Ayer, T., Ayvaci, M. U., Liu, Z. X., Alagoz, O. & Burnside, E. S. Computer-aided diagnostic models in breast cancer screening. Imaging Med. 2, 313–323 (2010).
Google Scholar
Lehman, C. D. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of digital screening mammography with and without computer-aided detection. JAMA Intern. Med. 175, 1828–1837 (2015).
Google Scholar
Heit, J. J. et al. Automated cerebral hemorrhage detection using RAPID. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 42, 273–278 (2021).
Google Scholar
McLouth, J. et al. Validation of a deep learning tool in the detection of intracranial hemorrhage and large vessel occlusion. Front. Neurol. 12, 656112 (2021).
Google Scholar
Matsoukas, S. et al. Pilot deployment of viz-intracranial hemorrhage for intracranial hemorrhage detection: real-world performance in a stroke code cohort. Stroke 53, e418–e419 (2022).
Google Scholar
Oakden-Rayner, L. The rebirth of CAD: how is modern AI different from the CAD we know? Radiol. Artif. Intell. 1, e180089 (2019).
Google Scholar
Mukherjee, S., Shukla, S., Woodle, J., Rosen, A. M. & Olarte, S. Misdiagnosis of schizophrenia in bipolar patients: a multiethnic comparison. Am. J. Psychiatry 140, 1571–1574 (1983).
Google Scholar
Wittchen, H. U., Muhlig, S. & Beesdo, K. Mental disorders in primary care. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 5, 115–128 (2003).
Google Scholar
Culpepper, L. Misdiagnosis of bipolar depression in primary care practices. J. Clin. Psychiatry 75, e05 (2014).
Google Scholar
Shen, H. et al. Analysis of misdiagnosis of bipolar disorder in an outpatient setting. Shanghai Arch. Psychiatry 30, 93–101 (2018).
Google Scholar
Arbabshirani, M. R. et al. Advanced machine learning in action: identification of intracranial hemorrhage on computed tomography scans of the head with clinical workflow integration. npj Digit. Med. 1, 9 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lin, E. L. & Yuh, E. L. Computational approaches for acute traumatic brain injury image recognition. Front. Neurol. 9, 791816 (2022).
Google Scholar
Pies, R. How ’objective’ are psychiatric diagnoses? Psychiatry (Edgmont) 4, 18–22 (2007).
Google Scholar
Brown, C., Story, G. H., Mourão-Miranda, J. & Baker, J. T. Will artificial intelligence eventually replace psychiatrists? Br. J. Psychiatry 218, 131–134 (2021).
Google Scholar
Klöppel, S. et al. Diagnostic neuroimaging across diseases. Neuroimage 61, 457–463 (2012).
Google Scholar
Falkai, P., Schmitt, A. & Andreasen, N. Forty years of structural brain imaging in mental disorders: is it clinically useful or not? Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 20, 179–186 (2018).
Google Scholar
Zhang, L., Wang, M., Liu, M. & Zhang, D. A survey on deep learning for neuroimaging-based brain disorder analysis. Front. Neurosci. 14, 779 (2020).
Google Scholar
Sendak, M. et al. Editorial: surfacing best practices for AI software development and integration in healthcare. Front. Digit. Health 5, 1150875 (2023).
Google Scholar
Fenton, J. J. et al. Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. N. Engl. J. Med. 356, 1399–1409 (2007).
Google Scholar
Gilbert, F. J. et al. Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography. N. Engl. J. Med. 359, 1675–1684 (2008).
Google Scholar
Philpotts, L. E. Can computer-aided detection be detrimental to mammographic interpretation? Radiology 253, 17–22 (2009).
Google Scholar
Wen, J. et al. Convolutional neural networks for classification of Alzheimer’s disease: overview and reproducible evaluation. Med. Image Anal. 63, 101694 (2020).
Google Scholar
Dreyer, K. J. AI Central (Data Science Institute, American College of Radiology) https://aicentral.acrdsi.org/ (2023).
Khunte, M. et al. Trends in clinical validation and usage of US Food and Drug Administration-cleared artificial intelligence algorithms for medical imaging. Clin. Radiol. 78, 123–9 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ranjbarzadeh, R. et al. Brain tumor segmentation based on deep learning and an attention mechanism using MRI multi-modalities brain images. Nat. Sci. Rep. 11, 10930 (2021).
