An enhanced machine learning model to predict 3-year mortality in nonlinear patients ages 75 and above | BMC elderly

Machine Learning


  • Rubin EJ, Leopold J, Morrissey S. Nejm, ESC-invasive and conservative strategies for elderly patients with myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejme2410900.

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • Sanchis J, Bueno H, Miñana G, Guerrero C, MartíD, Martínez-Sellés M, the impact of routine invasive and conservative strategies in elderly people with frail and non-segmental acute myocardial infarction: a randomized clinical trial. Jama Intern Med. 2023; 183(5): 407–15.

    ArticlePubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • Al'aref SJ, Anchouche K, Singh G, Slomka PJ, Kolli KK, Kumar A, et al. The relationship between clinical application of machine learning in cardiovascular disease and cardiac imaging. Eur Heart J. 2019; 40(24): 1975–86.

    ArticleCAS PubMed Google Scholar

  • Greener JG, Kandathil SM, Moffat L, Jones DT. A guide to machine learning for biologists. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2022; 23(1): 40–55.

    ArticleCAS PubMed Google Scholar

  • Collet JP, Thiele H, Barbato E, BarthélémyO, Bauersachs J, Bhatt DL. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Present Without Elevation of the Persistent ST Segment: The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Present Without Elevation of the Persistent ST Segment (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2020; 42(14): 1289–367.

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  • Long-term mortality rates in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction treated in US clinical practice, including Kochar A, Chen AY, Sharma PP, Pagidipati NJ, Fonarow GC, and Cowper PA. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.117.007230.

    ArticlePubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • Madhavan MV, Gersh BJ, Alexander KP, Granger CB, Stone GW. Coronary artery disease in patients over 80 years of age. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 71 (18): 2015–40.

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • Byrne R, Coughlan JJ, Rossello X, Ibanez B. “10 Commandments” in the 2023 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome. Eur Heart J. 2024; 45(14): 1193–5.

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • Conservative and invasive strategies in older patients with non-ST-effective myocardial infarction, including Van Den Broek Wwa, Gimbel ME, Chan Pin Yin D, Azzahhafi J, Hermanides RS, Runnett C: Insights from International Popular Age Registration. J Clin Med. 2023; 12 (17).

  • Machine learning that predicts the possibility of acute myocardial infarction, including MP, Pickering JW, Sandoval Y, Shah ASV, Tsanas A, and Apple FS. circulation. 2019; 140 (11): 899–909.

    ArticlePubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • Bhatt DL, Lopes RD, Harrington RA. Diagnosis and treatment of acute coronary syndromes: a review. Jama. 2022; 327(7): 662–75.

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • Khera R, Haimovich J, Hurley NC, McNamara R, Spertus JA, Desai N, et al. Use of machine learning models to predict death after acute myocardial infarction. Jama Cardior. 2021; 6(6): 633–41.

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • Dodson JA, Hajduk AM, Geda M, Krumholz HM, Murphy TE, Tsang S, et al. Predicting 6-month mortality rates in elderly hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction: a cohort study. Unintern Med. 2020; 172(1): 12–21.

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • Knowledge gaps in cardiovascular care in Rich MW, Chyun DA, Skolnick AH, Alexander KP, Forman DE, Kitzman DW, and other elderly populations. circulation. 2016;133(21):2103–22.

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • Recovery: 2020 2020 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Patients Present Without Elevation of the ST Segment: The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Patients Present Without Elevation of the Persistent ST Segment (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2021; 42(23): 2298.

  • Rao SV, O'Donoghue ML, Ruel M, Rab T, Tamis-Holland JE, Alexander JH, and more 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: Report from the American Society of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. circulation. 2025;151(13):E771–862.

    PubMed Google Scholar

  • Collet JP, Thiele H, Barbato E, BarthélémyO, Bauersachs J, Bhatt DL. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Present Without Residual ST Segment Elevation. Eur Heart J. 2021; 42(14): 1289–367.

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, Kacede Jr., Ganiatug, Holmes DR JR, and more than 2014 AHA/ACC Guidelines Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Non-ST Effective Acute Coronary Syndrome: Report of the American Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practical Guidelines. circulation. 2014; 130 (25): E344-426.

    PubMed Google Scholar

  • Breiman L. Statistical Modeling: Two Cultures. Stat Sci. 2001; 16(3): 199–215.

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  • Moons KG, De Groot JA, Bouwmeester W, Vergouwe Y, Mallett S, Altman DG, and other key assessments and data extraction for systematic review of predictive modeling studies: a Charms Checklist. Plos Med. 2014;11 (10): E1001744.

    ArticlePubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • Brayman L. Random Forest. Mach study. 2001; 45(1): 5–32.

