Abdullah, K. H. & Sofyan, D. Machine learning in safety and health research: a scientometric analysis. Int. J. Inf. Sci. Manag. 21(1), 17–37 (2023).
Shin, J., Kim, Y. & Kim, C. The perception of occupational safety and health (OSH) regulation and innovation efficiency in the construction industry: evidence from South Korea. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18(5), 2334 (2021).
Google Scholar
Alves, A. M. S., Gonçalves Filho, C., Santos, Nd. M. & Souki, G. Q. Factors influencing occupational accidents: a multidimensional analysis in the electricity sector. Gestão & Produção 27, e4609 (2020).
Google Scholar
Alizadeh, S. S. Estimation of economic costs of accidents at work in Iran: A case study of occupational accidents in 2012. Iran Occup. Health 12(1), 12–19 (2015).
Google Scholar
Bahr, N. J. System Safety Engineering and Risk Assessment: A Practical Approach (CRC Press, 2014).
Zio, E. The future of risk assessment. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 177, 176–190 (2018).
Google Scholar
Kh, A. Epidemiological study of occupational accidents in Yazd combined cycle power plant in years 1383 to 1390. Occup. Med. Q. J. 7(4), 88–97 (2016).
Atmaca, E. & Basar, H. B. Evaluation of power plants in Turkey using Analytic Network Process (ANP). Energy 44(1), 555–563 (2012).
Google Scholar
Darwish, M. A., Al Awadhi, F. M. & Bin Amer, A. O. Combining the nuclear power plant steam cycle with gas turbines. Energy 35(12), 4562–4571 (2010).
Google Scholar
Borgheipour, H. et al. Health safety and environmental hazards of the chlorination unit of combined cycle power plants by using HAZOP and bow-tie methods. Occup. Hygiene Health Promot. (2019).
Torres, M. J. F. & Beviá, F. R. Chlorine use reduction in nuclear or conventional power plants: A combined cooling-and-stripping tower for coastal power plants. J. Clean. Prod. 26, 1–8 (2012).
Google Scholar
Corporation, B. V. White’s Handbook of Chlorination and Alternative Disinfectants (Wiley, 2011).
George, P. G. & Renjith, V. Evolution of safety and security risk assessment methodologies towards the use of bayesian networks in process industries. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 149, 758–775 (2021).
Google Scholar
Cagno, E., Caron, F. & Mancini, M. Risk analysis in plant commissioning: The multilevel hazop. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 77(3), 309–323 (2002).
Google Scholar
Lee, K. M., Yoo, J., Kim, S.-W., Lee, J.-H. & Hong, J. Autonomic machine learning platform. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 49, 491–501 (2019).
Moradi Hanifi, S., Keighobodi, E. & Tabatabaei, S. H. Machine learning and its application regarding risk assessment and identification in complex processes. Arch. Occup. Health 6(4), 1318–1320 (2022).
Duan, Y., Edwards, J. S. & Dwivedi, Y. K. Artificial intelligence for decision making in the era of big data—evolution, challenges and research agenda. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 48, 63–71 (2019).
Fonseca, D. P., Wanke, P. F. & Correa, H. L. A two-stage fuzzy neural approach for credit risk assessment in a Brazilian credit card company. Appl. Soft Comput. 92, 106329 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gurtu, A. & Johny, J. Supply chain risk management: Literature review. Risks 9(1), 16 (2021).
Google Scholar
Paltrinieri, N., Comfort, L. & Reniers, G. Learning about risk: Machine learning for risk assessment. Saf. Sci. 118, 475–486 (2019).
Google Scholar
Witten, I. H., Frank, E., Hall, M. A., Pal, C. J. & Data, M. editors. Practical machine learning tools and techniques. Data Mining. (Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2005).
Zhou, Z.-H. Machine Learning (Springer, 2021).
Google Scholar
Sarker, I. H. Machine learning: Algorithms, real-world applications and research directions. SN Comput. Sci. 2(3), 160 (2021).
Google Scholar
Mienye, I. D. & Sun, Y. A survey of ensemble learning: Concepts, algorithms, applications, and prospects. IEEE Access. 10, 99129–99149 (2022).
Google Scholar
Bevilacqua, M., Ciarapica, F. E. & Giacchetta, G. Industrial and occupational ergonomics in the petrochemical process industry: A regression trees approach. Accid. Anal. Prev. 40(4), 1468–1479 (2008).
Google Scholar
Jin, K., Cho, J. & Kim, S.-Y. Machine learning-based categorization of source terms for risk assessment of nuclear power plants. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 54(9), 3336–3346 (2022).
