Negative Emissions Technologies and Reliable Sequestration: A Research Agenda (National Academies Press, 2019).
IPCC Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report (eds. Core Writing Team, Lee, H. & Romero, J.) (IPCC, 2023).
McWilliams, J. C. Submesoscale currents in the ocean. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 472, 20160117 (2016).
Google Scholar
Mansfield, L. A. et al. Updates on model hierarchies for understanding and simulating the climate system: a focus on data-informed methods and climate change impacts. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 15, e2023MS003715 (2023).
Google Scholar
Reichstein, M. et al. Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science. Nature 566, 195–204 (2019).
Google Scholar
Dijkstra, H. A., Petersik, P., Hernández-García, E. & López, C. The application of machine learning techniques to improve El Niño prediction skill. Front. Phys. 7, 153 (2019).
Google Scholar
Sonnewald, M. et al. Bridging observations, theory and numerical simulation of the ocean using machine learning. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 073008 (2021).
Google Scholar
Nadiga, B. T. Reservoir computing as a tool for climate predictability studies. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 13, e2020MS002290 (2021).
Google Scholar
Watson-Parris, D. Machine learning for weather and climate are worlds apart. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 379, 20200098 (2021).
Google Scholar
Chantry, M., Christensen, H., Dueben, P. & Palmer, T. Opportunities and challenges for machine learning in weather and climate modelling: hard, medium and soft AI. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 379, 20200083 (2021).
Google Scholar
Irrgang, C. et al. Towards neural Earth system modelling by integrating artificial intelligence in Earth system science. Nat. Mach. Intell. 3, 667–674 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kashinath, K. et al. Physics-informed machine learning: case studies for weather and climate modelling. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 379, 20200093 (2021).
Google Scholar
Christensen, H. & Zanna, L. Parametrization in weather and climate models. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.826 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2022).
Burgh-Day, C. O. D. & Leeuwenburg, T. Machine learning for numerical weather and climate modelling: a review. EGUsphere 2023, 1–48 (2023).
GCOS. The Global Climate Observing System 2021: The GCOS Status Report (WMO, 2021).
Hess, P., Drüke, M., Petri, S., Strnad, F. M. & Boers, N. Physically constrained generative adversarial networks for improving precipitation fields from Earth system models. Nat. Mach. Intell. 4, 828–839 (2022).
Google Scholar
Haas, M., Goswami, B. & von Luxburg, U. Pitfalls of climate network construction — a statistical perspective. J. Clim. 36, 3321–3342 (2023).
Google Scholar
Shen, H. et al. Missing information reconstruction of remote sensing data: a technical review. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag. 3, 61–85 (2015).
Google Scholar
Carrassi, A., Bocquet, M., Bertino, L. & Evensen, G. Data assimilation in the geosciences: an overview of methods, issues, and perspectives. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 9, e535 (2018).
Google Scholar
Mignot, A. et al. Using machine learning and Biogeochemical-Argo (BGC-Argo) floats to assess biogeochemical models and optimize observing system design. Biogeosciences 20, 1405–1422 (2023).
Google Scholar
Barth, A., Alvera-Azcárate, A., Licer, M. & Beckers, J.-M. Dincae 1.0: a convolutional neural network with error estimates to reconstruct sea surface temperature satellite observations. Geosci. Model Dev. 13, 1609–1622 (2020).
Google Scholar
Beauchamp, M., Febvre, Q., Georgenthum, H. & Fablet, R. 4DVarNet-SSH: end-to-end learning of variational interpolation schemes for nadir and wide-swath satellite altimetry. Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss. 2022, 1–37 (2022).
Bessenbacher, V., Seneviratne, S. I. & Gudmundsson, L. CLIMFILL v0.9: a framework for intelligently gap filling Earth observations. Geosci. Model Dev. 15, 4569–4596 (2022).
Google Scholar
Mura, A. et al. Oscillations and stability of the Jupiter polar cyclones. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48, e2021GL094235 (2021).
Google Scholar
Martinez, E. et al. Neural network approaches to reconstruct phytoplankton time-series in the global ocean. Remote Sens. 12, 4156 (2020).
Google Scholar
Landy, J. C., Ehn, J. K., Babb, D. G., Thériault, N. & Barber, D. G. Sea ice thickness in the eastern Canadian Arctic: Hudson Bay complex & Baffin Bay. Remote Sens. Environ. 200, 281–294 (2017).
