The use of AI in modern media can only be described as a heated debate, with most people standing on the side against its use and defending the artists and writers whose work has been stolen in the process of generative AI. And if a company with a huge platform chooses to use AI in this way, there’s no doubt it’ll make a big splash. This is exactly what Netflix has done with its recent foray into the true crime genre.
Lucy Levy research The film centers on the horrific case of Lucy Levy, a British neonatal nurse who murdered seven infants and attempted to murder seven more. The documentary features never-before-seen footage and never-before-seen insider testimony that provides previously unknown insight into the case. However, the documentary also appears to include interviews with the AI, and viewers of the series have complained about the studio’s strange choices, with some claiming they can’t believe the script the AI is reading is the true account of the events.
Nothing good happened when Netflix used AI.
Viewers across the internet are speaking out about Netflix’s use of AI. Lucy Levy researchreviews on Rotten Tomatoes and posts breaking this decision have already appeared on Reddit. “I can totally understand why victims don’t want to be seen, but I’d rather just change the dark profile and voice. It’s cheaper than AI and doesn’t add the inhuman aspect,” one Reddit viewer said. Another added: “Everyone should hate the show or flag it and report against its use of AI. They’re testing the waters and we need to make our voices heard.”
The general consensus is that the use of AI in documents has made the content almost unwatchable, apart from raising ethical issues. By making the victim’s statement appear performative, in contrast to the seriousness and urgency typically conveyed by the anonymous interviews conducted in these types of documentaries, it undermined the impact of the victim’s statement. “In other words, Netflix is saying that the style of an interviewee’s hair, the way they move their lips, the lighting, and how they look to us are so important that they have to be recreated by AI, even though they actually aren’t. And trying to convince us that an AI avatar will somehow make the interview more meaningful is counterproductive; it makes the documentary look more like a tabloid read-aloud,” one viewer said.
A review on Rotten Tomatoes similarly criticized this choice, with viewers calling for AI to be removed from movies, television, and other mediums that, in their opinion, have no place in it. One viewer said he couldn’t even believe the interview was real, saying: “You can’t ignore the terrible use of AI. Who’s to say the interviewee is a real human being?”
All in all, Netflix seems to have dropped the ball on this matter. And users of the platform have been incredibly clear about their position on AI in Netflix productions.
What do you think about Netflix’s use of AI? Lucy Levy research?Let us know in the comments. Don’t forget to check comic book forum To see what other fans are saying.