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  • Wang C, Chen X, Du L, Zhan Q, Yang T, Fang Z. Comparison of machine learning algorithms for the identification of acute exacerbations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Computer Method Program Biomed. 2020; 188:105267.

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • Friedman JH. Greedy Function Approximation: Gradient Boost Machine. Statistical chronicles. 2001; 29(5):1189–232, 44.

  • Ye Y, Xiong Y, Zhou Q, Wu J, Li X, Xiao X. Comparison of machine learning methods and traditional logistic regression to predict gestational diabetes using routine clinical data: a retrospective cohort study. J Diabetes Res. 2020; 2020: 4168340.

    ArticlePubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • Elhadd T, Mall R, Bashir M, Palotti J, Fernandez-Luque L, Farooq F, an AI-based machine learning model predicts glucose variability and hypoglycemic risk in multiple drug regimens who fasted during Ramadan (Profast – IT Ramadan Study). For diabetes, it's Clin cluster. 2020; 169:108388.

    ArticleCAS PubMed Google Scholar

  • Construction and evaluation of postnatal machine learning-based predictive models after fresh embryo transfer in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome including Zhu S, Huang Z, Chen X, Jiang W, Zhou Y, and Zheng B. J Ovarian Res. 2025; 18(1): 70.

    ArticleCAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • Calculating sample sizes required to develop clinical prediction models such as Riley Rd, Ensor J, Snell Kie, Harrell Fe Jr, Martin GP, ​​and Reitsma JB. BMJ. 2020; 368: M441.

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • There is no rationale for one variable for every 10 event criteria for binary logistic regression analysis, including Van Smeden M, De Groot JA, Moons KG, Collins GS, Altman DG, and Eijkemans MJ. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016; 16(1): 163.

    ArticlePubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • Sample sizes for binary logistic prediction models, including Van Smeden M, Moons KG, De Groot JA, Collins GS, Altman DG, Eijkemans MJ: Beyond events per variable criterion. stat method med res. 2019; 28(8): 2455–74.

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, Holford TR, Feinstein AR. Simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996; 49(12):1373–9.

    ArticleCAS PubMed Google Scholar

  • Fluss R, Faraggi D, Reiser B. Estimation of the Euden index and associated cutoff points. Biom J. 2005; 47(4): 458–72.

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • Perkins NJ, SchistermanEF. Conflicts of “optimal” cutpoints obtained using two criteria based on receiver operating characteristic curves. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163(7):670–5.

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • Cutoff finder including Budczies J, Klauschen F, Sinn BV, GyőrffyB, Schmitt WD, Darb-Esfahani S: A comprehensive and simple web application that allows rapid biomarker cutoff optimization. PLOS 1. 2012; 7 (12): E51862.

    ArticleCAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • Li Y, Guan L, Ning C, Zhang P, Zhao Y, Liu Q, and others combined with machine learning-based models predicting 1-year mortality rates in older Chinese patients with coronary artery disease, and impaired glucose tolerance or diabetes. Heart Vasc diabetes. 2023; 22(1): 139.

    ArticlePubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • Enhanced machine learning models to predict one-year mortality rates for individuals suffering from aortic anatomy, including Zhang J, Xiong W, Yang J, Sang Y, Zhen H, Tan C, and more. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025; 169(4): 1191-200.e3.

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • Minimum sample size for developing multivariable predictive models including Riley Rd, Snell Ki, Ensor J, Burke DL, Harrell Fe Jr, Moons KG: Part II – Results up to binary and event. Stack med. 2019; 38(7): 1276–96.

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • Prognostic impact of percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction, including Marenzi G, Cosentino N, Resta M, Lucci C, Bonomi A, and Trombara F: Actual findings from the Lombardy Health database. J Clin Med. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12175629.

    ArticlePubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • Long-term outcomes of invasive and conservation strategies for elderly patients with non-segmental acute coronary syndrome, including Berg ES, Tegn NK, Abdelnoor M, RøyslandK, Ryalen PC, and Aaberge L. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023; 82 (21): 2021–30.

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • Invasive treatment strategies for elderly patients with myocardial infarction, including Kunadian V, Mossop H, Shields C, Bardgett M, Watts P, and Teare MD. N Engl J Med. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2407791.

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • The importance of heart rate in the very early stages of elevated myocardial infarction in ST segments, including Nepper-Christensen L, LønborgJ, Ahtarovski KA, HøfstenDE, Kyhl K, and Schoos MM: Danami-3 trial results. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2019; 8(4):318–28.

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar

  • Rich MW, Chyun DA, Skolnick AH, Alexander KP, Forman DE, Kitzman DW, and others in cardiovascular therapy in elderly populations: Scientific statements from the American Heart Association, the American Faculty of Cardiology, and the American Association of Elderly People. circulation. 2016;133(21):2103–22.

    ArticlePubMed Google Scholar



  • Source link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *