Machine learning approach for disaster risk and resilience assessment in coupled human infrastructure systems performance

Machine Learning


  • Birkholz, S., Muro, M., Jeffrey, P. & Smith, H. M. Rethinking the relationship between flood risk perception and flood management. Sci. Total Environ. 478, 12–20 (2014).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekmekcioğlu, Ö., Koc, K. & Özger, M. Towards flood risk mapping based on multi-tiered decision making in a densely urbanized metropolitan city of Istanbul. Sustain. Cities Soc. 80, 103759 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Plate, E. J. Flood risk and flood management. J. Hydrol. 267, 2–11 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Assaf, G. & Assaad, R. H. Optimal preventive maintenance, repair, and replacement program for catch basins to reduce urban flooding: integrating agent-based modeling and monte carlo simulation. Sustainability 15, 8527 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansari, A. H., Mejia, A. & Cibin, R. Flood teleconnections from levees undermine disaster resilience. Npj Nat. Hazards 1, 2 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Savari, M., Jafari, A. & Sheheytavi, A. Determining factors affecting flood risk perception among local communities in Iran. Sci. Rep. 15, 4076 (2025).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Borowska-Stefańska, M. et al. Emergency management of self-evacuation from flood hazard areas in Poland. Transp. Res. Part Transp. Environ. 107, 103307 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayers, P. et al. Flood Risk Management: A Strategic Approach. (2013).

  • Rasoulkhani, K. & Mostafavi, A. Resilience as an emergent property of human-infrastructure dynamics: a multi-agent simulation model for characterizing regime shifts and tipping point behaviors in infrastructure systems. PLOS ONE 13, e0207674 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Molinari, D. et al. Ex post damage assessment: an Italian experience. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 14, 901–916 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kameshwar, S. et al. Probabilistic decision-support framework for community resilience: Incorporating multi-hazards, infrastructure interdependencies, and resilience goals in a Bayesian network. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 191, 106568 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Beguería, S. Validation and evaluation of predictive models in hazard assessment and risk management. Nat. Hazards 37, 315–329 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z. et al. Flood hazard risk assessment model based on random forest. J. Hydrol. 527, 1130–1141 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, F. et al. Smart flood resilience: harnessing community-scale big data for predictive flood risk monitoring, rapid impact assessment, and situational awareness. Environ. Res. Infrastruct. Sustain. 2, 025006 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. et al. Indicators for Measuring, Monitoring, And Evaluating Post-disaster Recovery. In Proc. International Workshop on Remote Sensing for Disaster Applications (Pavia, 2008).

