Jiang, T., Gradus, J. L. & Rosellini, A. J. Supervised machine learning: a brief primer. Behav. Ther. 51, 675–687 (2020).
Google Scholar
Alloghani, M., Al-Jumeily, D., Mustafina, J., Hussain, A. & Aljaaf, A. J. in Supervised and Unsupervised Learning for Data Science (eds Berry, M. W. et al.) 3–21 (Springer International, 2020).
Yala, A. et al. Optimizing risk-based breast cancer screening policies with reinforcement learning. Nat. Med. 28, 136–143 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kaufmann, E. et al. Champion-level drone racing using deep reinforcement learning. Nature 620, 982–987 (2023).
Google Scholar
Nasteski, V. An overview of the supervised machine learning methods. Horizons 4, 51–62 (2017).
Google Scholar
Dike, H. U., Zhou, Y., Deveerasetty, K. K. & Wu, Q. Unsupervised learning based on artificial neural network: a review. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Cyborg and Bionic Systems (CBS) 322–327 (2018).
Shurrab, S. & Duwairi, R. Self-supervised learning methods and applications in medical imaging analysis: a survey. PeerJ Comput. Sci. 8, e1045 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wang, X. et al. Transformer-based unsupervised contrastive learning for histopathological image classification. Med. Image Anal. 81, 102559 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wang, X. et al. RetCCL: clustering-guided contrastive learning for whole-slide image retrieval. Med. Image Anal. 83, 102645 (2023).
Google Scholar
Vinyals, O. et al. Grandmaster level in StarCraft II using multi-agent reinforcement learning. Nature 575, 350–354 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zhao, Y., Kosorok, M. R. & Zeng, D. Reinforcement learning design for cancer clinical trials. Stat. Med. 28, 3294–3315 (2009).
Google Scholar
Sapsford, R. & Jupp, V. Data Collection and Analysis (SAGE, 2006).
Yamashita, R., Nishio, M., Do, R. K. G. & Togashi, K. Convolutional neural networks: an overview and application in radiology. Insights Imaging 9, 611–629 (2018).
Google Scholar
Chowdhary, K. R. in Fundamentals of Artificial Intelligence (ed. Chowdhary, K. R.) 603–649 (Springer India, 2020).
Hochreiter, S. & Schmidhuber, J. Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 9, 1735–1780 (1997).
Google Scholar
Vaswani, A. et al. Attention is all you need. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762 (2017).
Shmatko, A., Ghaffari Laleh, N., Gerstung, M. & Kather, J. N. Artificial intelligence in histopathology: enhancing cancer research and clinical oncology. Nat. Cancer 3, 1026–1038 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wagner, S. J. et al. Transformer-based biomarker prediction from colorectal cancer histology: a large-scale multicentric study. Cancer Cell 41, 1650–1661.e4 (2023).
Google Scholar
Khan, A. et al. A survey of the vision transformers and their CNN-transformer based variants. Artif. Intell. Rev. 56, 2917–2970 (2023).
Google Scholar
Hamm, C. A. et al. Deep learning for liver tumor diagnosis part I: development of a convolutional neural network classifier for multi-phasic MRI. Eur. Radiol. 29, 3338–3347 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ren, J., Eriksen, J. G., Nijkamp, J. & Korreman, S. S. Comparing different CT, PET and MRI multi-modality image combinations for deep learning-based head and neck tumor segmentation. Acta Oncol. 60, 1399–1406 (2021).
Google Scholar
Unger, M. & Kather, J. N. A systematic analysis of deep learning in genomics and histopathology for precision oncology. BMC Med. Genomics 17, 48 (2024).
Google Scholar
Gawehn, E., Hiss, J. A. & Schneider, G. Deep learning in drug discovery. Mol. Inform. 35, 3–14 (2016).
Google Scholar
Bayramoglu, N., Kannala, J. & Heikkilä, J. Deep learning for magnification independent breast cancer histopathology image classification. In 2016 23rd International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR) 2440–2445 (IEEE, 2016).
Galon, J. et al. Type, density, and location of immune cells within human colorectal tumors predict clinical outcome. Science 313, 1960–1964 (2006).
