Erdiwansyah, F. et al. A critical review of the integration of renewable energy sources with various technologies. Protect. Control Mod. Power Syst. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41601-021-00181-3 (2021).
Google Scholar
Sharon, D. et al. Power quality factor for networks supplying unbalanced nonlinear loads. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 57(6), 1268–1274. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2007.915146 (2008).
Google Scholar
Kumar, R. S., Christopher Raj, I. S., Saravanan, S., Leninpugalhanthi, P. & Pandiyan, P. Impact of power quality issues in residential systems. Power Qual. Mod. Power Syst. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823346-7.00009-8 (2021).
Google Scholar
M. I. Muhamad, N. Mariun, and M. A. M. Radzi, “The effects of power quality to the industries,” in 2007 5th Student Conference on Research and Development, IEEE, 2007, pp. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/SCORED.2007.4451410.
H. W. Dugan, R. C., McGranaghan, M. F., Santoso, S., Beaty, Electrical Power Systems Quality, Third Edit. in McGraw-Hill professional engineering. McGraw Hill, London, 2012.
“IEEE Recommended Practice for Monitoring Electric Power Quality,” IEEE Std 1159–2019 (Revision IEEE Std 1159–2009), pp. 1–98, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2019.8796486.
“IEC: ‘61000–4–30: 2015’, Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)—Part 4–30: Testing and measurement techniques—Power quality measurement methods,” pp. 1–85, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/21844
Bollen, M. H. J. & Gu, I. Y. Signal Processing of Power Quality Disturbances (Wiley, London, 2006).
Google Scholar
Mishra, M. Power quality disturbance detection and classification using signal processing and soft computing techniques: A comprehensive review. Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst. 29(8), e12008. https://doi.org/10.1002/2050-7038.12008 (2019).
Google Scholar
Sipai, U. et al. Performance evaluation of discrete wavelet transform and machine learning based techniques for classifying power quality disturbances. IEEE Access 12, 95472–95486. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3426039 (2024).
Google Scholar
Priyadarshini, M. S., Bajaj, M., Prokop, L. & Berhanu, M. Perception of power quality disturbances using Fourier, Short-Time Fourier, continuous and discrete wavelet transforms. Sci. Rep. 14(1), 3443. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-53792-9 (2024).
Google Scholar
D. Moyal, N. Kothari, P. Vaghera, and D. Kumar, “Classifying power quality disturbance using time and multiresolution features through artificial neural network,” in 2021 International Conference on Intelligent Technologies (CONIT), IEEE, Jun. 2021, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/CONIT51480.2021.9498515.
Wang, Y., Li, Q., Zhou, F., Zhou, Y. & Mu, X. A new method with Hilbert transform and slip-SVD-Based noise-suppression algorithm for noisy power quality monitoring. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 68(4), 987–1001. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2018.2864446 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ravi, T. & Kumar, K. S. Detection and classification of power quality disturbances using stock well transform and improved grey wolf optimization-based kernel extreme learning machine. IEEE Access 11(May), 61710–61727. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3286308 (2023).
Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Jin, T., Mohamed, M. A. & Wang, Q. A novel three-step classification approach based on time-dependent spectral features for complex power quality disturbances. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 70, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2021.3050187 (2021).
Google Scholar
Sahani, M. & Dash, P. K. FPGA-based semisupervised multifusion RDCNN of process robust VMD data with online kernel RVFLN for power quality events recognition. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst. 33(2), 515–527. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2020.3027984 (2022).
Google Scholar
Erişti, H., Yıldırım, Ö., Erişti, B. & Demir, Y. Optimal feature selection for classification of the power quality events using wavelet transform and least squares support vector machines. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 49(1), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.12.018 (2013).
Google Scholar
A. Sundar and T. Instruments, “A report on Optimal feature selection for classification of the power quality events using wavelet transform and least squares support…,” no. July, 2015, https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4907.7604.
Khokhar, S., Zin, A. A., Memon, A. P. & Mokhtar, A. S. A new optimal feature selection algorithm for classification of power quality disturbances using discrete wavelet transform and probabilistic neural network. Measurement 1(95), 246–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.10.013 (2017).
Google Scholar
Qiu, W., Tang, Q., Liu, J. & Yao, W. An automatic identification framework for complex power quality disturbances based on multifusion convolutional neural network. IEEE Trans. Ind. Informatics 16(5), 3233–3241. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2019.2920689 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zhong, T. et al. Power quality disturbance recognition based on multiresolution S-transform and decision tree. IEEE Access 7, 88380–88392. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2924918 (2019).
Google Scholar
Reddy, M. V. & Sodhi, R. A modified S-transform and random forests-based power quality assessment framework. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Measure. 67(1), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2017.2761239 (2017).
Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Abreu, A. D., Delgado-Prieto, M., Osornio-Rios, R. A., Saucedo-Dorantes, J. J. & Romero-Troncoso, R. D. J. A novel deep learning-based diagnosis method applied to power quality disturbances. Energies 14(10), 2839. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14102839 (2021).
Google Scholar
Chiam, D. H., Lim, K. H. & Law, K. H. LSTM power quality disturbance classification with wavelets and attention mechanism. Electr. Eng. 105(1), 259–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-022-01667-5 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ekici, S., Ucar, F., Dandil, B. & Arghandeh, R. Power quality event classification using optimized Bayesian convolutional neural networks. Electr. Eng. 103(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-020-01066-8 (2021).
Google Scholar
Sindi, H., Nour, M., Rawa, M., Öztürk, Ş & Polat, K. A novel hybrid deep learning approach including combination of 1D power signals and 2D signal images for power quality disturbance classification. Exp. Syst. Appl. 15(174), 114785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114785 (2021).
Google Scholar
Yiğit, E., Özkaya, U., Öztürk, Ş, Singh, D. & Gritli, H. Automatic detection of power quality disturbance using convolutional neural network structure with gated recurrent unit. Mob. Inf. Syst. 2021, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7917500 (2021).
Google Scholar
Cui, C., Duan, Y., Hu, H., Wang, L. & Liu, Q. Detection and classification of multiple power quality disturbances using Stockwell transform and deep learning. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 71, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2022.3214284 (2022).
Google Scholar
Rodrigues, W. L. Jr., Borges, F. A., de Carvalho Filho, A. O. & Rabelo, R. D. A deep learning approach for the detection and classification of power quality disturbances with windowed signals. SN Comput. Sci. 2(2), 64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-020-00435-1 (2021).
Google Scholar
Yuan, D., Liu, Y., Lan, M., Jin, T. & Mohamed, M. A. A novel recognition method for complex power quality disturbances based on visualization trajectory circle and machine vision. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 71, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2022.3204985 (2022).
Google Scholar
U. Sipai, R. Jadeja, N. Kothari, T. Trivedi, and K. K. Ram, “Time–frequency convolution neural network for classification of single and combined power quality disturbances,” in Proc. of Fifth International Conference on Computing, Communications, and Cyber-Security, S. Tanwar, P. K. Singh, M. Ganzha, and G. Epiphaniou, Eds., Springer Nature, Singapore, 2024, pp. 793–807. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-2550-2_57.
Mahela, O. P., Shaik, A. G., Khan, B., Mahla, R. & Alhelou, H. H. Recognition of complex power quality disturbances using S-transform based ruled decision tree. IEEE Access 8, 173530–173547. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3025190 (2020).
Google Scholar
Tong, Z., Zhong, J., Li, J., Wu, J. & Li, Z. A power quality disturbances classification method based on multi-modal parallel feature extraction. Sci. Rep. 13(1), 17655. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44399-7 (2023).
Google Scholar
Thirumala, K., Kanjolia, A., Jain, T. & Umarikar, A. C. Empirical wavelet transform and dual feed-forward neural network for classification of power quality disturbances. Int. J. Power Energy Convers. 11(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPEC.2020.104805 (2020).
Google Scholar
Khetarpal, P. et al. Power quality disturbances detection and classification based on deep convolution auto-encoder networks. IEEE Access 11(May), 46026–46038. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3274732 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ullah, N., Siddique, M. F., Ullah, S., Ahmad, Z. & Kim, J.-M. Pipeline leak detection system for a smart city: leveraging acoustic emission sensing and sequential deep learning. Smart Cities 7(4), 2318–2338. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities7040091 (2024).
Google Scholar
Siddique, M. F. et al. Advanced bearing-fault diagnosis and classification using mel-scalograms and FOX-optimized ANN. Sensors 24(22), 7303. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24227303 (2024).
Google Scholar
Mathivanan, S. K. et al. Employing deep learning and transfer learning for accurate brain tumor detection. Sci. Rep. 14(1), 7232. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-57970-7 (2024).
Google Scholar
El Houby, E. M. F. COVID-19 detection from chest X-ray images using transfer learning. Sci. Rep. 14(1), 11639. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-61693-0 (2024).
Google Scholar
T. Singh, S. Mishra, R. Kalra, Satakshi, M. Kumar, and T. Kim, “COVID-19 severity detection using chest X-ray segmentation and deep learning,” Sci. Rep., 2024, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-70801-z.
Babu Vimala B, Srinivasan S, Mathivanan SK, Mahalakshmi, Jayagopal P, Dalu GT. Detection and classification of brain tumor using hybrid deep learning models. Sci. Rep. 2023;13(1):23029. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-50505-6.
Khaliki, M. Z. & Başarslan, M. S. Brain tumor detection from images and comparison with transfer learning methods and 3-layer CNN. Sci. Rep. 14(1), 2664. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52823-9 (2024).
