churański, am, martinez alvarado, ji, shields, bj & doyle, ag predicts the yield of responses via monitored learning. acc. Chemistry. res. 541856–1865 (2021).
Google Scholar
Quantitative Structures of Zahrt, AF, Athavale, SV & Denmark, SE – Selectivity Relationships in Enantioselective Catalysts: Past, Present, and Future. Chemistry. Pastor 1201620–1689 (2020).
Google Scholar
Computer-aided analysis in Corey, EJ, Long, AK & Rubenstein, SD Organic Synthesis. Science 228408–418 (1985).
Google Scholar
Todd, MH Computer-Aided Organic Synthesis. Chemistry. Soc. Pastor 34247 (2005).
Google Scholar
Cheong, Ph-Y. , Legault, Cy, Um, JM, çelebi-Ölçüm, N. & Houk, kn Quantum mechanical investigation: mechanism, reactivity, and selectivity. Chemistry. Pastor 1115042–5137 (2011).
Google Scholar
Klucznik, T. Etal. Efficient synthesis of a variety of drug-related targets planned and performed in the laboratory, computer-designed. Chemistry 4522–532 (2018).
Google Scholar
Crawford, J.M., Kingston, C., Toste, F.D. & Sigman, MS Data Science meets physical organic chemistry. acc. Chemistry. res. 543136–3148 (2021).
Google Scholar
Rinehart, Ni, Zahrt, AF, Henle, JJ & Denmark, Se Dreams, False Starts, Dead End, and Redemption: a record of the evolution of chemical workflows for enantioselective catalyst optimization. acc. Chemistry. res. 542041–2054 (2021).
Google Scholar
Rinehart, Ni et al. Machine learning tool for predicting substrate adaptation conditions for PD catalyst C-N coupling. Science 381965–972 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zahrt, Af et al. Prediction of highly selective catalysts through computer-driven workflows and machine learning. Science 363EAAU5631 (2019).
Google Scholar
Reid, JP & Sigman, Overall Prediction of Enantioselectivity in MS Asymmetric Catalysts. Nature 571343–348 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ahneman, DT, Estrada, JG, Lin, S., Dreher, SD & Doyle, AG predicts reaction performance in C–N cross-coupling using machine learning. Science 360186–190 (2018).
Google Scholar
Sandfort, F., Strieth-Kalthoff, F., Kühnemund, M., Beecks, C. & Glorius, F. A structure-based platform for predicting chemical reactivity. Chemistry 61379–1390 (2020).
Google Scholar
Schwaller, P., Vaucher, AC, Laino, T. & Reymond, J.-L. Chemical reaction predictions are generated using deep learning. Mach. learn. SCI. Technor. 2015016 (2021).
Google Scholar
Li, B. Etal. A deep learning framework for accurate response prediction and its application on high-throughput experimental data. J. ChemInformatics 1572 (2023).
Google Scholar
Coley, CW, Green, WH & Jensen, Machine Learning in KF Computer-Aided Synthesis Plans. acc. Chemistry. res. 511281–1289 (2018).
Google Scholar
Segler, MHS, Preuss, M. & Waller, MP Planning Chemical Syntheses features deep neural networks and symbolic AI. Nature 555604–610 (2018).
Google Scholar
Coley, CW, Barzilay, R., Jaakkola, TS, Green, WH & Jensen, Prediction of organic reaction outcomes using machine learning. ACS CENT. SCI. 3434–443 (2017).
Google Scholar
Tu, Z. & Coley, Sequence model from invariant graphs of retrosynthesis and reaction prediction without CW ordering templates. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 623503–3513 (2022).
Google Scholar
Schwaller, P. Etal. Molecular transformers: A model for uncertainty-kinetic-rate chemical reaction prediction. ACS CENT. SCI. 51572–1583 (2019).
Google Scholar
Lin, K., Xu, Y., Pei, J. & Lai, L. Automatic retrosynthetic route planning using template-free models. Chemistry. SCI. 113355–3364 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zheng, S., Rao, J., Zhang, Z., Xu, J. & Yang, Y. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 6047–55 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kim, E. , Lee, D. , Kwon, Y. , Park, MS & Che, Y.-S. Effective, plausible, diverse retrosynthesis using bidirectional transformers with latent variables. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 61123–133 (2021).
Google Scholar
Sacha, M. et al. Molecular Editing Graph Note Network: Models chemical reactions as sequences for graph editing. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 613273–3284 (2021).
Google Scholar
Mao, K. et al. Molecular graphs enhanced transformers for retrosynthesis prediction. Neural calculations 457193–202 (2021).
