh, J., Back, S., Kim, J. & Jung, Y. Active learning with non-ab initio input features toward efficient CO2 reduction catalysts. Chem. Sci. 9, 5152–5159 (2018).
Google Scholar
Zhong, M. et al. Accelerated discovery of CO2 electrocatalysts using active machine learning. Nature 581, 178–183 (2020).
Google Scholar
Pankajakshan, P. et al. Machine learning and statistical analysis for materials science: stability and transferability of fingerprint descriptors and chemical insights. Chem. Mater. 29, 4190–4201 (2017).
Google Scholar
Tran, K. & Ulissi, Z. W. Active learning across intermetallics to guide discovery of electrocatalysts for CO2 reduction and H2 evolution. Nat. Catal. 1, 696–703 (2018).
Google Scholar
Friederich, P., Häse, F., Proppe, J. & Aspuru-Guzik, A. Machine-learned potentials for next-generation matter simulations. Nat. Mater. 20, 750–761 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kocer, E., Ko, T. W. & Behler, J. Neural network potentials: a concise overview of methods. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 73, 163–186 (2022).
Google Scholar
Artrith, N. & Kolpak, A. M. Understanding the composition and activity of electrocatalytic nanoalloys in aqueous solvents: a combination of DFT and accurate neural network potentials. Nano Lett. 14, 2670–2676 (2014).
Google Scholar
Ulissi, Z. W. et al. Machine-learning methods enable exhaustive searches for active bimetallic facets and reveal active site motifs for CO2 reduction. ACS Catal. 7, 6600–6608 (2017).
Google Scholar
Lunger, J. R. et al. Towards atom-level understanding of metal oxide catalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction with machine learning. npj Comput. Mater. 10, 80 (2024).
Google Scholar
Li, Z., Achenie, L. E. K. & Xin, H. An adaptive machine learning strategy for accelerating discovery of perovskite electrocatalysts. ACS Catal. 10, 4377–4384 (2020).
Google Scholar
Flores, R. A. et al. Active learning accelerated discovery of stable iridium oxide polymorphs for the oxygen evolution reaction. Chem. Mater. 32, 5854–5863 (2020).
Google Scholar
Andersen, M. & Reuter, K. Adsorption enthalpies for catalysis modeling through machine-learned descriptors. Acc. Chem. Res. 54, 2741–2749 (2021).
Google Scholar
Andersen, M., Levchenko, S. V., Scheffler, M. & Reuter, K. Beyond scaling relations for the description of catalytic materials. ACS Catal. 9, 2752–2759 (2019).
Google Scholar
Abed, J. et al. Pourbaix machine learning framework identifies acidic water oxidation catalysts exhibiting suppressed ruthenium dissolution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146, 15740–15750 (2024).
Google Scholar
Chen, L. et al. A universal machine learning framework for electrocatalyst innovation: a case study of discovering alloys for hydrogen evolution reaction. Adv. Func. Mater. 32, 2208418 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zheng, J. et al. High-throughput screening of hydrogen evolution reaction catalysts in MXene materials. J. Phys. Chem. C 124, 13695–13705 (2020).
Google Scholar
Abraham, B. M., Sinha, P., Halder, P. & Singh, J. K. Fusing a machine learning strategy with density functional theory to hasten the discovery of 2D MXene-based catalysts for hydrogen generation. J. Mater. Chem. A 11, 8091–8100 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ge, L. et al. Predicted optimal bifunctional electrocatalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction and the oxygen evolution reaction using chalcogenide heterostructures based on machine learning analysis of in silico quantum mechanics based high throughput screening. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11, 869–876 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wexler, R. B., Martirez, J. M. P. & Rappe, A. M. Chemical pressure-driven enhancement of the hydrogen evolving activity of Ni2P from nonmetal surface doping interpreted via machine learning. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 4678–4683 (2018).
Google Scholar
Parker, A. J., Opletal, G. & Barnard, A. S. Classification of platinum nanoparticle catalysts using machine learning. J. Appl. Phys. 128, 014301 (2020).