Google Scholar
Agarwal, V. et al. Machine learning and economic models to enable risk-informed condition based maintenance of a nuclear plant asset. Idaho National Lab (INL), Idaho Falls, ID (United States) (2021).
Xue, G., Liu, S., Ren, L. & Gong, D. Risk assessment of utility tunnels through risk interaction-based deep learning. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 241, 109626 (2024).
Google Scholar
Kandel, R. & Baroud, H. A data-driven risk assessment of Arctic maritime incidents: Using machine learning to predict incident types and identify risk factors. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 243, 109779 (2024).
Google Scholar
Sharifani, K. & Amini, M. Machine learning and deep learning: A review of methods and applications. World Inf. Technol. Eng. J. 10(07), 3897–3904 (2023).
Dong, X., Yu, Z., Cao, W., Shi, Y. & Ma, Q. A survey on ensemble learning. Front. Comput. Sci. 14, 241–258 (2020).
Google Scholar
Khan, F. et al. Dynamic risk management: A contemporary approach to process safety management. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 14, 9–17 (2016).
Google Scholar
Meel, A. & Seider, W. D. Plant-specific dynamic failure assessment using Bayesian theory. Chem. Eng. Sci. 61(21), 7036–7056 (2006).
Google Scholar
Rausand, M. Risk Assessment: Theory, Methods, and Applications (Wiley, UK, 2013).
Kharajou B, Ahmadi H, Rafiei M, Hanifi S. Quantitative risk estimation of CNG station by using fuzzy bayesian networks and consequence modeling. Scientific Reports. 2024;14.
Kalantarnia, M., Khan, F. & Hawboldt, K. Dynamic risk assessment using failure assessment and Bayesian theory. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 22(5), 600–606 (2009).
Google Scholar
Ramzan, N., Compart, F. & Witt, W. Methodology for the generation and evaluation of safety system alternatives based on extended Hazop. Process Saf. Progress. 26(1), 35–42 (2007).
Google Scholar
Ferdous, R., Khan, F., Sadiq, R., Amyotte, P. & Veitch, B. Handling and updating uncertain information in bow-tie analysis. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 25(1), 8–19 (2012).
Google Scholar
Qiao, W. et al. On the causation analysis for hazards involved in the engine room fire-fighting system by integrating STPA and BN. Ocean Eng. 288, 116073 (2023).
Google Scholar
Wang, Y. F., Qin, T., Li, B., Sun, X. F. & Li, Y. L. Fire probability prediction of offshore platform based on Dynamic Bayesian Network. Ocean Eng. 145, 112–123 (2017).
Google Scholar
Zarei, E., Khakzad, N., Cozzani, V. & Reniers, G. Safety analysis of process systems using Fuzzy Bayesian Network (FBN). J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 57, 7–16 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ab Rahim, M. S., Reniers, G., Yang, M. & Bajpai, S. Risk assessment methods for process safety, process security and resilience in the chemical process industry: A thorough literature review. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 88, 105274 (2024).
Google Scholar
Adeniran, I. A., Efunniyi, C. P., Osundare, O. S. & Abhulimen, A. O. Enhancing security and risk management with predictive analytics: A proactive approach. Int. J. Manag. Entrep. Res. 6(8), 32–40 (2024).
Mitrakas, C., Xanthopoulos, A. & Koulouriotis, D. Techniques and models for addressing occupational risk using fuzzy logic, neural networks, machine learning, and genetic algorithms: A review and meta-analysis. Appl. Sci. 15(4), 1909 (2025).
Google Scholar
Alauddin, M., Amyotte, P., Schrader, A., Addo, A. & Kamil, M. Z. A HAZOP of dust explosion testing and explosibility modelling using artificial neural networks. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 103(1), 110–125 (2025).
Google Scholar
Contessotto, F. Towards phenomena-based HAZOP support.
Bozorgi, A., Roozbahani, A., Hashemy Shahdany, S. M. & Abbassi, R. Developing a risk management framework for agricultural water systems using fuzzy dynamic bayesian networks and decision-making models. Water Resour. Manag. 1–23 (2024).
Li, C.-y, Wang, J.-h, Zhi, Y.-r, Wang, Z.-r & Gong, J.-h. Simulation of the chlorination process safety management system based on system dynamics approach. Procedia Eng. 211, 332–342 (2018).
Google Scholar
Bassey, M. E. Application of Data Mining and Machine Learning Techniques for Cause Analysis and Severity Prediction of Loss of Containment Incidents in Offshore Oil and Gas Facilities (The George Washington University, 2023).
Li, X., Wang, J. & Chen, G. A machine learning methodology for probabilistic risk assessment of process operations: A case of subsea gas pipeline leak accidents. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 165, 959–968 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wu, S., Zhang, L., Fan, J. & Zhou, Y. Dynamic risk analysis of hydrogen sulfide leakage for offshore natural gas wells in MPD phases. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 122, 339–351 (2019).
Google Scholar
Wang, F. & Gu, W. Intelligent HAZOP analysis method based on data mining. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 80, 104911 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ekramipooya, A., Boroushaki, M. & Rashtchian, D. Predicting possible recommendations related to causes and consequences in the HAZOP study worksheet using natural language processing and machine learning: BERT, clustering, and classification. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 89, 105310 (2024).
Google Scholar
Single, J. I., Schmidt, J. & Denecke, J. computer-aided hazop: Ontologies and ai for hazard identification and propagation. In Computer Aided Chemical Engineering vol. 48 1783–1788 (Elsevier, 2020).
Pirbalouti, R. G., Behnam, B. & Dehkordi, M. K. A risk-based approach to identify safety-critical equipment in process industries. Results Eng. 20, 101448 (2023).
Google Scholar
Guo, X., Ji, J., Khan, F., Ding, L. & Tong, Q. A novel fuzzy dynamic Bayesian network for dynamic risk assessment and uncertainty propagation quantification in uncertainty environment. Saf. Sci. 141, 105285 (2021).
Google Scholar
Liu, Z., Ma, Q., Cai, B., Liu, Y. & Zheng, C. Risk assessment on deepwater drilling well control based on dynamic Bayesian network. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 149, 643–654 (2021).
Google Scholar
Li, L., Xu, K., Yao, X. & Chen, S. Probabilistic analysis of aluminium production explosion accidents based on a fuzzy Bayesian network. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 73, 104618 (2021).
Google Scholar
Li, M., Wang, D. & Shan, H. Risk assessment of mine ignition sources using fuzzy Bayesian network. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 125, 297–306 (2019).
Google Scholar
Xue, J., Yip, T. L., Wu, B., Wu, C. & Van Gelder, P. A novel fuzzy Bayesian network-based MADM model for offshore wind turbine selection in busy waterways: An application to a case in China. Renew. Energy 172, 897–917 (2021).
Google Scholar
Gul, M., Yucesan, M. & Karci, C. A stratified Bayesian decision-making model for occupational risk assessment of production facilities. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 133, 108283 (2024).
Google Scholar
Marhavilas, P. K., Filippidis, M., Koulinas, G. K. & Koulouriotis, D. E. A HAZOP with MCDM based risk-assessment approach: Focusing on the deviations with economic/health/environmental impacts in a process industry. Sustainability 12(3), 993 (2020).
Google Scholar
Penelas, Ad. J. & Pires, J. C. Hazop analysis in terms of safety operations processes for oil production units: A case study. Appl. Sci. 11(21), 10210 (2021).
Google Scholar
Mokhtarname, R. et al. Application of multivariable process monitoring techniques to HAZOP studies of complex processes. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 74, 104674 (2022).
Google Scholar
Heo, K.-N. et al. Development and validation of a machine learning-based fall-related injury risk prediction model using nationwide claims database in Korean community-dwelling older population. BMC Geriatr. 23(1), 830 (2023).
Google Scholar
Hegde, J. & Rokseth, B. Applications of machine learning methods for engineering risk assessment—A review. Saf. Sci. 122, 104492 (2020).
Google Scholar
Mazumder, R. K., Salman, A. M. & Li, Y. Failure risk analysis of pipelines using data-driven machine learning algorithms. Struct. Saf. 89, 102047 (2021).
Google Scholar
Mangalathu, S., Hwang, S.-H. & Jeon, J.-S. Failure mode and effects analysis of RC members based on machine-learning-based SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) approach. Eng. Struct. 219, 110927 (2020).
Google Scholar
Robles-Velasco, A., Cortés, P., Muñuzuri, J. & Onieva, L. Prediction of pipe failures in water supply networks using logistic regression and support vector classification. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 196, 106754 (2020).
Google Scholar
Sun, Z. & Müller, D. A framework for modeling payments for ecosystem services with agent-based models, Bayesian belief networks and opinion dynamics models. Environ. Model. Softw. 45, 15–28 (2013).
Google Scholar