  • Martín, Y., Cutter, S. L. & Li, Z. Bridging Twitter and survey data for evacuation assessment of Hurricane Matthew and Hurricane Irma. Nat. Hazards Rev. 21, 04020003 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Vamvakeridou-Lyroudia, L. S. et al. Assessing and visualising hazard impacts to enhance the resilience of Critical Infrastructures to urban flooding. Sci. Total Environ. 707, 136078 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, A. S. et al. From hazard to impact: flood damage assessment tools for megacities. Nat. Hazards 82, 857–890 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmeister, M. et al. Cross-domain flood risk assessment for smart cities using dynamic knowledge graphs. Sustain. Cities Soc. 101, 105113 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pant, R., Thacker, S., Hall, J. W., Alderson, D. & Barr, S. Critical infrastructure impact assessment due to flood exposure. J. Flood Risk Manag. 11, 22–33 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasmalkar, I. G. et al. When floods hit the road: resilience to flood-related traffic disruption in the San Francisco Bay Area and beyond. Sci. Adv. 6, eaba2423 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Najafi, M. R., Zhang, Y. & Martyn, N. A flood risk assessment framework for interdependent infrastructure systems in coastal environments. Sustain. Cities Soc. 64, 102516 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, F., Yu, J., Zhou, G., Li, S. & Sun, T. Projected urban flood risk assessment under climate change and urbanization based on an optimized multi-scale geographically weighted regression. Sustain. Cities Soc. 112, 105642 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, Q., Shen, S.-L., Zhou, A. & Lyu, H.-M. Inundation risk assessment based on G-DEMATEL-AHP and its application to Zhengzhou flooding disaster. Sustain. Cities Soc. 86, 104138 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gliksman, D. et al. Review article: a European perspective on wind and storm damage – from the meteorological background to index-based approaches to assess impacts. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 23, 2171–2201 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Satta, A., Snoussi, M., Puddu, M., Flayou, L. & Hout, R. An index-based method to assess risks of climate-related hazards in coastal zones: the case of Tetouan. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 175, 93–105 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, X., Hao, Y., Li, X., Liu, J. & Qi, J. Evaluating global intelligence innovation: an index based on machine learning methods. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 194, 122736 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Esmalian, A., Coleman, N. & Yuan, F. et al. Characterizing equitable access to grocery stores during disasters usinglocation-based data. Sci Rep 12, 20203 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutter, S. L. et al. A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Glob. Environ. Change 18, 598–606 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin, H., Liang, Q., Chen, H. & De Silva, V. A high‐performance coupled human and natural systems (CHANS) model for flood risk assessment and reduction. Water Resour. Res. 60, e2023WR036269 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, B. & Mostafavi, A. Location intelligence reveals the extent, timing, and spatial variation of hurricane preparedness. Sci. Rep. 12, 16121 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong, S., Wang, H., Mostafavi, A. & Gao, J. Robust component: a robustness measure that incorporates access to critical facilities under disruptions. J. R. Soc. Interface 16, 20190149 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, J., George, H. & Damon, C. Introduction to Emergency Management (Butterworth-Heinemann, 2017).

  • Lindell, M., Perry, R., Prater, C. & Nicholson, W. Fundamentals of Emergency Management (FEMA, 2006).

  • Bronfman, N. C., Cisternas, P. C., Repetto, P. B. & Castañeda, J. V. Natural disaster preparedness in a multi-hazard environment: Characterizing the sociodemographic profile of those better (worse) prepared. PLoS ONE 14, e0214249 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dargin, J. S., Li, Q., Jawer, G., Xiao, X. & Mostafavi, A. Compound hazards: an examination of how hurricane protective actions could increase transmission risk of COVID-19. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 65, 102560 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cova, T. J., Drews, F. A., Siebeneck, L. K. & Musters, A. Protective actions in wildfires: evacuate or shelter-in-place? Nat. Hazards Rev. 10, 151–162 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C.-C., Chou, C. & Mostafavi, A. Specifying evacuation return and home-switch stability during short-term disaster recovery using location-based data. Sci. Rep. 12, 15987 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadiq, A.-A., Tyler, J. & Noonan, D. S. A review of community flood risk management studies in the United States. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 41, 101327 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty, J., Tobin, G. A. & Montz, B. E. Population evacuation: assessing spatial variability in geophysical risk and social vulnerability to natural hazards. Nat. Hazards Rev. 6, 23–33 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Opdyke, A., Bodo, D. D. & Smyth, J. Higher ground or into harm’s way? Household storm surge sheltering and evacuation plans. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 106, 104452 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellman, J. Living with floods and coping with vulnerability. Disaster Prev. Manag. Int. J. 24, 468–483 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., Kwan, M.-P., Li, Q. & Chen, J. A model for evacuation risk assessment with consideration of pre- and post-disaster factors. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 36, 207–217 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Renne, J. L. Emergency evacuation planning policy for carless and vulnerable populations in the United States and United Kingdom. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 31, 1254–1261 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • FEMA. National Disaster Recovery Framework. https://www.fema.gov/pdf/recoveryframework/ndrf.pdf (2011).