Google Scholar
Lotlikar, V. S., Satpute, N. & Gupta, A. Brain tumor detection using machine learning and deep learning: a review. Curr. Med. Imaging 18, 604–622 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zijdenbos, A., Forghani, R. & Evans, A. Automatic “pipeline” analysis of 3-D MRI data for clinical trials: application to multiple sclerosis. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 1280–1291 (2003) http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1174106/?reload=true (2003).
Whiting, P. et al. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: systematic review. BMJ 332, 875–884 (2006).
Google Scholar
Shoeibi, A. et al. Applications of deep learning techniques for automated multiple sclerosis detection using magnetic resonance imaging: a review. Comput. Biol. Med. 136, 104697 (2021).
Google Scholar
Yeboah, D., Nguyen, H., Hier, D. B., Olbricht, G. R. & Obafemi-Ajayi, T. A deep learning model to predict traumatic brain injury severity and outcome from MR images. In 2021 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (CIBCB) 1–6 (Melbourne, Victoria, 2021).
Mainali, S., Darsie, M. E. & Smetana, K. S. Machine learning in action: stroke diagnosis and outcome prediction. Front. Neurol. 21, 734345 (2021).
Google Scholar
Shakil, S. & Khurshid, K. Role of deep learning in brain tumor detection and classification (2015 to 2020): a review. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 91, 101940 (2021).
Google Scholar
Grewal, M., Srivastava, M. M., Kumar, P. & Varadarajan, S. RADNET: radiologist level accuracy using deep learning for hemorrhage detection in CT scans. In 2018 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2018), 281–284 (Washington, DC, 2018).
Ye, H. et al. Precise diagnosis of intracranial hemorrhage and subtypes using a three-dimensional joint convolutional and recurrent neural network. Eur. Radiol. 29, 6191–6201 (2019).
Google Scholar
Yeo, M. et al. Review of deep learning algorithms for the automatic detection of intracranial hemorrhages on computed tomography head imaging. J. Neurointerv. Surg. 13, 369–378 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zeng, C., Gu, L., Liu, Z. & Zhao, S. Review of deep learning approaches for the segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions on brain MRI. Front. Neuroinform. 20, 610967 (2020).
Google Scholar
Bruffaerts, R. Machine learning in neurology: what neurologists can learn from machines and vice versa. J. Neurol. 265, 2745–2748 (2018).
Google Scholar
Martin, S. A., Townend, F. J., Barkhof, F. & Cole, J. H. Interpretable machine learning for dementia: a systematic review. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2023, 1–15 (2023).
Snider, S. B. & Edlow, B. L. Magnetic resonance imaging in disorders of consciousness. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 33, 676–683 (2022).
Google Scholar
Leming, M., Das, S. & Im, H. Adversarial confound regression and uncertainty measurements to classify heterogeneous clinical MRI in Mass General Brigham. PLoS ONE 18, e0277572 (2022).
Google Scholar
Matsuda, H. Voxel-based morphometry of brain MRI in normal aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Aging Dis 4, 29–37 (2013).
Google Scholar
Lerch, J. P. et al. Mapping anatomical correlations across cerebral cortex (MACACC) using cortical thickness from MRI. Neuroimage 31, 993–1003 (2006).
Google Scholar
Bron, E. E. et al. Standardized evaluation of algorithms for computer-aided diagnosis of dementia based on structural MRI: the CADDementia challenge. Neuroimage 111, 562–579 (2015).
Google Scholar
Vemuri, P. et al. Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis in individual subjects using structural MR images: validation studies. NeuroImage 39, 1186–1197 (2008).
Google Scholar
Alzheimer’s Association. Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimer’s Dement. 17, 327–406 (2021).
Rasmussen, J. & Langerman, H. Alzheimer’s disease—why we need early diagnosis. Degener. Neurol. Neuromuscul. Dis. 9, 123–130 (2019).
Google Scholar
Vinters, H. V. Emerging concepts in Alzheimer’s disease. Annu. Rev. Pathol. Mech. Dis. 10, 291–319 (2015).
Google Scholar
Knopman, D. S. et al. Alzheimer disease. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 7, 33 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ellis, K. A. et al. The Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study of aging: methodology and baseline characteristics of 1112 individuals recruited for a longitudinal study of Alzheimer’s disease. Int. Psychogeriatr. 21, 672–687 (2009).
Google Scholar
Marcus, D. S., Fotenos, A. F., Csernansky, J. G., Morris, J. C. & Buckner, R. L. Open access series of imaging studies: longitudinal MRI data in nondemented and demented older adults. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 22, 2677–2684 (2010).