Google Scholar
Harilal, N., Hodge, B.-M., Subramanian, A. & Monteleoni, C. Stint: Self-supervised temporal interpolation for geospatial data. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.00059 (2023).
Ricker, R. et al. A weekly Arctic sea-ice thickness data record from merged CryoSat-2 and SMOS satellite data. Cryosphere 11, 1607–1623 (2017).
Google Scholar
Salathé, E. P., Leung, L. R., Qian, Y. & Zhang, Y. Regional climate model projections for the state of Washington. Clim. Change 102, 51–75 (2010).
Google Scholar
Bader, D. et al. Climate Models: An Assessment of Strengths and Limitations. US Climate Change Science Program Synthesis and Assessment Product 3.1 (US Department of Energy, 2009).
Harris, L., McRae, A. T., Chantry, M., Dueben, P. D. & Palmer, T. N. A generative deep learning approach to stochastic downscaling of precipitation forecasts. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 14, e2022MS003120 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kajbaf, A. A., Bensi, M. & Brubaker, K. L. Temporal downscaling of precipitation from climate model projections using machine learning. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 36, 2173–2194 (2022).
Google Scholar
Leinonen, J., Nerini, D. & Berne, A. Stochastic super-resolution for downscaling time-evolving atmospheric fields with a generative adversarial network. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 59, 7211–7223 (2020).
Google Scholar
Höhlein, K., Kern, M., Hewson, T. & Westermann, R. A comparative study of convolutional neural network models for wind field downscaling. Meteorol. Appl. 27, e1961 (2020).
Google Scholar
Serifi, A., Günther, T. & Ban, N. Spatio-temporal downscaling of climate data using convolutional and error-predicting neural networks. Front. Clim. 3, 656479 (2021).
Google Scholar
Harilal, N., Hodge, B.-M., Monteleoni, C. & Subramanian, A. EnhancedSD: Downscaling solar irradiance from climate model projections. In Tackling Climate Change with Machine Learning: Workshop at NeurIPS 2022 (2022).
Mardani, M. et al. Residual corrective diffusion modeling for km-scale atmospheric downscaling. Preprint at Research Square https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3673869/v1 (2024).
Thiria, S. et al. Downscaling of ocean fields by fusion of heterogeneous observations using deep learning algorithms. Ocean Model. 182, 102174 (2023).
Google Scholar
Barthélémy, S., Brajard, J., Bertino, L. & Counillon, F. Super-resolution data assimilation. Ocean Dyn. 72, 661–678 (2022).
Google Scholar
Bischoff, T. & Deck, K. Unpaired downscaling of fluid flows with diffusion bridges. Artif. Intell. Earth Syst. 3, e230039 (2024).
Groenke, B., Madaus, L. & Monteleoni, C. Climalign: Unsupervised statistical downscaling of climate variables via normalizing flows. In Proc. 10th International Conference on Climate Informatics CI2020, 60–66 (ACM, 2021).
Harder, P. et al. Generating physically-consistent high-resolution climate data with hard-constrained neural networks. In Proceedings of the AAAI 2022 Fall Symposium: The Role of AI in Responding to Climate Challenges https://www.climatechange.ai/papers/aaaifss2022/5 (2022).
Blei, D. M., Kucukelbir, A. & McAuliffe, J. D. Variational inference: a review for statisticians. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 112, 859–877 (2017).
Google Scholar
Lantuéjoul, C. Geostatistical Simulation: Models and Algorithms, 1139 (Springer, 2001).
Cleary, E., Garbuno-Inigo, A., Lan, S., Schneider, T. & Stuart, A. M. Calibrate, emulate, sample. J. Comput. Phys. 424, 109716 (2021).
Google Scholar
Haynes, K., Lagerquist, R., McGraw, M., Musgrave, K. & Ebert-Uphoff, I. Creating and evaluating uncertainty estimates with neural networks for environmental-science applications. Artif. Intell. Earth Syst. 2, 220061 (2023).
Price, I. et al. Gencast: Diffusion-based ensemble forecasting for medium-range weather. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.15796 (2023).
Qi, D. & Majda, A. J. Using machine learning to predict extreme events in complex systems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 52–59 (2019).
