Lappé, F. M. Diet for a Small Planet (Ballantine Books, 1971).
Clark, M. A. et al. Global food system emissions could preclude achieving the 1.5° and 2°C climate change targets. Science 370, 705–708 (2020).
Google Scholar
Xu, X. et al. Global greenhouse gas emissions from animal-based foods are twice those of plant-based foods. Nat. Food 2, 724–732 (2021). This study shows that animal-based foods produce roughly twice the greenhouse gases of plant-based foods. It underscores the environmental benefits of plant and microbial proteins central to sustainable food design.
Google Scholar
Keesing, F. Diet for a small footprint. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2204241119 (2022).
Google Scholar
Friedrich, B. Transforming a 12,000-year-old technology. Nat. Food 3, 807–808 (2022).
Google Scholar
Barabasi, A. L. et al. The unmapped chemical complexity of our diet. Nat. Food 1, 33–37 (2020). This perspective reveals the vast and largely unexplored chemical diversity in everyday foods. It highlights the need for computational and AI-driven mapping of food molecules to understand nutrition, flavour and health interactions.
Google Scholar
Zeni, C. et al. A generative model for inorganic materials design. Nature 639, 624–632 (2025).
Google Scholar
Al-Sarayreh, M. et al. Inverse design and AI/deep generative networks in food design: a comprehensive review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 138, 215–228 (2023).
Google Scholar
Datta, A. et al. Computer-aided food engineering. Nat. Food 3, 894–904 (2022). This review outlines how computation, modelling and automation can transform food engineering. It establishes a framework for integrating AI, digital twins and process optimization into food design and manufacturing.
Google Scholar
King, A. Four ways to power-up AI for drug discovery. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-00602-5 (2025).
Kuhl, E. AI for food: accelerating and democratizing discovery and innovation. npj Sci. Food 9, 82 (2025).
Google Scholar
Turing, A. M. Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 59, 433–460 (1950).
Google Scholar
Rumelhart, D. E. et al. Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 323, 533–536 (1986).
Google Scholar
Krizhevsky, A. et al. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Commun. ACM 60, 84–90 (2017).
Google Scholar
Goodfellow, I. et al. Generative adversarial networks. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 27, 2672–2680 (2014). This work presents the GAN framework for generating realistic synthetic data. It underpins AI applications in food imaging, formulation design and sensory data augmentation.
Vaswani, A. et al. Attention is all you need. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 30, 5998–6008 (2017). This landmark paper introduces the transformer architecture of today’s large language models. It enables multimodal AI systems for recipe generation, ingredient substitution and scientific discovery.
International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409, 860–921 (2001).
Google Scholar
Gilmer, J. et al. Neural message passing for quantum chemistry. Proc. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. 34, 1263–1272 (2017). This paper introduces message-passing neural networks for predicting molecular properties from graph structures. It lays the foundation for AI models in food chemistry and ingredient design.
Zeevi, D. et al. Personalized nutrition by prediction of glycemic responses. Cell 163, 1079–1094 (2015).
Google Scholar
Gordon, E. B. et al. Biomaterials in cellular agriculture and plant-based foods for the future. Nat. Rev. Mater. 10, 500–518 (2025).
Google Scholar
Schreurs, M. et al. Predicting and improving complex beer flavor through machine learning. Nat. Commun. 15, 2368 (2024).
Google Scholar
Lee, B.-K. et al. A principal odor map unifies diverse tasks in olfactory perception. Science 381, 999–1006 (2023). This work creates a continuous map linking molecular structure to human odour perception. It enables AI models to predict and generate new flavour and aroma profiles for food design.
Google Scholar
Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021). This breakthrough model achieves near-experimental accuracy in protein structure prediction. It inspires the design of functional food proteins and enzymes for alternative protein production.
Google Scholar
Butler, K. T. et al. Machine learning for molecular and materials science. Nature 559, 547–555 (2018). This review outlines how machine learning accelerates discovery in chemistry and materials science. It provides key methodologies directly transferable to AI-based formulation and texture engineering in food.
Google Scholar
Graham, A. E. & Ledesma-Amaro, R. The microbial food revolution. Nat. Commun. 14, 2231 (2023).
Google Scholar
Lurie-Luke, E. Alternative protein sources: science-powered startups to fuel food innovation. Nat. Commun. 15, 4425 (2024).