Google Scholar
Schmidt, U., Weigert, M., Broaddus, C. & Myers, G. Cell detection with star-convex polygons. In Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention — MICCAI 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 11071 (eds Frangi, A. et al.) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00934-2_30 (Springer, 2018).
Edlund, C. et al. LIVECell—a large-scale dataset for label-free live cell segmentation. Nat. Methods 18, 1038–1045 (2021).
Google Scholar
Bankhead, P. et al. QuPath: open source software for digital pathology image analysis. Sci. Rep. 7, 16878 (2017).
Google Scholar
Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH image to imageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671–675 (2012).
Google Scholar
Rueden, C. T. et al. ImageJ2: ImageJ for the next generation of scientific image data. BMC Bioinformatics 18, 529 (2017).
Google Scholar
Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).
Google Scholar
Linkert, M. et al. Metadata matters: access to image data in the real world. J. Cell Biol. 189, 777–782 (2010).
Google Scholar
Gómez-de-Mariscal, E. et al. DeepImageJ: a user-friendly environment to run deep learning models in ImageJ. Nat. Methods 18, 1192–1195 (2021).
Google Scholar
Betge, J. et al. The drug-induced phenotypic landscape of colorectal cancer organoids. Nat. Commun. 13, 3135 (2022).
Google Scholar
Park, T. et al. Development of a deep learning based image processing tool for enhanced organoid analysis. Sci. Rep. 13, 19841 (2023).
Google Scholar
Belthangady, C. & Royer, L. A. Applications, promises, and pitfalls of deep learning for fluorescence image reconstruction. Nat. Methods 16, 1215–1225 (2019).
Google Scholar
Echle, A. et al. Deep learning in cancer pathology: a new generation of clinical biomarkers. Br. J. Cancer 124, 686–696 (2021).
Google Scholar
Cifci, D., Foersch, S. & Kather, J. N. Artificial intelligence to identify genetic alterations in conventional histopathology. J. Pathol. 257, 430–444 (2022).
Google Scholar
Greenson, J. K. et al. Pathologic predictors of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 33, 126–133 (2009).
Google Scholar
Kather, J. N. et al. Deep learning can predict microsatellite instability directly from histology in gastrointestinal cancer. Nat. Med. 25, 1054–1056 (2019).
Google Scholar
Echle, A. et al. Clinical-grade detection of microsatellite instability in colorectal tumors by deep learning. Gastroenterology 159, 1406–1416.e11 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kather, J. N. et al. Pan-cancer image-based detection of clinically actionable genetic alterations. Nat. Cancer 1, 789–799 (2020).
Google Scholar
Fu, Y. et al. Pan-cancer computational histopathology reveals mutations, tumor composition and prognosis. Nat. Cancer 1, 800–810 (2020).
Google Scholar
Coudray, N. et al. Classification and mutation prediction from non-small cell lung cancer histopathology images using deep learning. Nat. Med. 24, 1559–1567 (2018).
Google Scholar
Schmauch, B. et al. A deep learning model to predict RNA-seq expression of tumours from whole slide images. Nat. Commun. 11, 3877 (2020).
Google Scholar
Binder, A. et al. Morphological and molecular breast cancer profiling through explainable machine learning. Nat. Mach. Intell. 3, 355–366 (2021).
Google Scholar
Loeffler, C. M. L. et al. Predicting mutational status of driver and suppressor genes directly from histopathology with deep learning: a systematic study across 23 solid tumor types. Front. Genet. 12, 806386 (2022).
Google Scholar
Chen, R. J. et al. Pan-cancer integrative histology-genomic analysis via multimodal deep learning. Cancer Cell 40, 865–878.e6 (2022).
Google Scholar
Bilal, M. et al. Development and validation of a weakly supervised deep learning framework to predict the status of molecular pathways and key mutations in colorectal cancer from routine histology images: a retrospective study. Lancet Digit. Health 3, e763–e772 (2021).
Google Scholar
Yamashita, R. et al. Deep learning model for the prediction of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer: a diagnostic study. Lancet Oncol. 22, 132–141 (2021).
