In the ironic comical case, humanity, the leading developer of artificial intelligence models, asks applicants for an open work role to prove they do not use AI in the application process.
Anthropic develops Claude, a chatbot well known for its friendly conversation tone and coding capabilities. The company has raised nearly $11 billion in funding from deep companies like Google and Amazon, competing with Openai on artificial general information or AI that replaces most people who replace most tasks. Recently, we demonstrated the ability to control a user's device and complete tasks, which is the form of “agent AI” that Openai is building.
As for all the cries and spins about how great an AI chatbot is, when the push sticks out, it doesn't seem like humanity is good enough to replace humans entirely. “We encourage people to use AI systems during their roles to help them work faster and more effectively, but do not use AI assistants during the application process,” the application states. “We want to understand your personal interest in humanity without mediating through AI systems. We also want to assess your non-AS assisted communication skills. Please indicate “yes” if you read and agree. “This field was first noticed by open source developer Simon Willison and reported by 404 Media.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqx18kgizae
Of course, this makes sense because someone needs to develop an AI system in the first place. Computers do not have inherent human traits, such as agents or creativity. Openai's SORA video generation model can create impressive videos, but humans still need to use their taste to see something attractive and interesting.
Even if AI coding models still make many mistakes that need to be solved by experts, the world of software engineering is where AI will replace engineering jobs.
AI advocates argue that the technology can make developers more efficient and therefore develop more programs that they would not have had the resources to build in the past. However, skeptics believe that leaders at large companies will replace humans with AI, even if they know that labor is not as good as humans, as they are almost always the largest cost center in a company. Salesforce and Klarna publicly promoted the ability to replace customer service features with chatbots, but there is no clear picture of what that actually means and how experience compares to human-driven support.
For now, at least, humanity doesn't want to spend money where there is a mouth. When it comes to mission-critical tasks, the company still wants to know that people can do all their jobs. How should other companies considering using AI interpret this?