Google Scholar
Sun, B., Barron, H., Opletal, G. & Barnard, A. S. From process to properties: correlating synthesis conditions and structural disorder of platinum nanocatalysts. J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 28085–28093 (2018).
Google Scholar
Rück, M., Garlyyev, B., Mayr, F., Bandarenka, A. S. & Gagliardi, A. Oxygen reduction activities of strained platinum core–shell electrocatalysts predicted by machine learning. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11, 1773–1780 (2020).
Google Scholar
Chun, H. et al. First-principle-data-integrated machine-learning approach for high-throughput searching of ternary electrocatalyst toward oxygen reduction reaction. Chem Catal. 1, 855–869 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kang, J. et al. First-principles database driven computational neural network approach to the discovery of active ternary nanocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 24539–24544 (2018).
Google Scholar
Batchelor, T. A. A. et al. High-entropy alloys as a discovery platform for electrocatalysis. Joule 3, 834–845 (2019).
Google Scholar
Svane, K. L. & Rossmeisl, J. Theoretical optimization of compositions of high-entropy oxides for the oxygen evolution reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, e202201146 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wan, X. et al. Machine-learning-assisted discovery of highly efficient high-entropy alloy catalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction. Patterns 3, 100553 (2022).
Google Scholar
Xu, W., Diesen, E., He, T., Reuter, K. & Margraf, J. T. Discovering high entropy alloy electrocatalysts in vast composition spaces with multiobjective optimization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146, 7698–7707 (2024).
Google Scholar
Pedersen, J. K. et al. Bayesian optimization of high-entropy alloy compositions for electrocatalytic oxygen reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 24144–24152 (2021).
Google Scholar
Jinnouchi, R., Hirata, H. & Asahi, R. Extrapolating energetics on clusters and single-crystal surfaces to nanoparticles by machine-learning scheme. J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 26397–26405 (2017).
Google Scholar
Jinnouchi, R. & Asahi, R. Predicting catalytic activity of nanoparticles by a DFT-aided machine-learning algorithm. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8, 4279–4283 (2017).
Google Scholar
Hutchinson, M. L. et al. Overcoming data scarcity with transfer learning. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1711.05099 (2017).
Zafari, M., Kumar, D., Umer, M. & Kim, K. S. Machine learning-based high throughput screening for nitrogen fixation on boron-doped single atom catalysts. J. Mater. Chem. A 8, 5209–5216 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kim, M. et al. Artificial intelligence to accelerate the discovery of N2 electroreduction catalysts. Chem. Mater. 32, 709–720 (2020).
Google Scholar
Shakouri, K., Behler, J., Meyer, J. & Kroes, G.-J. Accurate neural network description of surface phonons in reactive gas–surface dynamics: N2 + Ru(0001). J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8, 2131–2136 (2017).
Google Scholar
Boes, J. R. & Kitchin, J. R. Neural network predictions of oxygen interactions on a dynamic Pd surface. Mol. Simul. 43, 346–354 (2017).
Google Scholar
Li, Z., Wang, S., Chin, W. S., Achenie, L. E. & Xin, H. High-throughput screening of bimetallic catalysts enabled by machine learning. J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 24131–24138 (2017).
Google Scholar
Back, S. et al. Convolutional neural network of atomic surface structures to predict binding energies for high-throughput screening of catalysts. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10, 4401–4408 (2019).
Google Scholar
Davran-Candan, T., Günay, M. E. & Yıldırım, R. Structure and activity relationship for CO and O2 adsorption over gold nanoparticles using density functional theory and artificial neural networks. J. Chem. Phys. 132, 174113 (2010).
Google Scholar
Tomacruz, J. G. T., Pilario, K. E. S., Remolona, M. F. M., Padama, A. A. B. & Ocon, J. D. A machine learning-accelerated density functional theory (ML-DFT) approach for predicting atomic adsorption energies on monometallic transition metal surfaces for electrocatalyst screening. Chem. Eng. Trans. 94, 733–738 (2022).