Google Scholar
Irwin, R., Dimitriadis, S., He, J. & Bjerrum, EJ Chemformer: Pre-trained transformers for computational chemistry. Mach. learn. SCI. Technor. 3015022 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zhu, J. Etal. Dual view molecular training. in Proc. 29th ACM SIGKDD Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining Conference (eds Singh, Ak et al.) 3615–3627 (ACM, 2023).
Lu, J. & Zhang, Y. A unified deep learning model for multitasking response prediction with explanation. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 621376–1387 (2022).
Google Scholar
Li, S.-W., Xu, L. C., Zhang, C., Zhang, S.-Q. & Hong, X. Reaction performance prediction with surrogate and interpretable graph models based on chemical knowledge. nut. commune. 143569 (2023).
Google Scholar
Shi, R., Yu, G., Huo, X. & Yang, Y. Prediction of chemical reactions through large-scale multiview pretraining. J. ChemInformatics 1622 (2024).
Google Scholar
Xia, J. Etal. Mole-Bert: A rethink of graph neural networks before molecular training. in Proc. 11th International Conference on Learning Expressions (eds Yan, L. et al.) https://openreview.net/pdf?id=jevy-dtiztr (ICLR 2023).
Ying, C. Etal. Does Trans really work badly for graphical representations? in 35th Conference on Neuroin Information Processing Systems (New Rip 2021) https://openreview.net/pdf?id=oewoooxfwda (Neurips, 2021).
Shi, Y. Etal. Benchmark graph mothers for large molecular modeling data sets. Preprinted at https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.04810 (2023).
Vaswani, A. Etal. Care is required. in Conference 31 on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017) https://papers.nips.cc/paper_files/paper/2017/file/3f5ee243547dee91fbd053c1c4a845aa-paper.pdf (2017).
Perera, D. Etal. Platform for automated nanomole-scale reaction screening and micromole-scale synthesis in flows. Science 359429–434 (2018).
Google Scholar
Li, X., Zhang, S., Xu, L. & Hong, X. Angew. Chemistry. int. Edited 5913253–13259 (2020).
Google Scholar
Schneider, N., Stiefl, N. & Landrum, Ga What's What: The (almost) Response role assignment guide. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 562336–2346 (2016).
Google Scholar
Dai, H., Li, C., Coley, C., Dai, Song, L. Retrosynthesis prediction using conditional graph logic networks. in 33rd Conference on Neuroin Information Processing Systems (Neurips 2019) https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2019/file/0d2b2061826a5df322116a5085a6052-paper.pdf (Neurips, 2019).
Schwaller, P., Gaudin, T., Lányi, D., Bekas, C. & Laino, T. Chemistry. SCI. 96091–6098 (2018).
Google Scholar
Jin, W., Coley, C., Barzilay, R. & Jaakkola, T. Prediction of organic reaction results by the Weisfeiler-Lehman network. in Conference 31 on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017) https://papers.nips.cc/paper_files/paper/2017/file/ced556cd9f9c0c8315cfbe0744a3baf0-paper.pdf (2017).
Arjovsky, M., Bottou, L., Gulrajani, I. & Lopez-Paz, D. Minimizing unchanging risk. Prelint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.02893 (2020).
Schwaller, P. Etal. Maps the space of chemical reactions using attention-based neural networks. nut. Mach. Intel. 3144–152 (2021).
Google Scholar
Schneider, N., Lowe, DM, Sayle, Ra & Landrum, GA, development of new fingerprints for chemical reactions and applications to large-scale reaction classification and similarity. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 5539–53 (2015).
Google Scholar
Schleinitz, J. Etal. Machine learning yields are predicted from Nicolit, a small literature data set for nickel catalyst C-O coupling. J. Am. Chemistry. Soc. 14414722–14730 (2022).
Google Scholar
Xu, L. Etal. Towards a data-driven design of asymmetric hydrogenation of olefins: databases and hierarchical learning. Angew. Chemistry. int. Edited 6022804–22811 (2021).
Google Scholar
Xu, L.-C. et al. Enantioselectivity prediction of paradada electrocatalyst C-H activation using knowledge of transition states in machine learning. nut. Synth. 2321–330 (2023).
Google Scholar
Xu, L. C., Tang, M.-J., An, J., Cao, F. &Qi, Y. Xenod https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15770470 (2025).
Xu, L. C., Tang, M.-J., An, J., Cao, F. &Qi, Y. figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28356077 (2025).
