Meta-designing quantum experiments with language models

Machine Learning


  • Lemos, G. B. et al. Quantum imaging with undetected photons. Nature 512, 409–412 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kviatkovsky, I., Chrzanowski, H. M., Avery, E. G., Bartolomaeus, H. & Ramelow, S. Microscopy with undetected photons in the mid-infrared. Sci. Adv. 6, 0264 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreau, P.-A., Toninelli, E., Gregory, T. & Padgett, M. J. Imaging with quantum states of light. Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 367–380 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Aslam, N. et al. Quantum sensors for biomedical applications. Nat. Rev. Phys. 5, 157–169 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pezzè, L., Smerzi, A., Oberthaler, M. K., Schmied, R. & Treutlein, P. Quantum metrology with nonclassical states of atomic ensembles. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 035005 (2018).

  • Polino, E., Valeri, M., Spagnolo, N. & Sciarrino, F. Photonic quantum metrology. AVS Quantum Sci. 2, 024703 (2020).

  • DeMille, D., Hutzler, N. R., Rey, A. M. & Zelevinsky, T. Quantum sensing and metrology for fundamental physics with molecules. Nat. Phys. 20, 741–749 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Flamini, F., Spagnolo, N. & Sciarrino, F. Photonic quantum information processing: a review. Rep. Progr. Phys. 82, 016001 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Couteau, C. et al. Applications of single photons to quantum communication and computing. Nat. Rev. Phys. 5, 326–338 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Aspuru-Guzik, A. & Walther, P. Photonic quantum simulators. Nat. Phys. 8, 285–291 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornish, S. L., Tarbutt, M. R. & Hazzard, K. R. A. Quantum computation and quantum simulation with ultracold molecules. Nat. Phys. 20, 730–740 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, L. S. et al. Quantum computational advantage with a programmable photonic processor. Nature 606, 75–81 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Krenn, M., Erhard, M. & Zeilinger, A. Computer-inspired quantum experiments. Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 649–661 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Krenn, M., Malik, M., Fickler, R., Lapkiewicz, R. & Zeilinger, A. Automated search for new quantum experiments. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 090405 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Knott, P. A search algorithm for quantum state engineering and metrology. New J. Phys. 18, 073033 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, R., Mineh, L., Rubio, J., Matthews, J. C. & Knott, P. A. Designing quantum experiments with a genetic algorithm. Quantum Sci. Technol. 4, 045012 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallnöfer, J., Melnikov, A. A., Dür, W. & Briegel, H. J. Machine learning for long-distance quantum communication. PRX Quantum 1, 010301 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Prabhu, M. et al. Accelerating recurrent ising machines in photonic integrated circuits. Optica 7, 551–558 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Krenn, M., Kottmann, J. S., Tischler, N. & Aspuru-Guzik, A. Conceptual understanding through efficient automated design of quantum optical experiments. Phys. Rev. X 11, 031044 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Gonzalez, C. et al. Digital discovery of 100 diverse quantum experiments with pytheus. Quantum 7, 1204 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Goel, S. et al. Inverse design of high-dimensional quantum optical circuits in a complex medium. Nat. Phys. 20, 232–239 (2024).

  • Landgraf, J., Peano, V. & Marquardt, F. Automated discovery of coupled-mode setups. Phys. Rev. X 15, 021038 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Molesky, S. et al. Inverse design in nanophotonics. Nat. Photon. 12, 659–670 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapra, N. V. et al. On-chip integrated laser-driven particle accelerator. Science 367, 79–83 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, W. et al. Deep learning for the design of photonic structures. Nat. Photon. 15, 77–90 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gedeon, J., Hassan, E. & Lesina, A. C. Time-domain topology optimization of arbitrary dispersive materials for broadband3D nanophotonics inverse design. ACS Photon. 10, 3875–3887 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostaszewski, M., Trenkwalder, L. M., Masarczyk, W., Scerri, E. & Dunjko, V. Reinforcement learning for optimization of variational quantum circuit architectures. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 34, 18182–18194 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nägele, M. & Marquardt, F. Optimizing ZX-diagrams with deep reinforcement learning. Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol. 5, 035077 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kottmann, J. S. Molecular quantum circuit design: a graph-based approach. Quantum 7, 1073 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zen, R. et al. Quantum circuit discovery for fault-tolerant logical state preparation with reinforcement learning. Phys. Rev. X 15, 041012 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLellan, B., Roztocki, P., Czischek, S. & Melko, R. G. End-to-end variational quantum sensing. npj Quantum Inf. 10, 118 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarnecki, K. & Eisenecker, U. W. Generative Programming: Methods, Tools and Applications (Addison-Wesley, 2000).