Panapitiya, G. et al. Machine-learning prediction of CO adsorption in thiolated, Ag-alloyed Au nanoclusters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 17508–17514 (2018).
Google Scholar
Pablo-García, S. et al. Fast evaluation of the adsorption energy of organic molecules on metals via graph neural networks. Nat. Comput. Sci. 3, 433–442 (2023).
Google Scholar
Dasgupta, A., Gao, Y., Broderick, S. R., Pitman, E. B. & Rajan, K. Machine learning-aided identification of single atom alloy catalysts. J. Phys. Chem. C 124, 14158–14166 (2020).
Google Scholar
Jung, H., Sauerland, L., Stocker, S., Reuter, K. & Margraf, J. T. Machine-learning driven global optimization of surface adsorbate geometries. npj Comput. Mater. 9, 114 (2023).
Ock, J., Badrinarayanan, S., Magar, R., Antony, A. & Farimani, A. B. Multimodal language and graph learning of adsorption configuration in catalysis. Nat. Mach. Intell. 6, 1501–1511 (2024).
Noh, J. & Chang, H. Data-driven prediction of configurational stability of molecule-adsorbed heterogeneous catalysts. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 63, 5981–5995 (2023).
Google Scholar
Toyao, T. et al. Toward effective utilization of methane: machine learning prediction of adsorption energies on metal alloys. J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 8315–8326 (2018).
Google Scholar
Singh, A. R., Rohr, B. A., Gauthier, J. A. & Nørskov, J. K. Predicting chemical reaction barriers with a machine learning model. Catal. Lett. 149, 2347–2354 (2019).
Google Scholar
Takahashi, K. & Miyazato, I. Rapid estimation of activation energy in heterogeneous catalytic reactions via machine learning. J. Comput. Chem. 39, 2405–2408 (2018).
Google Scholar
Bang, G. J., Gu, G. H., Noh, J. & Jung, Y. Activity trends of methane oxidation catalysts under emission conditions. ACS Catal. 12, 10255–10263 (2022).
Google Scholar
Li, X.-T., Chen, L., Wei, G.-F., Shang, C. & Liu, Z.-P. Sharp increase in catalytic selectivity in acetylene semihydrogenation on Pd achieved by a machine learning simulation-guided experiment. ACS Catal. 10, 9694–9705 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ulissi, Z. W., Singh, A. R., Tsai, C. & Nørskov, J. K. Automated discovery and construction of surface phase diagrams using machine learning. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7, 3931–3935 (2016).
Google Scholar
Ulissi, Z. W., Medford, A. J., Bligaard, T. & Nørskov, J. K. To address surface reaction network complexity using scaling relations machine learning and DFT calculations. Nat. Commun. 8, 14621 (2017).
Google Scholar
Gu, G. H. & Vlachos, D. G. Group additivity for thermochemical property estimation of lignin monomers on Pt(111). J. Phys. Chem. C 120, 19234–19241 (2016).
Google Scholar
Natarajan, S. K. & Behler, J. Neural network molecular dynamics simulations of solid–liquid interfaces: water at low-index copper surfaces. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 28704–28725 (2016).
Google Scholar
Artrith, N. & Kolpak, A. M. Grand canonical molecular dynamics simulations of Cu–Au nanoalloys in thermal equilibrium using reactive ANN potentials. Comput. Mater. Sci. 110, 20–28 (2015).
Google Scholar
Lansford, J. L. & Vlachos, D. G. Infrared spectroscopy data- and physics-driven machine learning for characterizing surface microstructure of complex materials. Nat. Commun. 11, 1513 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zhai, H. & Alexandrova, A. N. Ensemble-average representation of Pt clusters in conditions of catalysis accessed through GPU accelerated deep neural network fitting global optimization. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 12, 6213–6226 (2016).