  • Bruneau, M. et al. A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthq. Spectra 19, 733–752 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenheim, N., Guidotti, R., Gardoni, P. & Peacock, W. G. Integration of detailed household and housing unit characteristic data with critical infrastructure for post-hazard resilience modeling. Sustain. Resilient Infrastruct. 6, 385–401 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajput, A. A., Nayak, S., Dong, S. & Mostafavi, A. Anatomy of perturbed traffic networks during urban flooding. Sustain. Cities Soc 97, 104693 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, N., Esmalian, A. & Mostafavi, A. Anatomy of susceptibility for shelter-in-place households facing infrastructure service disruptions caused by natural hazards. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 50, 101875 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, P., Sinha, V. S. P., Vijhani, A. & Pahuja, N. Vulnerability assessment of urban road network from urban flood. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 28, 237–250 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, Y., Liu, Z. & Mostafavi, A. Digital Divide in Disasters: Investigating Spatial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Internet Service Disruptions During Extreme Weather Events. https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=4672649, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4672649 (2023).

  • Yabe, T., Tsubouchi, K., Fujiwara, N., Sekimoto, Y. & Ukkusuri, S. V. Understanding post-disaster population recovery patterns. J. R. Soc. Interface 17, 20190532 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. et al. Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 317, 1513–1516 (2007).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Donner, W. & Rodríguez, H. Population composition, migration and inequality: the influence of demographic changes on disaster risk and vulnerability. Soc. Forces 87, 1089–1114 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yabe, T., Rao, P. S. C. & Ukkusuri, S. V. Resilience of interdependent urban socio-physical systems using large-scale mobility data: modeling recovery dynamics. Sustain. Cities Soc. 75, 103237 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, W., Bocchini, P. & Davison, B. D. Applications of artificial intelligence for disaster management. Nat. Hazards 103, 2631–2689 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Y. et al. Data-driven tracking of the bounce-back path after disasters: critical milestones of population activity recovery and their spatial inequality. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct 92, 103693 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Podesta, C., Coleman, N., Esmalian, A., Yuan, F. & Mostafavi, A. Quantifying community resilience based on fluctuations in visits to points-of-interest derived from digital trace data. J. R. Soc. Interface 18, 20210158 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, F., Xu, Y., Li, Q. & Mostafavi, A. Spatio-temporal graph convolutional networks for road network inundation status prediction during urban flooding. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 97, 101870 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Praharaj, S., Chen, T. D., Zahura, F. T., Behl, M. & Goodall, J. L. Estimating impacts of recurring flooding on roadway networks: a Norfolk, Virginia case study. Nat. Hazards 107, 2363–2387 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Guan, Q. et al. Hyperspectral technique for detection of peanut leaf spot disease based on improved PCA loading. Agronomy 13, 1153 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • De Winter, J. C. F. & Dodou, D. Common factor analysis versus principal component analysis: a comparison of loadings by means of simulations. Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput. 45, 299–321 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • OpenStreetMap contributors. Planet dump retrieved from https://planet.osm.org (2024).

  • Wang, Y., Zhang, C., Chen, A. S., Wang, G. & Fu, G. Exploring the relationship between urban flood risk and resilience at a high-resolution grid cell scale. Sci. Total Environ. 893, 164852 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E. S. Assessing climate vulnerability for resilient urban planning: a multidiagnosis approach. Sens. Mater. 35, 3479 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ermagun, A., Smith, V. & Janatabadi, F. High urban flood risk and no shelter access disproportionally impacts vulnerable communities in the USA. Commun. Earth Environ. 5, 2 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, A. P., Fu, X. & Kattel, G. R. Shannon entropy-based quantitative method for measuring Risk-integrated Resilience (RiR) index on flood disaster in West Rapti basin of Nepal Himalaya. Nat. Hazards 120, 477–510 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeley, J. E. & Syphard, A. D. Twenty-first century California, USA, wildfires: fuel-dominated vs. wind-dominated fires. Fire Ecol. 15, 24 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirbabaie, M., Bunker, D., Stieglitz, S., Marx, J. & Ehnis, C. Social media in times of crisis: learning from Hurricane Harvey for the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic response. J. Inf. Technol. 35, 195–213 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Doubleday, A., Choe, Y., Miles, S. & Errett, N. A. Daily bicycle and pedestrian activity as an indicator of disaster recovery: a hurricane harvey case study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 16, 2836 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Emanuel, K. Assessing the present and future probability of Hurricane Harvey’s rainfall. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 12681–12684 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, E. & Zelinsky, D. National Hurricane Center Tropical Cyclone Report (2018).

