Companies are increasingly integrating artificial intelligence into their daily operations, but not all results are positive. New concerns are gaining “workslop,” or low-quality AI generation work. This is currently believed to be at the expense of businesses economically and socially. This trend is because it prompts warnings from researchers and business leaders, observing productivity slipping and trust erosion among employees. Recent reports show that the increase in the presence of worksloops in office environments may be a direct factor in the unfortunate returns that many companies see from AI investments.
Harvard Business Review recently created the term Workslop for work documents generated in low-quality AI. Respected business publications argue that this growing mountain of phone notes and reports is one of the reasons why many companies are making little profits on AI investments. Only a few seem to enjoy the tangible benefits as offices around the world are rushing to adopt AI-powered tools. A survey by MIT Media Lab highlighted that fewer than one in ten people in AI pilot projects will result in an actual revenue increase, with “95% of the organization getting zero returns” earning zero revenue on AI bets. The research suggests that Workslop is likely the perpetrator, prompting businesses to rethink how AI is used in their workflows.
The global AI industry is expanding rapidly. The United Nations recently predicted that the global market will steal rockets from $189 billion in 2023 to $4.8 trillion by 2033. This growth is reflected in the workplace, with a share of employees who say they use AI at least several times a year, according to Gallup. Meanwhile, Accenture reported that the number of companies fully implementing AI-driven processes has almost doubled over the past year. Despite these numbers, challenges remain. A way for AI to ensure real value rather than produce worklops.
But what exactly is Workslop?
Harvard Business Review defines Workslop as “shaming as a great job, but without the substance that will move a particular task meaningfully forward. Example examples may report a summary from a well-formatted presentation and even code that appears to be appropriate on the surface, but fail to provide meaningful insights or progress. Researchers found that 40% of the employees surveyed received a work slop last month, highlighting the prevalence of problems in modern office culture.
The economic impact of Workslop is important. The surveyed employees reported that on average they spent nearly two hours per incident on average to deal with poor quality AI output. The calculations based on respondents' pay estimates of hidden costs of approximately $186 per employee per month. In large organizations, these losses can turn millions of people each year into declining productivity, allowing decision makers to question the true returns of AI investments.
The presence of workslops affects more than just the balance sheet. Social and emotional outcomes are rising in the office. More than half of the workers surveyed said they were irritated about receiving the workslot, with 38% reporting confusion and 22% saying they were offended. Almost half of respondents show that the person responsible for sending the worklop is perceived as being less competent and less reliable, suggesting a deeper impact on workplace trust and morale.
Researchers point out that the real burden of workslop is often shifted downstream. As one report stated, “The insidious effect of workslots is that it shifts the burden of downstream work, and requires recipients to interpret, modify or redo the work.” This transfer not only SAPS productivity, but also increases the cognitive and emotional workload of those responsible for cleaning up AI-generated content.
To address this issue, experts recommend a structured and thoughtful approach to AI adoption. Researchers suggest that managers need to set up clear guardrails and model the thoughtful and intentional use of AI itself. They warn against indiscriminate AI use, saying that blankets are mandatory “AI is always everywhere.” Instead, organizations are encouraged to develop best practices that will help AI tools meaningfully support the company's goals, rather than simply generating more content.
– end
