Machine learning elucidates associations between oral microbiota and the decline of sweet taste perception during aging

Machine Learning


  • WHO. Ageing and health. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health (2024) (1 January 2025, date last accessed).

  • Xu, F., Laguna, L. & Sarkar, A. Aging-related changes in quantity and quality of saliva: where do we stand in our understanding?. J. Texture Stud. 50, 27–35 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergi, G., Bano, G., Pizzato, S., Veronese, N. & Manzato, E. Taste loss in the elderly: possible implications for dietary habits. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 57, 3684–3689 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, E. B. et al. Aging is associated with a modality-specific decline in taste. iScience 27, 110919 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Uota, M. et al. Factors related to taste sensitivity in elderly: cross-sectional findings from SONIC study. J. Oral Rehabil. 43, 943–952 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T. et al. Age-related changes in oral sensitivity, taste and smell. Sci. Rep. 12, 1533 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neyraud, E. & Morzel, M. Biological films adhering to the oral soft tissues: Structure, composition, and potential impact on taste perception. J. Texture Stud. 50, 19–26 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattaneo, C. et al. New insights into the relationship between taste perception and oral microbiota composition. Sci. Rep. 9, 3549 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rud, I., Almli, V. L., Berget, I., Tzimorotas, D. & Varela, P. Taste perception and oral microbiota: recent advances and future perspectives. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 51, 101030 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Besnard, P. et al. Obese subjects with specific gustatory papillae microbiota and salivary cues display an impairment to sense lipids. Sci. Rep. 8, 6742 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattaneo, C., Riso, P., Laureati, M., Gargari, G. & Pagliarini, E. Exploring associations between interindividual differences in taste perception, oral microbiota composition, and reported food intake. Nutrients 11, 1167 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mameli, C. et al. Taste perception and oral microbiota are associated with obesity in children and adolescents. PLoS One 14, e0221656 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Licandro, H. et al. The bacterial species profiles of the lingual and salivary microbiota differ with basic tastes sensitivity in human. Sci. Rep. 13, 20339 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Khadka, S. et al. Poor oral hygiene, oral microorganisms and aspiration pneumonia risk in older people in residential aged care: a systematic review. Age and Ageing 50, 81–87 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, Y. et al. Oral pathobiont Klebsiella chaperon usher pili provide site-specific adaptation for the inflamed gut mucosa. Gut Microbes 16, 2333463 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sansores-España, L. D. et al. Oral-gut-brain axis in experimental models of periodontitis: associating gut dysbiosis with neurodegenerative diseases. Front. Aging 2, 781582 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao, Y. et al. Microbes translocation from oral cavity to nasopharyngeal carcinoma in patients. Nat. Commun. 15, 1645 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez-Leyva, A. J. et al. The breath volatilome is shaped by the gut microbiota. medRxiv, 2024.2008.2002.24311413 (2024).

  • Elmassry, M. M. & Piechulla, B. Volatilomes of bacterial infections in humans. Front. Neurosci. 14, 257 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumpitsch, C. et al. Reduced olfactory performance is associated with changed microbial diversity, oralization, and accumulation of dead biomaterial in the nasal olfactory area. Microbiol. Spectrum 12, e01549–01523 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Y. et al. Identification of antimicrobial peptides from the human gut microbiome using deep learning. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 921–931 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H. et al. The gut microbiota in prediabetes and diabetes: a population-based cross-sectional study. Cell Metab 32, 379–390.e373 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, S. B. Potential oral microbial markers for differential diagnosis of Crohnas disease and ulcerative colitis using machine learning models. Microorganisms 11, 1665 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, A., So, P. W. & Carpenter, G. H. Intraoral microbial metabolism and association with host taste perception. J. Dent. Res. 99, 739–745 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, Y. et al. The associations between biochemical and microbiological variables and taste differ in whole saliva and in the film lining the tongue. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018, 2838052 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Dávalos, P. C., Requena, T., Pozo-Bayón, M. Á & Muñoz-González, C. Decreased retronasal olfaction and taste perception in obesity are related to saliva biochemical and microbiota composition. Food Res. Int. 167, 112660 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi, N. Oral microbiome metabolism: from “Who Are They?” to “What Are They Doing?. J. Dent. Res. 94, 1628–1637 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanmugamprema, D., Muthuswamy, K. & Subramaniam, S. Emerging perspectives: the interplay of taste perception and oral microbiota composition in dietary preferences and obesity. Nutr. Res. Rev 38, 1–10 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Y. & Tse, C.-S. Sweet taste brings happiness, but happiness does not taste sweet: the unidirectionality of taste-emotion metaphoric association. J. Cogn. Psychol. 34, 339–361 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J.-Y., Prescott, J. & Kim, K.-O. Emotional responses to sweet foods according to sweet liker status. Food Qual. Prefer. 59, 1–7 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, P. Sweetness preference and its impact on energy intake and body weight-a review of evidence. Front. Nutr 10, 1289028 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, T. et al. Investigating taste sensitivity, chemesthetic sensation and their relationship with emotion perception in Chinese young and older adults. Food Qual. Prefer. 96, 104406 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffman, S. S., Lindley, M. G., Clark, T. B. & Makino, C. Molecular mechanism of sweet taste: relationship of hydrogen bonding to taste sensitivity for both young and elderly. Neurobiol. Aging 2, 173–185 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukunaga, A., Uematsu, H. & Sugimoto, K. Influences of aging on taste perception and oral somatic sensation. J. Gerontol. Ser. A 60, 109–113 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fluitman, K. S. et al. Associations of the oral microbiota and Candida with taste, smell, appetite and undernutrition in older adults. Sci. Rep. 11, 23254 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, Y. -c et al. Salivary dysbiosis in Sjögren’s syndrome and a commensal-mediated immunomodulatory effect of salivary gland epithelial cells. npj Biofilms Microbiomes 7, 21 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nørskov-Lauritsen, N. Classification, identification, and clinical significance of haemophilus and aggregatibacter species with host specificity for humans. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 27, 214–240 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, J. P. & Burd, E. M. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett’s Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases 8th edn (eds Bennett, J. E., Dolin, R. & Blaser, M. J.) 2667–2683.e2664 (W.B. Saunders, 2015).