  • Lample, G. & Charton, F. Deep learning for symbolic mathematics. In Proc. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR, 2020).

  • Kamienny, P.-A., d’Ascoli, S., Lample, G. & Charton, F. End-to-end symbolic regression with transformers. In Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 10269–10281 (Curran Associates, 2022).

  • Trinh, T. H., Wu, Y., Le, Q. V., He, H. & Luong, T. Solving olympiad geometry without human demonstrations. Nature 625, 476–482 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Alfarano, A., Charton, F. & Hayat, A. Discovering Lyapunov functions with transformers. In Proc. 3rd Workshop on Mathematical Reasoning and AI at NeurIPS’23 1–11 (NeurIPS, 2023).

  • Cai, T. et al. Transforming the bootstrap: using transformers to compute scattering amplitudes in planar N = 4 super Yang–Millstheory. Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol. 5, 035073 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Alnuqaydan, A. et al. Symbolic machine learning for high energy physics calculations. In Proc. Machine Learning and the Physical Sciences Workshop 1–7 (NeurIPS, 2023).

  • Melko, R. G. & Carrasquilla, J. Language models for quantum simulation. Nat. Comput. Sci. 4, 11–18 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. et al. Program synthesis with large language models. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.07732 (2021).

  • Li, Y. et al. Competition-level code generation with AlphaCode. Science 378, 1092–1097 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Romera-Paredes, B. et al. Mathematical discoveries from program search with large language models. Nature 625, 468–475 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Novikov, A. et al. AlphaEvolve: a coding agent for scientific and algorithmic discovery. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.13131 (2025).

  • Dou, S. et al. StepCoder: improve code generation with reinforcement learning from compiler feedback. In Proc. 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL, 2024).

  • De Regt, H. W. Understanding Scientific Understanding (Oxford Univ. Press, 2017).

  • Krenn, M. et al. On scientific understanding with artificial intelligence. Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 761–769 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Barman, K. G., Caron, S., Claassen, T. & De Regt, H. Towards a benchmark for scientific understanding in humans and machines. Minds Mach. 34, 6 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberger, D. M., Horne, M. A., Shimony, A. & Zeilinger, A. Bell’s theorem without inequalities. Am. J. Phys. 58, 1131–1143 (1990).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, J.-W., Bouwmeester, D., Daniell, M., Weinfurter, H. & Zeilinger, A. Experimental test of quantum nonlocality in three-photon Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger entanglement. Nature 403, 515–519 (2000).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Charton, F. Linear algebra with transformers. Trans. Mach. Learn. Res. (2022).

  • Vaswani, A. et al. Attention is all you need. In Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 5998–6008 (Curran Associates, 2017).

  • Xiong, R. et al. On layer normalization in the Transformer architecture. In Proc. International Conference on Machine Learning 10524–10533 (PMLR, 2020).

  • Gehring, J., Auli, M., Grangier, D., Yarats, D. & Dauphin, Y. N. Convolutional sequence to sequence learning. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. 70, 1243–1252 (2017).

  • Kingma, D. P. & Ba, J. Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. In Proc. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR, 2015).

  • Chen, M. et al. Evaluating large language models trained on code. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.03374 (2021).

  • Li, R. et al. StarCoder: may the source be with you. Trans. Mach. Learn. Res. (2023).

  • Bernien, H. et al. Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator. Nature 551, 579–584 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chhajlany, R. W., Tomczak, P., Wójcik, A. & Richter, J. Entanglement in the Majumdar-Ghosh model. Phys. Rev. A 75, 032340 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, M. A. & Chuang, I. L. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010).

  • Briegel, H. J., Browne, D. E., Dür, W., Raussendorf, R. & Nest, M. Measurement-based quantum computation. Nat. Phys. 5, 19–26 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, J. et al. Scaling laws for neural language models. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.08361 (2020).

  • Rodríguez, C., Arlt, S., Möckl, L. & Krenn, M. Automated discovery of experimental designs in super-resolution microscopy with XLuminA. Nat. Commun. 15, 10658 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Krenn, M., Drori, Y. & Adhikari, R. X. Digital discovery of interferometric gravitational wave detectors. Phys. Rev. X 15, 021012 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baydin, A. G. et al. Toward machine learning optimization of experimental design. Nucl. Phys. News 31, 25–28 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollice, R. et al. Data-driven strategies for accelerated materials design. Acc. Chem. Res. 54, 849–860 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Javadi-Abhari, A. et al. Quantum computing with Qiskit. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.08810 (2024).

  • Arlt, S. Model checkpoints and example training data for ‘Meta-designing quantum experiments with language models’. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14899993 (2025).

  • Arlt, S. Krenn, M. artificial-scientist-lab/metadesign: V1.0. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17287889 (2025).



  • Source link