Still, the proposal puts the EU at the forefront of AI regulation. For example, it will ban the use of AI in public space biometric systems, predictive police systems, and more, and make generative AI programs like ChatGPT more transparent. But that inclusiveness can also create challenges. The EU should set a single standard for its 27 member states, while the US has a more piecemeal approach, whether individual institutions decide their own policies or Congress passes legislation. may approach AI policy in a variety of ways. One that corresponds to a specific sector.
“[The EU] We need to set a single standard that the entire continent follows. The U.S. doesn’t need to do this,” said Alex Engler, a governance research fellow at Brookings University who studies AI and emerging data technologies. “The US approach is probably more specific and in some ways a better guide. and will never be uniform.”
Senator Martin Heinrich, co-founder of the bipartisan Senate Artificial Intelligence Caucus, said the EU and the US have “historically very different regulatory cultures”. “We would have to cross the finish line here and get something with 60 votes. mentioned the threshold of 60 votes needed to advance the bill.