Google Scholar
Weiner, M. W. et al. The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: a review of papers published since its inception. Alzheimers Dement. 9, e111–94 (2013).
Google Scholar
Young, A. L. et al. Uncovering the heterogeneity and temporal complexity of neurodegenerative diseases with Subtype and Stage Inference. Nat. Commun. 9, 4273 (2018).
Google Scholar
Staffaroni, A. M. et al. Temporal order of clinical and biomarker changes in familial frontotemporal dementia. Nat. Med. 28, 2194–2206 (2022).
Google Scholar
Vernooij, M. W. et al. Dementia imaging in clinical practice: a European-wide survey of 193 centres and conclusions by the ESNR working group. Neuroradiology 61, 633–642 (2019).
Google Scholar
Calhoun, V. D., Lawrie, S. M., Mourao-Miranda, J. & Stephan, K. E. Prediction of individual differences from neuroimaging data. Neuroimage 145, 135–136 (2018).
Google Scholar
Rathore, S., Habes, M., Iftikhar, M. A., Shacklett, A. & Davatzikos, C. A review on neuroimaging-based classification studies and associated feature extraction methods for Alzheimer’s disease and its prodromal stages. Neuroimage 155, 530–548 (2017).
Google Scholar
Borchert, R et al. Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and prognosis in neuroimaging for dementia; a systematic review. medRxiv (2021).
Cheng, D. & Liu, M. CNNs based multi-modality classification for AD diagnosis. In 10th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, Biomedical Engineering and Informatics (CISP-BMEI) Vol. 6, 1–5 (Shanghai, China, 2017).
Li, F., Cheng, D. & Liu, M. Alzheimer’s disease classification based on combination of multi-model convolutional neural networks. In IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques (IST) 1–5 (Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 2017).
Korolev, S., Safiullin, A., Belyaev, M. & Dodonova, Y. Residual and plain convolutional neural networks for 3D brain MRI classification. In IEEE 14th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 835–838 (Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 2017).
Backstrom, K., Nazari, M., Gu, I. Y. & Jakola, A. S. An efficient 3D deep convolutional network for Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis using MR images. In 2018 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2018) 149–153 (Washington, DC, USA, 2018).
Senanayake, U., Sowmya, A. & Dawles, L. Deep fusion pipeline for mild cognitive impairment diagnosis. In IEEE 15th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2018) 1394–1397 (2018).
Edlow, B. L. et al. Therapies to restore consciousness in patients with severe brain injuries: a gap analysis and future directions. Neurocrit. Care 35, 68–85 (2021).
Google Scholar
Thung, K. H., Yap, P. T. & Shen, D. Multi-stage diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease with incomplete multimodal data via multi-task deep learning. In Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis and Multimodal Learning for Clinical Decision Support: Lecture Notes in Computer Science 10553 (Quebec City, Quebec, Canada, 2017).
Apostolopoulos, I. D., Apostolopoulos, D. I., Spyridonidis, T. I., Papathanasiou, N. D. & Panayiotakis, G. S. Multi-input deep learning approach for cardiovascular disease diagnosis using myocardial perfusion imaging and clinical data. Phys. Med. 84, 168–177 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kloppel, S. et al. Automatic classification of MR scans in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 131, 681–689 (2008).
Google Scholar
Etminani, K. et al. A 3D deep learning model to predict the diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies, Alzheimer’s disease, and mild cognitive impairment using brain 18F-FDG PET. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 49, 563–584 (2021).
Google Scholar
Liu, Y. et al. Disrupted small-world networks in schizophrenia. Brain 131, 945–961 (2008).
Google Scholar
Lynall, M. E. et al. Functional connectivity and brain networks in schizophrenia. J. Neurosci. 30, 9477–9487 (2010).
Google Scholar
Han, S., Wuang, W., Zhang, Y., Zhao, J. & Chen, H. Recognition of early-onset schizophrenia using deep-learning method. Appl. Inform. 4, 16 (2017).
Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. P., Redcay, E. & Courchesne, E. Failing to deactivate: resting functional abnormalities in autism. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 8275–8280 (2006).
Google Scholar
Nielsen, J. A. et al. Multisite functional connectivity MRI classification of autism: ABIDE results. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7, 599 (2013).
Google Scholar
Price, T., Wee, C. Y., Gao, W. & Shen, D. Multiple-network classification of childhood autism using functional connectivity dynamics. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv. 17, 177–184 (2014).
Google Scholar
Plitt, M., Barnes, K. A. & Martin, A. Functional connectivity classification of autism identifies highly predictive brain features but falls short of biomarker standards. NeuroImage Clin. 7, 359–366 (2015).