Google Scholar
Kyriakopoulou, K. et al. in Sustainable Meat Production and Processing (ed. Galanakis, C. M.) 103–126 (Academic Press, 2019).
Fasolin, L. H. et al. Emergent food proteins—towards sustainability, health and innovation. Foods 10, 600 (2021).
Day, L. Proteins from land plants—potential resources for human nutrition and food security. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 32, 25–42 (2013).
Google Scholar
Liu, M.-Q. et al. Digging natural emulsifiers based on machine learning and exploration their performance for stabilizing dairy products. Preprint at SSRN https://ssrn.com/abstract=4994781 (2025).
Siejak, P. et al. The prediction of pectin viscosity using machine learning based on physical characteristics—case study: aglupectin HS-MR. Sustainability 16, 5877 (2024).
Google Scholar
Lie-Piang, A. et al. Quantifying techno-functional properties of ingredients from multiple crops using machine learning. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 7, 100601 (2023).
Google Scholar
Yilmaz, M. T. et al. Explainable AI-driven evaluation of plant protein rheology using tree-based and Gaussian process machine learning models. Ain Shams Eng. J. 16, 103565 (2025).
Google Scholar
Kraessig, P. M. et al. Sensory-biased autoencoder enables prediction of texture perception from food rheology. Food Res. Int. 205, 116007 (2025).
Google Scholar
Meng, Y. et al. Advancing salt reduction technologies: AI-assisted structural design of starch-based emulsion gel systems for next-generation low sodium food formulations. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 264, 105234 (2025).
Google Scholar
NotCo. Latent space method of generating food formulas. US patent 10,915,818 (2021).
NotCo. Neural network method of generating food formulas. US patent 10,957,424 (2021).
NotCo. Systems and methods to mimic target food items using artificial intelligence. US patent 11,164,478 (2021).
Martin, J. et al. Recipe1M+: a dataset for learning cross-modal embeddings for cooking recipes and food images. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 43 187–203 (2021).
Park, D. et al. FlavorGraph: a large-scale food-chemical graph for generating food representations and recommending food pairings. Sci. Rep. 11, 931 (2021).
Google Scholar
Garg, N. et al. FlavorDB: a database of flavor molecules. Nucl. Acids Res. 46, D1210–D1216 (2018).
Google Scholar
Ahn, Y.-Y. et al. Flavor network and the principles of food pairing. Sci. Rep. 1, 196 (2011).
Google Scholar
Tac, V., Gardner, C. & Kuhl, E. Generative artificial intelligence creates delicious, sustainable, and nutritious burgers. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.03092 (2026). This study uses generative AI to create burgers that outperformed the classic Big Mac in a blinded restaurant survey.
van den Bedem, S. D. et al. Open-source benchmarking of plant-based and animal meats. Foods 15, 2112 (2026).
Google Scholar
Eastham, J. L. & Leman, A. R. Precision fermentation for food proteins: ingredient innovations, bioprocess considerations, and outlook—a mini-review. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 58, 101194 (2024).
Google Scholar
Feng, X. et al. Enhanced lipid production by Chlorella pyrenoidosa through magnetic field pretreatment of wastewater and treatment of microalgae-wastewater culture solution: magnetic field treatment modes and conditions. Bioresour. Technol. 206, 123102 (2020).
Google Scholar
Sharma, D. et al. Response surface methodology and artificial neural network modelling for enhancing maturity parameters during vermicomposting of floral waste. Bioresour. Technol. 324, 124672 (2021).
Google Scholar
Liao, X. et al. Artificial Intelligence: a solution to involution of design–build–test–learn cycle. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 75, 102712 (2022).
Google Scholar
Liu, L. et al. Modeling and optimization of microbial hyaluronic acid production by Streptococcus zooepidemicus using radial basis function neural network coupling quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization algorithm. Biotechnol. Prog. 25, 1819–1825 (2009).
Google Scholar
Jia, R. et al. Exploration of deep learning models for real-time monitoring of state and performance of anaerobic digestion with online sensors. Bioresour. Technol. 363, 127908 (2022).
Google Scholar
Cheng, Y. et al. Artificial intelligence technologies in bioprocess: opportunities and challenges. Bioresour. Technol. 369, 128451 (2023).
