Huang, F., Pan, B., Wu, J., Chen, E. & Chen, L. Relationship between exposure to PM2. 5 and lung cancer incidence and mortality: a meta-analysis. Oncotarget 8, 43322 (2017).
Google Scholar
Kim, H. S., Kim, Y. J. & Seo, Y. R. An overview of carcinogenic heavy metal: molecular toxicity mechanism and prevention. J. Cancer Prev. 20, 232–240 (2015).
Google Scholar
Pan, Z., Gong, T. & Liang, P. Heavy metal exposure and cardiovascular disease. Circ. Res. 134, 1160–1178 (2024).
Google Scholar
Ni, R., Su, H., Burnett, R. T., Guo, Y. & Cheng, Y. Long-term exposure to PM2. 5 has significant adverse effects on childhood and adult asthma: a global meta-analysis and health impact assessment. One Earth 7, 1953–1969 (2024).
Google Scholar
McHugh, E. G. et al. Pulmonary, inflammatory, and oxidative effects of indoor nitrogen dioxide in patients with COPD. Environ. Epidemiol. 7, e271 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Z., Wang, J. & Lu, W. Exposure to nitrogen dioxide and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 25, 15133–15145 (2018).
Google Scholar
Madrid, E. et al. Oxidative damage associated with exposure to heavy metals present in topsoils in central Chile. Environ. Geochem. Health 45, 9891–9901 (2023).
Google Scholar
Schiavo, B. et al. Oxidative potential of metal-polluted urban dust as a potential environmental stressor for chronic diseases. Environ. Geochem. Health 45, 3229–3250 (2023).
Google Scholar
Killian, B. et al. Emission-related heavy metal associated with oxidative stress in children: effect of antioxidant intake. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113920 (2020).
Jandacka, D., Durcanska, D. & Bujdos, M. The contribution of road traffic to particulate matter and metals in air pollution in the vicinity of an urban road. Transport. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 50, 397–408 (2017).
Google Scholar
Lynnyk, I., Vakulenko, K. & Lezhneva, E. Analysis of the air quality in considering the impact of the atmospheric emission from the urban road traffic. In Research Methods in Modern Urban Transportation Systems and Networks, 13–27 (Springer, 2021).
Pollution, H. E. I. P. o. t. H. E. o. T.-R. A. Traffic-related air pollution: a critical review of the literature on emissions, exposure, and health effects. (2010).
Pant, P. & Harrison, R. M. Estimation of the contribution of road traffic emissions to particulate matter concentrations from field measurements: a review. Atmos. Environ. 77, 78–97 (2013).
Google Scholar
Amato, F. et al. Urban air quality: the challenge of traffic non-exhaust emissions. J. Hazard. Mater. 275, 31–36 (2014).
Google Scholar
Shirmohammadi, F. et al. The relative importance of tailpipe and non-tailpipe emissions on the oxidative potential of ambient particles in Los Angeles, CA. Faraday Discuss. 189, 361–380 (2016).
Google Scholar
Habre, R. et al. Contribution of tailpipe and non-tailpipe traffic sources to quasi-ultrafine, fine and coarse particulate matter in southern California. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 71, 209–230 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Q. et al. Identify the contribution of vehicle non-exhaust emissions: a single particle aerosol mass spectrometer test case at typical road environment. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 17, 62 (2023).
Google Scholar
Alves, C. A. et al. Physical and chemical properties of non-exhaust particles generated from wear between pavements and tyres. Atmos. Environ. 224, 117252 (2020).
Google Scholar
Yang, J. et al. From COVID-19 to future electrification: Assessing traffic impacts on air quality by a machine-learning model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2102705118 (2021).
Google Scholar
Lurmann, F., Avol, E. & Gilliland, F. Emissions reduction policies and recent trends in Southern California’s ambient air quality. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 65, 324–335 (2015).
Google Scholar
Jeong, C.-H. et al. Long-term analysis of PM2. 5 from 2004 to 2017 in Toronto: composition, sources, and oxidative potential. Environ. Pollut. 263, 114652 (2020).
Google Scholar
Liu, J. et al. Co-kriging with a low-cost sensor network to estimate spatial variation of brake and tire-wear metals and oxidative stress potential in Southern California. Environ. Int. 168, 107481 (2022).
Google Scholar
Yeom, K. Development of urban air monitoring with high spatial resolution using mobile vehicle sensors. Environ. Monit. Assess. 193, 375 (2021).
Google Scholar
Sorek-Hamer, M., Chatfield, R. & Liu, Y. Strategies for using satellite-based products in modeling PM2. 5 and short-term pollution episodes. Environ. Int. 144, 106057 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ermak, D. L. An analytical model for air pollutant transport and deposition from a point source. Atmos. Environ. 11, 231–237 (1977).
Google Scholar
Jathar, S. H., Woody, M., Pye, H. O., Baker, K. R. & Robinson, A. L. Chemical transport model simulations of organic aerosol in southern California: model evaluation and gasoline and diesel source contributions. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 17, 4305–4318 (2017).
Google Scholar
Wei, N. et al. Applying machine learning to construct braking emission model for real-world road driving. Environ. Int. 166, 107386 (2022).
Google Scholar
Yang, Y. et al. Exploring the environmental risks and seasonal variations of potentially toxic elements (PTEs) in fine road dust in resource-based cities based on Monte Carlo simulation, geo-detector and random forest model. J. Hazard Mater. 473, 134708 (2024).
Google Scholar
Tang, D., Zhan, Y. & Yang, F. A review of machine learning for modeling air quality: overlooked but important issues. Atmos. Res. 300, 107261 (2024).
Peng, Z. et al. Application of machine learning in atmospheric pollution research: a state-of-art review. Sci. Total Environ. 910, 168588 (2024).
Google Scholar
Järlskog, I. et al. Differentiating and quantifying carbonaceous (tire, bitumen, and road marking wear) and non-carbonaceous (metals, minerals, and glass beads) non-exhaust particles in road dust samples from a traffic environment. Water Air Soil Pollut. 233, 375 (2022).
Google Scholar
Rajput, J. S. & Trivedi, M. K. Extraction of tracer elements of particulate matter emission source using association rule mining. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 15, 102109 (2024).
Google Scholar
Denny, M., Baskaran, M., Burdick, S., Tummala, C. & Dittrich, T. Investigation of pollutant metals in road dust in a post-industrial city: case study from Detroit, Michigan. Front. Environ. Sci. 10, 974237 (2022).
Google Scholar
Song, W. et al. Reduction of brake emission by optimizing the curing condition for brake pads using an artificial neural network. Wear 516, 204606 (2023).
Google Scholar
Cao, Y. & Lu, X. Learning spatial-temporal representation for smoke vehicle detection. Multimed. Tools Appl. 78, 27871–27889 (2019).
Google Scholar
Du, Z. et al. Advancements in machine learning for spatiotemporal urban on-road traffic-air quality study: a review. Atmos. Environ. 346, 121054 (2025).
Karagöz, M. ANN based prediction of engine performance and exhaust emission responses of a CI engine powered by ternary blends. Int. J. Automot. Sci. Technol. 4, 180–184 (2020).
Google Scholar
Li, Z., Yim, S. H.-L. & Ho, K.-F. High temporal resolution prediction of street-level PM2. 5 and NOx concentrations using machine learning approach. J. Clean. Prod. 268, 121975 (2020).
Google Scholar
Salazar-Rojas, T., Cejudo-Ruiz, F. R., Gutiérrez-Soto, M. V. & Calvo-Brenes, G. Assessing heavy metal pollution load index (PLI) in biomonitors and road dust from vehicular emission by magnetic properties modeling. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30, 91248–91261 (2023).
Google Scholar
Rausch, J. et al. Automated identification and quantification of tire wear particles (TWP) in airborne dust: SEM/EDX single particle analysis coupled to a machine learning classifier. Sci. Total Environ. 803, 149832 (2022).
Google Scholar
Salazar-Rojas, T., Cejudo-Ruiz, F. R. & Calvo-Brenes, G. Comparison between machine linear regression (MLR) and support vector machine (SVM) as model generators for heavy metal assessment captured in biomonitors and road dust. Environ. Pollut. 314, 120227 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kumar, V., Sahu, M. & Biswas, P. Source apportionment of particulate matter by application of machine learning clustering algorithms. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 22, 210240 (2022).
