Smith, A. R. & Klosek, J. A review of air separation technologies and their integration with energy conversion processes. Fuel Process. Technol. 70(2), 115–134 (2001).
Hutson, N. D., Rege, S. U. & Yang, R. T. Mixed cation zeolites: LixAgy-X as a superior adsorbent for air separation. AIChE J. 45(4), 724–734 (1999).
Google Scholar
Li, J.-R. et al. Carbon dioxide capture-related gas adsorption and separation in metal-organic frameworks. Coord. Chem. Rev. 255(15–16), 1791–1823 (2011).
Castle, W. Air separation and liquefaction: Recent developments and prospects for the beginning of the new millennium. Int. J. Refrig 25(1), 158–172 (2002).
Kuznicki, S. M. et al. A titanosilicate molecular sieve with adjustable pores for size-selective adsorption of molecules. Nature 412(6848), 720–724 (2001).
Google Scholar
Jayaraman, A., Yang, R. T., Cho, S.-H., Bhat, T. S. & Choudary, V. N. Adsorption of nitrogen, oxygen and argon on Na-CeX zeolites. Adsorption 8, 271–278 (2002).
Jüntgen, H., Knoblauch, K. & Harder, K. Carbon molecular sieves: Production from coal and application in gas separation. Fuel 60(9), 817–822 (1981).
Murray, L. J. et al. Highly-selective and reversible O2 binding in Cr3 (1, 3, 5-benzenetricarboxylate) 2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132(23), 7856–7857 (2010).
Google Scholar
Akhtar, F., Ogunwumi, S. & Bergström, L. Thin zeolite laminates for rapid and energy-efficient carbon capture. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 10988 (2017).
Google Scholar
Silva, R. et al. Zeolite addition to improve biohydrogen production from dark fermentation of C5/C6-sugars and Sargassum sp. biomass. Sci. Rep. 11(1), 16350 (2021).
Google Scholar
Stadie, N. P. et al. Zeolite-templated carbon materials for high-pressure hydrogen storage. Langmuir 28(26), 10057–10063 (2012).
Google Scholar
Turnbull, M. S. Hydrogen Storage in Zeolites: Activation of the Pore Space Through Incorporation of Guest Materials (University of Birmingham, 2010).
Peter, S. A., Sebastian, J. & Jasra, R. V. Adsorption of nitrogen, oxygen, and argon in mono-, di-, and trivalent cation-exchanged zeolite mordenite. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 44(17), 6856–6864 (2005).
Baksh, M., Kikkinides, E. & Yang, R. Lithium type X zeolite as a superior sorbent for air separation. Sep. Sci. Technol. 27(3), 277–294 (1992).
Yang, X., Epiepang, F. E., Liu, Y. & Yang, R. T. Heats of adsorption on mixed-cation LiNa-LSX: Estimating SIII site occupancy by Li. Chem. Eng. Sci. 178, 194–198 (2018).
Epiepang, F. E. et al. Air separation sorbents: Mixed-cation zeolites with minimum lithium and silver. Chem. Eng. Sci. 198, 43–51 (2019).
Li, Y., Li, L. & Yu, J. Applications of zeolites in sustainable chemistry. Chem 3(6), 928–949 (2017).
Liu, Z., Feng, J. & Uden, L. From technology opportunities to ideas generation via cross-cutting patent analysis: Application of generative topographic mapping and link prediction. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 192, 122565 (2023).
Jacobs, P., Flanigen, E. M., Jansen, J. & van Bekkum, H. Introduction to Zeolite Science and Practice (Elsevier, 2001).
Beerdsen, E., Smit, B. & Calero, S. The influence of non-framework sodium cations on the adsorption of alkanes in MFI-and MOR-type zeolites. J. Phys. Chem. B 106(41), 10659–10667 (2002).
Pettinari, C. & Tombesi, A. Metal–organic frameworks for carbon dioxide capture. MRS Energy Sustain. 7, E35 (2020).
Dashti, A., Bahrololoomi, A., Amirkhani, F. & Mohammadi, A. H. Estimation of CO2 adsorption in high capacity metal—organic frameworks: Applications to greenhouse gas control. J. CO2 Utilizat. 41, 101256 (2020).