Google Scholar
Echle, A. et al. Artificial intelligence for detection of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer—a multicentric analysis of a pre-screening tool for clinical application. ESMO Open 7, 100400 (2022).
Google Scholar
Schirris, Y., Gavves, E., Nederlof, I., Horlings, H. M. & Teuwen, J. DeepSMILE: contrastive self-supervised pre-training benefits MSI and HRD classification directly from H&E whole-slide images in colorectal and breast cancer. Med. Image Anal. 79, 102464 (2022).
Google Scholar
Jain, M. S. & Massoud, T. F. Predicting tumour mutational burden from histopathological images using multiscale deep learning. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2, 356–362 (2020).
Google Scholar
Xu, H. et al. Spatial heterogeneity and organization of tumor mutation burden with immune infiltrates within tumors based on whole slide images correlated with patient survival in bladder cancer. J. Pathol. Inform. 13, 100105 (2022).
Google Scholar
Chen, S. et al. Deep learning-based approach to reveal tumor mutational burden status from whole slide images across multiple cancer types. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2204.03257 (2023).
Shamai, G. et al. Artificial intelligence algorithms to assess hormonal status from tissue microarrays in patients with breast cancer. JAMA Netw. Open 2, e197700 (2019).
Google Scholar
Beck, A. H. et al. Systematic analysis of breast cancer morphology uncovers stromal features associated with survival. Sci. Transl. Med. 3, 108ra113 (2011).
Google Scholar
Arslan, S. et al. A systematic pan-cancer study on deep learning-based prediction of multi-omic biomarkers from routine pathology images. Commun. Med. 4, 48 (2024).
Google Scholar
Campanella, G. et al. Clinical-grade computational pathology using weakly supervised deep learning on whole slide images. Nat. Med. 25, 1301–1309 (2019).
Google Scholar
Lu, M. Y. et al. AI-based pathology predicts origins for cancers of unknown primary. Nature 594, 106–110 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kleppe, A. et al. A clinical decision support system optimising adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancers by integrating deep learning and pathological staging markers: a development and validation study. Lancet Oncol. 23, 1221–1232 (2022).
Google Scholar
Jiang, X. et al. End-to-end prognostication in colorectal cancer by deep learning: a retrospective, multicentre study. Lancet Digit. Health 6, e33–e43 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zeng, Q. et al. Artificial intelligence-based pathology as a biomarker of sensitivity to atezolizumab–bevacizumab in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicentre retrospective study. Lancet Oncol. 24, 1411–1422 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ghaffari Laleh, N., Ligero, M., Perez-Lopez, R. & Kather, J. N. Facts and hopes on the use of artificial intelligence for predictive immunotherapy biomarkers in cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 29, 316–323 (2022).
Google Scholar
Pedersen, A. et al. FastPathology: an open-source platform for deep learning-based research and decision support in digital pathology. IEEE Access 9, 58216–58229 (2021).
Google Scholar
Pocock, J. et al. TIAToolbox as an end-to-end library for advanced tissue image analytics. Commun. Med. 2, 120 (2022).
Google Scholar
Lu, M. Y. et al. Data-efficient and weakly supervised computational pathology on whole-slide images. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 5, 555–570 (2021).
Google Scholar
El Nahhas, O. S. M. et al. From whole-slide image to biomarker prediction: a protocol for end-to-end deep learning in computational pathology. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.10944 (2023).
Paszke, A. et al. PyTorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1912.01703 (2019).
Jorge Cardoso, M. et al. MONAI: an open-source framework for deep learning in healthcare. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.02701 (2022).
Goode, A., Gilbert, B., Harkes, J., Jukic, D. & Satyanarayanan, M. OpenSlide: a vendor-neutral software foundation for digital pathology. J. Pathol. Inform. 4, 27 (2013).
Google Scholar
Martinez, K. & Cupitt, J. VIPS—a highly tuned image processing software architecture. In IEEE Int.Conf. Image Processing 2005; https://doi.org/10.1109/icip.2005.1530120 (2005).
Dolezal, J. M. et al. Deep learning generates synthetic cancer histology for explainability and education. NPJ Precis. Oncol. 7, 49 (2023).
