Haywood, J. & Boucher, O. Estimates of the direct and indirect radiative forcing due to tropospheric aerosols: a review. Rev. Geophys. 38, 513–543 (2000).
Google Scholar
Lohmann, U. & Feichter, J. Global indirect aerosol effects: a review. Atmos. Phys. Chem. 5, 715–737 (2005).
Google Scholar
Boucher, O. & Lohmann, U. The sulfate–CCN–cloud albedo effect. Tellus B 47, 281–300 (1995).
Google Scholar
Spracklen, D. V. et al. The contribution of boundary layer nucleation events to total particle concentrations on regional and global scales. Atmos. Phys. Chem. 6, 5631–5648 (2006).
Google Scholar
Kulmala, M. et al. Direct observations of atmospheric aerosol nucleation. Science 339, 943–946 (2013).
Google Scholar
Sipilä, M. et al. The role of sulfuric acid in atmospheric nucleation. Science 327, 1243–1246 (2010).
Google Scholar
Kirkby, J. et al. Role of sulphuric acid, ammonia and galactic cosmic rays in atmospheric aerosol nucleation. Nature 476, 429–433 (2011).
Google Scholar
Almeida, J. et al. Molecular understanding of sulphuric acid–amine particle nucleation in the atmosphere. Nature 502, 359–363 (2013).
Google Scholar
Merikanto, J., Spracklen, D. V., Mann, G. W., Pickering, S. J. & Carslaw, K. S. Impact of nucleation on global CCN. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 9, 8601–8616 (2009).
Google Scholar
IPCC Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).
Tröstl, J. et al. The role of low-volatility organic compounds in initial particle growth in the atmosphere. Nature 533, 527–531 (2016).
Google Scholar
Alfaouri, D. et al. A study on the fragmentation of sulfuric acid and dimethylamine clusters inside an atmospheric pressure interface time-of-flight mass spectrometer. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 15, 11–19 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kurtén, T. et al. The effect of H2SO4–amine clustering on chemical ionization mass spectrometry (CIMS) measurements of gas-phase sulfuric acid. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 11, 3007–3019 (2011).
Olenius, T. et al. Comparing simulated and experimental molecular cluster distributions. Faraday Discuss. 165, 75–89 (2013).
Google Scholar
Zapadinsky, E., Passananti, M., Myllys, N., Kurtén, T. & Vehkamäki, H. Modeling on FRagmentation of Clusters inside A Mass Spectrometer. J. Phys. Chem. A 123, 611–624 (2019).
Google Scholar
Passananti, M. et al. How well can we predict cluster fragmentation inside a mass spectrometer? Chem. Commun. 55, 5946–5949 (2019).
Google Scholar
Merikanto, J., Zapadinsky, E., Lauri, A. & Vehkamäki, H. Origin of the failure of classical nucleation theory: incorrect description of the smallest clusters. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 145702 (2007).
Google Scholar
McGrath, M. J. et al. Atmospheric cluster dynamics code: a flexible method for solution of the birth–death equations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 2345–2355 (2012).
Google Scholar
Olenius, T., Kupiainen-Määttä, O., Ortega, I. K., Kurtén, T. & Vehkamäki, H. Free energy barrier in the growth of sulfuric acid–ammonia and sulfuric acid–dimethylamine clusters. J. Chem. Phys. 139, 084312 (2013).
Google Scholar
Karl, M. et al. Description and evaluation of the community aerosol dynamics model MAFOR v2.0. Geosci. Model Dev. 15, 3969–4026 (2022).
Google Scholar
Clusius, P. et al. Atmospherically relevant chemistry and aerosol box model—ARCA box (version 1.2). Geosci. Model Dev. 15, 7257–7286 (2022).
Google Scholar
Roldin, P. et al. Development and evaluation of the aerosol dynamics and gas phase chemistry model ADCHEM. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 5867–5896 (2011).
Google Scholar
Roldin, P. et al. The role of highly oxygenated organic molecules in the boreal aerosol–cloud–climate system. Nat. Commun. 10, 4370 (2019).
Google Scholar
Yu, F., Nadykto, A. B., Luo, G. & Herb, J. H2SO4–H2O binary and H2SO4–H2O–NH3 ternary homogeneous and ion-mediated nucleation: lookup tables version 1.0 for 3-D modeling application. Geosci. Model Dev. 13, 2663–2670 (2020).
Google Scholar
Elm, J. Towards a holistic understanding of the formation and growth of atmospheric molecular clusters: a quantum machine learning perspective. J. Phys. Chem. A 125, 895–902 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kubečka, J., Christensen, A. S., Rasmussen, F. R. & Elm, J. Quantum machine learning approach for studying atmospheric cluster formation. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 9, 239–244 (2022).