Google Scholar
Esfandiari, M. & Hakimzadeh, M. A. Assessment of environmental pollution of heavy metals deposited on the leaves of trees at Yazd bus terminals. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 29, 32867–32881 (2022).
Google Scholar
Nkinahamira, F. et al. Machine learning approaches for monitoring environmental metal pollutants: recent advances in source apportionment, detection, quantification, and risk assessment. Trends Anal. Chem. 180, 117980 (2024).
Gao, F., Zhang, W., Baccarelli, A. A. & Shen, Y. Predicting chemical ecotoxicity by learning latent space chemical representations. Environ. Int. 163, 107224 (2022).
Google Scholar
Yin, X. et al. Exposure models for particulate matter elemental concentrations in Southern California. Environ. Int. 165, 107247 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wen, Y. et al. A data-driven method of traffic emissions mapping with land use random forest models. Appl. Energy 305, 117916 (2022).
Google Scholar
Cao, C. How to better predict the effect of urban traffic and weather on air pollution? Norwegian evidence from machine learning approaches. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 221, 544–569 (2024).
Google Scholar
Jain, S., Presto, A. A. & Zimmerman, N. Spatial modeling of daily PM2. 5, NO2, and CO concentrations measured by a low-cost sensor network: comparison of linear, machine learning, and hybrid land use models. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 8631–8641 (2021).
Google Scholar
Yuan, X., An, T., Hu, B. & Zhou, J. Analysis of spatial distribution characteristics and main influencing factors of heavy metals in road dust of Tianjin based on land use regression models. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30, 837–848 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhou, X. et al. Machine learning application in forecasting tire wear particles emission in China under different potential socioeconomic and climate scenarios with tire microplastics context. J. Hazard. Mater. 441, 129878 (2023).
Google Scholar
Xu, J., Saleh, M. & Hatzopoulou, M. A machine learning approach capturing the effects of driving behaviour and driver characteristics on trip-level emissions. Atmos. Environ. 224, 117311 (2020).
Google Scholar
Azeez, O. S. et al. Modeling of CO emissions from traffic vehicles using artificial neural networks. Appl. Sci. 9, 313 (2019).
Google Scholar
Núñez, M. R., Busso, I. T. & Carreras, H. A. Quantifying the contribution of environmental variables to cyclists’ exposure to PM2. 5 using machine learning techniques. Heliyon 10, e24724 (2024).
Ameer, S. et al. Comparative analysis of machine learning techniques for predicting air quality in smart cities. IEEE Access 7, 128325–128338 (2019).
Google Scholar
Larkin, A. et al. A global spatial-temporal land use regression model for nitrogen dioxide air pollution. Front. Environ. Sci. 11, 1125979 (2023).
Google Scholar
Dowell, D. C. et al. The High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR): an hourly updating convection-allowing forecast model. Part I: motivation and system description. Weather Forecast. 37, 1371–1395 (2022).
Google Scholar
Hersbach, H. et al. The ERA5 global reanalysis. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 146, 1999–2049 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gelaro, R. et al. The modern-era retrospective analysis for research and applications, version 2 (MERRA-2). J. Clim. 30, 5419–5454 (2017).
Google Scholar
Forlani, C., Bhatt, S., Cameletti, M., Krainski, E. & Blangiardo, M. A joint Bayesian space–time model to integrate spatially misaligned air pollution data in R-INLA. Environmetrics 31, e2644 (2020).
Google Scholar
Sun, Y. et al. Deep learning in statistical downscaling for deriving high spatial resolution gridded meteorological data: A systematic review. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 208, 14–38 (2024).
Google Scholar
Chakraborty, D. et al. Multimodal atmospheric super-resolution with deep generative models. Mach. Learn.: Earth 2, 015001 (2026).
Wei, N. et al. Machine learning predicts emissions of brake wear PM2. 5: model construction and interpretation. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 9, 352–358 (2022).
Google Scholar
Vasiljević, S., Glišović, J., Stojanović, N. & Grujić, I. Application of neural networks in predictions of brake wear particulate matter emission. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part D J. Automob. Eng. 236, 1579–1594 (2022).