Google Scholar
Treloar, N. J. et al. Deep reinforcement learning for the control of microbial co-cultures in bioreactors. PLoS Comput. Biol. 16, e1007783 (2020).
Google Scholar
Singhal, A. et al. Pretreatment of Leucaena leucocephala wood by acidified glycerol: optimization, severity index and correlation analysis. Bioresour. Technol. 265, 214–223 (2018).
Google Scholar
Austerjost, J. et al. A machine vision approach for bioreactor foam sensing. SLAS Technol. 26, 408–414 (2021).
Google Scholar
Butean, A. et al. A review of artificial intelligence applications for biorefineries and bioprocessing: from data-driven processes to optimization strategies and real-time control. Processes 13, 2544 (2025).
Google Scholar
Alejo, L. et al. Effluent composition prediction of a two-stage anaerobic digestion process: machine learning and stoichiometry techniques. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 25, 21149–21163 (2018).
Google Scholar
Akinade, O. O. & Oyedele, L. O. Integrating construction supply chains within a circular economy: an ANFIS-based waste analytics system (A-WAS). J. Clean. Prod. 229, 863–873 (2019).
Google Scholar
Peng, J. et al. Time-dependent fermentation control strategies for enhancing synthesis of marine bacteriocin 1701 using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm. Bioresour. Technol. 138, 345–352 (2013).
Google Scholar
Sharma, D. & Singh, K. AI-enhanced bioprocess technologies: machine learning implementations from upstream to downstream operations. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 41, 278 (2025).
Google Scholar
Holzinger, A. et al. AI for life: trends in artificial intelligence for biotechnology. New Biotechnol. 74, 16–24 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ghafarollahi, A. & Buehler, M. J. ProtAgents: protein discovery via large language model multi-agent collaborations combining physics and machine learning. Digit. Discov. 3, 1389–1409 (2024).
Google Scholar
St. Pierre, S. R. et al. Discovering the mechanics of artificial and real meat. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 415, 116236 (2023).
Google Scholar
St. Pierre, S. R. et al. The mechanical and sensory signature of plant-based and animal meat. npj Sci. Food 8, 94 (2024). This study quantitatively links mechanical texture measurements with human sensory perception in plant-based and animal meats. It provides critical benchmark data for AI models to predict texture and mouthfeel from physical properties.
Google Scholar
Sanahuja, M. et al. Classification of puffed snacks freshness based on crispiness-related mechanical and acoustical properties. J. Food Eng. 226, 53–64 (2018).
Google Scholar
Dahl, J. F. et al. Predicting rheological parameters of food biopolymer mixtures using machine learning. Food Hydrocoll. 160, 110786 (2025).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. et al. Construction of an intelligent recognition system for the cooking doneness of deep-fried golden pompano (Trachinotus ovatus) based on deep learning. Food Biosci. 68, 106644 (2025).
Google Scholar
Saalbrink, J. et al. Quantifying microscopic droplets in colloidal systems through machine learning-based image analysis. Food Hydrocoll. 166, 111301 (2025).
Google Scholar
Dunne, R. A. et al. Texture profile analysis and rheology of plant-based and animal meat. Food Res. Int. 205, 115876 (2025).
Google Scholar
Munekata, P. E. S. et al. Applications of electronic nose, electronic eye and electronic tongue in quality, safety and shelf life of meat and meat products: a review. Sensors 23, 672 (2023).
Google Scholar
Karakaya, D. et al. Electronic nose and its applications: a survey. Int. J. Autom. Comput. 17, 179–209 (2019).
Google Scholar
Bengio, Y. et al. Representation learning: a review and new perspectives. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 35, 1798–1828 (2012).
Google Scholar
Tom, G. et al. From molecules to mixtures: learning representations of olfactory mixture similarity using inductive biases. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.16271 (2025).
Istif, E. et al. Miniaturized wireless sensor enables real-time monitoring of food spoilage. Nat. Food 4, 427–436 (2023).
Google Scholar
Watson, N. J. et al. Intelligent sensors for sustainable food and drink manufacturing. Sustain. Food Syst. 5, 642786 (2021).
Google Scholar
Rombach, R. et al. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In Proc. IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 10684–10695 (IEEE, 2022).
Dinali, M. et al. Fibrous structure in plant-based meat: high-moisture extrusion factors and sensory attributes in production and storage. Food Rev. Int. 40, 2940–2968 (2024).