Agwu, O. E., Alatefi, S., Alkouh, A., Azim, R. A. & Wee, S. C. Carbon capture using ionic liquids: An explicit data driven model for carbon (IV) Oxide solubility estimation. J. Clean. Prod. 472, 143508 (2024).
Alatefi, S., Agwu, O. E. & Alkouh, A. Explicit and explainable artificial intelligent model for prediction of CO2 molecular diffusion coefficient in heavy crude oils and bitumen. Results Eng. 24, 103328 (2024).
Alkouh, A., Elraies, K., Agwu, O. E., Alatefi, S. & Azim, R. A. Explicit data-based model for predicting oil-based mud viscosity at downhole conditions. ACS Omega 9(6), 6684–6695 (2024).
Google Scholar
Agwu, O. E., Elraies, K. A., Alkouh, A. & Alatefi, S. Mathematical modelling of drilling mud plastic viscosity at downhole conditions using multivariate adaptive regression splines. Geoenergy Sci. Eng. 233, 212584 (2024).
Agwu, O. E., Alatefi, S., Azim, R. A. & Alkouh, A. Applications of artificial intelligence algorithms in artificial lift systems: A critical review. Flow Meas. Instrum. 97, 102613 (2024).
Mehrmohammadi, P. & Ghaemi, A. Investigating the effect of textural properties on CO2 adsorption in porous carbons via deep neural networks using various training algorithms. Sci. Rep. 13(1), 21264 (2023).
Google Scholar
Fathalian, F., Aarabi, S., Ghaemi, A. & Hemmati, A. Intelligent prediction models based on machine learning for CO2 capture performance by graphene oxide-based adsorbents. Sci. Rep. 12(1), 21507 (2022).
Google Scholar
Namdeo, S., Srivastava, V. C. & Mohanty, P. Machine learning implemented exploration of the adsorption mechanism of carbon dioxide onto porous carbons. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 647, 174–187 (2023).
Google Scholar
Naghizadeh, A., Larestani, A., Amar, M. N. & Hemmati-Sarapardeh, A. Predicting viscosity of CO2–N2 gaseous mixtures using advanced intelligent schemes. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 208, 109359 (2022).
Rahimi, M. & Salaudeen, S. A. Optimizing hydrogen-rich gas production by steam gasification with integrated CaO-based adsorbent materials for CO2 capture: Machine learning approach. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 95, 695–709 (2024).
Khosrowshahi, M. S. et al. Natural products derived porous carbons for CO2 capture. Advanced Science 10(36), 2304289 (2023).
Google Scholar
Hai, T. et al. Machine learning-aided modeling of the hydrogen storage in zeolite-based porous media. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer 145, 106848 (2023).
Alizadeh, S. M. S., Parhizi, Z., Alibak, A. H., Vaferi, B. & Hosseini, S. Predicting the hydrogen uptake ability of a wide range of zeolites utilizing supervised machine learning methods. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 47(51), 21782–21793 (2022).
Google Scholar
Bao, Z. et al. Adsorption equilibria of CO2, CH4, N2, O2, and Ar on high silica zeolites. J. Chem. Eng. Data 56(11), 4017–4023 (2011).
Wang, C.-Y. et al. Oxygen-selective adsorption in RPM3-Zn metal organic framework. Chem. Eng. Sci. 165, 122–130 (2017).
DeCoste, J. B. et al. Metal–organic frameworks for oxygen storage. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53(51), 14092–14095 (2014).
Wang, J. et al. Separation of cobalt and lithium from spent LiCoO2 batteries using zeolite NaA and the resulting ion exchange product for N2/O2 separation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 313, 123449 (2023).
Min, J. G., Kemp, K. C., Kencana, K. S. & Hong, S. B. Silver-exchanged CHA zeolite as a CO2-resistant adsorbent for N2/O2 separation. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 323, 111239 (2021).
Liu, H. et al. Oxygen-selective adsorption on high-silica LTA zeolite. Chem. Commun. 56(75), 11130–11133 (2020).
Liu, H. et al. Directly decorated CeY zeolite for O 2-selective adsorption in O 2/N 2 separation at ambient temperature. Mater. Horiz. 9(2), 688–693 (2022).
Google Scholar
Panezai, H., Sun, J. & Ullah, R. Kinetic evaluation of dehydration in MxNa96-xLSX (M= Li+, Ca2+ and Ag+) zeolites and resulting effects on selective adsorption of N2 and O2. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 301, 110233 (2020).
Williamson, D. F., Parker, R. A. & Kendrick, J. S. The box plot: A simple visual method to interpret data. Ann. Intern. Med. 110(11), 916–921 (1989).
Google Scholar
Hemmati-Sarapardeh, A., Varamesh, A., Husein, M. M. & Karan, K. On the evaluation of the viscosity of nanofluid systems: Modeling and data assessment. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 81, 313–329 (2018).
Kulkarni, S. G., Chaudhary, A. K., Nandi, S., Tambe, S. S. & Kulkarni, B. D. Modeling and monitoring of batch processes using principal component analysis (PCA) assisted generalized regression neural networks (GRNN). Biochem. Eng. J. 18(3), 193–210 (2004).
Naghizadeh, A. et al. Modeling thermal conductivity of hydrogen-based binary gaseous mixtures using generalized regression neural network. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 59, 242–250 (2024).
Google Scholar
Lashkarbolooki, M., Vaferi, B., Shariati, A. & Hezave, A. Z. Investigating vapor–liquid equilibria of binary mixtures containing supercritical or near-critical carbon dioxide and a cyclic compound using cascade neural network. Fluid Phase Equilib. 343, 24–29 (2013).
Fahlman, S. Lebiere, C. The cascade-correlation learning architecture. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2 (1989).
Amar, M. N. Modeling solubility of sulfur in pure hydrogen sulfide and sour gas mixtures using rigorous machine learning methods. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 45(58), 33274–33287 (2020).
Google Scholar
Abujazar, M. S. S., Fatihah, S., Ibrahim, I. A., Kabeel, A. & Sharil, S. Productivity modelling of a developed inclined stepped solar still system based on actual performance and using a cascaded forward neural network model. J. Clean. Prod. 170, 147–159 (2018).
Nami, F. & Deyhimi, F. Prediction of activity coefficients at infinite dilution for organic solutes in ionic liquids by artificial neural network. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 43(1), 22–27 (2011).
Google Scholar
Hagan, M. T. & Menhaj, M. B. Training feedforward networks with the Marquardt algorithm. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 5(6), 989–993 (1994).
Google Scholar
Hemmati-Sarapardeh, A., Larestani, A., Menad, N. A. & Hajirezaie, S. Applications of Artificial Intelligence Techniques in the Petroleum Industry (Gulf Professional Publishing, 2020).
Lv, Q. et al. Modeling thermo-physical properties of hydrogen utilizing machine learning schemes: Viscosity, density, diffusivity, and thermal conductivity. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 72, 1127–1142 (2024).
Google Scholar
Kirk, H., Haynes, F. & Monroe, R. Application of trend analysis to horticultural field trials (1980).
Helvensteijn, B. P., Wang, Y., Levan, D., Luna, B. & Kashani, A. Adsorption of oxygen onto zeolites at pressures up to 15 MPa. in AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1434, no. 1, pp. 1245–1252 (American Institute of Physics, 2012).
Amar, M. N. Prediction of hydrate formation temperature using gene expression programming. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 89, 103879 (2021).
Atashrouz, S., Hemmati-Sarapardeh, A., Mirshekar, H., Nasernejad, B. & Moraveji, M. K. On the evaluation of thermal conductivity of ionic liquids: Modeling and data assessment. J. Mol. Liq. 224, 648–656 (2016).
Shateri, M., Ghorbani, S., Hemmati-Sarapardeh, A. & Mohammadi, A. H. Application of Wilcoxon generalized radial basis function network for prediction of natural gas compressibility factor. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 50, 131–141 (2015).