Google Scholar
Retico, A., Tosetti, M., Muratori, F. & Calderoni, S. Neuroimaging-based methods for autism identification: a possible translational application? Funct. Neurol. 29, 231–239 (2022).
Du, Y., Fu, Z. & Calhoun, V. D. Classification and prediction of brain disorders using functional connectivity: promising but challenging. Front. Neurosci. 12, 525 (2018).
Google Scholar
Nunes, A. et al. Using structural MRI to identify bipolar disorders—13 site machine learning study in 3020 individuals from the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorders Working Group. Mol. Psychiatry 25, 2130–2143 (2020).
Google Scholar
Broyd, S. J. et al. Default-mode brain dysfunction in mental disorders: a systematic review. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 33, 279–296 (2009).
Google Scholar
Mana, S., Paillère Martinot, M. L. & Martinot, J. L. Brain imaging findings in children and adolescents with mental disorders: a cross-sectional review. Eur. Psychiatry 25, 345–354 (2010).
Google Scholar
Colby, J. B. et al. Insights into multimodal imaging classification of ADHD. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 6, 59 (2012).
Google Scholar
Christakou, A. et al. Disorder-specific functional abnormalities during sustained attention in youth with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and with autism. Mol. Psychiatry 18, 236–244 (2013).
Google Scholar
Chantiluke, K. et al. Disorder-specific functional abnormalities during temporal discounting in youth with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Autism and comorbid ADHD and Autism. Psychiatry Res. Neuroimaging 223, 113–120 (2014).
Google Scholar
Rosenberg, M. D. et al. A neuromarker of sustained attention from whole-brain functional connectivity. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 165–171 (2016).
Google Scholar
First, M. B. et al. Clinical applications of neuroimaging in psychiatric disorders. Am. J. Psychiatry 175, 915–9166 (2019).
Google Scholar
Barron, D. S. et al. Decision models and technology can help psychiatry develop biomarkers. Front. Psychol. 12, 706655 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ecker, C. et al. Intrinsic gray-matter connectivity of the brain in adults with autism spectrum disorder. PNAS 110, 13222–13227 (2013).
Google Scholar
Cerliani, L. et al. Increased functional connectivity between subcortical and cortical resting-state networks in autism spectrum disorder. JAMA Psychiatry 72, 767–777 (2015).
Google Scholar
Ha, S., Sohn, I. J., Kim, N., Sim, H. J. & Cheon, K. A. Characteristics of brains in autism spectrum disorder: structure, function and connectivity across the lifespan. Exp. Neurobiol. 24, 273–284 (2015).
Google Scholar
Chen, J. V. et al. Deep learning to predict neonatal and infant brain age from myelination on brain MRI scans. Radiology 305, 211860 (2022).
Google Scholar
Hazlett, H. C. et al. Early brain development in infants at high risk for autism spectrum disorder. Nature 542, 348–351 (2017).
Google Scholar
Rees, S. & Inder, T. Fetal and neonatal origins of altered brain development. Early Hum. Dev. 81, 753–761 (2005).
Google Scholar
Mostapha, M. & Styner, M. Role of deep learning in infant brain MRI analysis. Magn. Reson. Imaging 64, 171–189 (2022).
Google Scholar
Lai, M., Lombardo, M. V. & Baron-Cohen, S. Autism. Lancet 383, 896–910 (2014).
Google Scholar
Dinstein, I. et al. Disrupted neural synchronization in toddlers with autism. Neuron 70, 1218–1225 (2011).
Google Scholar
Green, J. et al. Intervention for infants at risk of developing autism: a case series. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 43, 2502–2514 (2013).
Google Scholar
Shen, M. D. & Piven, J. Brain and behavior development in autism from birth through infancy. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 19, 325–333 (2017).
Google Scholar
Biobank, U. Imaging Study. UK Biobank, https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/explore-your-participation/contribute-further/imaging-study (2022).
Leming, M., Das, S. & Im, H. Construction of a confounder-free clinical MRI dataset in the Mass General Brigham system for classification of Alzheimer’s disease. Artif. Intell. Med. 129, 102309 (2022).
Google Scholar
Quionero-Candela, J., Sugiyama, M., Schwaighofer, A. & Lawrence, N. D. Dataset Shift in Machine Learning (The MIT Press, 2009).
Ziyin, L., Hartwig, T. & Ueda, M. Neural networks fail to learn periodic functions and how to fix it. In 34th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) (Vancouver, Canada; Virtual, 2020).