  • Qin, R., Khakzad, N. & Zhu, J. An overview of the impact of Hurricane Harvey on chemical and process facilities in Texas. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 45, 101453 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiaghadi, A. & Rifai, H. S. Physical, chemical, and microbial quality of floodwaters in Houston following Hurricane Harvey. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 4832–4840 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, M. R. & Schneider, D. Income disparities and risk: geographical manifestations of extreme inequities in the United States. Risk Anal. Risa.14349 https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.14349 (2024).

  • Modica, M. & Zoboli, R. Vulnerability, resilience, hazard, risk, damage, and loss: a socio-ecological framework for natural disaster analysis. Web Ecol. 16, 59–62 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Noy, I. & Yonson, R. Economic vulnerability and resilience to natural hazards: a survey of concepts and measurements. Sustainability 10, 2850 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Spectus. Spectus mobility data. (2023).

  • Thommes, E. W. et al. U.S. state-level COVID-19 transmission insights from a mechanistic mobility-incidence model. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.21.22276712 (2022).

  • Ban, X. (Jeff), Chen, C., Wang, F., Wang, J. & Zhang, Y. Promises of data from emerging technologies for transportation applications: puget sound region case study. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.20005.55522 (2018).

  • Deng, H., Du, J., Gao, J. & Wang, Q. Network percolation reveals adaptive bridges of the mobility network response to COVID-19. PLoS ONE 16, e0258868 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Aleta, A. et al. Modelling the impact of testing, contact tracing and household quarantine on second waves of COVID-19. Nat. Hum. Behav. 4, 964–971 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yabe, T., Jones, N. K. W., Rao, P. S. C., Gonzalez, M. C. & Ukkusuri, S. V. Mobile phone location data for disasters: A review from natural hazards and epidemics. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 94, 101777 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierling, D. H. et al. Coastal bend hurricane evacuation study: hurricane harvey evacuation behavior survey outcomes and findings. https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/188203.

  • Dong, S., Esmalian, A., Farahmand, H. & Mostafavi, A. An integrated physical-social analysis of disrupted access to critical facilities and community service-loss tolerance in urban flooding. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 80, 101443 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhavathrathan, B. K. & Patil, G. R. Capacity uncertainty on urban road networks: a critical state and its applicability in resilience quantification. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 54, 108–118 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, C., Jiang, X. & Mostafavi, A. A network percolation-based contagion model of flood propagation and recession in urban road networks. Sci. Rep. 10, 13481 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, F., Yang, Y., Li, Q. & Mostafavi, A. Unraveling the temporal importance of community-scale human activity features for rapid assessment of flood impacts. IEEE Access 10, 1138–1150 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • FEMA. National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) redacted claims dataset (Version 2). (2023).

  • Microsoft. Microsoft Building Footprints dataset. (2023).

  • Ookla. Ookla speed test and network performance data. (2023).

  • Chen, Z., Gong, Z., Yang, S., Ma, Q. & Kan, C. Impact of extreme weather events on urban human flow: a perspective from location-based service data. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 83, 101520 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W. et al. Structural changes in intercity mobility networks of China during the COVID-19 outbreak: a weighted stochastic block modeling analysis. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 96, 101846 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • SafeGraph, Inc. SafeGraph Places data. (2023).

  • Li, X., Jiang, Y. & Mostafavi, A. Hazard exposure heterophily in socio-spatial networks contributes to post-disaster recovery in low-income populations. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 108, 104537 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Murtagh, F. & Contreras, P. Algorithms for hierarchical clustering: an overview. WIREs Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 2, 86–97 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, F. Hierarchical Clustering. in Introduction to HPC with MPI for Data Science 195–211 (Springer International Publishing, 2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21903-5_8.

  • National Hurricane Center. Tropical Cyclone Report: Hurricane Harvey (AL092017). National Oceanicand Atmospheric Administration (2018). https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL092017_Harvey.pdf.

  • U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, Table B19013: Median Household Income in the Past 12 Months (in 2017 Inflation-Adjusted Dollars). (2017).

  • INRIX. INRIX traffic and mobility data (2023).



  • Source link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *