The multi-level image segmentation in dermatology application using an enhance Secretary Bird Optimization Algorithm

Machine Learning


  • Kwitt, R., Hegenbart, S. & Uhl, A. Skin lesion segmentation using local color and texture features, Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro. In 2010 IEEE International Symposium, 1285–1288 (2010)

  • Scin dataset, skin Condition Image Network Dataset (2024).

  • Dreiseitl, S. & Binder, M. Computer-aided diagnosis: a review. Clin. Dermatol. 19(4), 285–292 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsata, M., Doe, J. & Smith, J. Two-dimensional multilevel thresholding image segmentation using entropy-based methods. J. Image Process. 25(5), 1234–1245 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali, A., Khan, J. I., Bashir, S. & Kausar, N. A deep learning-based framework for automated melanoma diagnosis. J. Digit. Imaging 34(5), 1045–1058 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, X., Jia, L. & Guo, Y. Skin lesion segmentation using deep learning and recognition of melanoma features. J. Healthc. Eng. 2020, 1–10 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barata, C., Marques, J. S. & Rozeira, J. Two systems for the detection of melanomas in dermoscopy images using texture and color features. IEEE Syst. J. 8(3), 965–979 (2013).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. & Davis, E. Liver cancer algorithm: A novel approach for optimization. J. Optim. 45(2), 123–134 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. & Johnson, S. Parrot optimizer: A nature-inspired algorithm. Comput. Intell. J. 38(1), 45–60 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. & Garcia, L. Slime mould algorithm for optimization. Swarm Evol. Comput. 65, 100–110 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W. & Moore, E. Artemisinin optimization: A natural-inspired metaheuristic. Nat. Comput. 50(3), 210–225 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. & Martinez, D. Runge kutta method in meta-heuristics. Appl. Math. Comput. 200, 50–60 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. & Harris, O. Polar lights optimization: A novel optimization algorithm. Phys.-Based Optim. J. 30, 100–120 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, S. & Gonzalez, A. Colony predation algorithm for optimization problems. Artif. Intell. Rev. 40, 200–215 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, J. & Mitchell, C. Educational competition optimizer: A social-based algorithm. Swarm Intell. 45(2), 300–320 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • White, B. & Green, I. Weighted mean of vectors optimization. J. Hybrid Comput. 10(5), 450–470 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D. & Scott, A. Fata morgana algorithm: A mirage-inspired metaheuristic, Advanced Optimization. Techniques 20, 250–270 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M. & Young, A. Rime optimization algorithm: A cold-inspired metaheuristic. Cold Comput. J. 15, 100–120 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, L. & Carter, A. Hunger games search: A metaheuristic inspired by survival dynamics, Natural Optimization. Methods 35, 50–70 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, E. & Turner, M. Moth search algorithm for solving complex optimization problems. Swarm Evol. Comput. 55, 60–75 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. & Anderson, M. Harris hawks optimization: A powerful algorithm for solving optimization problems. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 85, 34–50 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, P. & Verma, R. Hybrid ga-pso for multilevel segmentation of brain mri images for tumor diagnosis. Med. Image Anal. 45, 25–36 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., Lee, M.-S. & Park, J.-H. Firefly algorithm for segmentation of retinal images to detect diabetic retinopathy. Comput. Methods Progr. Biomed. 210, 106365 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, R., Sharma, A. & Singh, V. Enhanced whale optimization algorithm for lung ct image segmentation in lung cancer diagnosis. IEEE Access 12, 11547–11558 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu, Y. Secretary bird optimization algorithm: A novel global optimization approach. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 17(3), 303–321 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Emam, M. M., Houssein, E. H. & Ghoniem, R. M. A modified reptile search algorithm for global optimization and image segmentation: Case study brain mri images. Comput. Biol. Med. 152, 106404 (2023).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo, S. K., Houssein, E. H., Premkumar, M., Saha, A. K. & Emam, M. M. Self-adaptive moth flame optimizer combined with crossover operator and Fibonacci search strategy for COVID-19 ct image segmentation. Expert Syst. Appl. 227, 120367 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Otsu, N. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 9(1), 62–66 (1979).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Y., Zhang, J., Zhang, D. & Liu, J. Adaptive global thresholding based on minimum cross entropy for uneven lighting images. Inf. Sci. 515, 1–16 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Canny, J. A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 8(6), 679–698 (1986).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, T., Wang, X. & Liu, Q. An improved canny edge detection algorithm based on local binary pattern and gaussian filter. J. Real-Time Image Process. 20, 149–160 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, R. & Bischof, L. Seed-based region growing. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 16(6), 641–647 (1994).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, S., Rueckert, D. & Fichtinger, G. Region growing for medical image segmentation: From interactive to deep learning based approaches. Med. Image Anal. 61, 101620 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • MacQueen, J. et al., Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability, Vol. 1, Oakland, CA, USA, 281–297 (1967).

  • Aljalbout, E., Kossaifi, J., Panagakis, Y. & Pantic, M. Deep k-means clustering, arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.09985 (2020).

  • Sauvola, J. & Pietikäinen, M. Adaptive document image binarization. Pattern Recognit. 33(2), 225–236 (2000).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaur, P., Kumar, D. & Kaur, R. An improved local adaptive binarization technique for degraded document images for ocr applications. Expert Syst. Appl. 167, 114156 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, I. & Feldman, G. A 3×3 isotropic gradient operator for image processing. In Stanford Artificial Intelligence Project (SAIL), Vol. 271 (1968).

  • Hossain, M. S., Hasan, M. K. & Alam, M. A. Real-time edge detection using fpga-based Sobel operator. J. Real-Time Image Process. 19, 265–276 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, S. & Pavlidis, T. Picture segmentation by a directed split-and-merge procedure. In Proceedings of the Second International Joint Conference on Pattern Recognition, 424–433 (1976).

  • Li, X., Zhang, Y. & Xu, J. Hierarchical region splitting and merging using convolutional neural networks for image segmentation. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 30, 1408–1420 (2021).

    ADS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Comaniciu, D. & Meer, P. Mean shift: A robust approach toward feature space analysis. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 24(5), 603–619 (2002).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., Ma, W. & Zhang, H. Gpu accelerated mean shift algorithm based on cuda. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation (ICIA), 1081–1086 (IEEE, 2018).

  • Senthil Kumar, T. et al. A survey of thresholding techniques in image segmentation. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 48(8), 1–7 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin, X., He, T. & Lin, Y. Multi-objective model selection algorithm for online sequential ultimate learning machine. EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13638-019-1477-2 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M.-R., Zeng, G.-Q. & Lu, K.-D. A many-objective population extremal optimization algorithm with an adaptive hybrid mutation operation. Inf. Sci. 498, 62–90 (2019).

    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, B. et al. Prediction of recurrent spontaneous abortion using evolutionary machine learning with joint self-adaptive slime mould algorithm. Comput. Biol. Med. 148, 105885 (2022).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Fei, X., Wang, J., Ying, S., Hu, Z. & Shi, J. Projective parameter transfer based sparse multiple empirical kernel learning machine for diagnosis of brain disease. Neurocomputing 413, 271–283 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mostafa, R. R., Houssein, E. H., Hussien, A. G., Singh, B. & Emam, M. M. An enhanced chameleon swarm algorithm for global optimization and multi-level thresholding medical image segmentation. Neural Comput. Appl. 36(15), 8775–8823 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, C. et al. Particle swarm optimization for multilevel thresholding image segmentation. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 25(2), 918–927 (2016).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. et al. Ant colony optimization for medical image segmentation. Pattern Recognit. 81, 107–118 (2018).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoud, S. M. et al. Challenges and applications of metaheuristic algorithms in image segmentation: A review. Expert Syst. Appl. 146, 113204 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, L. et al. Hybrid metaheuristic and deep learning approach for image segmentation. Neural Netw. 137, 292–305 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. et al. Genetic algorithm-based multilevel thresholding method for land cover classification using satellite imagery. Remote Sens. 10(3), 421 (2018).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H. et al. Recent advances and future trends of metaheuristic algorithms in image segmentation. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 155, 129–142 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y. et al. Harmony search algorithm for multilevel thresholding in hyperspectral image segmentation. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 62(3), 1408–1421 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A. et al. Enhanced grey wolf optimizer for multilevel thresholding in medical image segmentation. J. Med. Syst. 47(6), 126 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, X. et al. Krill herd algorithm for multilevel thresholding in underwater image segmentation. Ocean Eng. 490, 112834 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z. & Wang, Q. Flower pollination algorithm for multilevel thresholding in industrial defect detection. J. Manuf. Syst. 64, 415–428 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, et al. Artificial immune system for biomedical image segmentation. Medical Imaging (Various) (2010).

  • Liu, et al. Honey bee mating optimization for MRI segmentation. Medical Imaging (MRI) (2011).

  • Smith, et al. Genetic algorithms for tumor segmentation. Medical Imaging (MRI) (2012).

  • Chen, et al. Cuckoo search for remote sensing image segmentation. Remote Sensing (Satellite Images) (2013).

  • Wang, e. a. Hybrid ga-pso for brain MRI segmentation. Medical Imaging (MRI) (2014).

  • Lee, J. Pso optimization in remote sensing. Remote Sensing (Satellite Images) (2015).

  • Liu, et al. Modified aco for satellite image segmentation. Remote Sensing (Satellite Images) (2016).

  • Kim, et al. Fa for lung nodule detection. Medical Imaging (CT Scans) (2017).

  • Zhang, et al. Ant colony optimization for object detection. Computer Vision (Object Recognition) (2018).

  • Singh, et al. Bat algorithm for image segmentation. Various (General Image Segmentation) (2019).

  • Garcia, et al. Pso-svm for skin lesion segmentation. Medical Imaging (Dermatology) (2019).

  • Kimura, et al. Abc for retinal image segmentation. Medical Imaging (Ophthalmology) (2020).

  • Davis, B. Firefly algorithm for organ segmentation. Medical Imaging (CT Scans) (2020).

  • Wang, et al. Grey wolf optimizer for brain MRI segmentation. Medical Imaging (MRI) (2021).

  • Patel, et al. Abc in biomedical image segmentation. Medical Imaging (Various) (2021).

  • Yang, et al. Fa for skin cancer image segmentation. Medical Imaging (Dermatology) (2023).

  • Wang, et al. Hybrid pso-aco for mri brain tumor segmentation. Medical Imaging (MRI) (2022).

  • Zhang, et al. Whale optimization algorithm for object detection. Computer Vision (Object Recognition) (2022).

  • Park, et al. Flower pollination algorithm for medical image segmentation. Medical Imaging (Various) (2023).

  • Lee, et al. Aco-svm for land cover classification. Remote Sensing (Satellite Images) (2024).

  • Al, K., Smith, J. & Lee, C. Benchmarking metaheuristic algorithms for optimization problems. J. Comput. Optim. 45(2), 105–120 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Swardt, L. F., Johnson, P. M. & Wilson, B. D. Ecology and behavior of the secretary bird in southern Africa. Afr. J. Ecol. 49(2), 123–136 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmeyr, J. H., Nel, D. G. & Robertson, M. P. Predator-prey dynamics: interactions between the secretary bird and other predators. J. Zool. 293(3), 201–213 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Portugal, S. J., Anderson, N. S. & Griffiths, M. Hunting behavior of the secretary bird. Anim. Behav. 112, 45–57 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feduccia, A. & Voorhies, M. R. Birds of Prey: Biology and Conservation in the Secretary Bird (Cambridge University Press, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu, Y., Liu, D., Chen, J. & He, L. Secretary bird optimization algorithm: a new metaheuristic for solving global optimization problems. Artif. Intell. Rev. 57(5), 1–102 (2024).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tizhoosh, H. R. Opposition-based learning: a new scheme for machine intelligence. In Computational intelligence for modelling, control and automation, 2005 and international conference on intelligent agents, web technologies and internet commerce, international conference, Vol. 1, 695–701 (IEEE, 2005).