Google Scholar
Rahimi, M. Modeling and simulation of vehicle emissions for the reduction of road traffic pollution. Environ. Sci. Pllut. Res. Int. 30, 14745–14759 (2023).
Le Cornec, C. M., Molden, N., van Reeuwijk, M. & Stettler, M. E. Modelling of instantaneous emissions from diesel vehicles with a special focus on NOx: insights from machine learning techniques. Sci. Total Environ. 737, 139625 (2020).
Google Scholar
Han, P. et al. Calibrations of low-cost air pollution monitoring sensors for CO, NO2, O3, and SO2. Sensors 21, 256 (2021).
Google Scholar
Jensen, K. M. & Santos, I. F. Estimation of passenger car brake pad temperatures and wear from on-road data and lumped multi-physical models. Wear 578, 206138 (2025).
Google Scholar
Fussell, J. C. et al. A Review of Road Traffic-Derived Non-Exhaust Particles: Emissions, Physicochemical Characteristics, Health Risks, and Mitigation Measures. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56, 6813–6835 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wei, P. et al. Combining Google traffic map with deep learning model to predict street-level traffic-related air pollutants in a complex urban environment. Environ. Int. 191, 108992 (2024).
Google Scholar
Qi, M. & Hankey, S. Using street view imagery to predict street-level particulate air pollution. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 2695–2704 (2021).
Google Scholar
Martín-Baos, J. Á, Rodriguez-Benitez, L., García-Ródenas, R. & Liu, J. IoT based monitoring of air quality and traffic using regression analysis. Appl. Soft Comput. 115, 108282 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ağbulut, Ü. Forecasting of transportation-related energy demand and CO2 emissions in Turkey with different machine learning algorithms. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 29, 141–157 (2022).
Google Scholar
O’Sharkey, K. et al. Associations between brake and tire wear-related PM2. 5 metal components, particulate oxidative stress potential, and autism spectrum disorder in Southern California. Environ. Int. 185, 108573 (2024).
Google Scholar
Li, Y. et al. Non-targeted analysis based on quantitative prediction and toxicity assessment for emerging contaminants in tire particle leachates. Environ. Res. 243, 117806 (2024).
Google Scholar
Akinosho, T. D. et al. A scalable deep learning system for monitoring and forecasting pollutant concentration levels on UK highways. Ecol. Inform. 69, 101609 (2022).
Google Scholar
Meng, Q. et al. Fine particulate matter metal composition, oxidative potential, and adverse birth outcomes in Los Angeles. Environ. Health Perspect. 131, 107012 (2023).
Google Scholar
Okumuş, F., Sönmez, H. İ, Safa, A., Kaya, C. & Kökkülünk, G. Gradient boosting machine for performance and emission investigation of diesel engine fueled with pyrolytic oil–biodiesel and 2-EHN additive. Sustain. Energy Fuels 7, 4002–4018 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhao, B. et al. Urban air pollution mapping using fleet vehicles as mobile monitors and machine learning. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 5579–5588 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wang, A., Xu, J., Tu, R., Saleh, M. & Hatzopoulou, M. Potential of machine learning for prediction of traffic related air pollution. Transport. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 88, 102599 (2020).
Google Scholar
Suleiman, A., Tight, M. & Quinn, A. Applying machine learning methods in managing urban concentrations of traffic-related particulate matter (PM10 and PM2. 5). Atmos. Pollut. Res. 10, 134–144 (2019).
Google Scholar
Fan, Z. et al. Enhancing urban real-time PM2. 5 monitoring in street canyons by machine learning and computer vision technology. Sustain. Cities Soc. 100, 105009 (2024).
Google Scholar
Van denBossche, J., De Baets, B., Verwaeren, J., Botteldooren, D. &Theunis, J.Development and evaluation of land use regression models for black carbon based on bicycle and pedestrian measurements in the urban environment. Environ. Model. Softw. 99, 58–69 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wang, J. M. et al. Quantifying metal emissions from vehicular traffic using real world emission factors. Environ. Pollut. 268, 115805 (2021).
Google Scholar
Liu, K. et al. Time series prediction of the chemical components of PM2. 5 based on a deep learning model. Chemosphere 342, 140153 (2023).
Google Scholar
Wang, G. et al. Prediction of heavy metal and PM2. 5 concentrations in atmospheric particulate matter using key magnetic parameters. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 18, 815–825 (2024).