Google Scholar
Miloshevich, G., Cozian, B., Abry, P., Borgnat, P. & Bouchet, F. Probabilistic forecasts of extreme heatwaves using convolutional neural networks in a regime of lack of data. Phys. Rev. Fluids 8, 040501 (2023).
Google Scholar
Tagklis, F., Bracco, A., Ito, T. & Castelao, R. M. Submesoscale modulation of deep water formation in the Labrador Sea. Sci. Rep. 10, 17489 (2020).
Google Scholar
Schneider, T. et al. Harnessing AI and computing to advance climate modelling and prediction. Nat. Clim. Change 13, 887–889 (2023).
Google Scholar
Smagorinsky, J. General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. I. The basic experiment. Mon. Weather Rev. 91, 99 (1963).
Google Scholar
Schneider, T., Lan, S., Stuart, A. & Teixeira, J. Earth System Modeling 2.0: a blueprint for models that learn from observations and targeted high-resolution simulations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 12396–12417 (2017).
Google Scholar
Couvreux, F. et al. Process-based climate model development harnessing machine learning: I. A calibration tool for parameterization improvement. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 13, e2020MS002217 (2020).
Google Scholar
McNeall, D. et al. Correcting a bias in a climate model with an augmented emulator. Geosci. Model Dev. 13, 2487–2509 (2020).
Google Scholar
Watson-Parris, D., Williams, A., Deaconu, L. & Stier, P. Model calibration using ESEm v1.1.0 — an open, scalable Earth system emulator. Geosci. Model Dev. 14, 7659–7672 (2021).
Google Scholar
Neelin, J. D., Bracco, A., Luo, H., McWilliams, J. C. & Meyerson, J. E. Considerations for parameter optimization and sensitivity in climate models. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 170, e21349–21354 (2010).
Google Scholar
Kutz, J. N. Machine learning for parameter estimation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2300990120 (2023).
Google Scholar
Frezat, H., Le Sommer, J., Fablet, R., Balarac, G. & Lguensat, R. A posteriori learning for quasi-geostrophic turbulence parametrization. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 14, e2022MS003124 (2022).
Google Scholar
Gentine, P., Pritchard, M., Rasp, S., Reinaudi, G. & Yacalis, G. Could machine learning break the convection parameterization deadlock? Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 5742–5751 (2018).
Google Scholar
Zanna, L. & Bolton, T. Data driven equation discovery of ocean mesoscale closures. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2020GL088376 (2020).
Google Scholar
Beucler, T., Rasp, S., Pritchard, M. & Gentine, P. Achieving conservation of energy in neural network emulators for climate modeling. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.06622 (2019).
Beucler, T. et al. Climate-invariant machine learning. Sci. Adv. 10, eadj7250 (2024).
Google Scholar
Guan, Y., Subel, A., Chattopadhyay, A. & Hassanzadeh, P. Learning physics-constrained subgrid-scale closures in the small-data regime for stable and accurate LES. Phys. D 443, 133568 (2023).
Google Scholar
Rudin, C. Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nat. Mach. Intell. 1, 206–215 (2019).
Google Scholar
Räz, T. & Beisbart, C. The importance of understanding deep learning. Erkenntnis 89, 1823–1840 (2024).
Google Scholar
Sun, Y. Q., Hassanzadeh, P., Alexander, M. J. & Kruse, C. G. Quantifying 3D gravity wave drag in a library of tropical convection-permitting simulations for data-driven parameterizations. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 15, e2022MS003585 (2023).
Google Scholar
Jakhar, K., Guan, Y., Mojgani, R., Chattopadhyay, A. & Hassanzadeh, P. Learning closed-form equations for subgrid-scale closures from high-fidelity data: promises and challenges. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 16, e2023MS003874 (2024).
Google Scholar
Brenowitz, N. D., Beucler, T., Pritchard, M. & Bretherton, C. S. Interpreting and stabilizing machine-learning parametrizations of convection. J. Atmos. Sci. 77, 4357—4375 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wang, X., Han, Y., Xue, W., Yang, G. & Zhang, G. J. Stable climate simulations using a realistic general circulation model with neural network parameterizations for atmospheric moist physics and radiation processes. Geosci. Model Dev. 15, 3923–3940 (2022).