Google Scholar
Siddique, M. F., Ahmad, Z., Ullah, N., Ullah, S. & Kim, J. M. Pipeline Leak detection: a comprehensive deep learning model using CWT image analysis and an optimized DBN-GA-LSSVM framework. Sensors 24(12), 4009. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24124009 (2024).
Google Scholar
Sindi, H., Nour, M., Rawa, M., Öztürk, Ş & Polat, K. An adaptive deep learning framework to classify unknown composite power quality event using known single power quality events. Exp. Syst. Appl. 15(178), 115023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115023 (2021).
Google Scholar
R. S. Salles, G. C. S. Almeida, L. R. M. Silva, C. A. Duque, and P. F. Ribeiro, “Visualization of Quality PerformanceParameters Using Wavelet Scalograms Images for Power Systems,” in Anais do Congresso Brasileiro de Automática 2020, sbabra, 2020. https://doi.org/10.48011/asba.v2i1.1497.
Mallat, S. A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing: The Sparse Way (Elsevier, London, 2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374370-1.X0001-8.
Google Scholar
Siddique, M. F., Ahmad, Z., Ullah, N. & Kim, J. A hybrid deep learning approach: integrating short-time Fourier transform and continuous wavelet transform for improved pipeline leak detection. Sensors 23(19), 8079. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23198079 (2023).
Google Scholar
Coppola, L., Liu, Q., Buso, S., Boroyevich, D. & Bell, A. Wavelet transform as an alternative to the short-time Fourier transform for the study of conducted noise in power electronics. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 55(2), 880–887. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2007.911203 (2008).
Google Scholar
Umar, M., Siddique, M. F., Ullah, N. & Kim, J.-M. Milling machine fault diagnosis using acoustic emission and hybrid deep learning with feature optimization. Appl. Sci. 14(22), 10404. https://doi.org/10.3390/app142210404 (2024).
Google Scholar
Todeschini, G., Kheta, K. & Giannetti, C. An image-based deep transfer learning approach to classify power quality disturbances. Electric Power Syst. Res. 1(213), 108795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2022.108795 (2022).
Google Scholar
C. Szegedy et al., “Going deeper with convolutions,” in 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), IEEE, 2015, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298594.
F. N. Iandola, S. Han, M. W. Moskewicz, K. Ashraf, W. J. Dally, and K. Keutzer, “SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model size.” pp. 1–13, 2016. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1602.07360.
K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, “Deep residual learning for image recognition,” in 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), IEEE, 2016, pp. 770–778. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.90.
X. Zhang, X. Zhou, M. Lin, and J. Sun, “ShuffleNet: An extremely efficient convolutional neural network for mobile devices,” in 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, IEEE, 2018, pp. 6848–6856. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2018.00716.
Liu, M., Chen, Y., Zhang, Z. & Deng, S. Classification of power quality disturbance using segmented and modified S-transform and DCNN-MSVM hybrid model. IEEE Access. 2(11), 890–899. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3233767 (2023).
Google Scholar
U. Sipai, R. Jadeja, N. Kothari, and T. Trivedi, “Power Quality Disturbances Dataset of Single and Combined Disturbances,” Harvard Dataverse. Accessed: Feb. 23, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/PC44W4
U. Sipai, R. Jadeja, N. Kothari, and T. Trivedi, “Synthetic Power Quality Disturbance Dataset of Single and Combined Disturbances Generated in Accordance with IEEE 1159 Specifications,” IEEE Dataport. Accessed Feb. 23, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ieee-dataport.org/documents/synthetic-power-quality-disturbances-dataset-single-and-combined-disturbances-generated
Lilly, J. M. & Olhede, S. C. Generalized Morse wavelets as a superfamily of analytic wavelets. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 60(11), 6036–6041. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2012.2210890 (2012).
Google Scholar
M. Grandini, E. Bagli, and G. Visani, “Metrics for Multi-Class Classification: an Overview.” pp. 1–17, 2020. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2008.05756.
J. M. S.-F. Olivia Florencias-Oliveros, M. J. Espinosa-Gavira, Juan-José González de la Rosa, A. Agüera-Pérez, José Carlos Palomares-Salas, “Real-Life Power Quality Sags,” IEEE Dataport. Accessed: 24, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ieee-dataport.org/documents/real-life-power-quality-sags
J. M. S.-F. Olivia Florencias-Oliveros, M. J. Espinosa-Gavira, J. J. González-de-la-Rosa, A. Agüera-Pérez, J. C. P. Salas, “Real-Life Power Quality Transients,” IEEE Dataport. Accessed: Dec. 24, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ieee-dataport.org/documents/real-life-power-quality-transients
C. Szegedy, V. Vanhoucke, S. Ioffe, J. Shlens, and Z. Wojna, “Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision,” in 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), IEEE, Jun. 2016, pp. 2818–2826. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.308.