Google Scholar
Fernandez, M., Barron, H. & Barnard, A. S. Artificial neural network analysis of the catalytic efficiency of platinum nanoparticles. RSC Adv. 7, 48962–48971 (2017).
Google Scholar
Su, Y.-Q. et al. Stability of heterogeneous single-atom catalysts: a scaling law mapping thermodynamics to kinetics. npj Comput. Mater. 6, 144 (2020).
Google Scholar
Saadun, A. J. et al. Performance of metal-catalyzed hydrodebromination of dibromomethane analyzed by descriptors derived from statistical learning. ACS Catal. 10, 6129–6143 (2020).
Google Scholar
Pablo-García, S. et al. Generalizing performance equations in heterogeneous catalysis from hybrid data and statistical learning. ACS Catal. 12, 1581–1594 (2022).
Corma, A., Serra, J., Serna, P. & Moliner, M. Integrating high-throughput characterization into combinatorial heterogeneous catalysis: unsupervised construction of quantitative structure/property relationship models. J. Catal. 232, 335–341 (2005).
Google Scholar
Corma, A. et al. Optimisation of olefin epoxidation catalysts with the application of high-throughput and genetic algorithms assisted by artificial neural networks (softcomputing techniques). J. Catal. 229, 513–524 (2005).
Google Scholar
Baumes, L. A., Serna, P. & Corma, A. Merging traditional and high-throughput approaches results in efficient design, synthesis and screening of catalysts for an industrial process. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 381, 197–208 (2010).
Google Scholar
Baumes, L. A., Serra, J. M., Serna, P. & Corma, A. Support vector machines for predictive modeling in heterogeneous catalysis: a comprehensive introduction and overfitting investigation based on two real applications. J. Comb. Chem. 8, 583–596 (2006).
Google Scholar
Serra, J. M., Chica, A. & Corma, A. Development of a low temperature light paraffin isomerization catalysts with improved resistance to water and sulphur by combinatorial methods. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 239, 35–42 (2003).
Google Scholar
Holeňa, M. & Baerns, M. Feedforward neural networks in catalysis. Catal. Today 81, 485–494 (2003).
Klanner, C. et al. The development of descriptors for solids: teaching “catalytic intuition” to a computer. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43, 5347–5349 (2004).
Google Scholar
Artrith, N., Lin, Z. & Chen, J. G. Predicting the activity and selectivity of bimetallic metal catalysts for ethanol reforming using machine learning. ACS Catal. 10, 9438–9444 (2020).
Google Scholar
Jayakumar, T. P., Suresh Babu, S. P., Nguyen, T. N., Le, S. D. & Taniike, T. Exploration of ethanol-to-butadiene catalysts by high-throughput experimentation and machine learning. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 666, 119427 (2023).
Google Scholar
Hattori, T. & Kito, S. Neural network as a tool for catalyst development. Catal. Today 23, 347–355 (1995).
Google Scholar
Madaan, N., Shiju, N. R. & Rothenberg, G. Predicting the performance of oxidation catalysts using descriptor models. Catal. Sci. Technol. 6, 125–133 (2016).
Arcotumapathy, V., Siahvashi, A. & Adesina, A. A. A new weighted optimal combination of ANNs for catalyst design and reactor operation: methane steam reforming studies. AIChE J. 58, 2412–2427 (2012).
Google Scholar
Baysal, M., Günay, M. E. & Yıldırım, R. Decision tree analysis of past publications on catalytic steam reforming to develop heuristics for high performance: a statistical review. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 42, 243–254 (2017).
Google Scholar
Şener, A. N., Günay, M. E., Leba, A. & Yıldırım, R. Statistical review of dry reforming of methane literature using decision tree and artificial neural network analysis. Catal. Today 299, 289–302 (2018).
Hossain, M. A., Ayodele, B. V., Cheng, C. K. & Khan, M. R. Artificial neural network modeling of hydrogen-rich syngas production from methane dry reforming over novel Ni/CaFe2O4 catalysts. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 41, 11119–11130 (2016).