  • Lommi, S. et al. The composition and functional capacities of saliva microbiota differ between children with low and high sweet treat consumption. Front. Nutr 9, 864687 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, D. et al. Enhancement effect of odor and multi-sensory superposition on sweetness. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 22, 4871–4889 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barba, C., Beno, N., Guichard, E. & Thomas-Danguin, T. Selecting odorant compounds to enhance sweet flavor perception by gas chromatography/olfactometry-associated taste (GC/O-AT). Food Chem. 257, 172–181 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Djordjevic, J., Zatorre, R. J. & Jones-Gotman, M. Odor-induced changes in taste perception. Exp. Brain Res. 159, 405–408 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. P. et al. Odorants identified in Chinese dry-cured ham contribute to salty taste enhancement. J. Agri. Food Chem. 72, 613–624 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roslund, K. et al. On-line profiling of volatile compounds produced in vitro by pathogenic oral bacteria. J. Breath Res. 14, 016010 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, J. A. M. et al. Unravelling the potential of salivary volatile metabolites in oral diseases. A review. Molecules 25, 3098 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roslund, K., Lehto, M., Pussinen, P. & Metsälä, M. Volatile composition of the morning breath. J. Breath Res. 16, 046010 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Amann, A. et al. The human volatilome: volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath, skin emanations, urine, feces and saliva. J. Breath Res. 8, 034001 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vascellari, S. et al. Genetic variants of TAS2R38 bitter taste receptor associate with distinct gut microbiota traits in Parkinson’s disease: a pilot study. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 165, 665–674 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, R. & Covasa, M. Do gut microbes taste?. Nutrients 13, 2581 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, H. T. & Heymann, H. Sensory Evaluation of Food: Principles and Practices (eds Lawless, H. T. & Heymann, H.) 125-147 (Springer New York, 2010).

  • Normalizacyjny PK Sensory analysis—methodology—method of investigating sensitivity of taste. Warszawa, Poland: Polski Komitet Normalizacyjny (2011).

  • Guedes, D. et al. Sensitive to music? Examining the crossmodal effect of audition on sweet taste sensitivity. Food Res. Int. 173, 113256 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C. et al. Denitrifying sulfide removal process on high-salinity wastewaters in the presence of Halomonas sp. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 100, 1421–1426 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • McInnes, L., Healy, J., Saul, N. & Großberger, L. UMAP: uniform manifold approximation and projection. J. Open Source Softw. 3, 861 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Muzellec, B., Telenczuk, M., Cabeli, V. & Andreux, M. PyDESeq2: a Python package for bulk RNA-seq differential expression analysis. Bioinformatics 39, btad547 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clauset, A., Newman, M. E. J. & Moore, C. Finding community structure in very large networks. Phys. Rev. E. 70, 066111 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagberg, A. A., Schult, D. A., Swart, P. & Hagberg, J. Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using NetworkX. Proceedings of the Python in Science Conference 11–16 (2008).

  • Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.) 57, 289–300 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, S. M. & Lee, S.-I. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Neural Inform. Proces. Syst. 4768–4777 (Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY, USA, 2017).



  • Source link