  • Aarts, E., Aarts, E. H. & Lenstra, J. K. Local Search in Combinatorial Optimization (Princeton University Press, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Houssein, E. H., Emam, M. M. & Ali, A. A. An optimized deep learning architecture for breast cancer diagnosis based on improved marine predators algorithm. Neural Comput. Appl. 34(20), 18015–18033 (2022).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Emam, M. M., Houssein, E. H., Tolba, M. A., Zaky, M. M. & Hamouda Ali, M. Application of modified artificial hummingbird algorithm in optimal power flow and generation capacity in power networks considering renewable energy sources. Sci. Rep. 13(1), 21446 (2023).

    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H. et al. Orthogonal Nelder–Mead moth flame method for parameters identification of photovoltaic modules. Energy Convers. Manag. 211, 112764 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, W.-F., Liu, S.-Y. & Huang, L.-L. A novel artificial bee colony algorithm based on modified search equation and orthogonal learning. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 43(3), 1011–1024 (2013).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Research, G. Scin: A new resource for representative dermatology images. (accessed 6 Feb 2025). https://research.google/blog/scin-a-new-resource-for-representative-dermatology-images/ (2024).

  • Arcuri, A. & Fraser, G. Parameter tuning or default values? An empirical investigation in search-based software engineering. Empir. Softw. Eng. 18(3), 594–623 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Otsu, N. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 9(1), 62–66 (1979).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapur, J. N., Sahoo, P. K. & Wong, A. K. C. A new method for gray-level picture thresholding using the entropy of the histogram. Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process. 29(3), 273–285 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R. & Simoncelli, E. P. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 13(4), 600–612 (2004).

    ADS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., Zhang, L., Mou, X. & Zhang, D. Fsim: A feature similarity index for image quality assessment. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 20(8), 2378–2386 (2011).

    ADS 
    MathSciNet 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhanu, B. & Peng, J. Adaptive integrated image segmentation and object recognition. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C Appl. Rev. 30(4), 427–41 (2000).

    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Canny, J. A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 8(6), 667–698 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcoxon, F. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometr. Bull. 1(6), 80–3 (1945).

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J., Shelhamer, E. & Darrell, T. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 3431–3440. arxiv:1411.4038 (2015).

  • Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P. & Brox, T. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 234–241 (2015). arxiv:1505.04597 (2015).

  • Badrinarayanan, V., Kendall, A. & Cipolla, R. Segnet: A deep convolutional encoder-decoder architecture for image segmentation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 39(12), 2481–2495 (2017).

    ADS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L.-C., Zhu, Y., Papandreou, G., Schroff, F. & Adam, H. Encoder-decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image segmentation. In European Conference on Computer Vision, 833–851. arxiv:1802.02611 (2018).

  • He, K., Gkioxari, G., Dollár, P. & Girshick, R. Mask r-cnn. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2961–2969. arxiv:1703.06870 (2017).

  • Oktay, O., Schlemper, J., Le, H. T. et al. Attention u-net: Learning where to look for the pancreas. In International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 1–9. arxiv:1804.03999 (2018).

  • Milletari, F., Navab, N. & Ahmadi, S. A. V-net: Fully convolutional neural networks for volumetric medical image segmentation. In Proceedings of the 3D Vision Conference, 565–571. arxiv:1606.04797 (2016).

  • Isola, P., Zhu, J.-Y., Zhou, T. & Efros, A. A. Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 1125–1134. arxiv:1611.07004 (2017).



  • Source link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *