Fiorucci, M. et al. Machine learning for cultural heritage: A survey. pattern recognition. Let. 133102–108 (2020).
Xing, Y., Gan, W. & Chen, Q. Artificial intelligence in landscape architecture: A survey. internal. J. Mach. learn. Cybern. 1-26 (2025).
Coro, J., Vallemeron, J.M., Zornozaindal, A., Rodríguez-Miranda, Á. New perspectives and regular challenges: Introducing technologies for document management in architectural heritage conservation work. ACM J. on Computing. cult. herit. (2025).
Jiménez Díaz, G. Interpretable clusters for expressing citizens’ sense of belonging through interaction with other cultural heritage sites. ACM J. on Computing. cult. Herit. 171–22 (2025).
Google Scholar
Pan, B. et al. Automatic recognition and modeling of heritage building components based on local characteristics. J. Cult. Herit. 71252–264 (2025).
Zhao, J. et al. Semantic segmentation of point clouds of ancient buildings based on weak supervision. Herit. Science. 12232 (2024).
Zhou, Z., Xi, Y., Xing, S. & Chen, Y. Reducing cultural bias in visual language models for digital heritage documentation: A comparative analysis of bias reduction techniques. Artif. intelligence. Mach. learn. pastor 528–40 (2024).
Wang, X., Zhang, J., Cenci, J. & Becue, V. Spatial distribution characteristics and influencing factors of world architectural heritage. heritage 42942–2959 (2021).
Karadag, I. Machine learning for the preservation of architectural heritage. open house international 4823–37 (2023).
Foka, A. & Griffin, G. Ai, cultural heritage, and prejudice: Some important questions arising from the use of genai. heritage 76125–6136 (2024).
Jain, V., Mohanan, P. & Naira, M. The role of artificial intelligence in managing and preserving old documents with new technologies. Artif. intelligence. Business: Development Methodology Strategy. For Inoff. 25–38 (2025).
Mahadevkar, SV, Patil, S., Kotecha, K., Soong, LW, Choudhury, T. Exploring AI-driven approaches for unstructured document analysis and future prospects. J. Big Data 1192 (2024).
Galantucci, R.A., Musicco, A., Verdoscia, C. & Fatiguso, F. Machine learning for semi-automated 3D attenuation segmentation and mapping of heritage assets. internal. J. Architt. Herit. 19389–407 (2025).
Seo, H., Sihag, P., Fu, L., Kim, D. A new rcc fusion machine learning method for automatic damage detection of historic buildings using 3D point cloud data. J. Civ. Structure. heal. monitor. 1-18 (2025).
Pansoni, S., Tiribelli, S., Paolanti, M., Frontoni, E., Giovanola, B. Designing an ethical framework for artificial intelligence in cultural heritage. in 2023 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Engineering, Science, and Technology (ETHICS)1–5 (IEEE, 2023).
Pansoni, S. et al. Artificial intelligence and cultural heritage: Design and evaluation of an ethical framework. internal. arch. photogram. remote. Sensory and spatial information science. 481149–1155 (2023).
Ai, H. High-level expert group on artificial intelligence. Ethical guidelines for trustworthy AI 61005 (2019).
Google Scholar
Pierdicca, R. et al. Point cloud semantic segmentation using a deep learning framework for cultural heritage. remote. Sense. 121005 (2020).
Wang, Y. et al. Dynamic graph cnn for learning with point clouds. ACM transactions on the graph. (Tog) 381–12 (2019).
Google Scholar
Matron, F. et al. Benchmarking large-scale heritage point cloud semantic segmentation. Int.Arch. Photogram. remote. Sensory spatial information science. 431419–1426 (2020).
Tiribelli, S., Giovanola, B., Pietrini, R., Frontoni, E. & Paolanti, M. Incorporating AI ethics into the design and use of computer vision technology to understand consumer behavior. Calculate. Vis. Image understanding. 248104142 (2024).
Giovanola, B. & Tiribelli, S. Beyond bias and discrimination: Redefining AI ethical principles of fairness in medical machine learning algorithms. AI and society 38549–563 (2023).
Migliorelli, L. et al. A responsible deep learning-based vision system for monitoring preterm infants. computer 5684–93 (2023).
Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., Galstyan, A. A survey of bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Research (CSUR) 541–35 (2021).
Suresh, H. & Guttag, J. A framework for understanding sources of harm throughout the machine learning lifecycle. in Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Fairness and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization.1–9 (2021).
Olteanu, A., Castillo, C., Diaz, F. & Kıcıman, E. Social data: biases, methodological pitfalls, and ethical boundaries. front. big data 213 (2019).
Cabitza, F. et al. Quoderat Demonstranum? – Towards a typology of explanatory concepts for the design of explainable AI. expert. System using Appl 213118888 (2023).
Ding, W., Abdel-Basset, M., Hawash, H. & Ali, AM Explainability of artificial intelligence methods, applications, and challenges: A comprehensive survey. Information science. 615238–292 (2022).
Hoffman, RR, Mueller, ST, Klein, G. & Litman, J. Explainable AI metrics: Challenges and prospects. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.04608 (2018).
Pokholkova, M., Boch, A., Hohma, E. & Lütge, C. Measuring compliance with AI ethics: A methodology for assessing compliance with ethical principles in use cases of AI-enabled credit scoring applications. AI ethics 1-23 (2024).
Matrone, F., Paolanti, M., Felicetti, A., Martini, M. & Pierdicca, R. Bubblex: An explainable deep learning framework for point cloud classification. IEEE J. Sel.Top. Applied Earth Observation Remote. Sense. 156571–6587 (2022).
Matrone, F., Felicetti, A., Paolanti, M., Pierdicca, R. Explaining AI: Understanding Deep Learning Models of Heritage Point Clouds. ISPRS annual report photogram. remote. Sensory spatial information science. 207–214 (2023).
Hasany, SN, Petitjean, C. & Mériaudeau, F. Seg-xres-cam: Spatial local region description in image segmentation. in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition3733–3738 (2023).
Felicetti, A., Paolanti, M., Zingaretti, P., Pierdicca, R. & Malinverni, ES Mo. se.: Mosaic image segmentation based on deep cascade learning. Virtual archaeol. pastor 1225–38 (2021).
Malimbani, ES et al. Deep learning-based platforms to combat illegal trade in cultural heritage are key. Science. report 1415081 (2024).
Paolanti, M. et al. Perganet: A deep learning framework for automatic appearance-based analysis of ancient parchment collections. in International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing290–301 (Springer, 2022).
Paolanti, M. et al. Deep convolutional neural networks for sentiment analysis of cultural heritage sites. Int.Arch. Photogram. remote. Sensory spatial information science. 42871–878 (2019).