Google Scholar
Jiang, Y. et al. Plant-based protein extrusion optimization: comparison between machine learning and conventional experimental design. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 11, 101157 (2025).
Google Scholar
Abdurrahman, E. E. M. et al. Digital twin applications in the food industry: a review. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 9, 1538375 (2025).
Google Scholar
Top, J. et al. Cultivating FAIR principles for agri-food data. Comput. Electron. Agric. 196, 106909 (2022).
Google Scholar
Bölücü, N. et al. An evaluation of large language models for supplementing a food extrusion dataset. Foods 14, 1355 (2025).
Google Scholar
Watson, N. & Rafiq, S. NAPIC Partner Engagement Workshop Report (Univ. Leeds, 2025); https://doi.org/10.48785/100/320
Reducing the Price of Alternative Proteins (Good Food Institute, 2025); https://gfi.org/reducing-the-price-of-alternative-proteins
Mohbat, F. & Mohammed, J. Z. Llava-chef: a multi-modal generative model for food recipes. In Proc. 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (ACM, 2024).
Li, P. et al. Cheffusion: multimodal foundation model integrating recipe and food image generation. In Proc. 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (ACM, 2024).
Senath, T. et al. Large language models for ingredient substitution in food recipes using supervised fine-tuning and direct preference optimization. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.04922 (2024).
Tac, V. & Kuhl, E. Generative AI for material design: a mechanics perspective from burgers to matter. Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 61, 119171 (2026).
Google Scholar
Liu, G. et al. Retrieval augmented recipe generation. In IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) (IEEE, 2025).
Thomas, A. T. et al. What can large language models do for sustainable food? Proc. 42nd Int. Conf. Mach. Learn 267, 59377–59433 (PMLR, 2025).
Yang, D. et al. Social skill training with large language models. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.04204 (2024).
Rosas, L. G. et al. The effectiveness of Recipe4Health: a quasi-experimental evaluation. Am. J. Prevent. Med. 68, 377–390 (2025).
Google Scholar
Abramson, J. et al. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature 630, 493–500 (2024).
Google Scholar
Yuen, J. S. K. et al. Aggregating in vitro-grown adipocytes to produce macroscale cell-cultured fat tissue with tunable lipid compositions for food applications. eLife 12, e82120 (2023).
Google Scholar
Vervenne, T. et al. Probing mycelium mechanics and taste: the moist and fibrous signature of fungi steak. Acta Biomat. 202, 341–351 (2025).
Google Scholar
Rackauckas, C. et al. Universal differential equations for scientific machine learning. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.04385 (2020).
Raissi, M. et al. Physics-informed neural networks: a deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. J. Comput. Phys. 378, 686–707 (2019).
Google Scholar
Karniadakis, G. E. et al. Physics-informed machine learning. Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 422–440 (2021).
Google Scholar
Linka, K. & Kuhl, E. A new family of constitutive artificial neural networks towards automated model discovery. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 403, 115731 (2023).
Google Scholar
Brunton, S. L. et al. Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 3932–3937 (2016).
Google Scholar
St. Pierre, S. R. et al. Biaxial testing and sensory texture evaluation of plant-based and animal deli meat. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 10, 101080 (2025).
Google Scholar
Ghafarollahi, A. & Buehler, M. J. Sparks: multi-agent artificial intelligence model discovers protein design principles. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.19017 (2025).
Roohani, Y. et al. BioDiscoveryAgent: an AI agent for designing genetic perturbation experiments. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.17631 (2024).
Swanson, K. et al. The Virtual Lab of AI agents designs new SARS-CoV-2 nanobodies. Nature 646, 716–723 (2025).
Google Scholar
Buehler, M. J. Accelerating scientific discovery with generative knowledge extraction, graph-based representation, and multimodal intelligent graph reasoning. Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol. 5, 035083 (2024).
Google Scholar
Boiko, D. A. et al. Autonomous chemical research with large language models. Nature 624, 570–578 (2023). This paper demonstrates how large language models can autonomously plan, execute and interpret chemical experiments. It marks a major step towards self-driving discovery systems, directly inspiring similar AI-driven pipelines for food formulation and ingredient design.
Google Scholar
Peirlinck, M. et al. On automated model discovery and a universal material subroutine for hyperelastic materials. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 418, 116534 (2024).
Google Scholar