Google Scholar
Plass, M. et al. Explainability and causability in digital pathology. Hip Int. 9, 251–260 (2023).
Reis-Filho, J. S. & Kather, J. N. Overcoming the challenges to implementation of artificial intelligence in pathology. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 115, 608–612 (2023).
Google Scholar
Aggarwal, R. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of deep learning in medical imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. NPJ Digit. Med. 4, 65 (2021).
Google Scholar
Rajput, D., Wang, W.-J. & Chen, C.-C. Evaluation of a decided sample size in machine learning applications. BMC Bioinformatics 24, 48 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ligero, M. et al. Minimizing acquisition-related radiomics variability by image resampling and batch effect correction to allow for large-scale data analysis. Eur. Radiol. 31, 1460–1470 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zwanenburg, A. et al. The image biomarker standardization initiative: standardized quantitative radiomics for high-throughput image-based phenotyping. Radiology 295, 328–338 (2020).
Google Scholar
van Griethuysen, J. J. M. et al. Computational radiomics system to decode the radiographic phenotype. Cancer Res. 77, e104–e107 (2017).
Google Scholar
Fedorov, A. et al. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imaging network. Magn. Reson. Imaging 30, 1323–1341 (2012).
Google Scholar
Yushkevich, P. A. et al. User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage 31, 1116–1128 (2006).
Google Scholar
Khader, F. et al. Multimodal deep learning for integrating chest radiographs and clinical parameters: a case for transformers. Radiology 309, e230806 (2023).
Google Scholar
Yu, A. C., Mohajer, B. & Eng, J. External validation of deep learning algorithms for radiologic diagnosis: a systematic review. Radiol. Artif. Intell. 4, e210064 (2022).
Google Scholar
US FDA. Artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML)-enabled medical devices; https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/software-medical-device-samd/artificial-intelligence-and-machine-learning-aiml-enabled-medical-devices (2023).
Bruker Corporation. Artificial intelligence in NMR; https://www.bruker.com/en/landingpages/bbio/artificial-intelligence-in-nmr.html (2024).
Wasserthal, J. TotalSegmentator: tool for robust segmentation of 104 important anatomical structures in CT images. GitHub https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6802613 (2023).
Garcia-Ruiz, A. et al. An accessible deep learning tool for voxel-wise classification of brain malignancies from perfusion MRI. Cell Rep. Med. 5, 101464 (2024).
Google Scholar
Lång, K. et al. Artificial intelligence-supported screen reading versus standard double reading in the Mammography Screening with Artificial Intelligence trial (MASAI): a clinical safety analysis of a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority, single-blinded, screening accuracy study. Lancet Oncol. 24, 936–944 (2023).
Google Scholar
Bera, K., Braman, N., Gupta, A., Velcheti, V. & Madabhushi, A. Predicting cancer outcomes with radiomics and artificial intelligence in radiology. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 19, 132–146 (2022).
Google Scholar
Núñez, L. M. et al. Unraveling response to temozolomide in preclinical GL261 glioblastoma with MRI/MRSI using radiomics and signal source extraction. Sci. Rep. 10, 19699 (2020).
Google Scholar
Müller, J. et al. Radiomics-based tumor phenotype determination based on medical imaging and tumor microenvironment in a preclinical setting. Radiother. Oncol. 169, 96–104 (2022).
Google Scholar
Amirrashedi, M. et al. Leveraging deep neural networks to improve numerical and perceptual image quality in low-dose preclinical PET imaging. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 94, 102010 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zinn, P. O. et al. A coclinical radiogenomic validation study: conserved magnetic resonance radiomic appearance of periostin-expressing glioblastoma in patients and xenograft models. Clin. Cancer Res. 24, 6288–6299 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lin, Y.-C. et al. Diffusion radiomics analysis of intratumoral heterogeneity in a murine prostate cancer model following radiotherapy: pixelwise correlation with histology. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 46, 483–489 (2017).
Google Scholar
Moor, M. et al. Foundation models for generalist medical artificial intelligence. Nature 616, 259–265 (2023).
Google Scholar
Chen, R. J. et al. Towards a general-purpose foundation model for computational pathology. Nat. Med. 30, 850–862 (2024).
Google Scholar
Unger, M. & Kather, J. N. Deep learning in cancer genomics and histopathology. Genome Med. 16, 44 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zhou, Y. et al. A foundation model for generalizable disease detection from retinal images. Nature 622, 156–163 (2023).
Google Scholar
Filiot, A. et al. Scaling self-supervised learning for histopathology with masked image modeling. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.21.23292757 (2023).
Campanella, G. et al. Computational pathology at health system scale—self-supervised foundation models from three billion images. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.07033 (2023).
Vorontsov, E. et al. Virchow: a million-slide digital pathology foundation model. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.07778 (2023).
Clusmann, J. et al. The future landscape of large language models in medicine. Commun. Med. 3, 141 (2023).
Google Scholar
Bubeck, S. et al. Sparks of artificial general intelligence: early experiments with GPT-4. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.12712 (2023).
Truhn, D., Reis-Filho, J. S. & Kather, J. N. Large language models should be used as scientific reasoning engines, not knowledge databases. Nat. Med. 29, 2983–2984 (2023).
Google Scholar
Adams, L. C. et al. Leveraging GPT-4 for post hoc transformation of free-text radiology reports into structured reporting: a multilingual feasibility study. Radiology 307, e230725 (2023).
Google Scholar
Truhn, D. et al. Extracting structured information from unstructured histopathology reports using generative pre-trained transformer 4 (GPT-4). J. Pathol. 262, 310–319 (2023).
Google Scholar
Wiest, I. C. et al. From text to tables: a local privacy preserving large language model for structured information retrieval from medical documents. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.07.23299648 (2023).
Singhal, K. et al. Large language models encode clinical knowledge. Nature 620, 172–180 (2023).
Google Scholar
Truhn, D. et al. A pilot study on the efficacy of GPT-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from MRI reports. Sci. Rep. 13, 20159 (2023).
Google Scholar
Wang, H. et al. Scientific discovery in the age of artificial intelligence. Nature 620, 47–60 (2023).
Google Scholar
Derraz, B. et al. New regulatory thinking is needed for AI-based personalised drug and cell therapies in precision oncology. NPJ Precis. Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-024-00517-w (2024).
Extance, A. ChatGPT has entered the classroom: how LLMs could transform education. Nature 623, 474–477 (2023).
Google Scholar
Thirunavukarasu, A. J. et al. Large language models in medicine. Nat. Med. 29, 1930–1940 (2023).
Google Scholar
Webster, P. Six ways large language models are changing healthcare. Nat. Med. 29, 2969–2971 (2023).
Google Scholar
Krishnan, R., Rajpurkar, P. & Topol, E. J. Self-supervised learning in medicine and healthcare. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 6, 1346–1352 (2022).
Google Scholar
Meskó, B. Prompt engineering as an important emerging skill for medical professionals: tutorial. J. Med. Internet Res. 25, e50638 (2023).
Google Scholar
Sushil, M. et al. CORAL: expert-curated oncology reports to advance language model inference. NEJM AI 1, 4 (2024).
Google Scholar
Brown, T. B. et al. Language models are few-shot learners. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.01416 (2020).
Ferber, D. & Kather, J. N. Large language models in uro-oncology. Eur. Urol. Oncol. 7, 157–159 (2023).
Google Scholar
Jiang, L. Y. et al. Health system-scale language models are all-purpose prediction engines. Nature 619, 357–362 (2023).
Google Scholar
Nori, H. et al. Can generalist foundation models outcompete special-purpose tuning? Case study in medicine. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.16452 (2023).
Balaguer, A. et al. RAG vs fine-tuning: pipelines, tradeoffs, and a case study on agriculture. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.08406 (2024).
Gemini Team et al. Gemini: a family of highly capable multimodal models. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.11805 (2023).
Tisman, G. & Seetharam, R. OpenAI’s ChatGPT-4, BARD and YOU.Com (AI) and the cancer patient, for now, caveat emptor, but stay tuned. Digit. Med. Healthc. Technol. https://doi.org/10.5772/dmht.19 (2023).
Touvron, H. et al. LLaMA: open and efficient foundation language models. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.13971 (2023).
Lipkova, J. et al. Artificial intelligence for multimodal data integration in oncology. Cancer Cell 40, 1095–1110 (2022).
Google Scholar
Niehues, J. M. et al. Generalizable biomarker prediction from cancer pathology slides with self-supervised deep learning: a retrospective multi-centric study. Cell Rep. Med. 4, 100980 (2023).
Google Scholar
Foersch, S. et al. Multistain deep learning for prediction of prognosis and therapy response in colorectal cancer. Nat. Med. 29, 430–439 (2023).
Google Scholar
Boehm, K. M. et al. Multimodal data integration using machine learning improves risk stratification of high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Nat. Cancer 3, 723–733 (2022).
Google Scholar
Vanguri, R. et al. Multimodal integration of radiology, pathology and genomics for prediction of response to PD-(L)1 blockade in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Nat. Cancer 3, 1151–1164 (2022).
Google Scholar
Shifai, N., van Doorn, R., Malvehy, J. & Sangers, T. E. Can ChatGPT vision diagnose melanoma? An exploratory diagnostic accuracy study. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 90, 1057–1059 (2024).
Google Scholar
Liu, H., Li, C., Wu, Q. & Lee, Y. J. Visual instruction tuning. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.08485 (2023).
Li, C. et al. LLaVA-med: training a large language-and-vision assistant for biomedicine in one day. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.00890 (2023).
Lu, M. Y. et al. A foundational multimodal vision language AI assistant for human pathology. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.07814 (2023).
Adalsteinsson, V. A. et al. Scalable whole-exome sequencing of cell-free DNA reveals high concordance with metastatic tumors. Nat. Commun. 8, 1324 (2017).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Z. et al. Uniform genomic data analysis in the NCI Genomic Data Commons. Nat. Commun. 12, 1226 (2021).
Google Scholar
Vega, D. M. et al. Aligning tumor mutational burden (TMB) quantification across diagnostic platforms: phase II of the Friends of Cancer Research TMB Harmonization Project. Ann. Oncol. 32, 1626–1636 (2021).
Google Scholar
Anaya, J., Sidhom, J.-W., Mahmood, F. & Baras, A. S. Multiple-instance learning of somatic mutations for the classification of tumour type and the prediction of microsatellite status. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 8, 57–67 (2023).
Google Scholar
Chen, B. et al. Predicting HLA class II antigen presentation through integrated deep learning. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 1332–1343 (2019).
Google Scholar
Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).
Google Scholar
Callaway, E. What’s next for AlphaFold and the AI protein-folding revolution. Nature 604, 234–238 (2022).
Google Scholar
Cheng, J. et al. Accurate proteome-wide missense variant effect prediction with AlphaMissense. Science 381, eadg7492 (2023).
Google Scholar
Barrio-Hernandez, I. et al. Clustering predicted structures at the scale of the known protein universe. Nature 622, 637–645 (2023).
Google Scholar
Yang, X., Wang, Y., Byrne, R., Schneider, G. & Yang, S. Concepts of artificial intelligence for computer-assisted drug discovery. Chem. Rev. 119, 10520–10594 (2019).
Google Scholar
Mullowney, M. W. et al. Artificial intelligence for natural product drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 22, 895–916 (2023).
Google Scholar
Jayatunga, M. K. P., Xie, W., Ruder, L., Schulze, U. & Meier, C. AI in small-molecule drug discovery: a coming wave? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 21, 175–176 (2022).
Google Scholar
Vert, J.-P. How will generative AI disrupt data science in drug discovery? Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 750–751 (2023).
Google Scholar
Wong, F. et al. Discovery of a structural class of antibiotics with explainable deep learning. Nature 626, 177–185 (2023).
Google Scholar
Swanson, K. et al. Generative AI for designing and validating easily synthesizable and structurally novel antibiotics. Nat. Mach. Intell. 6, 338–353 (2024).
Google Scholar
Janizek, J. D. et al. Uncovering expression signatures of synergistic drug responses via ensembles of explainable machine-learning models. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 7, 811–829 (2023).