Google Scholar
Han, X. et al. Using data mining technology in screening potential additives to Ni/Al2O3 catalysts for methanation. Catal. Sci. Technol. 7, 6042–6049 (2017).
Google Scholar
Zavyalova, U., Holena, M., Schlögl, R. & Baerns, M. Statistical analysis of past catalytic data on oxidative methane coupling for new insights into the composition of high-performance catalysts. ChemCatChem 3, 1935–1947 (2011).
Google Scholar
Takahashi, K., Takahashi, L., Nguyen, T. N., Thakur, A. & Taniike, T. Multidimensional classification of catalysts in oxidative coupling of methane through machine learning and high-throughput data. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11, 6819–6826 (2020).
Google Scholar
Taniike, T., Fujiwara, A., Nakanowatari, S., García-Escobar, F. & Takahashi, K. Automatic feature engineering for catalyst design using small data without prior knowledge of target catalysis. Commun. Chem. 7, 11 (2024).
Google Scholar
Palkovits, S. A primer about machine learning in catalysis – a tutorial with code. ChemCatChem 12, 3995–4008 (2020).
Google Scholar
Pirro, L. et al. Descriptor–property relationships in heterogeneous catalysis: exploiting synergies between statistics and fundamental kinetic modelling. Catal. Sci. Technol. 9, 3109–3125 (2019).
Google Scholar
Schmack, R. et al. A meta-analysis of catalytic literature data reveals property-performance correlations for the OCM reaction. Nat. Commun. 10, 441 (2019).
Google Scholar
Takahashi, K., Miyazato, I., Nishimura, S. & Ohyama, J. Unveiling hidden catalysts for the oxidative coupling of methane based on combining machine learning with literature data. ChemCatChem 10, 3223–3228 (2018).
Google Scholar
Kondratenko, E. V., Schlüter, M., Baerns, M., Linke, D. & Holena, M. Developing catalytic materials for the oxidative coupling of methane through statistical analysis of literature data. Catal. Sci. Technol. 5, 1668–1677 (2015).
Google Scholar
Odabaşı, Ç., Günay, M. E. & Yıldırım, R. Knowledge extraction for water gas shift reaction over noble metal catalysts from publications in the literature between 2002 and 2012. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 39, 5733–5746 (2014).
Günay, M. E. & Yildirim, R. Modeling preferential CO oxidation over promoted Au/Al2O3 catalysts using decision trees and modular neural networks. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 91, 874–882 (2013).
Günay, M. E. & Yildirim, R. Knowledge extraction from catalysis of the past: a case of selective CO oxidation over noble metal catalysts between 2000 and 2012. ChemCatChem 5, 1395–1406 (2013).
Günay, M. E. & Yildirim, R. Developing global reaction rate model for CO oxidation over Au catalysts from past data in literature using artificial neural networks. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 468, 395–402 (2013).
Günay, M. E. & Yildirim, R. Neural network analysis of selective CO oxidation over copper-based catalysts for knowledge extraction from published data in the literature. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 50, 12488–12500 (2011).
Smith, A., Keane, A., Dumesic, J. A., Huber, G. W. & Zavala, V. M. A machine learning framework for the analysis and prediction of catalytic activity from experimental data. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 263, 118257 (2020).
Google Scholar
Li, J., Pan, L., Suvarna, M. & Wang, X. Machine learning aided supercritical water gasification for H2-rich syngas production with process optimization and catalyst screening. Chem. Eng. J. 426, 131285 (2021).
Google Scholar
Baumes, L., Farrusseng, D., Lengliz, M. & Mirodatos, C. Using artificial neural networks to boost high-throughput discovery in heterogeneous catalysis. QSAR Comb. Sci. 23, 767–778 (2004).
Google Scholar
Günay, M. E., Türker, L. & Tapan, N. A. Decision tree analysis for efficient CO2 utilization in electrochemical systems. J. CO2 Util. 28, 83–95 (2018).
Sun, Y., Yang, G., Wen, C., Zhang, L. & Sun, Z. Artificial neural networks with response surface methodology for optimization of selective CO2 hydrogenation using K-promoted iron catalyst in a microchannel reactor. J. CO2 Util. 24, 10–21 (2018).
Google Scholar
Suvarna, M., Araújo, T. P. & Pérez-Ramírez, J. A generalized machine learning framework to predict the space-time yield of methanol from thermocatalytic CO2 hydrogenation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 315, 121530 (2022).
Google Scholar
Estahbanati, M. R. K., Feilizadeh, M. & Iliuta, M. C. Photocatalytic valorization of glycerol to hydrogen: optimization of operating parameters by artificial neural network. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 209, 483–492 (2017).
Google Scholar
Leonard, K. C. & Bard, A. J. Pattern recognition correlating materials properties of the elements to their kinetics for the hydrogen evolution reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 15885–15889 (2013).
Google Scholar
Can, E. & Yildirim, R. Data mining in photocatalytic water splitting over perovskites literature for higher hydrogen production. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 242, 267–283 (2019).
Google Scholar
Hickman, R. J., Häse, F., Roch, L. M. & Aspuru-Guzik, A. Gemini: dynamic bias correction for autonomous experimentation and molecular simulation. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2103.03391 (2021).
Jenewein, K. J. et al. Navigating the unknown with AI: multiobjective Bayesian optimization of non-noble acidic OER catalysts. J. Mater. Chem. A 12, 3072–3083 (2024).
Google Scholar
Serra, J. M. & Vert, V. B. Quaternary mixture designs applied to the development of multi-element oxygen electrocatalysts based on the Ln0.58Sr0.4Fe0.8Co0.2O3−δ system (Ln = La1−x−y−zPrxSmyBaz: predictive modeling approaches. Catal. Today 159, 47–54 (2011).
Google Scholar
Hong, W. T., Welsch, R. E. & Shao-Horn, Y. Descriptors of oxygen-evolution activity for oxides: a statistical evaluation. J. Phys. Chem. C 120, 78–86 (2016).
Google Scholar
Paszke, A. et al. PyTorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. In Proc. 33rd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (eds Wallach, A. M. et al.) 8026–8037 (Curran, 2019).
Bezanson, J., Edelman, A., Karpinski, S. & Shah, V. B. Julia: a fresh approach to numerical computing. SIAM Rev. 59, 65–98 (2017).
Chen, T. & Guestrin, C. XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. KDD ‘16: Proc. 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 785–794 (ACM, 2016).
Wu, Y., Walsh, A. & Ganose, A. M. Race to the bottom: Bayesian optimisation for chemical problems. Digit. Discov. 3, 1086–1100 (2024).
Sui, F., Guo, R., Zhang, Z., Gu, G. X. & Lin, L. Deep reinforcement learning for digital materials design. ACS Mater. Lett. 3, 1433–1439 (2021).
Google Scholar
Pizzuto, G. et al. Accelerating laboratory automation through robot skill learning for sample scraping. In 2024 IEEE 20th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE) 2103–2110 (IEEE, 2024).
Lan, T., Wang, H. & An, Q. Enabling high throughput deep reinforcement learning with first principles to investigate catalytic reaction mechanisms. Nat. Commun. 15, 6281 (2024).
Google Scholar
Lan, T. & An, Q. Discovering catalytic reaction networks using deep reinforcement learning from first-principles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 16804–16812 (2021).
Google Scholar
Mamun, O., Winther, K. T., Boes, J. R. & Bligaard, T. A Bayesian framework for adsorption energy prediction on bimetallic alloy catalysts. npj Comput. Mater. 6, 177 (2020).
Google Scholar
Farrusseng, D. et al. Design of discovery libraries for solids based on QSAR models. QSAR Comb. Sci. 24, 78–93 (2005).
Google Scholar
Farrusseng, D., Clerc, F., Mirodatos, C. & Rakotomalala, R. Virtual screening of materials using neuro-genetic approach: concepts and implementation. Comput. Mater. Sci. 45, 52–59 (2009).