FDA. Proposed regulatory framework for modifications to artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML)-based Software as a Medical Device (SaMD)—Discussion Paper and Request for Feedback. https://www.fda.gov/media/122535/download (2019).
FDA. Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning (AI/ML)-based Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) Action Plan. https://www.fda.gov/media/145022/download (2021).
Duffy, B. A. et al. Retrospective motion artifact correction of structural MRI images using deep learning improves the quality of cortical surface reconstructions. Neuroimage 230, 117756 (2021).
Google Scholar
Gilmore, A. D., Buser, N. J. & Hanson, J. L. Variations in structural MRI quality significantly impact commonly used measures of brain anatomy. Brain Inf. 8, 7 (2021).
Google Scholar
Monereo-Sanchez, J. et al. Quality control strategies for brain MRI segmentation and parcellation: practical approaches and recommendations—insights from the Maastricht study. Neuroimage 237, 118174 (2021).
Google Scholar
Rieke, N. et al. The future of digital health with federated learning. npj Digit. Med. 3, 119 (2020).
Google Scholar
Dayan, I. et al. Federated learning for predicting clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Nat. Med. 27, 1735–1743 (2021).
Google Scholar
Chang, K. et al. Distributed deep learning networks among institutions for medical imaging. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 25, 945–954 (2018).
Google Scholar
Beers, A. et al. DeepNeuro: an open-source deep learning toolbox for neuroimaging. Neuroinformatics 19, 127–140 (2021).
Google Scholar
Guan, H. et al. Multi-site MRI harmonization via attention-guided deep domain adaptation for brain disorder identification. Med. Image Anal. 71, 102076 (2021).
Google Scholar
Yamashita, A. et al. Harmonization of resting-state functional MRI data across multiple imaging sites via the separation of site differences into sampling bias and measurement bias. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000042 (2019).
Google Scholar
Radua, J. et al. Increased power by harmonizing structural MRI site differences with the ComBat batch adjustment method in ENIGMA. NeuroImage 218, 116956 (2020).
Google Scholar
Keenan, K. E. et al. Multi-site, multi-platform comparison of MRI T1 measurement using the system phantom. PLoS ONE 16, e0252966 (2021).
Google Scholar
Billot, B et al. SynthSeg: domain randomisation for segmentation of brain scans of any contrast and resolution. arXiv (2021).
Cali, R. J. et al. Synthesis of high-resolution research-quality MRI data from clinical MRI data in patients with COVID-19. Medrxiv (2021).
Zhao, Q., Adeli, E. & Pohl, K. M. Training confounder-free deep learning models for medical applications. Nat. Commun. 11, 6010 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gollub, R. L. & Benson, N. Use of medical imaging to advance mental health care: contributions from neuroimaging informatics. In Mental Health Informatics: Enabling a Learning Mental Healthcare System 1st edn 191–216 (eds, Tenenbaum, J. D. & Ranallo, P. A.) (Springer Nature, Switzerland, 2021).
Haneuse, S., Arterburn, D. & Daniels, M. J. Assessing missing data assumptions in EHR-based studies: a complex and underappreciated task. Jama Netw. Open 4, e210184 (2021).
Google Scholar
Rädsch, T. et al. What your radiologist might be missing: using machine learning to identify mislabeled instances of X-ray images. In Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (Wailea, Hawaii, USA, 2020).
Goodkin, O. et al. The quantitative neuroradiology initiative framework: application to dementia. Br. J. Radiol. 92, 20190365 (2019).
Google Scholar
Muehlematter, U. J., Daniore, P. & Vokinger, K. N. Approval of artificial intelligence and machine learning based medical devices in the USA and Europe (2015–20): a comparative analysis. Lancet Digit. Health 3, e195–e203 (2021).
Google Scholar
Food, U.S. Administration, D. Computer-assisted detection devices applied to radiology images and radiology device data–premarket notification [510 (k)] submissions—guidance for industry and Food and Drug Administration staff. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/computer-assisted-detection-devices-applied-radiology-images-and-radiology-device-data-premarket (2012).
Daye, D et al. Implementation of clinical artificial intelligence in radiology: who decides and how? Radiology 305, (2022).
King, H. China’s digital health regulatory framework for SaMD. Regul. Focus Quarterly 1, 33–41 (2022).
Jain, D. Regulation of digital healthcare in india: ethical and legal challenges. Healthcare (Basel) 11, 911 (2023).