Google Scholar
Savage, N. Drug discovery companies are customizing ChatGPT: here’s how. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 585–586 (2023).
Google Scholar
Boiko, D. A., MacKnight, R., Kline, B. & Gomes, G. Autonomous chemical research with large language models. Nature 624, 570–578 (2023).
Google Scholar
Arnold, C. AlphaFold touted as next big thing for drug discovery—but is it? Nature 622, 15–17 (2023).
Google Scholar
Mock, M., Edavettal, S., Langmead, C. & Russell, A. AI can help to speed up drug discovery—but only if we give it the right data. Nature 621, 467–470 (2023).
Google Scholar
AI’s potential to accelerate drug discovery needs a reality check. Nature 622, 217 (2023).
Upswing in AI drug-discovery deals. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 1361 (2023).
Hutson, M. AI for drug discovery is booming, but who owns the patents? Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 1494–1496 (2023).
Google Scholar
Wong, C. H., Siah, K. W. & Lo, A. W. Estimation of clinical trial success rates and related parameters. Biostatistics 20, 273–286 (2019).
Google Scholar
Subbiah, V. The next generation of evidence-based medicine. Nat. Med. 29, 49–58 (2023).
Google Scholar
Yuan, C. et al. Criteria2Query: a natural language interface to clinical databases for cohort definition. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 26, 294–305 (2019).
Google Scholar
Lu, L., Dercle, L., Zhao, B. & Schwartz, L. H. Deep learning for the prediction of early on-treatment response in metastatic colorectal cancer from serial medical imaging. Nat. Commun. 12, 6654 (2021).
Google Scholar
Trebeschi, S. et al. Prognostic value of deep learning-mediated treatment monitoring in lung cancer patients receiving immunotherapy. Front. Oncol. 11, 609054 (2021).
Google Scholar
Castelo-Branco, L. et al. ESMO guidance for reporting oncology real-world evidence (GROW). Ann. Oncol. 34, 1097–1112 (2023).
Google Scholar
Morin, O. et al. An artificial intelligence framework integrating longitudinal electronic health records with real-world data enables continuous pan-cancer prognostication. Nat. Cancer 2, 709–722 (2021).
Google Scholar
Yang, X. et al. A large language model for electronic health records. NPJ Digit. Med. 5, 194 (2022).
Google Scholar
Huang, X., Rymbekova, A., Dolgova, O., Lao, O. & Kuhlwilm, M. Harnessing deep learning for population genetic inference. Nat. Rev. Genet. 25, 61–78 (2024).
Google Scholar
Pawlicki, Lee, D.-S., Hull & Srihari. Neural network models and their application to handwritten digit recognition. In IEEE 1988 Int. Conf. Neural Networks (eds Pawlicki, T. F. et al.) 63–70 (1988).
Chui, M. et al. The economic potential of generative AI: the next productivity frontier. McKinsey https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/the-economic-potential-of-generative-ai-the-next-productivity-frontier (2023).
Dell’Acqua, F. et al. Navigating the jagged technological frontier: field experimental evidence of the effects of AI on knowledge worker productivity and quality. Harvard Business School https://www.hbs.edu/ris/Publication%20Files/24-013_d9b45b68-9e74-42d6-a1c6-c72fb70c7282.pdf (2023).
Boehm, K. M., Khosravi, P., Vanguri, R., Gao, J. & Shah, S. P. Harnessing multimodal data integration to advance precision oncology. Nat. Rev. Cancer 22, 114–126 (2022).
Google Scholar
Gilbert, S., Harvey, H., Melvin, T., Vollebregt, E. & Wicks, P. Large language model AI chatbots require approval as medical devices. Nat. Med. 29, 2396–2398 (2023).
Google Scholar
Mobadersany, P. et al. Predicting cancer outcomes from histology and genomics using convolutional networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E2970–E2979 (2018).
Google Scholar
Chang, Y. et al. A survey on evaluation of large language models. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 15, 1–45 (2024).
Google Scholar
Lin, T., Wang, Y., Liu, X. & Qiu, X. A survey of transformers. AI Open 3, 111–132 (2022).
Google Scholar