Google Scholar
Elm, J. Clusteromics I: principles, protocols and applications to sulfuric acid–base cluster formation. ACS Omega 6, 7804–7814 (2021).
Google Scholar
Elm, J. Clusteromics II: methanesulfonic acid–base cluster formation. ACS Omega 7, 17035–17044 (2021).
Google Scholar
Elm, J. Clusteromics III: acid synergy in sulfuric acid–methanesulfonic acid–base cluster formation. ACS Omega 6, 15206–15214 (2022).
Google Scholar
Knattrup, Y. & Elm, J. Clusteromics IV: the role of nitric acid in atmospheric cluster formation. ACS Omega 7, 31551–31560 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ayoubi, D., Knattrup, Y. & Elm, J. Clusteromics V: organic enhanced atmospheric cluster formation. ACS Omega 8, 9621–9629 (2023).
Elm, J. An atmospheric cluster database consisting of sulfuric acid, bases, organics, and water. ACS Omega 4, 10965–10974 (2019).
Google Scholar
Kubečka, J. Jammy Key for Configurational Sampling. JKCS (accessed 30March 2023); https://jkcs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html
Kubečka, J., Besel, V., Kurtén, T., Myllys, N. & Vehkamäki, H. Configurational sampling of noncovalent (atmospheric) molecular clusters: sulfuric acid and guanidine. J. Phys. Chem. A 123, 6022–6033 (2019).
Google Scholar
Dral, P. O. in Chemical Physics and Quantum Chemistry Advances in Quantum Chemistry Vol. 81 (eds Ruud, K. & Brändas, E. J.) 291–324 (Academic Press, 2020).
Noé, F., Tkatchenko, A., Müller, K.-R. & Clementi, C. Machine learning for molecular simulation. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 71, 361–390 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kulichenko, M. et al. The rise of neural networks for materials and chemical dynamics. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 12, 6227–6243 (2021).
Google Scholar
Bender, A. et al. Evaluation guidelines for machine learning tools in the chemical sciences. Nat. Rev. Chem. 6, 428–442 (2022).
Google Scholar
Browning, N. J., Faber, F. A. & Anatole von Lilienfeld, O. GPU-accelerated approximate kernel method for quantum machine learning. J. Chem. Phys. 157, 214801 (2022).
Google Scholar
Pederson, R. et al. Large scale quantum chemistry with tensor processing units. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 19, 25–32 (2023).
Google Scholar
Lumiaro, E., Todorović, M., Kurten, T., Vehkamäki, H. & Rinke, P. Predicting gas–particle partitioning coefficients of atmospheric molecules with machine learning. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 21, 13227–13246 (2021).
Google Scholar
Hyttinen, N., Pihlajamäki, A. & Häkkinen, H. Machine learning for predicting chemical potentials of multifunctional organic compounds in atmospherically relevant solutions. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 13, 9928–9933 (2022).
Google Scholar
Jiang, S. et al. Towards fully ab initio simulation of atmospheric aerosol nucleation. Nat. Commun. 13, 6067 (2022).
Google Scholar
Rupp, M., Tkatchenko, A., Müller, K.-R. & von Lilienfeld, O. A. Fast and accurate modeling of molecular atomization energies with machine learning. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 058301 (2012).
Google Scholar
Hansen, K. et al. Machine learning predictions of molecular properties: accurate many-body potentials and nonlocality in chemical space. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 2326–2331 (2015).
Google Scholar
Bartók, A. P., Kondor, R. & Csányi, G. On representing chemical environments. Phys. Rev. B 87, 184115 (2013).
Google Scholar
Huo, H. & Rupp, M. Unified representation of molecules and crystals for machine learning. Mach. Learn.: Sci. Technol. 3, 045017 (2022).
Christensen, A. S., Bratholm, L. A., Faber, F. A. & Anatole von Lilienfeld, O. FCHL revisited: faster and more accurate quantum machine learning. J. Chem. Phys. 152, 044107 (2020).
Google Scholar
Faber, F. A., Christensen, A. S., Huang, B. & von Lilienfeld, O. A. Alchemical and structural distribution based representation for universal quantum machine learning. J. Chem. Phys. 148, 241717 (2018).
Google Scholar
Christensen, A. S. et al. QML: a Python toolkit for quantum machine learning. GitHub https://github.com/qmlcode/qml (2017).
Stewart, J. Optimization of parameters for semiempirical methods V: modification of NDDO approximations and application to 70 elements. J. Mol. Model. 13, 1173–1213 (2007).
