Ian Hogarth has called for greater regulation of companies developing “god-like” artificial intelligence, saying he believes individuals working on the front lines of AI “would wholeheartedly welcome government intervention” (Life & Arts, April 15).
Agree. There are smart compromises for policymakers looking to address risk without stifling future innovation. Technology companies wishing to train general-purpose AI models at scale must apply for regulatory approval. This certification is granted only after demonstrating that certain safety requirements have been met. This only affects a handful of large tech companies, and the individuals I speak to at these companies increasingly support this type of regulation.
Far from stifling innovation, this kind of certification scheme could protect and stimulate the UK’s thriving AI market. The government’s current plan places a regulatory burden on small businesses. By imposing requirements on Big Tech as well, SMEs will:
AI applications to the UK, given that it ensures that safety and ethics issues are addressed further up the supply chain, reducing liability.
The decisions governments make now will determine how AI will shape our society. We should start by closely monitoring how AI is developed, not just how it is used.
Jess Whittlestone
Head of AI Policy, The Center for Long-Term Resilience, London SW1, UK