Xiao, H. et al. Prediction of heavy metals in airborne fine particulate matter using magnetic parameters by machine learning from a metropolitan city in China. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 13, 101347 (2022).
Google Scholar
Bettiol, A., Gelain, E., Milanesio, E., Asta, F. & Rusconi, F. The first 1000 days of life: traffic-related air pollution and development of wheezing and asthma in childhood. A systematic review of birth cohort studies. Environ. Health 20, 1–10 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kwon, D. et al. Traffic-related air pollution and Parkinson’s disease in central California. Environ. Res. 240, 117434 (2024).
Google Scholar
LeCun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y. & Haffner, P. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proc. IEEE 86, 2278–2324 (2002).
Google Scholar
Cui, B. et al. Deep learning methods for atmospheric PM2. 5 prediction: a comparative study of transformer and CNN-LSTM-attention. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 14, 101833 (2023).
Google Scholar
Velickovic, P. et al. Graph attention networks. stat 1050, 10–48550 (2017).
Kipf, T. N. & Welling, M. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2017).
Gao, F., Wolf, G. & Hirn, M. In Proc. International Conference on Machine Learning 2122–2131 (PMLR) (2019).
Gilmer, J., Schoenholz, S. S., Riley, P. F., Vinyals, O. & Dahl, G. E. In Proc. International conference on machine learning 1263–1272 (PMLR) (2017).
Iskandaryan, D., Ramos, F. & Trilles, S. Graph neural network for air quality prediction: a case study in Madrid. IEEE Access 11, 2729–2742 (2023).
Google Scholar
Terroso-Saenz, F., Morales-García, J. & Munoz, A. Nationwide air pollution forecasting with heterogeneous graph neural networks. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 15, 1–19 (2024).
Google Scholar
Rowley, A. & Karakuş, O. Predicting air quality via multimodal AI and satellite imagery. Remote Sens. Environ. 293, 113609 (2023).
Google Scholar
Kushal, K. A. & Mamun, A. A. AQFusionNet: multimodal deep learning for air quality index prediction with imagery and sensor data. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.00353 (2025).
Long, Q., Ma, J., Guo, C., Wang, M. & Wang, Q. High-resolution spatio-temporal estimation of street-level air pollution using mobile monitoring and machine learning. J. Environ. Manag. 377, 124642 (2025).
Google Scholar
Altmann, A., Toloşi, L., Sander, O. & Lengauer, T. Permutation importance: a corrected feature importance measure. Bioinformatics 26, 1340–1347 (2010).
Google Scholar
Oka, S., Yamazaki, T. & Takefuji, Y. Pitfalls of XAI interpretation in environmental modeling: a warning on model bias in air quality data analysis. Environ. Model. Softw.194, 106700 (2025).
Liu, Y. et al. Impact of vehicle type, tyre feature and driving behaviour on tyre wear under real-world driving conditions. Sci. Total Environ. 842, 156950 (2022).
Google Scholar
Liu, Y. et al. Brake wear induced PM10 emissions during the world harmonised light-duty vehicle test procedure-brake cycle. J. Clean. Prod. 361, 132278 (2022).
Google Scholar
Gao, Z. et al. On airborne tire wear particles along roads with different traffic characteristics using passive sampling and optical microscopy, single particle SEM/EDX, and µ-ATR-FTIR analyses. Front. Environ. Sci. 10, 1022697 (2022).
Google Scholar
Letaïef, S., Camps, P. & Carvallo, C. A supervised machine learning approach to classify traffic-derived PM sources based on their magnetic properties. Environ. Res. 231, 116006 (2023).
Google Scholar
O’Leary, J., Sawlani, K. & Mesbah, A. Deep learning for classification of the chemical composition of particle defects on semiconductor wafers. IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manuf. 33, 72–85 (2020).
Google Scholar
Seddiki, K. et al. Early diagnosis: End-to-end CNN–LSTM models for mass spectrometry data classification. Anal. Chem. 95, 13431–13437 (2023).
Google Scholar
Beck, A. G. et al. Recent developments in machine learning for mass spectrometry. ACS Meas. Sci. Au 4, 233–246 (2024).
Google Scholar