Google Scholar
Karaboga, D. & Basturk, B. On the performance of artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm. Appl. Soft Comput. 8, 687–697 (2008).
Google Scholar
Zhang, J. & Dolg, M. ABCluster: the artificial bee colony algorithm for cluster global optimization. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 24173–24181 (2015).
Google Scholar
Zhang, J. & Dolg, M. Global optimization of clusters of rigid molecules using the artificial bee colony algorithm. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 3003–3010 (2016).
Google Scholar
Dieterich, J. M. & Hartke, B. OGOLEM: global cluster structure optimisation for arbitrary mixtures of flexible molecules. a multiscaling, object-oriented approach. Mol. Phys. 108, 279–291 (2010).
Google Scholar
Hartke, B. Global optimization. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 1, 879–887 (2011).
Google Scholar
Wales, D. J. & Doye, J. P. K. Global optimization by basin-hopping and the lowest energy structures of Lennard-Jones clusters containing up to 110 atoms. J. Phys. Chem. A 101, 5111–5116 (1997).
Google Scholar
Stewart, J. Optimization of parameters for semiempirical methods VI: more modifications to the NDDO approximations and re-optimization of parameters. J. Mol. Model. 19, 1–32 (2013).
Google Scholar
Grimme, S., Bannwarth, C. & Shushkov, P. A robust and accurate tight-binding quantum chemical method for structures, vibrational frequencies, and noncovalent interactions of large molecular systems parametrized for all spd-block elements (Z = 1–86). J. Chem. Theory Comput. 13, 1989–2009 (2017).
Google Scholar
Bannwarth, C., Ehlert, S. & Grimme, S. GFN2-xTB—an accurate and broadly parametrized self-consistent tight-binding quantum chemical method with multipole electrostatics and density-dependent dispersion contributions. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15, 1652–1671 (2019).
Google Scholar
Riplinger, C. & Neese, F. An efficient and near linear scaling pair natural orbital based local coupled cluster method. J. Chem. Phys. 138, 034106 (2013).
Google Scholar
Riplinger, C., Sandhoefer, B., Hansen, A. & Neese, F. Natural triple excitations in local coupled cluster calculations with pair natural orbitals. J. Chem. Phys. 139, 134101 (2013).
Google Scholar
Grimme, S., Brandenburg, J. G., Bannwarth, C. & Hansen, A. Consistent structures and interactions by density functional theory with small atomic orbital basis sets. J. Chem. Phys. 143, 054107 (2015).
Google Scholar
Brandenburg, J. G., Bannwarth, C., Hansen, A. & Grimme, S. B97-3c: a revised low-cost variant of the B97-D density functional method. J. Chem. Phys. 148, 064104 (2018).
Google Scholar
Grimme, S., Hansen, A., Ehlert, S. & Mewes, J. r2SCAN-3c: a ‘Swiss army knife’ composite electronic-structure method. J. Chem. Phys. 154, 064103 (2021).
Google Scholar
Temelso, B. et al. Effect of mixing ammonia and alkylamines on sulfate aerosol formation. J. Phys. Chem. A 122, 1612–1622 (2018).
Google Scholar
Odbadrakh, T. T., Gale, A. G., Ball, B. T., Temelso, B. & Shields, G. C. Computation of atmospheric concentrations of molecular clusters from ab initio thermochemistry. J. Vis. Exp. 158, e60964 (2020).
Bready, C. J., Vanovac, S., Odbadrakh, T. T. & Shields, G. C. Amino acids compete with ammonia in sulfuric acid-based atmospheric aerosol prenucleation: the case of glycine and serine. J. Phys. Chem. A 126, 5195–5206 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kurfman, L. A., Odbadrakh, T. T. & Shields, G. C. Calculating reliable Gibbs free energies for formation of gas-phase clusters that are critical for atmospheric chemistry: (H2SO4)3. J. Phys. Chem. A 125, 3169–3176 (2021).
Google Scholar
Harold, S. E. et al. Hydrogen-bond topology is more important than acid/base strength in atmospheric prenucleation clusters. J. Phys. Chem. A 126, 1718–1728 (2022).
Google Scholar
Xu, W. & Zhang, R. A theoretical study of hydrated molecular clusters of amines and dicarboxylic acids. J. Chem. Phys. 139, 064312 (2013).
Google Scholar
Peng, X.-Q., Liu, Y.-R., Huang, T., Jiang, S. & Huang, W. Interaction of gas phase oxalic acid with ammonia and its atmospheric implications. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 9552–9563 (2015).