Google Scholar
Jaiswal, A. Use of artificial intelligence in healthcare lacks legal regulations. Times India https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/use-of-artificial-intelligence-in-healthcare-lacks-legal-regulations/articleshow/97937942.cms?from=mdr (2023).
Pemberton, H. G. et al. Technical and clinical validation of commercial automated volumetric MRI tools for dementia diagnosis—a systematic review. Neuroradiology 63, 1773–1789 (2021).
Google Scholar
Tchou, P. M. et al. Interpretation time of computer-aided detection at screening mammography. Radiology 257, 40–46 (2010).
Google Scholar
Copeland, R. Google’s ‘Project Nightingale’ gathers personal health data on millions of Americans. Wall Street J. https://www.wsj.com/articles/google-s-secret-project-nightingale-gathers-personal-health-data-on-millions-of-americans-11573496790 (2019).
Powles, J. & Hodson, H. Google DeepMind and healthcare in an age of algorithms. Health Technol. (Berl.) 7, 351–367 (2017).
Google Scholar
Quach, K. IBM Watson dishes out ’dodgy cancer advice’, Google Translate isn’t better than humans yet, and other AI tidbits. Register https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/07/28/ai_roundup_720718/ (2018).
Hansen, T. Paging Dr. Algorithm: AI comes to rescue. Nvidia Blog. https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/2018/02/26/ai-radiology-machine-learning-global-impact-awards/ (2018).
Landi, H. Microsoft launches $40M AI for Health program to accelerate medical research. Fierce Healthcare https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/tech/microsoft-launches-40m-ai-for-health-program-to-accelerate-medical-research (2020).
Flagg, M. Reward research for being useful—not just flashy. Nature 610, 9 (2022).
Google Scholar
Bizzo, B. C. et al. Addressing the challenges of implementing artificial intelligence tools in clinical practice: principles from experience. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 20, 352–60 (2023).
Google Scholar
Mongan, J., Moy, L. & Kahn, C. E. Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM): a guide for authors and reviewers. Radiology 2, e200029 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kwok, R. Junior AI researchers are in demand by universities and industry. Nature 568, 581–583 (2019).
Google Scholar
Alberts, B., Kirschner, M. W., Tilghman, S. & Varmus, H. Rescuing US biomedical research from its systemic flaws. PNAS 111, 5773–5777 (2014).
Google Scholar
Woolston, C. Huge variations in US postdoc salaries point to undervalued workforce. Nature (2019).
Glassdoor. Salary Details for a Post Doctoral Research Scientist at Google (accessed 15 Sept 2022); https://www.glassdoor.com/Salary/Google-Post-Doctoral-Research-Scientist-Salaries-E9079_D_KO7,39.htm.
Glassdoor. Salary Details for a Post Doctoral Research Scientist at Meta (accessed 15 Sept 2022); https://www.glassdoor.com/Salary/Meta-Postdoctoral-Researcher-Salaries-E40772_D_KO5,28.htm.
Glassdoor. Salary Details for a Post Doctoral Research Scientist at Microsoft (accessed 15 Sept 2022); https://www.glassdoor.com/Salary/Microsoft-Post-Doc-Researcher-Salaries-E1651_D_KO10,29.htm.
Glassdoor. Postdoctoral Fellow Salary Policy (accessed 15 Sept 2022); https://mghresearch.partners.org/postdoctoral-fellow-salary-policy-html/.
Glassdoor. Mayo Clinic Postdoctoral Fellow Salaries (accessed 15 Sept 2022) https://www.glassdoor.com/Salary/Mayo-Clinic-Postdoctoral-Fellow-Salaries-E19884_D_KO12,31.htm.
Glassdoor. The Johns Hopkins University Postdoctoral Fellow Salaries (accessed 25 Sept 2022) https://www.glassdoor.com/Salary/The-Johns-Hopkins-University-Postdoctoral-Fellow-Salaries-E2851_D_KO29,48.htm.
Murphy, S. N. et al. High throughput tools to access images from clinical archives for research. J. Digit. Imaging 28, 194–204 (2014).
Google Scholar
Zhang, J. et al. Fully automated echocardiogram interpretation in clinical practice. Circulation 138, 1623–1635 (2018).
Google Scholar
van Garderen, K. A. et al. EASE: clinical implementation of automated tumor segmentation and volume quantification for adult low-grade glioma. Front. Med. (Lausanne) 8, 738425 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ries, E. The Lean Startup. 2nd edn (Crown Publishing Group, Random House, Inc., New York, NY, 2011).