Google Scholar
Grundner, A. et al. Deep learning based cloud cover parameterization for ICON. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 14, e2021MS002959 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kochkov, D. et al. Neural general circulation models for weather and climate. Nature 632, 1060–1066 (2024).
Google Scholar
Ross, A., Li, Z., Perezhogin, P., Fernandez-Granda, C. & Zanna, L. Benchmarking of machine learning ocean subgrid parameterizations in an idealized model. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 15, e2022MS003258 (2023).
Google Scholar
Kontolati, K., Goswami, S., Shields, M. D. & Karniadakis, G. E. On the influence of over-parameterization in manifold based surrogates and deep neural operators. J. Comput. Phys. 479, 112008 (2023).
Google Scholar
Schneider, T., Stuart, A. M. & Wu, J.-L. Ensemble Kalman inversion for sparse learning of dynamical systems from time-averaged data. J. Comput. Phys. 470, 111559 (2022).
Google Scholar
Dunbar, O. R., Garbuno-Inigo, A., Schneider, T. & Stuart, A. M. Calibration and uncertainty quantification of convective parameters in an idealized GCM. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 13, e2020MS002454 (2021).
Google Scholar
Mojgani, R., Waelchli, D., Guan, Y., Koumoutsakos, P. & Hassanzadeh, P. Extreme event prediction with multi-agent reinforcement learning-based parametrization of atmospheric and oceanic turbulence. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.00907 (2023).
Rasp, S., Pritchard, M. S. & Gentine, P. Deep learning to represent subgrid processes in climate models. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 9684–9689 (2018).
Google Scholar
Subel, A., Guan, Y., Chattopadhyay, A. & Hassanzadeh, P. Explaining the physics of transfer learning in data-driven turbulence modeling. PNAS Nexus 2, pgad015 (2023).
Google Scholar
Shen, Z., Sridhar, A., Tan, Z., Jaruga, A. & Schneider, T. A library of large-eddy simulations forced by global climate models. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 14, e2021MS002631 (2022).
Google Scholar
Pahlavan, H. A., Hassanzadeh, P. & Alexander, M. J. Explainable offline–online training of neural networks for parameterizations: a 1D gravity wave-QBO testbed in the small-data regime. Geophys. Res. Lett. 51, e2023GL106324 (2024).
Google Scholar
Grundner, A., Beucler, T., Gentine, P. & Eyring, V. Data-driven equation discovery of a cloud cover parameterization. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 16, e2023MS003763 (2024).
Google Scholar
Karniadakis, G. E. et al. Physics-informed machine learning. Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 422–440 (2021).
Google Scholar
Champion, K., Lusch, B., Kutz, N. & Brunton, S. L. Data-driven discovery of coordinates and governing equations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 22445–22451 (2019).
Google Scholar
Reinbold, P. A. K., Kageorge, L. M., Schatz, M. F. & Grigoriev, R. O. Robust learning from noisy, incomplete, high-dimensional experimental data via physically constrained symbolic regression. Nat. Commun. 12, 3219 (2021).
Google Scholar
Golden, M., Grigoriev, R. O., Nambisan, J. & Fernandez-Nieves, A. Physically informed data-driven modeling of active nematics. Sci. Adv. 9, eabq6120 (2023).
Google Scholar
Slingo, J. & Palmer, T. Uncertainty in weather and climate prediction. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 369, 4751–4767 (2011).
Google Scholar
Yang, R. et al. Interpretable machine learning for weather and climate prediction: a survey. Atmos. Environ. 338, 120797 (2024).
Google Scholar
Dueben, P. D. & Bauer, P. Challenges and design choices for global weather and climate models based on machine learning. Geosci. Model Dev. 11, 3999–4009 (2018).
Google Scholar
Weyn, J. A., Durran, D. R. & Caruana, R. Can machines learn to predict weather? Using deep learning to predict gridded 500-hPa geopotential height from historical weather data. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 11, 2680–2693 (2019).
Google Scholar
Weyn, J. A., Durran, D. R., Caruana, R. & Cresswell-Clay, N. Sub-seasonal forecasting with a large ensemble of deep-learning weather prediction models. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 13, e2021MS002502 (2021).
Google Scholar
Arcomano, T. et al. A machine learning based global atmospheric forecast model. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2020GL087776 (2020).
Google Scholar
Rasp, S. & Thuerey, N. Data-driven medium-range weather prediction with a resnet pretrained on climate simulations: a new model for weatherbench. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 13, e2020MS002405 (2021).
Google Scholar
Palmer, T. A vision for numerical weather prediction in 2030. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.04830 (2022).
Keisler, R. Forecasting global weather with graph neural networks. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.07575 (2022).
Pathak, J. et al. FourCastNet: A global data-driven high-resolution weather model using adaptive Fourier neural operators. In PASC ‘23: Proceedings of the Platform for Advanced Scientific Computing Conference, 13 (ACM, 2023); https://doi.org/10.1145/3592979.3593412.
Bi, K. et al. Accurate medium-range global weather forecasting with 3D neural networks. Nature 619, 533–538 (2023).
Google Scholar
Lam, R. et al. Learning skillful medium-range global weather forecasting. Science 382, 1416–1421 (2023).
Google Scholar
Chen, L. et al. FuXi: a cascade machine learning forecasting system for 15-day global weather forecast. npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. 6, 190 (2023).
Google Scholar
Chen, K. et al. Fengwu: Pushing the skillful global medium-range weather forecast beyond 10 days lead. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.02948 (2023).
Bogerd, L., Overeem, A., Leijnse, H. & Uijlenhoet, R. A comprehensive five-year evaluation of IMERG late run precipitation estimates over the Netherlands. J. Hydrometeorol. 22, 1855–1868 (2021).
Hersbach, H. et al. The ERA5 global reanalysis. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 146, 1999–2049 (2020).
Google Scholar
Andrychowicz, M. et al. Deep learning for day forecasts from sparse observations. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.06079 (2023).
Ravuri, S. et al. Skilful precipitation nowcasting using deep generative models of radar. Nature 597, 672–677 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ji, Y., Gong, B., Langguth, M., Mozaffari, A. & Zhi, X. CLGAN: a GAN-based video prediction model for precipitation nowcasting. EGUsphere 2022, 1–23 (2022).
Ben-Bouallegue, Z. et al. The rise of data-driven weather forecasting: a first statistical assessment of machine learning-based weather forecasts in an operational-like context. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 105, E864–E883 (2024).
Google Scholar
Selz, T. & Craig, G. C. Can artificial intelligence-based weather prediction models simulate the butterfly effect? Geophys. Res. Lett. 50, e2023GL105747 (2023).
Google Scholar
Bonavita, M. On some limitations of current machine learning weather prediction models. Geophys. Res. Lett. 51, e2023GL107377 (2023).
Google Scholar
Salmon, R. Hamiltonian fluid mechanics. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 20, 225–256 (1988).
Google Scholar
Holm, D. D., Marsden, J. E. & Ratiu, T. S. in Large-Scale Atmosphere-Ocean Dynamics. II. Geometric Methods and Models (eds Norbury, J. & Roulstone, I.) 251–299 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2002).
Finzi, M., Stanton, S., Izmailov, P. & Wilson, A. G. Generalizing convolutional neural networks for equivariance to Lie groups on arbitrary continuous data. In Proc. 37th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML’20 (JMLR.org, 2020).
Chattopadhyay, A., Mustafa, M., Hassanzadeh, P., Bach, E. & Kashinath, K. Towards physics-inspired data-driven weather forecasting: integrating data assimilation with a deep spatial-transformer-based u-net in a case study with ERA5. Geosci. Model Dev. 15, 2221–2237 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wang, R., Walters, R. & Yu, R. Incorporating symmetry into deep dynamics models for improved generalization. In International Conference on Learning Representations https://openreview.net/forum?id=wta_8Hx2KD (2021).
Watt-Meyer, O. et al. ACE: A fast, skillful learned global atmospheric model for climate prediction. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.02074 (2023).
Hakim, G. J. & Masanam, S. Dynamical tests of a deep-learning weather prediction model. Artif. Intell. Earth Syst. 3, e230090 (2024).
Flora, M. L., Potvin, C. K., McGovern, A. & Handler, S. A machine learning explainability tutorial for atmospheric sciences. Artif. Intell. Earth Syst. 3, e230018 (2024).
DelSole, T. et al. Tracking seasonal prediction models. In Machine Learning and Data Mining Approaches to Climate Science: Proc. 5th International Workshop on Climate Informatics (2015).
Brajard, J., Counillon, F., Wang, Y. & Kimmritz, M. Enhancing seasonal forecast skills by optimally weighting the ensemble from fresh data. Weather Forecast. 38, 1241–1252 (2023).
Google Scholar
Cesa-Bianchi, N. & Lugosi, G. Prediction, Learning, and Games (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006).
Monteleoni, C., Schmidt, G. A., Saroha, S. & Asplund, E. Tracking climate models. Stat. Anal. Data Min. 4, 372–392 (2011).
Google Scholar
McQuade, S. & Monteleoni, C. Global climate model tracking using geospatial neighborhoods. In Proc. 26th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 335–341 (AAAI, 2012).
McQuade, S. & Monteleoni, C. in Large-Scale Machine Learning in the Earth Sciences; Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Series (eds Srivastava, A. et al.), Ch. 3 (Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2017).
McQuade, S. & Monteleoni, C. Multi-task learning from a single task: can different forecast periods be used to improve each other? In Proc. Fifth International Workshop on Climate Informatics (2015).
Chattopadhyay, A., Nabizadeh, E. & Hassanzadeh, P. Analog forecasting of extreme-causing weather patterns using deep learning. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 12, e2019MS001958 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lopez-Gomez, I., McGovern, A., Agrawal, S. & Hickey, J. Global extreme heat forecasting using neural weather models. Artif. Intell. Earth Syst. 2, e220035 (2023).
Li, H. et al. A machine learning model that outperforms conventional global subseasonal forecast models. Nat. Commun. 15, 6425 (2024).
Google Scholar
Mayer, K. J. & Barnes, E. A. Subseasonal forecasts of opportunity identified by an explainable neural network. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48, e2020GL092092 (2021).
Google Scholar
Falasca, F., Crétat, J., Braconnot, P. & Bracco, A. Spatiotemporal complexity and time-dependent networks in sea surface temperature from mid- to late Holocene. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 135, 392 (2020).
Google Scholar
Crowley, C. J. et al. Turbulence tracks recurrent solutions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2120665119 (2022).
Google Scholar
Timmermann, A. et al. El Niño–Southern Oscillation complexity. Nature 559, 535–545 (2018).
Google Scholar
Barnston, A. G., Tippett, M. K., Ranganathan, M. & L’Heureux, M. L. Deterministic skill of ENSO predictions from the North American Multimodel Ensemble. Clim. Dyn. 53, 7215–7234 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ham, Y.-G., Kim, J.-H. & Luo, J.-J. Deep learning for multi-year ENSO forecasts. Nature 573, 568–572 (2019).
Google Scholar
Petersik, P. J. & Henk A. Dijkstra, D. Probabilistic forecasting of El Niño using neural network models. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2019GL086423 (2020).
Google Scholar
Patil, K. R., Doi, T., Jayanthi, V. R. & Behera, S. Deep learning for skillful long-lead ENSO forecasts. Front. Clim. 4, 1058677 (2023).
Google Scholar
Hassanibesheli, F., Kurths, J. & Boers, N. Long-term ENSO prediction with echo-state networks. Environ. Res.: Clim. 1, 011002 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ham, Y.-G., Kim, J.-H., Kim, E.-S. & On, K.-W. Unified deep learning model for El Niño/Southern Oscillation forecasts by incorporating seasonality in climate data. Sci. Bull. 66, 1358–1366 (2021).
Google Scholar
Shin, N.-Y., Ham, Y.-G., Kim, J.-H., Cho, M. & Kug, J.-S. Application of deep learning to understanding ENSO dynamics. Artif. Intell. Earth Syst. 1, e210011 (2022).
Jonnalagadda, J. & Hashemi, M. Long lead ENSO forecast using an adaptive graph convolutional recurrent neural network. Eng. Proc. 39, 5 (2023).
Hermanson, L. et al. WMO global annual to decadal climate update: a prediction for 2021–25. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 103, E1117–E1129 (2022).
Google Scholar
Yeager, S. G. et al. Predicting near-term changes in the Earth system: a large ensemble of initialized decadal prediction simulations using the Community Earth System Model. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 99, 1867– 886 (2018).
Google Scholar
Stevens, B. et al. Dyamond: the dynamics of the atmospheric general circulation modeled on non-hydrostatic domains. Prog. Earth Planet. Sci. 6, 61 (2019).
Google Scholar
Hohenegger, C. et al. ICON-sapphire: simulating the components of the Earth system and their interactions at kilometer and subkilometer scales. Geosci. Model Dev. 16, 779–811 (2023).
Google Scholar
Bonev, B. et al. Spherical Fourier neural operators: learning stable dynamics on the sphere. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.03838 (2023).
Rahaman, N. et al. On the spectral bias of neural networks. In Proc. 36th International Conference on Machine Learning (eds Chaudhuri, K. & Salakhutdinov, R.) 5301–5310 (PMLR, 2019).
Chattopadhyay, A. & Hassanzadeh, P. Long-term instabilities of deep learning-based digital twins of the climate system: the cause and a solution. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.07029 (2023).
Subel, A. & Zanna, L. Building ocean climate emulators. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.04342 (2024).
Wang, X. et al. Xihe: A data-driven model for global ocean eddy-resolving forecasting. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.02995v2 (2024).
Strobach, E. & Bel, G. Improvement of climate predictions and reduction of their uncertainties using learning algorithms. Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. 15, 7707–7734 (2015).
Google Scholar
Nguyen, T., Brandstetter, J., Kapoor, A., Gupta, J. K. & Grover, A. ClimaX: a foundation model for weather and climate. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.10343 (2023).
Toms, B. A., Barnes, E. A. & Hurrell, J. W. Assessing decadal predictability in an Earth system model using explainable neural networks. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48, e2021GL093842 (2021).
Google Scholar
Stevens, B. et al. Earth Virtualization Engines (EVE). Earth Syst. Sci. Data 16, 2113–2122 (2024).
Google Scholar
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K. & Toutanova, K. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.04805 (2019).
Bommasani, R. et al. On the opportunities and risks of foundation models. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.07258 (2021).
Lessig, C. et al. Atmorep: A stochastic model of atmosphere dynamics using large scale representation learning. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.13280 (2023).
Sun, Y. Q. et al. Data imbalance, uncertainty quantification, and transfer learning in data-driven parameterizations: lessons from the emulation of gravity wave momentum transport in waccm. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 16, e2023MS004145 (2024).
Google Scholar
Ragone, F., Wouters, J. & Bouchet, F. Computation of extreme heat waves in climate models using a large deviation algorithm. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 24–29 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lancia, G., Goede, I. J., Spitoni, C. & Dijkstra, H. Physics captured by data-based methods in El Niño prediction. Chaos: Interdiscip. J. Nonlinear Sci. 32, 103115 (2022).
Google Scholar
Saha, M., Soni, D., Finley, B. & Monteleoni, C. Changes in information hubs over the Pacific ENSO region. In Proc. 9th International Workshop on Climate Informatics (CI) (2019).
Montavon, G., Binder, A., Lapuschkin, S., Samek, W. & Müller, K.-R. in Explainable AI: Interpreting, Explaining and Visualizing Deep Learning (eds Samek, W. et al.) 193–209 (Springer, 2019).
Mamalakis, A., Ebert-Uphoff, I. & Barnes, E. A. in xxAI — Beyond Explainable AI (eds Holzinger, A. et al.) 315–339 (Springer, 2022).
Landy, J. C. et al. A year-round satellite sea-ice thickness record from CryoSat-2. Nature 609, 517–522 (2022).
Google Scholar
Williams, T., Korosov, A., Rampal, P. & Ólason, E. Presentation and evaluation of the Arctic sea ice forecasting system nextsim-f. Cryosphere 15, 3207–3227 (2021).
Google Scholar
SWOT Data Challenge NATL60 — 2020a SSH mapping NATL60. Aviso https://www.aviso.altimetry.fr/en/data/products/ocean-data-challenges/2020a-ssh-mapping-natl60.html (2020).
Manshausen, P. et al. Generative data assimilation of sparse weather station observations at kilometer scales. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.16947 (2024).
Huang, L., Gianinazzi, L., Yu, Y., Dueben, P. D. & Hoefler, T. DiffDA: a diffusion model for weather-scale data assimilation. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.05932 (2024).
Pathak, J. et al. Hybrid forecasting of chaotic processes: using machine learning in conjunction with a knowledge-based model. Chaos 28, 041101 (2018).
Google Scholar
