Please take a look
Generated AI is rapidly gaining widespread adoption worldwide, including companies. This has raised concerns among most experts about the possibility that technology could take over the job.
Earlier this year, Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates argued that AI will replace humans for most things. However, the charity billionaire showed that humans have the ability to maintain some tasks and jobs for themselves, and he joked that no one wanted to see a computer play football.
However, the workplace paradigm shift is already in place, with Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff recently showing that AI is already doing up to 50% of company jobs. The executive previously showed that the company was seriously discussing software engineers in 2025, citing incredible productivity gains from Agent AIS.
Former Openai CTO and founder of Thinking Machines Lab, Mira Murati has shown that AI can kill several occupations at the same time and create new job opportunities.
“Some creative work may go away, but they probably didn't have been there in the first place. We know if the content coming out of it isn't very high quality.”
Interestingly, Salesforce isn't the only one that integrates AI into your workflow. Meta and Microsoft are also folded. Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella revealed that AI writes up to 30% of the company's code.
Meanwhile, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg showed that mid-sized AI engineers could insist on coding work from company experts in 2025.
Coding is too complicated to fully augment using AI
Last year, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang appears to have shown that coding could be dying underwater along with the rapid prevalence of AI, urging it to recommend alternative career paths such as manufacturing, agriculture and biology to the next generation.
However, Bill Gates has shown that energy, biology, and software development is too complicated to fully augment using AI. And, like now, executives could have been on something, indicating potentially coding could survive the AI revolution.
Replit's AI Coder recently removed the company's codebase during a 12-day vibe coding experiment (via Business Insider). Software startup investor Jason Lemkin was building applications using Replit's AI coder when an incident occurred.
“It deleted the production database without permission. Perhaps even worse, it lied about it in secret.”
The incident has attracted a lot of traction on social media, prompting Replica to issue a public apology for the incident on X.
“I saw Jason's post. The replica agent in development deleted data from the production database. It's unacceptable and never possible.
– Around the weekend, we started deploying automatic DB DEV/PROD separations to prevent this category. The environment during work is also staged. More tomorrow.
– Thankfully, there's a backup. A one-click restoration of the entire project state in case the agent makes a mistake.
– Agents could not access appropriate internal documents – Expand modifications to force searching for documents regarding commercial knowledge.
– And yes, I've heard the pain of “code freeze” loudly and clearly – we're actively working on a plan/chat-only mode so we can develop strategies without putting our codebase at risk.
I reached out to Jason the moment I saw this on Friday morning. We will refund him for trouble and carry out posthumous actions to determine exactly what happened and how he will respond to it in the future.
We appreciate his feedback and the feedback of everyone else. We move quickly to improve the safety and robustness of our replica environment. Top priority. ”
I saw Jason's post. The @RepLit agent in development has deleted data from the production database. It should not be acceptable and never impossible. – Working over the weekend, I started deploying automatic DB DEV/PROD separation to prevent this category. Staging environment…pic.twitter.com/omvupdakeJuly 20, 2025
Replit appears to have lived up to its promise after recently announced the beta release of a separate development database for replicating apps. This update should make it easier for users to vibrate codes in replicas, including repeating apps without affecting production data and safely previewing and testing database changes before moving to live.
While the launch of a new Replit product seems like a step in the right direction, the incident raises great concern, especially for companies that replace staff with AI. Rather than strengthening productivity, this appears to be a long route that repeats the importance of human intervention in important tasks such as coding.
What do you think about the hot ongoing topics about AI that could replace workplace professionals? Share your thoughts with us in the comments.