Google Scholar
Tapan, N. A., Günay, M. E. & Yildirim, R. Constructing global models from past publications to improve design and operating conditions for direct alcohol fuel cells. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 105, 162–170 (2016).
Google Scholar
Alper Tapan, N., Yıldırım, R. & Günay, M. E. Analysis of past experimental data in literature to determine conditions for high performance in biodiesel production: determining conditions for high performance in biodiesel production. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefin. 10, 422–434 (2016).
Google Scholar
Suvarna, M., Preikschas, P. & Pérez-Ramírez, J. Identifying descriptors for promoted rhodium-based catalysts for higher alcohol synthesis via machine learning. ACS Catal. 12, 15373–15385 (2022).
Google Scholar
Bozal-Ginesta, C. et al. Performance prediction of high-entropy perovskites La0.8Sr0.2MnxCoyFezO3 with automated high-throughput characterization of combinatorial libraries and machine learning. Adv. Mater. 36, e2407372 (2024).
Google Scholar
Szymanski, N. J. et al. An autonomous laboratory for the accelerated synthesis of novel materials. Nature 624, 86–91 (2023).
Google Scholar
Cheetham, A. K. & Seshadri, R. Artificial intelligence driving materials discovery? Perspective on the article: scaling deep learning for materials discovery. Chem. Mater. 36, 3490–3495 (2024).
Google Scholar
Leeman, J. Challenges in high-throughput inorganic materials prediction and autonomous synthesis. PRX Energy 3, 011002 (2024).
Chen, X., Singh, M. M. & Geyer, P. Utilizing domain knowledge: robust machine learning for building energy performance prediction with small, inconsistent datasets. Knowl.-Based Syst. 294, 111774 (2024).
Murdock, R. J., Kauwe, S. K., Wang, A. Y.-T. & Sparks, T. D. Is domain knowledge necessary for machine learning materials properties? Integr. Mater. Manuf. Innov. 9, 221–227 (2020).
Wang, L., He, T. & Ouyang, B. The impact of domain knowledge on universal machine learning models. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-fmq8p (2024).
Veeramani, M., Doss, S. S., Narasimhan, S. & Bhatt, N. Semi-supervised machine learning approach for reaction stoichiometry and kinetic model identification using spectral data from flow reactors. React. Chem. Eng. 9, 355–368 (2024).
Google Scholar
Kunz, M. R. et al. Data driven reaction mechanism estimation via transient kinetics and machine learning. Chem. Eng. J. 420, 129610 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kollenz, P., Herten, D.-P. & Buckup, T. Unravelling the kinetic model of photochemical reactions via deep learning. J. Phys. Chem. B 124, 6358–6368 (2020).
Google Scholar
Esterhuizen, J. A., Goldsmith, B. R. & Linic, S. Interpretable machine learning for knowledge generation in heterogeneous catalysis. Nat. Catal. 5, 175–184 (2022).
Xin, H., Mou, T., Pillai, H. S., Wang, S.-H. & Huang, Y. Interpretable machine learning for catalytic materials design toward sustainability. Acc. Mater. Res. 5, 22–34 (2024).
Google Scholar
Fare, C., Fenner, P., Benatan, M., Varsi, A. & Pyzer-Knapp, E. O. A multi-fidelity machine learning approach to high throughput materials screening. npj Comput. Mater. 8, 257 (2022).
Goodlett, S. M., Turney, J. M. & Schaefer, H. F. III Comparison of multifidelity machine learning models for potential energy surfaces. J. Chem. Phys. 159, 044111 (2023).
Google Scholar
Liu, X., De Breuck, P.-P., Wang, L. & Rignanese, G.-M. A simple denoising approach to exploit multi-fidelity data for machine learning materials properties. npj Comput. Mater. 8, 233 (2022).
Artrith, N. et al. Best practices in machine learning for chemistry. Nat. Chem. 13, 505–508 (2021).
Google Scholar