Google Scholar
Wang, Z.-Q. et al. The nucleation mechanism of succinic acid involved sulfuric acid–dimethylamine in new particle formation. Atmos. Environ. 263, 118683 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wang, Z.-Q. et al. Multicomponent nucleation of malonic acid involved in the sulfuric acid–dimethylamine system and its atmospheric implications. Atmos. Environ. 267, 118558 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ramakrishnan, R., Dral, P. O., Rupp, M. & von Lilienfeld, O. A. Big data meets quantum chemistry approximations: the Δ-machine learning approach. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11, 2087–2096 (2015).
Google Scholar
Ruddigkeit, L., van Deursen, R., Blum, L. C. & Reymond, J.-L. Enumeration of 166 billion organic small molecules in the chemical universe database GDB-17. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 52, 2864–2875 (2012).
Google Scholar
Reymond, J.-L. The Chemical Space Project. Acc. Chem. Res. 48, 722–730 (2015).
Google Scholar
Ramakrishnan, R., Dral, P. O., Rupp, M. & von Lilienfeld, O. A. Quantum chemistry structures and properties of 134 kilo molecules. Sci. Data 1, 140022 (2014).
Google Scholar
Smith, J. S., Isayev, O. & Roitberg, A. E. ANI-1: an extensible neural network potential with DFT accuracy at force field computational cost. Chem. Sci. 8, 3192–3203 (2017).
Google Scholar
Smith, J. S., Isayev, O. & Roitberg, A. E. ANI-1, a data set of 20 million calculated off-equilibrium conformations for organic molecules. Sci. Data 4, 170193 (2017).
Google Scholar
Smith, J. S. et al. The ANI-1ccx and ANI-1x data sets, coupled-cluster and density functional theory properties for molecules. Sci. Data 7, 134 (2020).
Google Scholar
Devereux, C. et al. Extending the applicability of the ANI deep learning molecular potential to sulfur and halogens. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 16, 4192–4202 (2020).
Google Scholar
Chmiela, S. et al. Machine learning of accurate energy-conserving molecular force fields. Sci. Adv. 3, e1603015 (2017).
Google Scholar
Schütt, K. T., Arbabzadah, F., Chmiela, S., Müller, K. R. & Tkatchenko, A. Quantum-chemical insights from deep tensor neural networks. Nat. Commun. 8, 13890 (2017).
Google Scholar
Thaler, D., Elezaj, L., Bamer, F. & Markert, B. Training data selection for machine learning-enhanced Monte Carlo simulations in structural dynamics. Appl. Sci. 12, 581 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wibbeke, J., Teimourzadeh Baboli, P. & Rohjans, S. Optimal data reduction of training data in machine learning-based modelling: a multidimensional bin packing approach. Energies 15, 3092 (2022).
Google Scholar
Jensen, A. B., Kubečka, J., Schmitz, G., Christiansen, O. & Elm, J. Massive assessment of the binding energies of atmospheric molecular clusters. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 18, 7373–7383 (2022).
Google Scholar
Chmiela, S., Sauceda, H. E., Müller, K.-R. & Tkatchenko, A. Towards exact molecular dynamics simulations with machine-learned force fields. Nat. Commun. 9, 3887 (2018).
Google Scholar
Chmiela, S., Sauceda, H. E., Poltavsky, I., Müller, K.-R. & Tkatchenko, A. sGDML: constructing accurate and data efficient molecular force fields using machine learning. Comput. Phys. Commun. 240, 38–45 (2019).
Google Scholar
Schmitz, G. & Christiansen, O. Gaussian process regression to accelerate geometry optimizations relying on numerical differentiation. J. Chem. Phys. 148, 241704 (2018).
Google Scholar
Born, D. & Kästner, J. Geometry optimization in internal coordinates based on gaussian process regression: comparison of two approaches. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 17, 5955–5967 (2021).
Google Scholar
Yang, Y., Jiménez-Negrón, O. A. & Kitchin, J. R. Machine-learning accelerated geometry optimization in molecular simulation. J. Chem. Phys. 154, 234704 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ha, M., Hajibabaei, A., Pourasad, S. & Kim, K. S. Sparse Gaussian process regression-based machine learned first-principles force-fields for saturated, olefinic, and aromatic hydrocarbons. ACS Phys. Chem. Au 2, 260–264 (2022).
Google Scholar
Deringer, V. L. et al. Gaussian process regression for materials and molecules. Chem. Rev. 121, 10073–10141 (2021).
Google Scholar
Venturi, S., Jaffe, R. L. & Panesi, M. Bayesian machine learning approach to the quantification of uncertainties on ab initio potential energy surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. A 124, 5129–5146 (2020).
Google Scholar
Mansimov, E., Mahmood, O., Kang, S. & Cho, K. Molecular geometry prediction using a deep generative graph neural network. Sci. Rep. 9, 20381 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ortega, I. K. et al. From quantum chemical formation free energies to evaporation rates. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 225–235 (2012).
Google Scholar
Lim, H. & Jung, Y. Delfos: deep learning model for prediction of solvation free energies in generic organic solvents. Chem. Sci. 10, 8306–8315 (2019).
Google Scholar
Weinreich, J., Browning, N. J. & Anatole von Lilienfeld, O. Machine learning of free energies in chemical compound space using ensemble representations: reaching experimental uncertainty for solvation. J. Chem. Phys. 154, 134113 (2021).
Google Scholar
Alibakhshi, A. & Hartke, B. Improved prediction of solvation free energies by machine-learning polarizable continuum solvation model. Nat. Commun. 12, 3584 (2021).
Google Scholar
Martins-Costa, M. T. C., Anglada, J. M., Francisco, J. S. & Ruiz-Lopez, M. F. Reactivity of volatile organic compounds at the surface of a water droplet. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 11821–11827 (2012).
Google Scholar
Zhu, C., Kais, S., Cheng Zeng, X., Francisco, J. S. & Gladich, I. Interfaces select specific stereochemical conformations: the isomerization of glyoxal at the liquid water interface. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 27–30 (2017).
Google Scholar
Zhu, C. et al. New mechanistic pathways for criegee-water chemistry at the air/water interface. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 11164–11169 (2016).
Google Scholar
Zhong, J., Kumar, M., Zhu, C. Q., Francisco, J. S. & Zeng, X. C. Surprising stability of larger criegee intermediates on aqueous interfaces. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 7740–7744 (2017).
Google Scholar
Kumar, M., Zhong, J., Francisco, J. S. & Zeng, X. C. Criegee intermediate–hydrogen sulfide chemistry at the air/water interface. Chem. Sci. 8, 5385–5391 (2017).
Google Scholar
Kumar, M., Zhong, J., Cheng Zeng, X. & Francisco, J. S. Reaction of Criegee intermediate with nitric acid at the air–water interface. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 4913–4921 (2018).
Google Scholar
Li, L. et al. Near-barrierless ammonium bisulfate formation via a loop-structure promoted proton-transfer mechanism on the surface of water. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 1816–1819 (2016).
Google Scholar
Kumar, M. & Francisco, J. S. Ion pair particles at the air–water interface. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 12401–12406 (2017).
Google Scholar
Kumar, M., Trabelsi, T. & Francisco, J. S. Can urea be a seed for aerosol particle formation in air? J. Phys. Chem. A 122, 3261–3269 (2018).
Google Scholar
Zhong, J., Kumar, M., Francisco, J. S. & Cheng Zeng, X. Insight into chemistry on cloud/aerosol water surfaces. Acc. Chem. Res. 51, 1229–1237 (2018).
Google Scholar
Zheng, P., Yang, W., Wu, W., Isayev, O. & Dral, P. O. Toward chemical accuracy in predicting enthalpies of formation with general-purpose data-driven methods. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 13, 3479–3491 (2022).
Google Scholar
Gao, X., Ramezanghorbani, F., Isayev, O., Smith, J. S. & Roitberg, A. E. TorchANI: a free and open source PyTorch-based deep learning implementation of the ANI neural network potentials. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 60, 3408–3415 (2020).
Google Scholar
Unke, O. T. & Meuwly, M. PhysNet: a neural network for predicting energies, forces, dipole moments, and partial charges. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15, 3678–3693 (2019).
Google Scholar
Li, Z., Meidani, K., Yadav, P. & Farimani, A. B. Graph neural networks accelerated molecular dynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 156, 144103 (2022).
Google Scholar
Doerr, S. et al. TorchMD: a deep learning framework for molecular simulations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 17, 2355–2363 (2021).
Google Scholar
Xu, M., Zhu, T. & Zhang, J. Z. H. Automatically constructed neural network potentials for molecular dynamics simulation of zinc proteins. Front. Chem. 9, 692200 (2021).
Google Scholar
Degiacomi, M. T. Coupling molecular dynamics and deep learning to mine protein conformational space. Structure 27, 1034–1040 (2019).
Google Scholar
Döscher, R. et al. The EC-Earth3 Earth system model for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6. Geosci. Model Dev. 15, 2973–3020 (2022).
Google Scholar
Stevens, B. et al. Atmospheric component of the MPI-M Earth system model: ECHAM6. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 5, 146–172 (2013).
Google Scholar
